Mini Normal 1775 END!

[Expedience]

Funny to see naked votes from the person that hates naked votes and gut reads.

These posts made me think that you were scum:

All these people sheeping me are giving me the chills however...

P-Edit:

Unvote

Ok there's something very wrong with my wagon getting traction so easily.

Your explanation for your unvote is not believable to me.

It seems like you're just turning the tables on everyone who agreed with your (bad) accusation of knightmare, so that you always remain on top.

I also think that 28 is reachy. So if you show me that you were doing RVS things in 28, I'll unvote you.

fixed

[Expedience]

K, read (well, skimmed) everything, and every part of my gut and brain is screaming that knight is town. I will defend him not to the death, but at least to the slight inconvenience!

He should really stop posting huge walls trying to defend himself though.

Oh hey knight is scum. Good find, whoever started this. Early wagons rule. BLOOD!

VOTE: knight

I do not believe this is alignment indicative.

Hey, same.

[Goodlordwill]

unless you think knightmare is a mislynch?

Yeah, that was about it. I've explained it afterwards as "i rarely get sheeped this easily and it's usually impossible to get my suspects lynched" (usually not even past my own vote).
Hence why i said it was giving me the chills, a.k.a i had a bad feeling about it.

You're still attacking knightmare but you are not voting him and you have also been casting aspersions on his whole wagon (can't be bothered on mobile to find a billion quotes, but I believe this representation is accurate)

VOTE: Sakura Hana

[Goodlordwill]

Randomly ninja'd with a more detailed explanation of my thoughts. Wow.

[knightmare]

@Expedience/Goodwill - is your post about Lowell a meta thing or are you speaking generally?

Look at 81 again and let me know what you think.

[knightmare]

Oops that should be 84.

My bad.

[Goodlordwill]

I mean, he is aggressive on an early wagon. He then gives a few reasons and is still aggressive. I don't know Lowell, but it seems fine to me.

[Sakura Hana]

@Expedience i dont take back anything i said, feel free to vote me if you thought those posts were unsincere and reachy respectively.
@GoodLord: What you said in 127 is false. The only thing that could be more or less "attacking" would be my post on: 98 which was something i forgot to address earlier so i brought it later.

[Sakura Hana]

Dang, I was hoping to find some sort of issue with Expedience's reasoning, and the part that isn't true is about the sincerity of those posts, yet i can't seem to find a way to prove that, or probably im just too tired.

[Madonna]

unless you think knightmare is a mislynch?

Yeah, that was about it. I've explained it afterwards as "i rarely get sheeped this easily and it's usually impossible to get my suspects lynched" (usually not even past my own vote).
Hence why i said it was giving me the chills, a.k.a i had a bad feeling about it.

You guys are pages ahead of me still, but this still bugs. You cut off my quote, Sakura Hana! What happened to the good reason which caused you to suspect knightmare? Other people joining your wagon should not affect your vote's reasoning. And if you are suspecting you started a mislynch and wanted to get off it, are you then looking closely at the people who joined the wagon? I will catch up and find out, but I will bet this is a no.

[Sakura Hana]

Your question in full was this:

Why do you state worry about sheeps instead challenging them? Why not be happy with their votes

unless you think knightmare is a mislynch?

The part in bold is the part i quoted because it's pretty much the answer to your own question.
As for your new question:

also what's your thoughts on lowell?

His OMGUS vote was the first thign that caught my attention, but also was accompanied by a defiant tone, thought it was townie back then. Haven't looked at all the votes on the wagon so far, it's just that

suddenly sayaka and boon voted in succession and gave me a chill.

Probably my gut trying to tell me something.
I still dont think Knight's very townie, but if he is the people that blindly sheeped me would be the first ppl i would look at... I usually have trouble convincing ppl of my reads since they come from gut most of the time, and ppl just blindly sheeping me gives me a bad feeling.

You seem to have skipped over it.
Neither of them have been posted since i pointed my finger here.

[Sakura Hana]

Also i should go to sleep, i shouldn't be awake past 2 am.

[Madonna]

Your question in full was this:

Why do you state worry about sheeps instead challenging them? Why not be happy with their votes

unless you think knightmare is a mislynch?

The part in bold is the part i quoted because it's pretty much the answer to your own question.
As for your new question:

also what's your thoughts on lowell?

His OMGUS vote was the first thign that caught my attention, but also was accompanied by a defiant tone, thought it was townie back then. Haven't looked at all the votes on the wagon so far, it's just that

suddenly sayaka and boon voted in succession and gave me a chill.

Probably my gut trying to tell me something.
I still dont think Knight's very townie, but if he is the people that blindly sheeped me would be the first ppl i would look at... I usually have trouble convincing ppl of my reads since they come from gut most of the time, and ppl just blindly sheeping me gives me a bad feeling.

You seem to have skipped over it.
Neither of them have been posted since i pointed my finger here.

Yeah, no. You have stated discomfort with the wagon you started because of the other players who joined. This is passive, not active. If the other players were an issue, voting or trying to engage them is an active method of addressing the issue. It seems to me that your main scumspect pool should be: chilledtea, Boonskiies, Sayaka Maizono, Lowell, and Almost50. Heck, you narrowed it down to Sayaka Maizona and Boonskiies. However, I do not see you engaging any of these players. You instead bemoan that you cannot refute Expedience's reasoning to vote you. This is bad; amend.

knightmare's defensive and emotional walls were off-putting. Not sure if I want to lynch this person, but it may be sympathy holding me back.

