Mini 1773 : Symphonic Metal Mafia (Game Over?!)

Wisdom · Post Post #1125 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 12:44 am

Shiro, I felt Snarky's fact post was town. You don't think?

Wisdom · Post Post #1126 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 12:46 am

Though to be honest, my cold feet on Snarky are more that farmer's pushing is absolutely not bussing and farmer is scum. He had no reason to make the last posts he did if he was bussing.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #1127 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:02 am

In post 1124, Shiro wrote:Ok saying that I didn't engage the situation is pretty fake. I was consistently here the past few arguments.

I could do Farmer. I did say that I think at least one of the two is scum but if he flips town we should get snarky.

Vote:Farmer

Why not just get snarky now? This counter wagon attempt really bothers me

Wisdom · Post Post #1128 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:04 am

Jake, you could do with some reevaluating now and then. How are you not bothered with everyone being super fine with lynching Snarky? Does he not have a buddy?

Shiro · Post Post #1129 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:06 am

Because suddenly people are getting cold feet about it jake

and no I am not seeing his posts as town wisdom. I honestly could see farmer bussing, like Snarky posts talking about farmer then suddenly tieing maestro and jake out of nowhere was weird but that pair is not my top.

P.edit

Hey hint hint Masq defended him hint hint

Wisdom · Post Post #1130 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:08 am

In post 1129, Shiro wrote:I honestly could see farmer bussing, like Snarky posts talking about farmer then suddenly tieing maestro and jake out of nowhere was weird but that pair is not my top.

I am talking about farmer's side of the bussing. Why post 1095/1096 as his scumbuddy?

Jeanne11 · Post Post #1131 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:08 am

Ha, that is rich right there. You don't reevaluate yourself either. No, you set your sights on someone and refuse to consider any other possibility. I think this topic will do you well

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #1132 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:08 am

In post 1128, Wisdom wrote:Jake, you could do with some reevaluating now and then. How are you not bothered with everyone being super fine with lynching Snarky? Does he not have a buddy?

His wagon took years to get close to lynch. If he got there quickly if probably have an issue with it but it was like pulling teeth which makes me feel better about it

Wisdom · Post Post #1133 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:10 am

In post 1129, Shiro wrote:Hey hint hint Masq defended him hint hint

You're making me paranoid now. Masq even opted to compromise to lynching him and even placed him on L-1 with the danger of a Maestro hammer. How is that defending?

Wisdom · Post Post #1134 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:12 am

In post 1132, Jake from State Farm wrote:
In post 1128, Wisdom wrote:Jake, you could do with some reevaluating now and then. How are you not bothered with everyone being super fine with lynching Snarky? Does he not have a buddy?

His wagon took years to get close to lynch. If he got there quickly if probably have an issue with it but it was like pulling teeth which makes me feel better about it

Time is irrelevant, as the pace of the game is slow. What matters is the people's progression on him. Both Maestro and Aristophanes scumread him out of nowhere. farmer's "case" on him is a forced pile of bullshit, especially the last point. Even if you think Snarky is scum you can't just disregard these things.

Shiro · Post Post #1135 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:14 am

That was after posts like this

In post 996, Masquerade wrote:I see the scumreads on Snarky, I get them and am inclined to think the same way. But Maestro's second-to-last post made me think he's going to look for a valid reason to vote Snarky so he can't be accused of simple omgus... And I think it's more likely for Maestro to flip scum over Snarky. I don't like his refusal to give reads.

In post 997, Masquerade wrote:But I don't know Maestro, this is my first game with him and maybe he does this as town. And I'm a gullible person and maybe I'm just too willing to believe Snarky when he defends himself. So that's kinda my conflict.

In post 1008, Masquerade wrote:I don't feel as strongly about Snarky's case on you as some other players, don't tell me to reread just because I don't agree (immediately)
Even though I can see Snarky as scum, and don't see the 2 of you as buddies, I will not disregard my scumread on you
until
Snarky actually flips scum. I'm concerned about your lack of reads and vote today. Why aren't you voting Snarky if you believe he's scum? What are you still looking for?

which have a defending tone to them. Sure he opted to compromse but later.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #1136 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:15 am

Well I'm not really concerned with others. The mere fact he lied and kept changing his story is enough to convince me he can't possibly be town. I'm still hanging on to hope people will be willing to lynch you.

You and him are the only people I'll be voting today

Wisdom · Post Post #1137 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:15 am

So a scumbuddy defends him then compromises on him because the game is getting apathetic? Really?

pedit: @Shiro

Wisdom · Post Post #1138 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:16 am

In post 1136, Jake from State Farm wrote:Well I'm not really concerned with others. The mere fact he lied and kept changing his story is enough to convince me he can't possibly be town. I'm still hanging on to hope people will be willing to lynch you.

You and him are the only people I'll be voting today

Wow. And you're asking why people scumread you.

Wisdom · Post Post #1139 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:17 am

Normal games are a great place to find who you shouldn't play with. A great lesson.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #1140 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:18 am

I'm not asking why people scum read me. I don't care if people scum read me. I did ask YOU to explain your scum read on me, or on anyone cause everything somebody has asked you (at least early on in the game) you outright refused to explain yourself. Even now you don't really explain yourself but people stopped asking you.

Besides there's nothing scummy or wrong with having 2 string scum reads and wanting to lynch them so lol @ you

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #1141 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:19 am

In post 1139, Wisdom wrote:Normal games are a great place to find who you shouldn't play with. A great lesson.

Yes and most people have come to the conclusion you are a cancer and should be avoided at all cost.

Wisdom · Post Post #1142 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:20 am

See, Masquerade? Good luck playing this game with people like the above posting. I am now supposed to treat this one-dimensional bullheadness as town.

Wisdom · Post Post #1143 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:21 am

In post 1141, Jake from State Farm wrote:
In post 1139, Wisdom wrote:Normal games are a great place to find who you shouldn't play with. A great lesson.

Yes and most people have come to the conclusion you are a cancer and should be avoided at all cost.

Go hide under your hole. I am the only one actually trying in this game.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #1144 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:22 am

You are trying? Outright refusing to answer questions and explaining yourself is trying?

No seriously go troll someplace else please

Wisdom · Post Post #1145 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:24 am

Yeah because catching scum is all about explaining yourself and answering questions

Masquerade · Post Post #1146 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:25 am

VOTE: Shiro
Yes.
OMGUS.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #1147 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:26 am

Post game if you and maestro turn out to be town I'm actually going to have the mod's look into your conduct to see if it qualifies as playing against your win condition. Imo you both have been if you both are town.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #1148 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:26 am

In post 1145, Wisdom wrote:Yeah because catching scum is all about explaining yourself and answering questions

You haven't caught scum yet...

Wisdom · Post Post #1149 (ISO) » Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:28 am

Besides the point.

You are arguing that I am not trying because I am not explaining myself, which is silly. I don't need to explain myself to anyone to find who is scum.