In post 683, Ircher wrote:Yeah, okay, past page 20.
We're definitely not lynching Ranger today, and that's final.
Can you like have any reason. At all? Or are you just trying to make as much crap up as you can?
In post 683, Ircher wrote:Yeah, okay, past page 20.
We're definitely not lynching Ranger today, and that's final.
In post 685, Ircher wrote:You dont lynch someone just cuz they have a string scum game. Ranger has an equally strong town game, so your point is?
Jeanne was scummy for lurking, generally, I'd like to PL any lurking slots. But, the slot claimed watcher -- not lynching a potentially useful role that is also a very powerful player D1.
In post 726, TheDominator37 wrote:In post 685, Ircher wrote:You dont lynch someone just cuz they have a string scum game. Ranger has an equally strong town game, so your point is?
Jeanne was scummy for lurking, generally, I'd like to PL any lurking slots. But, the slot claimed watcher -- not lynching a potentially useful role that is also a very powerful player D1.
So we should PL half the game? Good idea
In post 730, Code of Honor wrote:Ircher, saying the phrase "scumhunting" is a vacuum buzzword. It means nothing. As for addressing a Ranger wall, I cannot see it. You haven't elaborated on why Ranger's town at all. Even now, your position is Ranger or Magua must die. Yet, rather than address why those MUST be the lynches for today, you're just discrediting my observations on you. You don't defend why Ranger is a viable wagon to you despite being a top townread or why Magua is a good scumread.
If you think Magua is such a good scumread, why are you placing zero effort to lynch her?
If you think Ranger is town, why do you leave Ranger as a viable wagon despite being supposedly against their lynch today?
~Titus
In post 728, Ircher wrote:In post 726, TheDominator37 wrote:In post 685, Ircher wrote:You dont lynch someone just cuz they have a string scum game. Ranger has an equally strong town game, so your point is?
Jeanne was scummy for lurking, generally, I'd like to PL any lurking slots. But, the slot claimed watcher -- not lynching a potentially useful role that is also a very powerful player D1.
So we should PL half the game? Good idea
To clarify: Those who are doing extensive lurking: FA and Masq rn.
But, why are you guys being so keen on spotting the "slightest" flaw. And am I pushing for a PL roght now? I dont think so.
In post 733, TheDominator37 wrote:In post 728, Ircher wrote:In post 726, TheDominator37 wrote:In post 685, Ircher wrote:You dont lynch someone just cuz they have a string scum game. Ranger has an equally strong town game, so your point is?
Jeanne was scummy for lurking, generally, I'd like to PL any lurking slots. But, the slot claimed watcher -- not lynching a potentially useful role that is also a very powerful player D1.
So we should PL half the game? Good idea
To clarify: Those who are doing extensive lurking: FA and Masq rn.
But, why are you guys being so keen on spotting the "slightest" flaw. And am I pushing for a PL roght now? I dont think so.
Oh you just want to lynch people because they disagree with you. My bad.
In post 732, Ircher wrote:In post 730, Code of Honor wrote:Ircher, saying the phrase "scumhunting" is a vacuum buzzword. It means nothing. As for addressing a Ranger wall, I cannot see it. You haven't elaborated on why Ranger's town at all. Even now, your position is Ranger or Magua must die. Yet, rather than address why those MUST be the lynches for today, you're just discrediting my observations on you. You don't defend why Ranger is a viable wagon to you despite being a top townread or why Magua is a good scumread.
If you think Magua is such a good scumread, why are you placing zero effort to lynch her?
If you think Ranger is town, why do you leave Ranger as a viable wagon despite being supposedly against their lynch today?
~Titus
I said Magna wall illustratong why all the points against Ranger are rather void and poor.
In post 735, Ircher wrote:In post 733, TheDominator37 wrote:In post 728, Ircher wrote:In post 726, TheDominator37 wrote:In post 685, Ircher wrote:You dont lynch someone just cuz they have a string scum game. Ranger has an equally strong town game, so your point is?
Jeanne was scummy for lurking, generally, I'd like to PL any lurking slots. But, the slot claimed watcher -- not lynching a potentially useful role that is also a very powerful player D1.
So we should PL half the game? Good idea
To clarify: Those who are doing extensive lurking: FA and Masq rn.
But, why are you guys being so keen on spotting the "slightest" flaw. And am I pushing for a PL roght now? I dont think so.
Oh you just want to lynch people because they disagree with you. My bad.
Stop with the sarcasm. Ive yet to express a scumread on you... Dont make me change my mind.
In post 734, Ircher wrote:As to viable wagons: Not my choice, ask all the people voting Ranger why thats the case. Magna and Dragon seem intent on the Ranger lynch; Ask them
In post 740, Dragon Knight wrote:This is 100% scum!titus
In post 743, Code of Honor wrote:In post 740, Dragon Knight wrote:This is 100% scum!titus
Which head is this? Sign please. It will help me determine your alignment. Pretty sure FA and Ircher are scum, BBT, Polar, Ranger, Magua are town. So I would like to determine if you're dumb or scum.
In post 742, Ircher wrote:Hey Titus, go do me a favor:
Go review Ice Cream Mafia (1769) and tell me if this does or does not resemble my play there. Ok, thanks!
In post 745, Ircher wrote:I'm leaning toward town Titus rn tbh though.... She was this way in Ice Cream Mafia too last time I remember
In post 742, Ircher wrote:Hey Titus, go do me a favor:
Go review Ice Cream Mafia (1769) and tell me if this does or does not resemble my play there. Ok, thanks!