In post 320, House wrote:Yume's role is tailor made for Traitor, who is part of group scum but not in the scum PT. The Traitor has to help scum mislynch town and drive wagons away from buddies, which is hard to do when they don't know who their buddies are.
So the Traitor has to hunt scum, but for scummy reasons.
Neighborizing scum allows the Traitor to communicate with their scum team and gives 2 members of scum day talk.
After the Traitor neighborizes their scum mate, they can use their second ability to kill a town PR by drawing night actions, furthering the scum win con.
Yume admitted to being a loner. Know who else is a loner? The Traitor.
Apricity, House mentioned a killing role - which is where I got the vig from. Traitors are rarely ever combined with killing powers.
Yeah, you didn't read properly. House's whole reason for voting Yume was based on the premise that her role claim fit with the mafia traitor role. Part of Yume's role that she claimed mentioned killing the second person attempting to target her with an action or something like that. I could go find the post link but I think you should read again.
In post 395, Frozen Angel wrote:Apricity why lynching a mafia traitor is not in favor of us?
although I'm not at all convinced about existing one in a micro.
Also I explained this, but I suppose I can do it again. Your second line there has to do with it too. First of all, I feel highly uncomfortable lynching Yume just because House thinks her claimed abilities line up with mafia traitor. If she's actually town which I think is far more likely, then all we've done is mislynch. Even if she's the traitor, she wouldn't count as groupscum, meaning we can win without lynching her if we lynch all the groupscum, meaning that takes less priority over finding groupscum.
@House even with a PM she wouldn't be groupscum; she wouldn't be able to do the NK. The only possible benefit to killing her now that I see, if she's a traitor, would be your first point about obtaining a majority. And the whole thing hinges on whether or not she's a traitor to begin with, which I'm not ready to believe.
In post 406, Apricity wrote:Which you wouldn't have needed to ask if you had in fact read properly =.=
FA, I haven't tried searching up the image myself, hold on...
Here's the interesting thing about questions. You can read something properly and not understand it. Your brain does not work the same way that my brain works and therefore, does not process the information it the same way.
That's why I asked a question: to clarify.
Want to stop asking mundane questions and start... uh, y'know - being useful?
Mod notes: Sorry about this weekend, I was on mobile and I didn't anticipate this much posting. In the future I'll try to have an updated votecount every few pages, even if it's not pretty.[/area]
Last edited by Something_Smart on Mon Jun 20, 2016 3:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
