This is hilarious.In post 45, Smithereens wrote:VOTE: KuroiXHF
I actually agree completely. It was a joke, and then he killed the joke by taking it too far, wouldn't shut up about the joke, and now it's no longer a joke.
Not a joke = serious.
Well but I explained why I vote for Karnos, right? Beside, this is the first time I played this setup. I do not know if claiming scum is indeed beneficial for town (ergo I say IMO there's no point), but there might as well be.In post 39, Almost50 wrote:yet you are voting a third person who did not claim scum!!In post 38, sad1492 wrote:IMO it is likely that everyone trying to claim scum actually is scum. As town I see little to no reason why I would pull off such gambit.
I've been finding it funny. So has Almost. So has House. Everyone found it funny, well... except you.In post 51, Smithereens wrote:when you're still harping it on when it's not funny it's obviously not humour you see?
I can imagine myself as scum having a fun time calling myself scum so I feel comfortable killing based on that alone.
Correct me if I'm wrong, your reason for voting Karnos was the suspicion that he organised the bandwagon? And you're saying that this vote is serious and ergo your reasons are sufficient...?In post 53, sad1492 wrote:Well but I explained why I vote for Karnos, right? Beside, this is the first time I played this setup. I do not know if claiming scum is indeed beneficial for town (ergo I say IMO there's no point), but there might as well be.In post 39, Almost50 wrote:yet you are voting a third person who did not claim scum!!In post 38, sad1492 wrote:IMO it is likely that everyone trying to claim scum actually is scum. As town I see little to no reason why I would pull off such gambit.
In other word, I'm being confused as fuck of how this setup works; before playing here my origin was Epicmafia.com, where practivally every setup have a *best-town sided strategy*
I told him to signup. Where do I collect my $100 incentive for bringing a new player over?In post 22, Smithereens wrote: How did you know he's new? Scum slip of information much.
Wow. What a jerk.In post 60, karnos wrote:I told him to signup. Where do I collect my $100 incentive for bringing a new player over?In post 22, Smithereens wrote: How did you know he's new? Scum slip of information much.
Being a jerk doesn't make one scum. Town can be jerks, too.In post 61, KuroiXHF wrote:Wow. What a jerk.In post 60, karnos wrote:I told him to signup. Where do I collect my $100 incentive for bringing a new player over?In post 22, Smithereens wrote: How did you know he's new? Scum slip of information much.
VOTE: Smithereens
I don't quite follow you here... yes, I vote Karnos because perhaps he organised the bw, but about how legitimate (or sufficient) my reason is differs from people to people. To me, after all this is still just the beginning of the game so I shall cling to every smallest bit of information available.In post 59, Smithereens wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, your reason for voting Karnos was the suspicion that he organised the bandwagon? And you're saying that this vote is serious and ergo your reasons are sufficient...?In post 53, sad1492 wrote:Well but I explained why I vote for Karnos, right? Beside, this is the first time I played this setup. I do not know if claiming scum is indeed beneficial for town (ergo I say IMO there's no point), but there might as well be.In post 39, Almost50 wrote:yet you are voting a third person who did not claim scum!!In post 38, sad1492 wrote:IMO it is likely that everyone trying to claim scum actually is scum. As town I see little to no reason why I would pull off such gambit.
In other word, I'm being confused as fuck of how this setup works; before playing here my origin was Epicmafia.com, where practivally every setup have a *best-town sided strategy*
In post 41, Ranger wrote:{karnos, hiplop}
{JaeReed, Charloux, Kuroi}
{Creature, Almost50}
{Chip Butty}
{Bellaphant}
{LicketyQuickety}
Explain these lists, please.In post 42, Ranger wrote:{karnos, hiplop}
{JaeReed, Charloux, Kuroi}
{Creature, Almost50}
{Chip Butty, Smithereens, Kop, pistachi0n}
{sad}
{Bellaphant, DixC}
{House}
{LicketyQuickety}
Your vote has all the appearance of being serious, so I was just asking how serious you were being. Imo thinking that Karnos organised a bandwagon prior to the game start is a bit farfetched to be a serious vote.In post 65, sad1492 wrote:I don't quite follow you here... yes, I vote Karnos because perhaps he organised the bw, but about how legitimate (or sufficient) my reason is differs from people to people. To me, after all this is still just the beginning of the game so I shall cling to every smallest bit of information available.In post 59, Smithereens wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong, your reason for voting Karnos was the suspicion that he organised the bandwagon? And you're saying that this vote is serious and ergo your reasons are sufficient...?
Do you find my vote at anywhere unconstructive?
"It was humours"In post 61, KuroiXHF wrote:Wow. What a jerk.In post 60, karnos wrote:I told him to signup. Where do I collect my $100 incentive for bringing a new player over?In post 22, Smithereens wrote: How did you know he's new? Scum slip of information much.
VOTE: Smithereens
Which of his two posts read scummy to you and why?
The names at the top of the lists are winners, the names at the bottom are losers.
I didn't ask you.In post 73, karnos wrote:The names at the top of the lists are winners, the names at the bottom are losers.
