Mini 1792: Baccano! Mafia [Game Over]


User avatar
Thor665
Thor665
Papa Smurf
User avatar
User avatar
Thor665
Papa Smurf
Papa Smurf
Posts: 33454
Joined: October 11, 2009
Location: Venice, FL

Post Post #600 (ISO) » Fri May 13, 2016 11:18 am

Post by Thor665 »

In post 591, Nosferatu wrote:isn't essentially a policy lynch
What's wrong with a policy lynch?
User avatar
Thor665
Thor665
Papa Smurf
User avatar
User avatar
Thor665
Papa Smurf
Papa Smurf
Posts: 33454
Joined: October 11, 2009
Location: Venice, FL

Post Post #601 (ISO) » Fri May 13, 2016 11:21 am

Post by Thor665 »

In post 599, Aristophanes wrote:Because he also feigned being 3P, and I thought he had essentially claimed it at one point.
Like, through the night phase, I was kicking myself for being on that wagon, not because I didn't think it was a good one, but because Nahdia was a better one. She flipped town too though, so...

He was acting scummy , essentially claimed 3P, and refused to work with us. I don't know why he did it.
So it's laughably bad that people believed Camn's claim of an investigative role, but it makes sense to think Fate claimed 3rd party in response to it?
How does that make sense?
User avatar
Nosferatu
Nosferatu
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Nosferatu
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7726
Joined: June 23, 2015
Location: Geek U.S.A.

Post Post #602 (ISO) » Fri May 13, 2016 11:21 am

Post by Nosferatu »

In post 600, Thor665 wrote:
In post 591, Nosferatu wrote:isn't essentially a policy lynch
What's wrong with a policy lynch?
I don't like to lynch people for non alignment indicative things if I can help it.
BRASIL BRASIL BRASIL BRRRRR
last.fm
gtkas
User avatar
Nosferatu
Nosferatu
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Nosferatu
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7726
Joined: June 23, 2015
Location: Geek U.S.A.

Post Post #603 (ISO) » Fri May 13, 2016 11:26 am

Post by Nosferatu »

btw this is probably why tsuki started calling Fate conf 3p, since after this is when he starts referring to him as such.
In post 446, camntsuki wrote:
In post 407, Fate wrote:Staeg there's uh

a few things that would interfere with my ability to read Katsuki.

THis game unfortunately includes one of them

We can lynch White Light or Thor.

Unvote:
Vote: White Light


Thor will probably have less traction and he's a slippery son of a bitch, so here we are
LOOK AT THIS BACKTRACK LMAO

FATE SCUM WOULDNT BACKTRACK LIKE THIS
AND FATE TOWN WOULD NEVER HAVE PUSHED US IN THE FIRST PLACE

G FUCKING G
BRASIL BRASIL BRASIL BRRRRR
last.fm
gtkas
User avatar
Nosferatu
Nosferatu
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Nosferatu
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7726
Joined: June 23, 2015
Location: Geek U.S.A.

Post Post #604 (ISO) » Fri May 13, 2016 11:32 am

Post by Nosferatu »

In post 597, Cerberus v666 wrote: 2) He said something about not giving in to his ghoul nature and eating. That is CLEARLY a joke. There is no argument that can be made that he intended that be interpreted as a claim to be Szilard.

This argument, unlike the defense of camn's terrible play, goes far beyond semantics alone.
In post 469, Fate wrote:
SHUT THE FUCK UP ISSAC
In post 471, camntsuki wrote:OOPS CATS OUTTA THE BAG NOW

WE ARE ISSAC
TOWN BAD DRIVER

ONCE DURING THE GAME, WE MAY CHOOSE TO CRASH OUR CAR INTO A PLAYER
WE WILL BE NOTIFIED IF IT IS SZILARD

LYNCH AHOY
This is also pretty obviously a joke.
He literally just claimed to be the person that fate referred to him as. Exactly what happened when fate talked about refusing to eat after tsuki said it would be funny to lynch him before he had the opportunity to. These have the same progression but you reached different conclusions for essentially no reason.
BRASIL BRASIL BRASIL BRRRRR
last.fm
gtkas
User avatar
Aristophanes
Aristophanes
He/Him
Mr. Blue Sky
User avatar
User avatar
Aristophanes
He/Him
Mr. Blue Sky
Mr. Blue Sky
Posts: 17170
Joined: December 30, 2014
Pronoun: He/Him
Location: Hiding from Actual Cannibal Shia Lebeouf

Post Post #605 (ISO) » Fri May 13, 2016 11:39 am

Post by Aristophanes »

In post 601, Thor665 wrote:
In post 599, Aristophanes wrote:Because he also feigned being 3P, and I thought he had essentially claimed it at one point.
Like, through the night phase, I was kicking myself for being on that wagon, not because I didn't think it was a good one, but because Nahdia was a better one. She flipped town too though, so...

