In post 18, Frozen Angel wrote:lucky I guess?
In a nutshell, yes.
In post 18, Frozen Angel wrote:lucky I guess?
I don't care how others used this and I think we're not talking about the same "reaction testing" here.In post 26, kuribo wrote:i mean, i really really REALLY don't want to bring up camn's apartment because I was in that game for like two hours before ragequitting
but that's a pretty good example of the kind of bullshit that passes for reaction test
including up to AFTER MY SLOT DIED, the guy that did it saying "how did that slot flip town?!"
yeah, there's a reason my slot died before yours, stick your reaction tests where the sun don't shine, bub.
Its the "Reaction Test"In post 32, zMuffinMan wrote:it's bad because it introduces unnecessary elements into the game
if you can analyse someone's posts as well as you say you can, then you can do it without "reaction tests"
nah its not lieing. and the second part is not a very deep way for looking into what I mean.In post 40, Accountant wrote:when you say something that doesn't reflect your true thoughts about the game specifically to make someone else react to that thing that you said, in the hopes of discerning his alignment from his reaction
thats not what anyone else is doing as far as I see...In post 46, Accountant wrote:that's not reaction testing though that's just normal post analysis