In post 1075, Aeronaut wrote:
relatable image is relatable
In post 1075, Aeronaut wrote:
In post 1078, Night Hunters wrote:Okay, so one of fire or gl needs to be scum. Because either there are 2 scum blockers or GL is ascetic and titus and I don't think 3 roleblockers (2 scum 1 town) would be possible.
In post 1081, Night Hunters wrote:btw fire no replacing out, mmm k?
-Dad (Same with 1078)
pedit strongman, firebringer?
In post 1085, Night Hunters wrote:Logically a scum team hitting someone with bp and has a one-shotstrongmanwill strongman it the next time, right?
pedit ^^^^^^
In post 1085, Night Hunters wrote:Logically a scum team hitting someone with bp and has a one-shot bulletproof will strongman it the next time, right?
pedit ^^^^^^
In post 1088, Night Hunters wrote:WHY NOT?!
In post 1082, ɀefiend wrote:Alright, I've thoroughly reread and there's a lot I would like to talk about before a lynch goes through, since we have plenty of time. And I don't think massive will quick hammer. I'd like to hear anyone and everyone's thoughts.
1. Is it possible Thor died in one action due to a non-bullet kill like knife or poison? Or perhaps there is mafia power that ignores protection of all types? Who really believes Thor was shot twice? If you do, can you explain the scenarios involving factions where this is likely?
2. To clarify, Aristophanes hasn't actually claimed anything, but NH is saying that he was informed by the mod that Aristophanes neighborized him? If that's so, why can't Firebringer confirm or deny this if he and NH are in the same neighborhood?
3. Shadow was a town neighborizer. If Aristophanes confirms that he did neighborize NH and FB, that makes him likely scum neighborizer. Is it mechanically possible for scum to recruit people on their own team? Depending on this basis, does that make it more likely that NH/FB are aligned with each other? Or more likely that one of them could be part of a second scumteam? If Aristophanes denies that he's a neighborizer altogether, then obviously one of him/NH is scum, but what does that mean for FB?
4. The whole "there must be 3 roleblocker or GL is ascetic theory"... why does FB's claim that he jailed Jeanne (who claims VT) require the presence of a third roleblocker? On a related note, why would a jail keeper (and since someone mentioned it) and/or a tracker need to be enabled? And how can we distinguish between blocked results and unenabled actions without being bastardized by the mod? Last point on this subject,with the mod error basically confirming Shadow's story (but not necessarily NH's role),why the FUCK did NH, and everyone else voting him, stick with the Shadow lynch yesterday??
5. Why was there only one death N1 and two deaths N2? Does this suggest a limited SK, more BPs, a double kill on BBT, or something else. I want to hear all the theories.
In post 1095, Firebringer wrote:I don't want this game. I don't want to fight with anyone.
Maybe I am wrong about it all. I suck at this game anyways.
The only reason keeping me in game, is that I don't replace (except I did 1 time recently)
In post 789, Thor665 wrote:Looks like that would require a modifier of the Loud role that is not explicitly Normal.
That doesn't tell us much at this stage, but, with a few more flips that might be interesting, especially considering BBT's flip.
I'm also of the opinion we're missing a kill.
@NH - I'm asking if you were explicitly told you were blocked (not jailed).