In post 746, The Banterlords wrote:oh today was titus?
VOTE: Code of Honor
Someone hasn't answered my question. >:3
pedit she and eh
You should answer mine. I am trying to read you.
Thoughts on Ircher?
~Titus
In post 746, The Banterlords wrote:oh today was titus?
VOTE: Code of Honor
Someone hasn't answered my question. >:3
pedit she and eh
In post 746, The Banterlords wrote:oh today was titus?
VOTE: Code of Honor
Someone hasn't answered my question. >:3
pedit she and eh
In post 750, Code of Honor wrote:In post 746, The Banterlords wrote:oh today was titus?
VOTE: Code of Honor
Someone hasn't answered my question. >:3
pedit she and eh
You should answer mine. I am trying to read you.
Thoughts on Ircher?
~Titus
In post 682, Polar Vortex wrote:In post 588, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
In post 547, Polar Vortex wrote:Why is it unsurprising?
As I explained to Code above – my gut reaction to the terrible “case” (if you want to call it that) Ranger threw at me was “scum”. I disagree with your premise that this stance isn’t Scum looking to diffuse the wagon on them. A Town player in Ranger’s shoes should have some suspicion of the players whose case on Ranger’s slot is “Meta from prior player and lurking”. There was enough noise made in that direction that several other players stepped in to say “No, not lynching that”. But Ranger blithely just chalks that whole crew up to “Unimpeachable Town” which to me makes no sense from a Town standpoint. Especially on the basis she has provided as support.
You say it is unsurprising that she called her accusers town, but you're arguing that she's scum because she's not doing what you'd expect a town player to do in her position. It sounds like scum-her would have been better doing the expected from town and pushing one of her towny suspects, making her look town and still helping her push a mislynch. So her reads are not as expected or unsurprising as you made it sound.
Also, why is it so hard to believe that she does find them to be town? I find it harder to believe that a scum player would give up on such easy pushes.
In post 588, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
In post 547, Polar Vortex wrote:Yeah, I really don't get the "Scum looking to survive" vibe from her. I mean, it's not like she claimed cop at L-1
See this comment confuses me. Do you think it was scummy for a player to claim Cop at L-1? Independent of what I think of Dragon’s play that lead to the wagon I don’t see anything inherently more scummy about claiming at L-1 as opposed to Jean claiming Watcher effectively “just because”. Of the two Jean’s claim looks objectively worse when viewed form a distance.
A cop claim at L-1/2 from a suspected player is always something to be weary of. I think I've already said how damaging it could be to us if he's scum, but I'll say it again. If he was getting lynched on D1, the cop claim buys him another night (where he can kill and or use his role) and another day, where he can claim a result, which can lead to a mislynch. A mislynch on day 2 would buy him yet another night and day. A cop claim is a free ticket. He loses nothing because he was already getting lynched and he can win two nights and two days, plus all the chaos and distraction he can cause.
It's much different from Jeanne's claim. She wasn't under as much pressure, there was talk of lynching her but no wagon. Her claim had risks (DK's didn't). Claiming cornered her into a role that could bring her difficulties later on. If she had the role she'd have to use it wisely because she'd have to reveal her results and couldn't risk getting caught lying. If she didn't have the role the risk would be even bigger because she'd be forced to lie. This was entirely avoidable. It is counterproductive and unnecessary. If there's something bad about her claim is that it was also completely unnecessary for her to do claim as town, but Jeanne obviously didn't bother to play and relied on her role to survive.
In post 588, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
In post 548, Polar Vortex wrote:MoI, talk to me. I thought you'd see this, but apparently you don't. How is ranger's lynch acceptable but DK's isn't, taking not just their claims, but their play in consideration?
-Snow (previous one was mine too)
Ok I thought I had been talking to you this entire time.
I think I’ve explained this in my response to Ranger but I’ll reiterate – both players I’ve read as scummy. Dragon for his early player which earned my vote and Ranger for the replace in reads which to me don’t logically come from a Town standpoint. As I said earlier – I’m not lynching an UnCCed Cop Day 1 no matter how bad their player is. Dragon’s claim will be tested via Night and re-assessed. On the other hand I don’t believe a Watcher is nearly at the level of Cop as far as leash Day 1 goes.
Is Ranger my preferred lynch? No, not at this stage. But it is a lynch I would consider dependent on how my read on the slot develops.
As much as I'd like to, I'm not arguing for a DK lynch, I'm giving them a chance and hoping they're town, even though I'm aware their claim can be really hurtful to us if they're scum. So, if I'm willing to take this risk with DK, as are you, why aren't you willing to take the risk with Ranger? Because her reads "don’t logically come from a Town standpoint"? Because her role is weaker? Opinions. Opinions I disagree with. "Opinions" that to me can't logically come from a Town standpoint.
You're downplaying the value of her role and stubbornly scum reading her for things that are just wrong, no matter how well you try to justify them.
- Snow
Yes.Dragon Knight wrote:This is 100% scum!titus
"Misunderstanding". With quotation marks.Polar Vortex wrote:I honestly can't understand Code's last posts. She is misunderstanding a lot of stuff.
In post 766, Ranger wrote:"Misunderstanding". With quotation marks.Polar Vortex wrote:I honestly can't understand Code's last posts. She is misunderstanding a lot of stuff.
It kind-of reminds you of someone you happen to be voting right now, doesn't it?
In post 768, Ranger wrote:Eh, I'm still voting MagnaofIllusion for good reason, but I think given this, you can at least understand why I'd move to Code of Honor in a heartbeat, yes?