Open 643: Kill All Townies! (Game Over)

House · Post Post #275 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 7:47 am

Much lulz were had.

House · Post Post #276 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 7:49 am

In post 259, Charloux wrote:@LQ: You look really stupid right now
Hate the game not the gamers.

@Charloux:

You look like gloating scum.

VOTE: Charloux

House · Post Post #277 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 7:50 am

In post 262, Charloux wrote:Just take a day off and cool down. Blind rage never helped anyone.
UNVOTE: LQ. There, L-2

Oh, you knew my gambit. Gotcha.

UNVOTE:

KuroiXHF · Post Post #278 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 8:02 am

In post 272, House wrote:
In post 271, KuroiXHF wrote:I'm pretty sure LQ is already lynched.
I was already on the wagon when I "hammered".

Huh. Fooled me.

In post 273, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 266, House wrote:
In post 258, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Terrible vote.
Lol.
Admittedly, its not as bad as if it was a hammer, but its still a pretty bad vote.

P-Edit: K, so it was the hammer. I stand by my statement that it was a terrible vote then.

I feel stupid.[/quote]

Yet we're

retards.

Maybe you should think before you use derogatory terminology.

House · Post Post #279 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 8:09 am

In post 278, KuroiXHF wrote:
In post 272, House wrote:
In post 271, KuroiXHF wrote:I'm pretty sure LQ is already lynched.
I was already on the wagon when I "hammered".
Huh. Fooled me.

I thought you were playing along. Not crazy about your response if you thought it was a real hammer.

Bellaphant · Post Post #280 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:51 am

....can you explain how that was a townie reaction to a hammer?

like, charl looks terrible and is prolly scum, but I'm still down for lynching lq.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #281 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:57 am

In post 280, Bellaphant wrote:....can you explain how that was a townie reaction to a hammer?

like, charl looks terrible and is prolly scum, but I'm still down for lynching lq.

If your read on me is based on meta, you don't have enough meta on me. I think last time I played a game with you was in 2015. But if it is based on meta, I'd like to hear your reasons.

JaeReed · Post Post #282 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 11:24 am

In post 280, Bellaphant wrote:....can you explain how that was a townie reaction to a hammer?

This. I found some of those unvotes sus as f for this reasoning.

Disagree about Charl, he's a nullish for me right now.

KuroiXHF · Post Post #283 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 11:28 am

Whether I agree with Charloux is irrelevant. I think he's town.

Charloux · Post Post #284 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 11:42 am

In post 280, Bellaphant wrote: like, charl looks terrible and is prolly scum, but I'm still down for lynching lq.

Explain the logic of not voting for prolly scum, but rather for LQ? Or you don't really care who gets lynched?

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #285 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 11:47 am

In post 282, JaeReed wrote:
In post 280, Bellaphant wrote:....can you explain how that was a townie reaction to a hammer?
This. I found some of those unvotes sus as f for this reasoning.

Disagree about Charl, he's a nullish for me right now.

You can't be serious. All you have are hypotheticals on why I am Scum. Nothing tangible at all.

House · Post Post #286 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 11:50 am

In post 280, Bellaphant wrote:....can you explain how that was a townie reaction to a hammer?

like, charl looks terrible and is prolly scum, but I'm still down for lynching lq.

I don't see scum really get pissed off after a hammer the way LQ was. I don't really give a shot about any "so what, scum can fake blah blah blah" go-to bullshit that people always fall back on when they're stuck in their confbias.

I'll ask you what I'm still asking hiplop about me... if Charloux is scum, why aren't you voting them?

JaeReed · Post Post #287 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 11:50 am

In post 284, Charloux wrote:
In post 280, Bellaphant wrote: like, charl looks terrible and is prolly scum, but I'm still down for lynching lq.
Explain the logic of not voting for prolly scum, but rather for LQ? Or you don't really care who gets lynched?

She's voting definite scum rather than probable scum. She's gotta care who gets lynched no matter her alignment. What you brought up is a null point and a misrep.

Don't think it was intentional, just saying read the posts :p

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #288 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 11:55 am

In post 287, JaeReed wrote:
In post 284, Charloux wrote:
In post 280, Bellaphant wrote: like, charl looks terrible and is prolly scum, but I'm still down for lynching lq.
Explain the logic of not voting for prolly scum, but rather for LQ? Or you don't really care who gets lynched?
She's voting definite scum rather than probable scum. She's gotta care who gets lynched no matter her alignment. What you brought up is a null point and a misrep.

Don't think it was intentional, just saying read the posts :p

How?
HOW?!?!
am I definite Scum?

VOTE: Jae

JaeReed · Post Post #289 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 11:55 am

Btw, I'm thinking that scum probably don't want to lynch scum at this point but they still want to find them. Scum need to narrow the town pool. Hence the unvotes on LQ.

His anger is NAI from how I'm seeing it. Can't decide if House is scum or bad town.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #290 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 11:57 am

In post 289, JaeReed wrote:Btw, I'm thinking that scum probably don't want to lynch scum at this point but they still want to find them. Scum need to narrow the town pool. Hence the unvotes on LQ.

His anger is NAI from how I'm seeing it. Can't decide if House is scum or bad town.

What have you actually done that is a town agenda? You keep ignoring me. You keep ignoring others to. That is not how this game is played. I seriously hope you eat rope because your self righteous playstyle is infuriating.

