In post 597, Not_Mafia wrote:In post 596, MarioManiac4 wrote:In post 594, Not_Mafia wrote:In post 592, MarioManiac4 wrote:In post 589, Not_Mafia wrote:Mario's alone vote just felt really opportunistic, it looks like Snarky is the consensus
Snarky is the consensus? what kind of reasoning is that?
You can't deny the entrance was scummy. I, as town, saw alone doing something scummy and voted him. Give me a reason why you don't think that was the case.
Shotty was also scummy zzzzzzzzzzzzzz
I never said alone wasn't scummy, I never said shotty wasn't scummy, these are not counterarguments
yes they are.
because they were scummy, I THOUGHT THEY WERE SCUM.
GET IT?
You seem to be pushing your read on me a lot more than your random read on Snarky.
Is snarky your partner?
pedit: dammmmmmmnnnnnnnn not_mafia, back at it again with the lylo mislynch tunnel!
This is just substituting arrogance for a lack of an actual argument, I called your pushes opportunistic and you wanting to stay in the background. Saying they're scummy is irrelevant, this would be a terrible counter in singleball, but especially in multiball, which you acknowledged yourself. The "Is Snarky your partner" is just pure desperation.
Yup, you just admitted to "calling" them opportunistic.
I didn't want to stay in the background. I wanted shotty lynched.
And what? It's not ultra towntell, it's what happened. I thought they were scummy. I lynched them.
And why would I be desperate? You're the only one pushing me.
You come into the day saying, "MM+SS scumteam?" then go on to suddenly try and get me lynched.