White unvoted and then voted Pwayne whom White has since unvoted. That brings Kak down to 2.
MoS voted kak for 3.
I voted kak for 4.
You have now voted kak for 5.
I'm new to mafia and I honestly don't know what is going on now. This whole claiming thing seems bizarre and highly beneficial to scum. Scum are the only ones in a position to validate any of these claims. They learn a lot more than we do, b/c we learn jack shite. We don't know if kak or tar are scum liars or if they are telling the truth, but the scum know exactly. What am I missing?
Tyhess wrote:
WHY DID YOU ASK HIM TO CLAIM??? I thought we weren't going to do that?
*blink*
You would rather we lynched a power role?
Also, I didn't that the claiming thing got resolved. Most relevant are are:
CKD in #81 wrote:
right right, I agree that L-1 it is important to claim if you are a power role, just so the town doesnt lynch you, but the mafia will get you the following night...pretty screwed either way..but claiming at L-1 does help the town in the short run.
MoS in #481 wrote:Secondly I, as a power role that might claim eventually, am not even sure if I wouldn't just claim townie. That's something I have debated back and forth. If I claim townie and live the cult might try to recruit me and fail. However if I claim townie we're left with my first point which is that I would be a bad recruit for the cult in the first place. If I claimed townie I wouldn't be a target for the mafia to kill therefore allowing me to keep my role alive and put it to good use.
Flameaxe was the second highest scummy rating on my list and he is lurking. I would be just as happy with a Pwayne lynch right now, but in the interests of avoiding a No Lynch:
Whoa boy. Kakeng claims RB? Now I don't know what to think. In fact, I'm not even sure that I believe him. Even if he is a roleblocker, he could still be scum.
The current bandwagon is Flameaxe now? Never saw anything all that scummy from him. Like Tar, I better look over Flameaxe's posts. (Again, there's a good chance I'll join in simply because lynch is better than no lynch.)
"shrug" I still don't really believe the claim - but I could kinda see a town role blocker in this setup to offset against the cult recruiter, meh I'm not sure. Either way . . .
Unvote
Flameaxe needs to pipe up. Other than that well I'm stumped. Deadline's tomorrow night yeh? I'll try and read over a few suspects. Oman in particular is starting to continously ping my radar.
pwayne put it best- the only person who can make anything from a claim is scum. How do we know he isn't lying? What would have happened if he had claimed vanilla? Then we would have two tars. That's not good.
And ckd- Honestly, in this game at this point, I would rather lynch a roleblocker than ask for a claim....not that I want to lynch a roleblocker, I just don't think that we are in a great position now- the 2 people that we had the best cases for are now claimed vanilla (who may or may not be recruited tommorow, and then we don't even know if he is vanilla) and a roleblocker (who may or may not be a roleblocker). If he is truly a roleblocker, he's going to be NK tonight. I would rather them try to talk themselves out of it than claim.
And yes I do realize that this gives a better chance at lynching scum and scum lynching the roleblocker than us lynching a roleblocker and scum lynching scum. Don't get me wrong though-I'm not for a Kak lynch at this point. I just don't like the ask for a claim.