In post 305, JohnnyFarrar wrote:I don't have a problem with it because I trust this player list to not be full of idiots. It's that some sort of mistake?
That's your first mistake.
In post 304, Antihero wrote:you're still not saying why the wagon, or any of its particular occupants, are SCUMMY
you're just spitting out QUICKLYNCH BAD
which.. nobody's arguing.
Obviously from the post below yours, someone is arguing, but you completely missed the point where it's scummy. Because quick lynches gives town a substantially reduced time to find scum, town is unlikely to do their job in finding scum. Something anti-town is inherently pro-scum. Actions that are pro-scum is scummy.
In post 308, T-Bone wrote:You don't understand this particular set-up if you're concerned by L-2.
Oh?
If you want to vote someone who's not posting much, aim lower because I'm in the middle of the pack.