Here, you also disliked drmy's jump on your OWN BANDWAGON was bad. But nope, gotta lynch him cause he's lurking!!!In post 49, Raskolnikov wrote:Simply put scum generally don't play with balls like this. Actually sorting this out so early is a mess because I have to consider ego and because town lying for reactions is hard to tell apart from scum lying for malicious purposes.
drmy's jump on is pretty shit though.
I said it was a bad vote based on shallow reasoning. I don't like how you make it out as though that's completely unsubstantial.In post 419, Transcend wrote:Okay, I did the same thing. I pressured him for being inactive and got nothing out of it. But you're saying he's your top scumread just for being inactive. And I brought up that you said his vote on Zach was bad, and you've said nothing about that.
In post 425, Transcend wrote:Here, you also disliked drmy's jump on your OWN BANDWAGON was bad. But nope, gotta lynch him cause he's lurking!!!
Eat rope imo.
In post 418, Raskolnikov wrote:You're misunderstanding me if you think him being my top scumread means I'm super confident on him and would definitely lynch him this moment.
The inactivity makes it really difficult to be certain and as of now I really just want to pressure people and get something actually substantial!
well you seem sensible to realize that.In post 424, inspectorscout wrote:depends on who you ask, scumreads right now are extremely personal at this moment, i think nearly everyone is currently accused of scumminess
Interesting your mindset is so into lynching at this point as opposed to wagoning and applying pressure, especially given the current gamestate.In post 425, Transcend wrote: Here, you also disliked drmy's jump on your OWN BANDWAGON was bad. But nope, gotta lynch him cause he's lurking!!!
Eat rope imo.
lol.In post 430, inspectorscout wrote:currently im thinking about jarjar, trivium and one of the above kiddos that are fighting, raskol/transcend. not sure which one, though. maybe both and its a cool scum on scum fight
You can't say that. I've pressured/wagoned people this game. I'm just in a more aggressive mood right now so my tunnel on you is more harsh as opposed to others.In post 431, Raskolnikov wrote:Interesting your mindset is so into lynching at this point as opposed to wagoning and applying pressure, especially given the current gamestate.In post 425, Transcend wrote: Here, you also disliked drmy's jump on your OWN BANDWAGON was bad. But nope, gotta lynch him cause he's lurking!!!
Eat rope imo.
In post 435, Transcend wrote:You can't say that. I've pressured/wagoned people this game. I'm just in a more aggressive mood right now so my tunnel on you is more harsh as opposed to others.
In post 432, Raskolnikov wrote:Not what you said but in how you're choosing to interpret me here.
I think a fair question would be why do you think he's town? I haven't seen a town move from him
because I scumread himIn post 380, Tommy wrote:Don't like that, but I'm town-reading you overall.In post 359, Dunnstral wrote:Don't agree with them being scum based on what was provided, but could see it with more information
Why?
Why?
dude you should, I did its really not that bad. Most of it is just Dunn and Zach bickering about Rask anywayIn post 386, nnn_thekushmountains wrote:oh I definitely won't be reading page 1-16 in it's entirety.
What do you mean there's no evidence he's figuring out the game? Can you read his mind? Give him a pass for now imoIn post 414, Raskolnikov wrote:He's been popping in the whole game throwing shade at people and asking lazy questions.In post 409, Transcend wrote:So I iso'd literally all of Shotty's posts, and you think this is the scummiest candidate? Tell me something I'm missing if you think this slot is scummy. It just looks like you're being opportunistic towards this guy. And then your vote on Blue Yoshi is also ick.
Mostly from a motivational standpoint I see him intentionally being useless/active lurking; no followup on the questions or conclusions drawn or really any pushing.
No evidence to suggest he's figuring the game out and with half of his questions being on fluff and dumb technical-details I really doubt it's a priority either.
JarJar, ISO Jar JarIn post 422, nnn_thekushmountains wrote:oh I won't be replacing out.
Who is the scummiest person for me to filter?
Welcome backIn post 445, Transcend wrote:Anyways: People were V/LA for Memorial Day most likely. The ante for this game and its content should be upped a bit. Kudos to everyone for not replacing out yet.
PEDIT: Fine. VOTE: JarJarDrinks
Still don't feel good about Rask but this needs pressure.
dude pull your shit together lmaoIn post 446, nnn_thekushmountains wrote:what is "LAMIST"?
In post 109, JarJarDrinks wrote:So now he's worried about the people defending him. Even though he voted DRMY for jumping on him. So I guess it's scummy to vote for Rask and it's scummy to defend him?In post 77, Raskolnikov wrote:Ironically everyone defending me for no reason is more worrying that dunn possibly confbias tunneling here.
In post 329, JarJarDrinks wrote:VOTE: inspectorscout
I just read his ISO and so much fluff. There's like barely any opinions on anyone. And when he finally does give his reads:it's basically townreading the guy that everyone is townreading and then weak-ass scumreads on 3 of the people that everyone else is suspecting.Spoiler:
And like all of his scum reads are "This guy seems like scum but IDK maybe not."
Just a list of strange reads there. WHy the F does he mention Kush as a null read for making ONE post but then he lumps everyone else in the nulls saying "Yah everyone i didnt mention is here too because they didnt post enough yet or just cuz i have absolutely no idea about them yet"?