He was acting scummy , essentially claimed 3P, and refused to work with us. I don't know why he did it.
So it's laughably bad that people believed Camn's claim of an investigative role, but it makes sense to think Fate claimed 3rd party in response to it?
How does that make sense?
It made sense to me at the time, and I thought it was a legit claim.
Half meme, Half real, All Aristophanes ;)
- Jingle
Ari has appeared way too competent for me to even pretend to know what they're thinking
- MooseEatsBear on discord mafia
it wouldn’t be an ari sig unless it takes up half the screen on mobile - Vonflare
User avatar
Cerberus v666
Cerberus v666
Let's Be Reasonable
User avatar
User avatar
Cerberus v666
Let's Be Reasonable
Let's Be Reasonable
Posts: 5479
Joined: November 14, 2014

Post Post #606 (ISO) » Fri May 13, 2016 11:45 am

Post by Cerberus v666 »

In post 604, Nosferatu wrote:
In post 597, Cerberus v666 wrote: 2) He said something about not giving in to his ghoul nature and eating. That is CLEARLY a joke. There is no argument that can be made that he intended that be interpreted as a claim to be Szilard.

This argument, unlike the defense of camn's terrible play, goes far beyond semantics alone.
In post 469, Fate wrote:
SHUT THE FUCK UP ISSAC
In post 471, camntsuki wrote:OOPS CATS OUTTA THE BAG NOW

WE ARE ISSAC
TOWN BAD DRIVER

ONCE DURING THE GAME, WE MAY CHOOSE TO CRASH OUR CAR INTO A PLAYER
WE WILL BE NOTIFIED IF IT IS SZILARD

LYNCH AHOY
This is also pretty obviously a joke.
He literally just claimed to be the person that fate referred to him as. Exactly what happened when fate talked about refusing to eat after tsuki said it would be funny to lynch him before he had the opportunity to. These have the same progression but you reached different conclusions for essentially no reason.
Touche. I completely missed the context that turned his claim into potentially a joke. I also gave a lot more weight to the idea of fates post being a joke because be was at l-1 or so when he made it, the time the real szilard would have surely attempted to eat someone.
GTK a me, currently live, this may be your only chance!
viewtopic.php?f=61&t=78521&p=10688009#p10688009
User avatar
camntsuki
camntsuki
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
camntsuki
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1098
Joined: January 11, 2016

Post Post #607 (ISO) » Fri May 13, 2016 12:10 pm

Post by camntsuki »

We were pretty convinced that Fate would flip 3rd Party.
joke-claims are Katz/Fate site meta FYI.
if you wanna push a Lynch on us because Fate flailed, go ahead and try. If you wanna talk about it forever though .. gods maybe let the Vig handle us instead.

PS, was that a Vig shot? or did the "best friends" die together lover-style?
User avatar
Florestan
Florestan
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Florestan
Goon
Goon
Posts: 253
Joined: May 2, 2016

Post Post #608 (ISO) » Fri May 13, 2016 12:12 pm

Post by Florestan »

Ftr I thought he was sliLizard obviously
"Quoint a quincidence! O.K. Omnius Kollidimus. As Ollover Krumwall sayed when he slepped ueber his grannyamother."
User avatar
heuristically_alone
heuristically_alone
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
heuristically_alone
Goon
Goon
Posts: 627
Joined: April 14, 2016

Post Post #609 (ISO) » Fri May 13, 2016 3:57 pm

Post by heuristically_alone »

In post 570, camntsuki wrote:
In post 562, Cerberus v666 wrote:
In post 559, Thor665 wrote:Why Heuristically Alone over Camn?
Camn is a filthy liar, so there's that.
For the record, I kinda don't care if we lose because of this, because fuck fake guilties from town.

VOTE: camntsuki
It was Fate's fault for trying to out our role!

