New York 196: My Game, My Flavor Mafia (Mafia Win)

Dunnstral · Post Post #1675 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:48 pm

In post 1673, podoboq wrote:
In post 1666, Titus wrote:If you want to wagon him, something other than he was fakeclaiming to get someone lynched since he owned up to it before Dunn reached L minus 1.
Maybe I'm misreading this, but Zach hasn't owned up to anything.

HE WILL

Wake1 · Post Post #1676 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:49 pm

In post 1638, podoboq wrote:
In post 1632, Titus wrote:Scum have to shoot and tell US what they fear. They tell us about associatives.
Analyzing why mafia targeted who they targeted at night is ALWAYS wifom in my experience.

How much experience do you have offsite?

Titus · Post Post #1677 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:49 pm

In post 1673, podoboq wrote:
In post 1666, Titus wrote:If you want to wagon him, something other than he was fakeclaiming to get someone lynched since he owned up to it before Dunn reached L minus 1.
Maybe I'm misreading this, but Zach hasn't owned up to anything.

The unvote was a retraction of the mason CC. We said e retracted multiple times, no one said anything.

podoboq · Post Post #1678 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:50 pm

In post 1670, Dunnstral wrote:Zach isn't claiming mason so get that out of your head, we don't need to lynch in us 4.

We don't need to lynch in you four, we need to wagon in you four. Get one of the mason claims retracted.

And Zach has claimed mason, I don't care what semantic garbage you want to use to say that he didn't.

Dunnstral · Post Post #1679 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:50 pm

In post 1664, Zachstralkita wrote:Anyways, I'm not speaking further until certain variables align themselves in the right way for me.

wait what

By the way I'm legitimately interested in hearing how implosion is scum because I am willing to vote them if there's a good case.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #1680 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:51 pm

In post 1677, Titus wrote:
In post 1673, podoboq wrote:
In post 1666, Titus wrote:If you want to wagon him, something other than he was fakeclaiming to get someone lynched since he owned up to it before Dunn reached L minus 1.
Maybe I'm misreading this, but Zach hasn't owned up to anything.
The unvote was a retraction of the mason CC. We said e retracted multiple times, no one said anything.

There you go again with those assumptions!

podoboq · Post Post #1681 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:51 pm

In post 1676, Wake1 wrote:
In post 1638, podoboq wrote:
In post 1632, Titus wrote:Scum have to shoot and tell US what they fear. They tell us about associatives.
Analyzing why mafia targeted who they targeted at night is ALWAYS wifom in my experience.
How much experience do you have offsite?

I play mafia (we call it werewolf) in person every Friday of the week. Usually between 12 and 20 people.

Titus · Post Post #1682 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:52 pm

In post 1640, Transcend wrote:I honestly think if you're fake claiming you should just retract lol.

This whole mason debacle is clogging the whole chat and distracting us from other scum hunting that could be done.

In post 1641, Zachstralkita wrote:UNVOTE:

VOTE: Vedith

In post 1642, Transcend wrote:I knew it lol

Wake1 · Post Post #1683 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:52 pm

In post 1644, implosion wrote:
AGar wrote: Wait seriously? Masons are ridiculously strong town power, and you think there'd be 2 sets of 2 in a fucking 19 player game?

Hoooooly shit.
Two things.
One, yes, I do? It's 19 player game. There's gonna be a lot of power. I also disagree that they're a "ridiculously strong town power." I mean just fucking look at what's happening today with people not believing the mason claim. Two, I don't actually think this [read: i think varsoon/zach are BSing]

AGar wrote:Why put off for tomorrow what you can do today?
Because literally any of the like 10 reasons I gave in my last couple dozen posts. I'm not fucking explaining it again.

Titus wrote:This has got to be the stupidest game of mafia ever.

Scum please dayvig me and save me from this. This game is a chore given scum and dumb town spam.

Getting anyone to work together in this is impossible.
So fucking much.
Jesus christ.

No, I agree with Agar on this.

Two sets of Masons in a presumably-balanced Normal Game is a lot of Town power.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #1684 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:52 pm

Nah I retract, sorry Varsoon I think they might actually be masons so I made a judgement call.

Dunnstral · Post Post #1685 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:53 pm

In post 1684, Zachstralkita wrote:Nah I retract, sorry Varsoon I think they might actually be masons so I made a judgement call.

podoboq · Post Post #1686 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:53 pm

In post 1684, Zachstralkita wrote:Nah I retract, sorry Varsoon I think they might actually be masons so I made a judgement call.

UNVOTE:
OK, sweet, now we can move on.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #1687 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:54 pm

As much as I want them to not be town, they probably are.

Dunnstral · Post Post #1688 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:55 pm

In post 1687, Zachstralkita wrote:As much as I want them to not be town

Why

Can you respond to me on the implosion stuff

podoboq · Post Post #1689 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:56 pm

I'm going to go ahead and assume that Varsoon's macho claim was a joke, and remove it from my spreadsheet.

Wake1 · Post Post #1690 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:57 pm

In post 1687, Zachstralkita wrote:As much as I want them to not be town, they probably are.

Both Masons, or both Town?

Dunnstral · Post Post #1691 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:57 pm

In post 1689, podoboq wrote:remove it from my spreadsheet.

You've got a spr-

nevermind.

Titus · Post Post #1692 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:59 pm

In post 1690, Wake1 wrote:
In post 1687, Zachstralkita wrote:As much as I want them to not be town, they probably are.
Both Masons, or both Town?

Does it matter to anyone but scum?

Wake1 · Post Post #1693 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:59 pm

In post 1691, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 1689, podoboq wrote:remove it from my spreadsheet.
You've got a spr-

nevermind.

...it's not a bad idea.

Dunnstral, Peregrine's absence is bothering me. What do you feel?

Zachstralkita · Post Post #1694 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:00 pm

But we're not

1) doing one of your dumb lynches

2) lynching Varsoon

Dunnstral wrote:
In post 1687, Zachstralkita wrote:As much as I want them to not be town
Why

Can you respond to me on the implosion stuff

Wake88 wrote:
In post 1687, Zachstralkita wrote:As much as I want them to not be town, they probably are.
Both Masons, or both Town?

If I looked at all the facts and sincerely believed that they were scum I would have kept up the lynch. They're probably masons. I just need them to both stop doing that bullshit that they be doing.

If they flip scum I'm going to videotape myself shotgunning a random mixture of high blod pressure pills with a malt liquor and lithium chaser.

Dunnstral · Post Post #1695 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:01 pm

He's absent site-wide

Dunnstral · Post Post #1696 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:01 pm

So absolutely no clue

Wake1 · Post Post #1697 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:01 pm

In post 1692, Titus wrote:
In post 1690, Wake1 wrote:
In post 1687, Zachstralkita wrote:As much as I want them to not be town, they probably are.
Both Masons, or both Town?
Does it matter to anyone but scum?

It's a valid question.

Not only that, but I'm wanting to know if he's considered whether one of you two could be Scum going along with a gambit.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #1698 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:01 pm

BUT IF I BELIEVED THEY WOULD I WOULDNT HAVE UNVOTED ^^^^^^^^^

podoboq · Post Post #1699 (ISO) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 3:01 pm

In post 1691, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 1689, podoboq wrote:remove it from my spreadsheet.
You've got a spr-

nevermind.

I like to keep track of players' claims for easy access so I don't have to go digging if I forget. It's nothing more. I know Plotinus makes very elaborate spreadsheets of how players interact with one another and stuff, but mine is nothing like that. Just claims.