and just as a note the trait isn't actually measuring intelligence or whatever;
it's a measure of 'intellectual curiosity'
to score low is to "prefer dealing with the world as it is, rarely considering abstract ideas"
to score high is to be "open to and intrigued by new ideas and love to explore them"
not just the speakeasy
but i didn't really think of that and would have excluded speakeasy posts if i had
i don't think anyone will ever read much less understand the data i sent to IBM
but i suppose i can't be sure
In post 63, Kublai Khan wrote:How does this not violate the privacy of those posting sensitive information in Speakeasy?
Whilst I know it's not being Googlecrawled, this is still the free-and-open internet. I don't think anyone should be under the illusion that the speakeasy is "Secret".
It's unfortunate that good oral sex excuses bad chemistry. - Korts
In post 63, Kublai Khan wrote:How does this not violate the privacy of those posting sensitive information in Speakeasy?
Whilst I know it's not being Googlecrawled, this is still the free-and-open internet. I don't think anyone should be under the illusion that the speakeasy is "Secret".
This is a private forum. Content posted in here, especially as it relates to people personally, should not be repeated or referred to outside the Speakeasy.
Huh, that's from the rules. I guess I just had a different expectation of what privacy/secrecy really means. How interesting.
It's unfortunate that good oral sex excuses bad chemistry. - Korts
In post 63, Kublai Khan wrote:How does this not violate the privacy of those posting sensitive information in Speakeasy?
Whilst I know it's not being Googlecrawled, this is still the free-and-open internet. I don't think anyone should be under the illusion that the speakeasy is "Secret".
This is a private forum. Content posted in here, especially as it relates to people personally, should not be repeated or referred to outside the Speakeasy.
Huh, that's from the rules. I guess I just had a different expectation of what privacy/secrecy really means. How interesting.
Well then I guess we shouldn't let anyone refer to the SUPP results at all since that happened in the Speakeasy
Or the Crummies
Or make titles referring to stuff that happened in the Speakeasy...
I think it's fair to say this rule is pretty outdated and inadequate, and to suddenly now act on it in regards to a thread seems questionable imo.
I don't think anyone is talking about acting on it. Maybe khan is. I'm agreeing with you that there shouldn't be an expectation of privacy, just a gentleman's agreement (for want of a better term) and a restriction on the googlebots.
There's so many holes in this system that to start patching them will be much less effective than just saying "it's under-the-radar, but certainly not private. Please be respectful of others, and maintain consideration for what you post."
It's unfortunate that good oral sex excuses bad chemistry. - Korts
In post 69, Oman wrote:I don't think anyone is talking about acting on it. Maybe khan is. I'm agreeing with you that there shouldn't be an expectation of privacy, just a gentleman's agreement (for want of a better term) and a restriction on the googlebots.
There's so many holes in this system that to start patching them will be much less effective than just saying "it's under-the-radar, but certainly not private. Please be respectful of others, and maintain consideration for what you post."
Yeah, that's generally it. The "don't talk about on-going games" is the most strict rule we have (and also I'm guessing that Psyche's quote-pulling isn't taking that into account but those quotes would already be public info), but the Speakeasy is intended to be sort of self-enclosed and semi-private. If someone wants a safe spot on-site to talk about being secretly gay, or transsexual, or something else, then Speakeasy is the forum to do it. People with Speakeasy access are expected to be honorable and not share other's secrets.
The 121 means that you came in 121nd out of the 146 people in the popularity contest.
Only playing in games at personal moderator and/or 50%+ playerlist request.
