Mini 1783: GTA 2 Mafia (GaME OVAH)

Ranger · Post Post #825 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:31 am

VOTE: Code of Honor.

The Banterlords · Post Post #826 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:31 am

In post 823, Dragon Knight wrote:Ircher, Ranger, hammer.

Also, for Dwlee, that is null, at best. that's not his town play, unfortunately.

I really don't understand that last line.
~Dwlee

Dragon Knight · Post Post #827 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:31 am

Eagerness to hammer is NEVER scummy. Not with the site's current meta. Let's just throw that out there. Ranger is starting to look town here.

Dragon Knight · Post Post #828 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:32 am

In post 826, The Banterlords wrote:
In post 823, Dragon Knight wrote:Ircher, Ranger, hammer.

Also, for Dwlee, that is null, at best. that's not his town play, unfortunately.

I really don't understand that last line.
~Dwlee

The unvote. It's not your town play.

Ranger · Post Post #829 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:32 am

Like...given shos is V/LA.

We have time to discuss things even after a hammer.

I mean, Titus will lie as scum and just say she was town even if she wasn't.

But.

We could get potentially DAYS worth of useful twilight discussion post-hammer.

And that's not something we're going to get without a hammer.

Dragon Knight · Post Post #830 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:32 am

Id be willing to bet you're being coached, but first I've gotta find that coach.

Polar Vortex · Post Post #831 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:32 am

Ranger's willingless to hammer is town. Just what she's doing is stupid and we need to discuss things first. Like the Code wagon has been mostly votes with absolutely no explanation. And I want that explanation before a flip.

Bearbert

BlackStar · Post Post #832 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:33 am

In post 827, Dragon Knight wrote:Eagerness to hammer is NEVER scummy. Not with the site's current meta. Let's just throw that out there. Ranger is starting to look town here.

In post 830, Dragon Knight wrote:Id be willing to bet you're being coached, but first I've gotta find that coach.

You changed your mind that fast?

The Banterlords · Post Post #833 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:33 am

In post 828, Dragon Knight wrote:
In post 826, The Banterlords wrote:
In post 823, Dragon Knight wrote:Ircher, Ranger, hammer.

Also, for Dwlee, that is null, at best. that's not his town play, unfortunately.

I really don't understand that last line.
~Dwlee

The unvote. It's not your town play.

Are you saying me unvoting is scummy? Are you for real?
~Dwlee

Dragon Knight · Post Post #834 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:34 am

Polar, how the HELL are you so dumb? Is it that you're scum? Are you dwlee's coach? That's probably it.

@Blackstar Dwlee is being coached.

Polar Vortex · Post Post #835 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:34 am

In post 828, Dragon Knight wrote:
In post 826, The Banterlords wrote:
In post 823, Dragon Knight wrote:Ircher, Ranger, hammer.

Also, for Dwlee, that is null, at best. that's not his town play, unfortunately.

I really don't understand that last line.
~Dwlee

The unvote. It's not your town play.

Are you implying that him not being dumb is a sign of scum? I guess that could explain all your reads...

Bearbert

The Banterlords · Post Post #836 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:34 am

In post 830, Dragon Knight wrote:Id be willing to bet you're being coached, but first I've gotta find that coach.

do you believe the words you say?
~Dwlee

pedit ok apparently you do

The Banterlords · Post Post #837 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:35 am

point to me being coached, por favor.
~Dwlee

Dragon Knight · Post Post #838 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:35 am

Dwlee's words are intelligent, yet empty. That's the exact opposite of his town-game.

Dragon Knight · Post Post #839 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:36 am

In post 837, The Banterlords wrote:point to me being coached, por favor.
~Dwlee

Why do you think I said I'd have to

find

your coach?

Polar Vortex · Post Post #840 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:37 am

In post 834, Dragon Knight wrote:Polar, how the HELL are you so dumb? Is it that you're scum? Are you dwlee's coach? That's probably it.

@Blackstar Dwlee is being coached.

That is the most idiotic statement ever. Even if they had daytalk this game, do you really think somebody told him to unvote, he read that message and then unvoted in those fucking 8 minutes from Ranger's intent to hammer until the unvote? Like I'm actually baffled about how you could think such an idiotic thing

Bearbert

The Banterlords · Post Post #841 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:37 am

In post 838, Dragon Knight wrote:Dwlee's words are intelligent, yet empty. That's the exact opposite of his town-game.

you mod one game where I am town and you're an expert on my meta?

~Dwlee

Ranger · Post Post #842 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:38 am

Code of Honor case, in a nutshell: 694, 762, 763, 764, and 766: Code of Honor has remained a null read for the majority of the game, not sticking out and doing much of anything. This, itself, would have been alarming enough, but I gave the benefit of the doubt and at the time called them null. Then, Titus went after Ircher with "misunderstanding" (air quotes intentional) after "misunderstanding", stretching credibility. Exploiting "misunderstandings" is, to a T, Titus's scumplay. She thrives off of these misrepresentations of a player, and stubbornly pushing them through.

Dragon Knight · Post Post #843 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:39 am

1. I've yet to see a game when scum didn't have day talk. That's why I always look for neighborhoods.
2. You and him are both on and active. It's entirely possible. I did it in MGSV with TBone.

Dragon Knight · Post Post #844 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:40 am

In post 841, The Banterlords wrote:
In post 838, Dragon Knight wrote:Dwlee's words are intelligent, yet empty. That's the exact opposite of his town-game.

you mod one game where I am town and you're an expert on my meta?
~Dwlee

No, when I actually started playing with you, I decided to read up. You're rather hapless (how I was before I got sick of following people), but you're entirely genuine and nigh-always obv-town during your town games.

The Banterlords · Post Post #845 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:41 am

I am mad I can't even call ds / firebringer an idiot because THEY DONT FUCKING SIGN /rant
~Dwlee
pedit that is great we're letting them claim
I am just like my country, I am young scrappy and hungry

pedit and yet I get mislynched very frequently. mm k

Dragon Knight · Post Post #846 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:43 am

In post 845, The Banterlords wrote:I am mad I can't even call ds / firebringer an idiot because THEY DONT FUCKING SIGN /rant
~Dwlee
pedit that is great we're letting them claim
I am just like my country, I am young scrappy and hungry

pedit and yet I get mislynched very frequently. mm k

how about you read what We said earlier. Like yesterday. We explained why we're not going to sign. And by explain, We merely said what's causing us to not sign. If you can't find that, then you don't need to read us. We both have very similar games.

The Banterlords · Post Post #847 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:46 am

In post 846, Dragon Knight wrote:
In post 845, The Banterlords wrote:I am mad I can't even call ds / firebringer an idiot because THEY DONT FUCKING SIGN /rant
~Dwlee
pedit that is great we're letting them claim
I am just like my country, I am young scrappy and hungry

pedit and yet I get mislynched very frequently. mm k

how about you read what We said earlier. Like yesterday. We explained why we're not going to sign. And by explain, We merely said what's causing us to not sign. If you can't find that, then you don't need to read us. We both have very similar games.

"oh we're the same slot so we don't sign"
Yea that's a real great reason to go directly against the rules and not sign
~Dwlee

BlackStar · Post Post #848 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:46 am

There's no good excuse for breaking the mod's rules

The Banterlords · Post Post #849 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2016 9:49 am

In post 848, BlackStar wrote:There's no good excuse for breaking the mod's rules

^^^
~Dwlee