No. You being an asshole who can't see the obvious and is insulting a PR who just handed scum to the game is the problem. But since I've been saying you're behaving like scum, and you've misrepped the fuck out of me, you're probably just mad that your buddy got outed.In post 1996, KickAssAndGiggle wrote:There's the issue.In post 1995, Fraggernaut wrote:I read Drixx town
I said it when I revealed, I was going to but wanted to see the interactions & pushes that were made, namely yours. That's also why I wanted to ISO to see what interactions you had with Irao based on that information. Plus I wanted another watch, to see if I could find out more information before I outted.In post 2002, Something_Smart wrote:UNVOTE:
@Fragger: what made you not claim your result on iraonavp yesterday?
Bout the response I expected from a outted mafia or third party. Sorry better luck next time.In post 2008, iraonavp wrote:Fraggernaut is lying and scum-aligned.
My role doesn't allow me to visit anyone.
This was a sarcastic semi-crumb.In post 806, iraonavp wrote:Don't vig me though. I am a PR of such extreme importance that it cannot be described in words. When I received my role PM, I could barely believe that the mods would add such a severely overpowered role into the game. On it's own my role could probably restore world peace.In post 801, DrippingGoofball wrote:In post 776, Fraggernaut wrote:Still think iraonvp is the better lynch today but we can't risk a no lynch.
VOTE: Reubus Swagrid
We can vig him. I didn't like his gratuitous power role hint. He's scum, too.
I didn't claim cause I wanted to see the push & interactions between yourself & Something_Smart, who I believe is your mafia partner, or you're just third party & Something_Smart is independently mafia. I am holding my claim, I hard claim & I will never rescind.In post 2009, iraonavp wrote:It's obvious that he only claimed now because he was about to get lynched. He would've immediately claimed the result on day 2 if he was what he claims to be, especially after nobody wanted to lynch me.
I'm town ascetic enabler. So there is almost certainly an ascetic role in this setup.
In post 2017, Aristophanes wrote:^ Correct.
Just read the claim. Too many over justifications, but I'll sheep the Guilty.
Ascetic are annoying anyway.
VOTE: Iraon
Uggh, this was at Drixx.
Got Ninja'd
Well, if we go by the theory that you are town aligned, you wouldn't because your role has no visiting/killing aspect.In post 2019, iraonavp wrote:I don't know, but why would I kill pisskop since I know I'm town-aligned?
Not by play really.In post 2020, iraonavp wrote:In post 2017, Aristophanes wrote:^ Correct.
Just read the claim. Too many over justifications, but I'll sheep the Guilty.
Ascetic are annoying anyway.
VOTE: Iraon
Uggh, this was at Drixx.
Got Ninja'd
Do you even think that I'm scum-aligned?
You sound like you don't believe it even here.
In post 2012, Fraggernaut wrote:I am holding my claim, I hard claim & I will never rescind.
In post 2021, Aristophanes wrote:Well, if we go by the theory that you are town aligned, you wouldn't because your role has no visiting/killing aspect.In post 2019, iraonavp wrote:I don't know, but why would I kill pisskop since I know I'm town-aligned?
So it is only if you are lying, and thus scum, that you could have killed him.
Therefore this post is pointless.
In post 2018, Fraggernaut wrote:Why would I trade one for one since I know I'm town? I know you visited pisskop the night they died, & I used that information to discern someone else's alignment as well.