New York 196: My Game, My Flavor Mafia (Mafia Win)

AGar · Post Post #900 (ISO) » Sat Jun 25, 2016 3:41 pm

In post 719, Mirhawk wrote:
In post 671, Zachstralkita wrote:What point does it serve AGar to " forget" about Titus' scumgame? Sounds like bullshit.
Actually legit I am maybe a little worried about AGar.

I played with him before, but it was a long time ago and I can't remember if he felt this disconnected before.

I'm on my phone but let me reiterate

I MOVED FROM NORTH CAROLINA TO FUCKING FLORIDA.

implosion · Post Post #901 (ISO) » Sat Jun 25, 2016 3:42 pm

In post 897, Wake1 wrote:
In post 810, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 808, Zachstralkita wrote:Was that a serious mason claim...
Unfortunately. I obviously wasn't going to let her get lynched
but whatever
now
If you and Titus truly were Masons you wouldn't allow her to be lynched under any circumstances.

Is this seriously how you're reading this post?

Wake1 · Post Post #902 (ISO) » Sat Jun 25, 2016 3:42 pm

In post 855, Zachstralkita wrote:
In post 854, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 851, Zachstralkita wrote:
In post 849, Dunnstral wrote:I'm saying I would know if Titus was faking or buddying up to me, or at least wouldn't townread her right away but it's whatever

Why are you saying this as if it's a concern or ever was if Titus is your mason partner?

Because I'm explaining my meaning to Wake? What are your thoughts on Wake's recent actions

He's trying to find shit out. I kinda like it.

THANK YOU.

implosion · Post Post #903 (ISO) » Sat Jun 25, 2016 3:43 pm

Like, I'm willing to believe that you read that post and interpreted it that way, but when you saw that a claimed mason was claiming not to care if their partner was lynched, was your first instinct really "this confirms that they're not really masons" rather than "hm, I bet I misread that"?

Zachstralkita · Post Post #904 (ISO) » Sat Jun 25, 2016 3:44 pm

AGar wrote:
In post 719, Mirhawk wrote:
In post 671, Zachstralkita wrote:What point does it serve AGar to " forget" about Titus' scumgame? Sounds like bullshit.
Actually legit I am maybe a little worried about AGar.

I played with him before, but it was a long time ago and I can't remember if he felt this disconnected before.
I'm on my phone but let me reiterate

I MOVED FROM NORTH CAROLINA TO FUCKING FLORIDA.

Ayy.. It fucking sucks here I'm sorry

implosion wrote:
Wake wrote:Third, no one is confirmed unless by the game moderator.
The fact that they are not
technically
moderator-confirmed or that it is technically possible that they are gambiting is, in fact, not a reason to have either of them in the lynch pool today at all.

You, my friend however have just got yourself a rubber ducky and swimming trunks.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #905 (ISO) » Sat Jun 25, 2016 3:45 pm

In post 903, implosion wrote:Like, I'm willing to believe that you read that post and interpreted it that way, but when you saw that a claimed mason was claiming not to care if their partner was lynched, was your first instinct really "this confirms that they're not really masons" rather than "hm, I bet I misread that"?

It was clearly a mistake in reading as he has (apparently) done before, you don't have to draw more attention to yourself.

AGar · Post Post #906 (ISO) » Sat Jun 25, 2016 3:52 pm

I have other thoughts, that require Internet and my laptop, not my phone and also sobriety. But! The one scum game I have with Titus (that I haven't "conveniently" forgotten, contrary to how she'd like you to see it), she claimed a fucking ridiculously modified vig role to save solely herself, at the expense of handing over control of our scumkill to the fucking TOWN some nights, even though it could have literally confirmed two mafia at any given point. Lynch the "mason". More tomorrow after Bright House hooks up my shit.

Wake1 · Post Post #907 (ISO) » Sat Jun 25, 2016 3:53 pm

In post 903, implosion wrote:Like, I'm willing to believe that you read that post and interpreted it that way, but when you saw that a claimed mason was claiming not to care if their partner was lynched, was your first instinct really "this confirms that they're not really masons" rather than "hm, I bet I misread that"?

False.

I question why a claimed Mason would be like 'whatever' if their partner got lynched.

Questioning something does not mean I automatically believe or disbelieve it. Certainty Day 1 is always unwise.

Wake1 · Post Post #908 (ISO) » Sat Jun 25, 2016 3:55 pm

What I'd like to ascertain is whether or not Scum OR Town Titus is willing to fake-claim Mason to deceive Town.

If you know the answer Titus now would be a very good time to save me the trouble of searching.

Dunnstral · Post Post #909 (ISO) » Sat Jun 25, 2016 3:55 pm

I wasn't "whatever" to Titus getting lynched though

Are you saying I'd be letting Titus get lynched if we're both mafia, anyway?