KuroiXHF · Post Post #291 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 11:58 am

Alright. I'm going to try this from a different direction...

LQ, who are your

town

reads?

Almost50 · Post Post #292 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 12:11 pm

In post 287, JaeReed wrote:
In post 284, Charloux wrote:
In post 280, Bellaphant wrote: like, charl looks terrible and is prolly scum, but I'm still down for lynching lq.
Explain the logic of not voting for prolly scum, but rather for LQ? Or you don't really care who gets lynched?
She's voting definite scum rather than probable scum.

I'm sorry, but I'm not sure who you're referring to here. Who is "she"?

Almost50 · Post Post #293 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 12:14 pm

In post 286, House wrote:I don't see scum really get pissed off after a hammer the way LQ was.

I've seen them outraged with excessive swearing and name calling insisting they were town for more than an hour until the thread actually got locked for a VC and a flip.

P.S. "Them" is in reference to scum in general, not particularly LQ, as I've never played with him before.

KuroiXHF · Post Post #294 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 12:14 pm

I asked myself the same question, but probably Bellaphant.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #295 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 12:17 pm

Town reads:

Almost50
House
Chip Butty
Smithereens
DixC
sad1492

KuroiXHF · Post Post #296 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 12:18 pm

How does someone with four posts (Sad) ring you as a town post?

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #297 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 12:30 pm

In post 296, KuroiXHF wrote:How does someone with four posts (Sad) ring you as a town post?

Because of their stance on who they are voting for. Its not set in stone by any means.

Chip Butty · Post Post #298 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 12:47 pm

In post 293, Almost50 wrote:
In post 286, House wrote:I don't see scum really get pissed off after a hammer the way LQ was.
I've seen them outraged with excessive swearing and name calling insisting they were town for more than an hour until the thread actually got locked for a VC and a flip.

P.S. "Them" is in reference to scum in general, not particularly LQ, as I've never played with him before.

I did this as Town just today. I don't find the temper display as particularly AI - sometimes it IS intensely frustrating when those Town morons just refuse to see that you are Town too. On the other hand, when the temper display is a first response, it DOES look pretty bad - I think Town will resort to reason first and persist with that for a long while, but might finally get frustrated. LQ's response here was of temper-first variety, and does look scummy. Also, there was about an hour-and-a-half between House's fakehammer and LQ's first response, which means he had plenty of time to plan that response. But who knows? maybe he had just logged in and lashed out when he saw what had happened. He did seem very slow to pick up on the fakehammer when it was revealed following Charl's unvote, but that can be faked too, I guess. So, all-in-all, I don't think LQ's fakehammer response gets him too much in the way of Town credit.

He did do one interesting thing during that episode, though, which was to post Charl's ISO and point out how terrible it was. He's quite right there, and Charl's posts since have not helped (I'll deal with those in a separate post). I'm thinking these guys might be scum from opposing factions. I could prob vote either -overall, LQ does look terrible, and that ISO of Charl just shows he knows what to do to find scum when he needs to. I'll make up my mind who to vote for after looking at Charl's updated ISO again. Charl is a guy who I have read as scummy when he was Town in another game, though (Newbie 1704) - Jae, hiplop: you were in that, too.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #299 (ISO) » Mon Jun 20, 2016 12:55 pm

In post 298, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 293, Almost50 wrote:
In post 286, House wrote:I don't see scum really get pissed off after a hammer the way LQ was.
I've seen them outraged with excessive swearing and name calling insisting they were town for more than an hour until the thread actually got locked for a VC and a flip.

P.S. "Them" is in reference to scum in general, not particularly LQ, as I've never played with him before.
I did this as Town just today. I don't find the temper display as particularly AI - sometimes it IS intensely frustrating when those Town morons just refuse to see that you are Town too. On the other hand, when the temper display is a first response, it DOES look pretty bad - I think Town will resort to reason first and persist with that for a long while, but might finally get frustrated. LQ's response here was of temper-first variety, and does look scummy. Also, there was about an hour-and-a-half between House's fakehammer and LQ's first response, which means he had plenty of time to plan that response. But who knows? maybe he had just logged in and lashed out when he saw what had happened. He did seem very slow to pick up on the fakehammer when it was revealed following Charl's unvote, but that can be faked too, I guess. So, all-in-all, I don't think LQ's fakehammer response gets him too much in the way of Town credit.

He did do one interesting thing during that episode, though, which was to post Charl's ISO and point out how terrible it was. He's quite right there, and Charl's posts since have not helped (I'll deal with those in a separate post). I'm thinking these guys might be scum from opposing factions. I could prob vote either -overall, LQ does look terrible, and that ISO of Charl just shows he knows what to do to find scum when he needs to. I'll make up my mind who to vote for after looking at Charl's updated ISO again. Charl is a guy who I have read as scummy when he was Town in another game, though (Newbie 1704) - Jae, hiplop: you were in that, too.

I have no idea why you think Town would resort to reason first. I don't know where you are getting that at all. Here's what happened. I woke up and thought I saw a hammer on me for reasons yet to be stated other than "vibes" and concoctions dreamed up by people. I was slow to catch on that the hammer wasn't actually a hammer because I just don't expect people to make that play. The day is early which was another reason why I was furious that I was lynched with so much time on the clock yet.

And you are a Town read because you are not playing like an experienced player plays and inexperienced players are the easiest to read. Just FYI.