And Fate implicitly claimed 3p. Your push is bad, and is a good place for us to start as we head out for the day to drink.

VOTE: cerberus
In post 581, Thor665 wrote:
In post 579, Cerberus v666 wrote:It's amazing how little I care what you want. You would be astonished, really.
Unvote: Camn
Vote: Cerberus
Did you forget that Cerberus claimed page one? Even if Cerb didn't care about the game, we shouldn't just vote out someone that is more likely town
User avatar
Thor665
Thor665
Papa Smurf
User avatar
User avatar
Thor665
Papa Smurf
Papa Smurf
Posts: 33454
Joined: October 11, 2009
Location: Venice, FL

Post Post #610 (ISO) » Sat May 14, 2016 12:57 am

Post by Thor665 »

In post 602, Nosferatu wrote:
In post 600, Thor665 wrote:
In post 591, Nosferatu wrote:isn't essentially a policy lynch
What's wrong with a policy lynch?
I don't like to lynch people for non alignment indicative things if I can help it.
I have never seen a policy lynch applied to anything that isn't excessive lurking, lying, or solid anti-town play.
If someone is actively playing in a way that benefits scum (which is why it's called anti-town) isn't that alignment indicative of them being less likely town?
In post 605, Aristophanes wrote:
In post 601, Thor665 wrote:
In post 599, Aristophanes wrote:Because he also feigned being 3P, and I thought he had essentially claimed it at one point.
Like, through the night phase, I was kicking myself for being on that wagon, not because I didn't think it was a good one, but because Nahdia was a better one. She flipped town too though, so...

He was acting scummy , essentially claimed 3P, and refused to work with us. I don't know why he did it.
So it's laughably bad that people believed Camn's claim of an investigative role, but it makes sense to think Fate claimed 3rd party in response to it?
How does that make sense?
It made sense to me at the time, and I thought it was a legit claim.
But if you found Camn a joke, why did you think Fate's claim made sense?
In post 607, camntsuki wrote:PS, was that a Vig shot? or did the "best friends" die together lover-style?
I already offered my thoughts on this - what are yours?
In post 609, heuristically_alone wrote:Did you forget that Cerberus claimed page one? Even if Cerb didn't care about the game, we shouldn't just vote out someone that is more likely town
I didn't forget it, I still never read it - why do you think it makes him more likely town than not?
User avatar
Nosferatu
Nosferatu
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Nosferatu
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7726
Joined: June 23, 2015
Location: Geek U.S.A.

Post Post #611 (ISO) » Sat May 14, 2016 3:34 am

Post by Nosferatu »

In post 610, Thor665 wrote:
In post 602, Nosferatu wrote:
In post 600, Thor665 wrote:
In post 591, Nosferatu wrote:isn't essentially a policy lynch
What's wrong with a policy lynch?
I don't like to lynch people for non alignment indicative things if I can help it.
I have never seen a policy lynch applied to anything that isn't excessive lurking, lying, or solid anti-town play.
If someone is actively playing in a way that benefits scum (which is why it's called anti-town) isn't that alignment indicative of them being less likely town?
No. There are townies that just act in anti town ways. Policy lynches are just lynches for a reason other than the content of their posts. Something better if avoided.
BRASIL BRASIL BRASIL BRRRRR
last.fm
gtkas
User avatar
Aristophanes
Aristophanes
He/Him
Mr. Blue Sky
User avatar
User avatar
Aristophanes
He/Him
Mr. Blue Sky
Mr. Blue Sky
Posts: 17170
Joined: December 30, 2014
Pronoun: He/Him
Location: Hiding from Actual Cannibal Shia Lebeouf

Post Post #612 (ISO) » Sat May 14, 2016 4:04 am

Post by Aristophanes »

In post 607, camntsuki wrote:We were pretty convinced that Fate would flip 3rd Party.
joke-claims are Katz/Fate site meta FYI.
if you wanna push a Lynch on us because Fate flailed, go ahead and try. If you wanna talk about it forever though .. gods maybe let the Vig handle us instead.