You're grasping at nothing

Titus · Post Post #910 (ISO) » Sat Jun 25, 2016 4:00 pm

Implosion read timeline

Zach

Implosion pushes Zach early wanting him to be the "first wagon of the game" 84 81 says that Zach is scummy but has no reasons. 165 and surrounding are hostile to Zach questioning VLAs (which town shouldn't do anyway but the point here is Implosion is hostile to Zach. VOICE OF MOD: 236 is a filler question. 239 Zach is close to townreading Zach (doesn't say why). 258 implosion says that Zach's response in 227 is consistent with town being improperly wagoned. Again, no reason.

Titus

Implosion says that my behavior is how he'd expect town to react to Wake in 141. Again, this doesn't explain why. 150 says that I don't have a good reason to do what I do without being town. 292 agrees that what I'm doing is scumhunting. I'm a townread in 407, I'm still town, in a read wall. In 450 Zach has completely forgotten why I'm a townread and votes me in 465. Later he says that his townreads are voting me. I've never heard of townreads causing amnesia to that degree considering I'm one of the closest players that he's given reasons for in this game. 647 I'm suddenly town again based on a skim.

After I claim Masons, implosion suddenly doesn't like AGar's post on me, despite ignoring it the entire time.

This should get rope today. Then after him Sick of it. That's the only place where implosion doesn't mirror a popular opinion that I saw on my lookthrough.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #911 (ISO) » Sat Jun 25, 2016 4:01 pm

AGar wrote:I have other thoughts, that require Internet and my laptop, not my phone and also sobriety. But! The one scum game I have with Titus (that I haven't "conveniently" forgotten, contrary to how she'd like you to see it), she claimed a fucking ridiculously modified vig role to save solely herself, at the expense of handing over control of our scumkill to the fucking TOWN some nights, even though it could have literally confirmed two mafia at any given point. Lynch the "mason". More tomorrow after Bright House hooks up my shit.

I would vote Titus off the strength of this, but that would require Dunn to be scum as well and I don't really see Dunn hard defending a scumbuddy like that.

Almost50 · Post Post #912 (ISO) » Sat Jun 25, 2016 4:01 pm

In post 758, Dunnstral wrote:He's an RC alt

WHAT THE ... *Slaps forehead*

Zachstralkita · Post Post #913 (ISO) » Sat Jun 25, 2016 4:02 pm

In post 912, Almost50 wrote:
In post 758, Dunnstral wrote:He's an RC alt
WHAT THE ... *Slaps forehead*

Negative sir this is a false statement

Dunnstral · Post Post #914 (ISO) » Sat Jun 25, 2016 4:03 pm

In post 912, Almost50 wrote:
In post 758, Dunnstral wrote:He's an RC alt
WHAT THE ... *Slaps forehead*

LMAO

Titus · Post Post #915 (ISO) » Sat Jun 25, 2016 4:03 pm

In post 906, AGar wrote:I have other thoughts, that require Internet and my laptop, not my phone and also sobriety. But! The one scum game I have with Titus (that I haven't "conveniently" forgotten, contrary to how she'd like you to see it), she claimed a fucking ridiculously modified vig role to save solely herself, at the expense of handing over control of our scumkill to the fucking TOWN some nights, even though it could have literally confirmed two mafia at any given point. Lynch the "mason". More tomorrow after Bright House hooks up my shit.

Really, that game you're describing. You know what I did, I totally played little miss angel peacemaker while Wake and Sakura had pissy fights onto whether or not to leash or lynch the SK, riling them up while looking like an angel to avoid the conflict. That's what you conveniently left out of your posting.

Second, if you were actually paying attention that game, claiming a dayvig in no way gives town control over a nightkill.

Third, you'd have to be exceptionally dumb to seriously think I'd fakeclaim mason day 1 as scum.

Wake1 · Post Post #916 (ISO) » Sat Jun 25, 2016 4:05 pm

In post 911, Zachstralkita wrote:
AGar wrote:I have other thoughts, that require Internet and my laptop, not my phone and also sobriety. But! The one scum game I have with Titus (that I haven't "conveniently" forgotten, contrary to how she'd like you to see it), she claimed a fucking ridiculously modified vig role to save solely herself, at the expense of handing over control of our scumkill to the fucking TOWN some nights, even though it could have literally confirmed two mafia at any given point. Lynch the "mason". More tomorrow after Bright House hooks up my shit.
I would vote Titus off the strength of this, but that would require Dunn to be scum as well and I don't really see Dunn hard defending a scumbuddy like that.

One or both of them could be non-Mason Town.

Town has been known to fake-claim Mason status.

If they're Town but not Mason they're both still lying to us.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #917 (ISO) » Sat Jun 25, 2016 4:07 pm

In post 916, Wake1 wrote:
In post 911, Zachstralkita wrote:
AGar wrote:I have other thoughts, that require Internet and my laptop, not my phone and also sobriety. But! The one scum game I have with Titus (that I haven't "conveniently" forgotten, contrary to how she'd like you to see it), she claimed a fucking ridiculously modified vig role to save solely herself, at the expense of handing over control of our scumkill to the fucking TOWN some nights, even though it could have literally confirmed two mafia at any given point. Lynch the "mason". More tomorrow after Bright House hooks up my shit.
I would vote Titus off the strength of this, but that would require Dunn to be scum as well and I don't really see Dunn hard defending a scumbuddy like that.
One or both of them could be non-Mason Town.

