In post 33, KainTepes wrote:VOTE: SOREN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! why do you ask 'would you rvs???' meaning???
I actually think you are onto something.
VOTE: Soren
Which would be?
In post 39, androgybee wrote:my god what a terrible post. what are you trying to do with that post? are you trying to discredit us? are you trying to throw shade? how rude. lemme tell u something Rhazh my newest pal; shadiness is a trait I like in trees and little else.
VOTE: RhazhBash
to answer ur question tho we did feel the Soren vote was legit. but a u vote is now even more legit. like, full tiers of legit-ness above the soren vote. it's really quite something.
That's a lot of questions to shroud over your horrible vote. I'm keeping my vote on you.
the questions were for realsies and also designed to highlight the lame-ness of the post i was calling out. it's not a "shroud" it's a spotlight. im hiding nothing; im emphasizing why i placed my vote. if u think it is horrible, perhaps u should explain why???
~Nahdia
It's horrible because you never really explained your vote and when questioned on it, instead of answering you shrouded it in questions.
In post 68, androgybee wrote:and when we said "I actually think you are onto something." we were agreeing with the reasoning KainTepes put forth. it was an odd post he called out and we agreed it deserved a vote so we voted u but then RB here had to go and one-up u
~Nahdia
Why do you agree on it? What was odd about that pinged you?
In post 69, androgybee wrote:tell me Soren, why do you jump to RhazhBash's defense? do you townread them?
In post 70, RhazhBash wrote:Not sure if androgyny is scum or Town trying too hard.
another excellent post which discredits but fails to address anything concrete. and by excellent i mean terrible. i'm town, so tell me, why am i "trying too hard". should i be trying less hard? wtf is ur point m9? could you maybe actually address the fact that i questioned what you were trying to do with 38 or do u just wanna continue to try and brush me off?
hint: brushing me off by saying im scum won't work. u already have 3 people voting u and I am very persistent. ur probably gonna wanna consider a change of strategy here.
In post 33, KainTepes wrote:VOTE: SOREN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! why do you ask 'would you rvs???' meaning???
I actually think you are onto something.
VOTE: Soren
Which would be?
In post 39, androgybee wrote:my god what a terrible post. what are you trying to do with that post? are you trying to discredit us? are you trying to throw shade? how rude. lemme tell u something Rhazh my newest pal; shadiness is a trait I like in trees and little else.
VOTE: RhazhBash
to answer ur question tho we did feel the Soren vote was legit. but a u vote is now even more legit. like, full tiers of legit-ness above the soren vote. it's really quite something.
That's a lot of questions to shroud over your horrible vote. I'm keeping my vote on you.
the questions were for realsies and also designed to highlight the lame-ness of the post i was calling out. it's not a "shroud" it's a spotlight. im hiding nothing; im emphasizing why i placed my vote. if u think it is horrible, perhaps u should explain why???
~Nahdia
It's horrible because you never really explained your vote and when questioned on it, instead of answering you shrouded it in questions.
In post 68, androgybee wrote:and when we said "I actually think you are onto something." we were agreeing with the reasoning KainTepes put forth. it was an odd post he called out and we agreed it deserved a vote so we voted u but then RB here had to go and one-up u
~Nahdia
Why do you agree on it? What was odd about that pinged you?
In post 69, androgybee wrote:tell me Soren, why do you jump to RhazhBash's defense? do you townread them?
In post 70, RhazhBash wrote:Not sure if androgyny is scum or Town trying too hard.
another excellent post which discredits but fails to address anything concrete. and by excellent i mean terrible. i'm town, so tell me, why am i "trying too hard". should i be trying less hard? wtf is ur point m9? could you maybe actually address the fact that i questioned what you were trying to do with 38 or do u just wanna continue to try and brush me off?
hint: brushing me off by saying im scum won't work. u already have 3 people voting u and I am very persistent. ur probably gonna wanna consider a change of strategy here.
im not gonna respond to this individually but just make a note of the fact that you're trying to make a scumread on someone for not having day 3 level read depth before the 5th page of day 1. i'm trying to get better about not just OMGUS'ing people but holy fuck what a terrible read dude. reads at this stage in the game do not have an incredible depth of logic. they are tonal. and quite frankly, i don't bother to explain because i have no need to. either you take my word for it or you don't; forcing a bunch of crappy reasons or even just saying "tonal read tonal read tonal read tonal read" over and over is a waste of my time and really shouldn't be convincing you any further if you weren't already gonna consider my opinion.
also ha-fucking-ha at accusing my head of scum acting. here u go:
i understand the concept must be hard for u soren bc u clearly do not have one but there it is. i can link some sicknasty wikipedia pages if that helps too (=
Greetings. My prime Mafia time is the opposite of now so I'll be making my first content post in the AM. Luckily Kain flaked soon enough that the thread is completely fresh so I'm working for fresh posts to analyze. See you in about 12 hours ....
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.
Nahdia/beeboy hydra