PS, was that a Vig shot? or did the "best friends" die together lover-style?
I'd have to assume a Vig shot, based on the PMs.
Half meme, Half real, All Aristophanes ;)
- Jingle
Ari has appeared way too competent for me to even pretend to know what they're thinking
- MooseEatsBear on discord mafia
it wouldn’t be an ari sig unless it takes up half the screen on mobile - Vonflare
User avatar
heuristically_alone
heuristically_alone
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
heuristically_alone
Goon
Goon
Posts: 627
Joined: April 14, 2016

Post Post #613 (ISO) » Sat May 14, 2016 4:06 am

Post by heuristically_alone »

In post 556, Thor665 wrote:
In post 555, AlpacaAlpaca wrote:So one town lynch and 2 town kills day one. This isn't turning out well
Thanks for that update, I was unaware of this information.
We all appreciate the sarcasm
User avatar
heuristically_alone
heuristically_alone
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
heuristically_alone
Goon
Goon
Posts: 627
Joined: April 14, 2016

Post Post #614 (ISO) » Sat May 14, 2016 4:11 am

Post by heuristically_alone »

In post 610, Thor665 wrote:Did you forget that Cerberus claimed page one? Even if Cerb didn't care about the game, we shouldn't just vote out someone that is more likely townI didn't forget it, I still never read it - why do you think it makes him more likely town than not?
I find that when someone claims immediately right at the beginning and there is no counter claim, they are most likely town. Would you disagree?
User avatar
Dwlee99
Dwlee99
They/them
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Dwlee99
They/them
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 25777
Joined: July 3, 2015
Pronoun: They/them
Location: Northeast USA

Post Post #615 (ISO) » Sat May 14, 2016 4:13 am

Post by Dwlee99 »

VOTE: heuristically_alone
I prefer they, thanks :)
User avatar
Nosferatu
Nosferatu
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Nosferatu
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7726
Joined: June 23, 2015
Location: Geek U.S.A.

Post Post #616 (ISO) » Sat May 14, 2016 4:35 am

Post by Nosferatu »

In post 614, heuristically_alone wrote:
In post 610, Thor665 wrote:Did you forget that Cerberus claimed page one? Even if Cerb didn't care about the game, we shouldn't just vote out someone that is more likely townI didn't forget it, I still never read it - why do you think it makes him more likely town than not?
I find that when someone claims immediately right at the beginning and there is no counter claim, they are most likely town. Would you disagree?
Ascetic is a modifier, not alignment indicative at all. Scum can have a modifier as well as town.
BRASIL BRASIL BRASIL BRRRRR
last.fm
gtkas
User avatar
Staeg
Staeg
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Staeg
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3154
Joined: April 19, 2011
Location: Latvia

Post Post #617 (ISO) » Sat May 14, 2016 4:46 am

Post by Staeg »

In post 614, heuristically_alone wrote:
In post 610, Thor665 wrote:Did you forget that Cerberus claimed page one? Even if Cerb didn't care about the game, we shouldn't just vote out someone that is more likely townI didn't forget it, I still never read it - why do you think it makes him more likely town than not?
I find that when someone claims immediately right at the beginning and there is no counter claim, they are most likely town. Would you disagree?
Do you know what an ascetic is?
sa vrede?
User avatar
Aristophanes
Aristophanes
He/Him
Mr. Blue Sky
User avatar
User avatar
Aristophanes
He/Him
Mr. Blue Sky
Mr. Blue Sky
Posts: 17170
Joined: December 30, 2014
Pronoun: He/Him
Location: Hiding from Actual Cannibal Shia Lebeouf

Post Post #618 (ISO) » Sat May 14, 2016 4:48 am

Post by Aristophanes »

^ Lol
Half meme, Half real, All Aristophanes ;)
- Jingle
Ari has appeared way too competent for me to even pretend to know what they're thinking
- MooseEatsBear on discord mafia
it wouldn’t be an ari sig unless it takes up half the screen on mobile - Vonflare
User avatar
Dwlee99
Dwlee99
They/them
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Dwlee99
They/them
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 25777
Joined: July 3, 2015
Pronoun: They/them
Location: Northeast USA

Post Post #619 (ISO) » Tue May 17, 2016 1:59 am

Post by Dwlee99 »

HI OK GAME IS BACK I CAN END THIS WITHDRAWL
I prefer they, thanks :)
User avatar
Thor665
Thor665
Papa Smurf
User avatar
User avatar
Thor665
Papa Smurf
Papa Smurf
Posts: 33454
Joined: October 11, 2009
Location: Venice, FL

