Open 632 - Jungle Republic (Game Over)

[Golden Robster]

Almost is being unnervingly quiet. Snarky has a recurring meta of lurking, which is slightly annoying but not alignment indicative. KainTepas is annoying as both alignments, hard to differentiate him as town or scum. Not played with half of these players so I have no idea of their capabilities.

[grapes]

hello everybody

VOTE: Golden robster

[knightmare]

On that note: my townreads are

much

easier to say yes on: the Golden Robster and SnarkySnowman townreads will not be going away; they're both town.

Is this based on meta?

[knightmare]

I liked Ranger's response in #21 and I disliked Knightmare's response to Ranger's vote. There was an aggressiveness in his posts that i'm not quite sure what to think of.

I tend to be an aggressive player in any alignment. Also, Ranger didn't vote me.

Question: why is A50 in your top bracket when your next post after this is voicing concern about his quietness? I'm a general note I think it's too early for that sort of shade throwing - the game just started less than 24h ago.

[Golden Robster]

I liked Ranger's response in #21 and I disliked Knightmare's response to Ranger's vote. There was an aggressiveness in his posts that i'm not quite sure what to think of.

I tend to be an aggressive player in any alignment. Also, Ranger didn't vote me.

Question: why is A50 in your top bracket when your next post after this is voicing concern about his quietness? I'm a general note I think it's too early for that sort of shade throwing - the game just started less than 24h ago.

The sooner the better. What's the point of RVS unless we make use of it?

Am I not allowed to voice concerns about the players I'm trying to discern?

[grapes]

I liked Ranger's response in #21 and I disliked Knightmare's response to Ranger's vote. There was an aggressiveness in his posts that i'm not quite sure what to think of.

Meh.
On my initial skim I didn't like this. Looked like he was talking out of both sides of his mouth but he's got knightmare in his list as a top scumread so it's not as hard a waffle as I thought really and actually comes off more as a thinking out loud kinda thing.

[knightmare]

Am I not allowed to voice concerns about the players I'm trying to discern?

Of course you are, but that's not what I asked you.

You have him in your top bracket along with Ranger which is what I assume is your town reads? Correct me if I'm wrong.

My question was why is he there if you're concerned about his quietness?

[Golden Robster]

That is my null category.

[grapes]

And at least you're voting the person you call a WW, which I think it kind of the more dangerous scum between the two factions so there's that.

I kinda wanna lynch this into the ground.
Weird as fuck thing to be factoring into your reads at this point.
Appeasement vibes out the ass.
And I don't understand how you can brush off rangers reads by assuming they're not serious but at the same time say something like this where it looks like you're taking them seriously.

VOTE: Knightmare

[knightmare]

Oh. I'm confused as to how your bracket is structured then so if you could explain I would appreciate that. I'm used to top reads being listed on top and gradually working down to scum reads.

{Almost50}
{Snarky}
{Kelbris, knightmare}
{Ranger}

{Ranger, Almost50, Snarky}
{Kop}
{Kelbris, Knightmare}

What happened between these posts to change these people's position?

[knightmare]

And at least you're voting the person you call a WW, which I think it kind of the more dangerous scum between the two factions so there's that.

I kinda wanna lynch this into the ground.
Weird as fuck thing to be factoring into your reads at this point.
Appeasement vibes out the ass.
And I don't understand how you can brush off rangers reads by assuming they're not serious but at the same time say something like this where it looks like you're taking them seriously.

VOTE: Knightmare

Ok so you're probably scum.

I think my point is valid about the WW's being the more dangerous faction and Ranger voting in that way makes me think he's coming from a townie mindset. His reads are thin, as I've stated, but I think it's coming from a townie place to get things going.

[knightmare]

VOTE: grapes

[Golden Robster]

Oh. I'm confused as to how your bracket is structured then so if you could explain I would appreciate that. I'm used to top reads being listed on top and gradually working down to scum reads.

{Almost50}
{Snarky}
{Kelbris, knightmare}
{Ranger}

{Ranger, Almost50, Snarky}
{Kop}
{Kelbris, Knightmare}

What happened between these posts to change these people's position?

Ranger had a good post. Kop entered the fray. Your aggressive rebuke to Ranger.

[Golden Robster]

Grape's post was bad but your initial reaction is terribad.

Thoughts from others?

[knightmare]

What's bad about it?

[Golden Robster]

A. Calling him/her scum.
B. Voting them.

You didn't explain why Grapes was scum; instead, you jumped the gun and tried to discredit his push.

Let me ask. Why is Grapes scum?

[knightmare]

Nearly 50% of the game is scum, so it's not at all out of the realm of possibility.

Scum tend to push bad points.

They are voting me because I pointed out something that is townie in Ranger's mindset. In the very least I am evaluating Ranger objectively which should be ~positive

They are spinning it as appeasement.

I think this is scummy. My job is to lynch scum, period.

[grapes]

I think my point is valid about the WW's being the more dangerous faction and Ranger voting in that way makes me think he's coming from a townie mindset. His reads are thin, as I've stated, but I think it's coming from a townie place to get things going.

Could you explain why you think this?

[grapes]

I mean I think you're wrong and it's mostly irrelevant to my point anyway because then it just becomes a matter of you seriously lacking in any paranoia whatsoever but let's hear it.

[grapes]

Like, you're taking someone's page one reads at face value - assuming that the way they're voting is based on "which faction is more dangerous" (which is a garbage reason to call anyone town for but w/e) and not something more realistic like maybe confidence in said read? Or whatever it is. You didn't ask. WHILE NOT EVEN THINKING THAT THEY'RE SERIOUS? lol

You're jumping too far to get to that conclusion. It feels like you know that rangers trajectory is coming from town for doing something that should be null considering how fake-able it is.

Probably because you aren't town.

[Almost50]

VOTE: Almost50

This game is only for the young ones.

OUCH!!!
I'm young at heart though.

[Almost50]

Almost is being unnervingly quiet.

Yes, I have this problem of NOT talking in my sleep. I'm working on it, but it's very hard to type when both my eyes are wide shut.

[Almost50]

Am I not allowed to voice concerns about the players I'm trying to discern?

Of course you are, but -out of sympathy- I decided to make it easier for you in this game: I'm a "werewolf mafia serial killer cult recruiter town godfather" (OH! Shoot!! Did I just claim on page 2?? Me and my soft heart.)

[Almost50]

Ok so you're probably scum.

VOTE: grapes

VOTE: knight

OMGUSy, extremely defensive, voting grapes in an attempt to deprive the town from wine, <insert any other genuinely funny but utterly ridiculous reasoning here>

[drmyshottyizsik]

It's been a long time since no one tried to insta lynch me. I guess 4 years away will do a lot.