In post 596, drmyshottyizsik wrote:Again you say this but.you have no reasons. You vote me andnput me L1 because me reads suck? That sounds like an omgus to me, also at least I'm giving read lists and reasons.
Posts like these are literally the only thing you're contributing. Where are these "readslist"?
In post 601, Aneninen wrote:Mobilepost.
Hi, Chilledtea!
To make it short. Blacle claimed Vig, there have been no counterclaim.
Focus on the wagoned players.
I assume the wagoned players are persivul and drmshotty?
I think #595 is scummy again regarding his changed stance on Texcat but i'm feeling like a broken record
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
In post 597, Masquerade wrote:What? Because on this page you said you're behind lynching me? You know you were sitting on a town?-read on me when I first voted you, right?
I have reasons but I'd just be repeating what's already been said. Lack of scumhunting, readslist with way too many scumreads with a lot of 'hard-to-read's and 'not-enough-content-yet's and gutfeelings. And you had me as gut-town?-lean and now you just flipped on me which leaves even less townreads.
I said in stead if a no lynch, and I said I read you as bad, butt town? Hence the question mark. The whole point was I couldn't get a read off of you, and I would lynch a low posting null reading player before a nl day 1 any day
All I can really add is that I don't like this vote on shozzy. I mean, it's not terrible, but don't count on me switching because it's L-1. Maybe if deadline is imminent, but two days was added on. I'm also looking forward to Chilledtea's catch-up.
Also, you're right Aneninen. That comment of mine does sound like a bussing comment. Woops.
4 of the 6 votes on me are people that I've attacked. I think pers and anem are the two scum. I think bw is a loose cannon, literally and the other three seem to really think I'm scum.
In post 167, SirCakez wrote:I like Clumsy's wall actually. I tend to townread walls too much but that one felt genuine.
On the contrary, really don't like Blacle's Anen vote. Liking Anen's post so far, and his reasoning for the vote is "I made myself look scummy to see if scum would go for me." Like wtf, if you're being scummy on purpose then obviously people will scumread you for it.
Just wanted to point out that blacle's argument was that when you act like a low hanging fruit, scum are more likely to townread you than town are - which is actually a fair point.
For the record I probably won't interfere with the wagons that have been formed at the moment. I am currently townreading shotty and scumreading persivul where I am at (around page 6) so you guys can go ahead and hammer if you want or change wagons whatever. Even if I do catch up I always feel day 1 lynches serve a lot as information banks, so I wouldn't interfere with them at this point.
Some more scum reads : - Max, wgeurtz.
Apart from that not much else to share.
Pedit : Ok I will see if that is true. From what I gathered blacle wasn't comfortable with anen's town read on him (which anen denies - according to anen he never townread blacle).
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
The reason I've gone silent is that you are all being completely mislead. Anyone in the bloody world could see that Shotty was a mislynch-compromise. The fact everyone went silent and things went stale is already a pretty good indicator of this. What do we gain from this lynch? Absolutely nothing besides the town hopefully opening their eyes and realising that they need to sort out the real question such as Persivul ect.