Post Post #620 (ISO) » Tue May 17, 2016 2:12 am

Post by Thor665 »

In post 611, Nosferatu wrote:No. There are townies that just act in anti town ways. Policy lynches are just lynches for a reason other than the content of their posts. Something better if avoided.
So we can agree that the player plays in a way that hurts town when they are town, and hurts town when they are scum.
I fail to see how the idea of lynching them then doesn't pay attention to the content of their posts.
If a player is hurting my wincon, then they're a good lynch, yeah?
In post 614, heuristically_alone wrote:I find that when someone claims immediately right at the beginning and there is no counter claim, they are most likely town. Would you disagree?
Depends on the claim.
I am willing to accept that they are ascetic if you'd like - but I don't see why that should inform me of their alignment. Clarify?
User avatar
The Daily Days
The Daily Days
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
The Daily Days
Townie
Townie
Posts: 51
Joined: April 7, 2016

Post Post #621 (ISO) » Tue May 17, 2016 2:42 am

Post by The Daily Days »

Official Vote Count


Cerberus v666
(2): camntsuki, Thor665
heuristically_alone
(2): Staeg, Dwlee99
AlpacaAlpaca
(1): Florestan
camntsuki
(1): Cerberus v666

Not Voting
(4): Nosferatu, heuristically_alone, AlpacaAlpaca, Aristophanes

With 10 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

Yay~ we're back. It appears the server is once again safe from tiger attacks. Adding 2 days to deadline.
User avatar
Nosferatu
Nosferatu
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Nosferatu
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7726
Joined: June 23, 2015
Location: Geek U.S.A.

Post Post #622 (ISO) » Tue May 17, 2016 3:00 am

Post by Nosferatu »

In post 620, Thor665 wrote:
In post 611, Nosferatu wrote:No. There are townies that just act in anti town ways. Policy lynches are just lynches for a reason other than the content of their posts. Something better if avoided.
So we can agree that the player plays in a way that hurts town when they are town, and hurts town when they are scum.
I fail to see how the idea of lynching them then doesn't pay attention to the content of their posts.
If a player is hurting my wincon, then they're a good lynch, yeah?
not exactly, I'm not saying you shouldn't policy lynch. If kaintepes was in this game, I'd be all for lynching him. My argument is they shouldn't be prioritized over an actual lynch.
BRASIL BRASIL BRASIL BRRRRR
last.fm
gtkas
User avatar
Cerberus v666
Cerberus v666
Let's Be Reasonable
User avatar
User avatar
Cerberus v666
Let's Be Reasonable
Let's Be Reasonable
Posts: 5479
Joined: November 14, 2014

Post Post #623 (ISO) » Tue May 17, 2016 3:08 am

Post by Cerberus v666 »

In post 622, Nosferatu wrote:
In post 620, Thor665 wrote:
In post 611, Nosferatu wrote:No. There are townies that just act in anti town ways. Policy lynches are just lynches for a reason other than the content of their posts. Something better if avoided.
So we can agree that the player plays in a way that hurts town when they are town, and hurts town when they are scum.
I fail to see how the idea of lynching them then doesn't pay attention to the content of their posts.
If a player is hurting my wincon, then they're a good lynch, yeah?
not exactly, I'm not saying you shouldn't policy lynch. If kaintepes was in this game, I'd be all for lynching him. My argument is they shouldn't be prioritized over an actual lynch.
What is the actual lynch you're suggesting we prioritize over camn?
GTK a me, currently live, this may be your only chance!
viewtopic.php?f=61&t=78521&p=10688009#p10688009
User avatar
camntsuki
camntsuki
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
camntsuki
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1098
Joined: January 11, 2016

Post Post #624 (ISO) » Tue May 17, 2016 3:44 am

Post by camntsuki »

I'm back, bitches!

Listen- you know what's anti-town? camntsuki getting nightkilled night 1. So we avoid it.
That said- everyone talking about a policy lynch or whatever...
THIS GAME HAS A VIG.


I love policy lynches. Like for lurking. Or if you don't have an avatar. But
NOT IN A GAME WITH A VIG
.


So somebody needs to get their head out of the sand and get back to lynching people you think are actually scum.

VOTE: Cerberus v666


Also, come on, dude. Get an avatar.
Last edited by The Daily Days on Wed May 18, 2016 7:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

Return to “Completed Mini Theme Games”