Town has been known to fake-claim Mason status.

If they're Town but not Mason they're both still lying to us.

ok well them fakeclaiming is bad in this position (see my sig image)

Dunnstral · Post Post #918 (ISO) » Sat Jun 25, 2016 4:09 pm

I wouldn't fake claim, no worries

Zach don't respond to this

Zachstralkita · Post Post #919 (ISO) » Sat Jun 25, 2016 4:09 pm

In post 918, Dunnstral wrote:I wouldn't fake claim, no worries

Zach don't respond to this

Mandatory.

Dunnstral · Post Post #920 (ISO) » Sat Jun 25, 2016 4:09 pm

[countdown]0.00[/countdown][/countdown]

In post 916, Wake1 wrote:
In post 911, Zachstralkita wrote:
AGar wrote:I have other thoughts, that require Internet and my laptop, not my phone and also sobriety. But! The one scum game I have with Titus (that I haven't "conveniently" forgotten, contrary to how she'd like you to see it), she claimed a fucking ridiculously modified vig role to save solely herself, at the expense of handing over control of our scumkill to the fucking TOWN some nights, even though it could have literally confirmed two mafia at any given point. Lynch the "mason". More tomorrow after Bright House hooks up my shit.

Meanwhile: Vote on me for something that doesn't make sense
I would vote Titus off the strength of this, but that would require Dunn to be scum as well and I don't really see Dunn hard defending a scumbuddy like that.
One or both of them could be non-Mason Town.

Town has been known to fake-claim Mason status.

If they're Town but not Mason they're both still lying to us.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #921 (ISO) » Sat Jun 25, 2016 4:11 pm

Dunnstral wrote:[countdown]0.00[/countdown][/countdown]
In post 916, Wake1 wrote:
In post 911, Zachstralkita wrote:
AGar wrote:I have other thoughts, that require Internet and my laptop, not my phone and also sobriety. But! The one scum game I have with Titus (that I haven't "conveniently" forgotten, contrary to how she'd like you to see it), she claimed a fucking ridiculously modified vig role to save solely herself, at the expense of handing over control of our scumkill to the fucking TOWN some nights, even though it could have literally confirmed two mafia at any given point. Lynch the "mason". More tomorrow after Bright House hooks up my shit.

Meanwhile: Vote on me for something that doesn't make sense
I would vote Titus off the strength of this, but that would require Dunn to be scum as well and I don't really see Dunn hard defending a scumbuddy like that.
One or both of them could be non-Mason Town.

Town has been known to fake-claim Mason status.

If they're Town but not Mason they're both still lying to us.

How much have you had to drink at this point

Almost50 · Post Post #922 (ISO) » Sat Jun 25, 2016 4:11 pm

In post 760, Dunnstral wrote:I want both varsoon and Mirhawk dead.

In post 761, Dunnstral wrote:Investigative roles on zach or Shannon

WHY are you messing up almost ALL my town reads??

I've got Lapsa, Zach, Mirhawk, Performer, Varsoon & Titus at "likely town" by now. I also have Agar, shannon, Transcend & Boem as town leans, and it seems to me you only town read Titus & Boem of that whole lot. What gives? Are you purposefully being silly or are you playing on a higher level that evades me??

Oh, welp..

UNVOTE: Dunn

This can't be scum. If he was part of a team they would have all bussed him by now. If he was 3P he doesn't ever need so much attention and for the wrong reasons too (his reads suck big time). I'm not touching that slot with a pole until I know exactly where he's going with all this weirdness.

VOTE: PeregrineV

You come back here and actually say something FGS.

Wake1 · Post Post #923 (ISO) » Sat Jun 25, 2016 4:13 pm

In post 915, Titus wrote: Third,
you'd have to be exceptionally dumb
to seriously think I'd fakeclaim mason day 1 as scum.

Don't even.

I'm sure you and I in the past have tried ridiculous things that did pay off.

Nothing can be put past a skilled Scum player.

A skilled deceiver would want people to think he or she wouldn't/couldn't do something outrageous.

Titus · Post Post #924 (ISO) » Sat Jun 25, 2016 4:14 pm

In post 923, Wake1 wrote:
In post 915, Titus wrote: Third,
you'd have to be exceptionally dumb
to seriously think I'd fakeclaim mason day 1 as scum.
Don't even.

I'm sure you and I in the past have tried ridiculous things that did pay off.

Nothing can be put past a skilled Scum player.

A skilled deceiver would want people to think he or she wouldn't/couldn't do something outrageous.

This is a strawman.