Lowell is both terrible and fine. He is the non-sympathy in my heart.

If I were to buy into Sakura Hana's innocence, and I have made no purchases, mind you, I would think the other members of the knightmare wagon are a fine place to begin. However, I do agree it is late and they can be looked at tomorrow. For now,

VOTE: Sakura Hana

[mhsmith0]

@madonna: is it your opinion that the wagon was a serious attempt to end d1 quickly?

[Expedience]

@Expedience/Goodwill - is your post about Lowell a meta thing or are you speaking generally?

Look at 81 again and let me know what you think.

I honestly haven't read some of the pages yet, so I was just thinking about that post in isolation. I still think that his confident tone shown in those posts is not alignment indicative.

Either he's really confident town, or he's pretending to be really confident town as scum. And I'm not really sure which at this point.

[Expedience]

@GoodLord: What you said in 127 is false. The only thing that could be more or less "attacking" would be my post on: 98 which was something i forgot to address earlier so i brought it later.

It's not so much attacking as "shade throwing", which is even worse imo.

[Expedience]

Dang, I was hoping to find some sort of issue with Expedience's reasoning, and the part that isn't true is about the sincerity of those posts, yet i can't seem to find a way to prove that, or probably im just too tired.

What's this supposed to mean?

You don't really think knightmare is scum, but you think I wouldn't believe you if you just told the truth?

[chilledtea]

VOTE: Madonna

Also

fos : Goodlordwill

[chilledtea]

Both Goodlordwill and madonna seem fake to me in their posts.

Early town reads : smith, knight, sakura, expedience.

The other S girl needs to post more.

[Lowell]

This is knight:

"OMG Lowell do something original!"

/OMGUSvotes

[knightmare]

This is knight:

"OMG Lowell do something original!"

/OMGUSvotes

Just noting that Lowell continues to make up new reasons to scum read me without taking into account my other content.

Or talking about anything else.

More votes here plz

[knightmare]

@madonna: is it your opinion that the wagon was a serious attempt to end d1 quickly?

I think you're taking this the wrong way, fwiw. Your question was good but this isn't really the conclusion to draw from it.

Do I think the votes on me were serious? Yes.

Do I think I would have been lynched blindly? No.

[Sakura Hana]

Your question in full was this:

Why do you state worry about sheeps instead challenging them? Why not be happy with their votes

unless you think knightmare is a mislynch?

The part in bold is the part i quoted because it's pretty much the answer to your own question.
As for your new question:

also what's your thoughts on lowell?

His OMGUS vote was the first thign that caught my attention, but also was accompanied by a defiant tone, thought it was townie back then. Haven't looked at all the votes on the wagon so far, it's just that

suddenly sayaka and boon voted in succession and gave me a chill.

Probably my gut trying to tell me something.
I still dont think Knight's very townie, but if he is the people that blindly sheeped me would be the first ppl i would look at... I usually have trouble convincing ppl of my reads since they come from gut most of the time, and ppl just blindly sheeping me gives me a bad feeling.

You seem to have skipped over it.
Neither of them have been posted since i pointed my finger here.

Yeah, no. You have stated discomfort with the wagon you started because of the other players who joined. This is passive, not active. If the other players were an issue, voting or trying to engage them is an active method of addressing the issue. It seems to me that your main scumspect pool should be: chilledtea, Boonskiies, Sayaka Maizono, Lowell, and Almost50. Heck, you narrowed it down to Sayaka Maizona and Boonskiies. However, I do not see you engaging any of these players. You instead bemoan that you cannot refute Expedience's reasoning to vote you. This is bad; amend.

knightmare's defensive and emotional walls were off-putting. Not sure if I want to lynch this person, but it may be sympathy holding me back.

Lowell is both terrible and fine. He is the non-sympathy in my heart.

If I were to buy into Sakura Hana's innocence, and I have made no purchases, mind you, I would think the other members of the knightmare wagon are a fine place to begin. However, I do agree it is late and they can be looked at tomorrow. For now,

VOTE: Sakura Hana

So is it your opinion that i should've been engaging the players instead of waiting until they reply to me pointing the finger at them?
Sorry but i dont play the way other people want me to play.

Dang, I was hoping to find some sort of issue with Expedience's reasoning, and the part that isn't true is about the sincerity of those posts, yet i can't seem to find a way to prove that, or probably im just too tired.

What's this supposed to mean?

You don't really think knightmare is scum, but you think I wouldn't believe you if you just told the truth?

I dont think knightmare is scum since like 2-3 pages ago.
I also unvoted because I thought the wagon buildup was too fast.
If you think im lying there's nothing I can do to show you differently, so im not even gonna bother.

[Sakura Hana]

I will however
VOTE: Lowell
I know as a gut player how it feels to have gut reads, but you seem to be hiding behind your gut reasoning for voting here.

[Sakura Hana]

Eh actually I forogot about 84
But that's just saying things, give me quotes or i will assume that all your talk is BS.