Mini Normal 1809: Game Over

Robbnva · Post Post #475 (ISO) » Mon Jul 04, 2016 4:05 am

I've already clarified with a site mod that my punishment will result in a mod kill and a temporary site ban. It's not egregious enough for a permanent ban.

What next?

Only people who benefit right now are scum. If you town you need to trust and believe I'm 100% serious right now.

House · Post Post #476 (ISO) » Mon Jul 04, 2016 4:06 am

In post 474, Grendel wrote:@Huose considering that you added the most fual to the Molla vs Rob flame you really shouldn't be talking.

I'm not the one making threats to ruin the game and providing the ultimatum to lynch in less than a day or regret it.

Rob crossed a line I never went anywhere near

He actually crossed TWO lines, but I can't discuss the other one because rules.

Robbnva · Post Post #477 (ISO) » Mon Jul 04, 2016 4:07 am

In post 473, Grendel wrote:yways, why are you threatening this anti-town behavior Robbnva?

Cause molla is scum and people aren't lynching him because he's molla and are willing to let their friend live longer just cause they are friends.

House · Post Post #478 (ISO) » Mon Jul 04, 2016 4:07 am

In post 475, Robbnva wrote:I've already clarified with a site mod that my punishment will result in a mod kill and a temporary site ban. It's not egregious enough for a permanent ban.

What next?

Only people who benefit right now are scum. If you town you need to trust and believe I'm 100% serious right now.

Here's the problem... I think a mod kill hurts town.

Force replacement would be much better for the game overall.

Wake1 · Post Post #479 (ISO) » Mon Jul 04, 2016 4:09 am

In post 472, House wrote: Molla isn't being lynched today

You don't know that

the Day's still young

.

Are you saying, right now, that you will not consider voting for or lynching Molla today?

Robbnva · Post Post #480 (ISO) » Mon Jul 04, 2016 4:10 am

That's the point of my deadline. Town doesn't want to help themselves so I'm helping them or doing what they want and letting town suffer whole letting scum off the hook

Hoopla · Post Post #481 (ISO) » Mon Jul 04, 2016 4:10 am

are you really 39 years old?

House · Post Post #482 (ISO) » Mon Jul 04, 2016 4:11 am

In post 479, Wake1 wrote:
In post 472, House wrote: Molla isn't being lynched today
You don't know that
the Day's still young
.

Are you saying, right now, that you will not consider voting for or lynching Molla today?

Not with Rob's bullshit going on. I don't care if Molla straight up named the entire scum team. I'm not rewarding terrorist behavior.

Robbnva · Post Post #483 (ISO) » Mon Jul 04, 2016 4:12 am

In post 481, Hoopla wrote:are you really 39 years old?

Yes.

If you are town are you really that dumb that you can't see molla is scum?

Robbnva · Post Post #484 (ISO) » Mon Jul 04, 2016 4:15 am

In post 65, BBmolla wrote:Let's just mass claim now

Me and House are Masons

Popcorn House

In post 71, BBmolla wrote:I disagree I think scum is more likely to suggest a mass claim d1

^ scum

Basically admits it if you think about it.

Grendel · Post Post #485 (ISO) » Mon Jul 04, 2016 4:17 am

In post 195, Grendel wrote:
I suppose I'll reread the thread since I'm not recalling things well.

I'm actually just doing this now, and I'm taking notes. Need some time though, kind of a slow reader.

Robbnva wrote:I've already clarified with a site mod that my punishment will result in a mod kill and a temporary site ban. It's not egregious enough for a permanent ban.

What next?

Only people who benefit right now are scum. If you town you need to trust and believe I'm 100% serious right now.

I don't get why you're so sure you need to do this. You just saying how you hate people adding anti-town quarks to their meta, and this is pretty anti-town. Is this normal for you, or are you feeling idk more indignity then usual?

Wake1 · Post Post #486 (ISO) » Mon Jul 04, 2016 4:19 am

In post 482, House wrote:
In post 479, Wake1 wrote:
In post 472, House wrote: Molla isn't being lynched today
You don't know that
the Day's still young
.

Are you saying, right now, that you will not consider voting for or lynching Molla today?
Not with Rob's bullshit going on. I don't care if Molla straight up named the entire scum team. I'm not rewarding terrorist behavior.

Take Robb out of the equation. That doesn't matter.

What matters to me is whether or not you—on your own—are willing to consider voting for or lynching BBmolla Day 1.

House · Post Post #487 (ISO) » Mon Jul 04, 2016 4:20 am

In post 486, Wake1 wrote:
In post 482, House wrote:
In post 479, Wake1 wrote:
In post 472, House wrote: Molla isn't being lynched today
You don't know that
the Day's still young
.

Are you saying, right now, that you will not consider voting for or lynching Molla today?
Not with Rob's bullshit going on. I don't care if Molla straight up named the entire scum team. I'm not rewarding terrorist behavior.
Take Robb out of the equation. That doesn't matter.

What matters to me is whether or not you—on your own—are willing to consider voting for or lynching BBmolla Day 1.

Once Rob is taken out of the equation, I'll take him out of the equation.

Wake1 · Post Post #488 (ISO) » Mon Jul 04, 2016 4:21 am

In post 484, Robbnva wrote:
In post 65, BBmolla wrote:Let's just mass claim now

Me and House are Masons

Popcorn House

In post 71, BBmolla wrote:I disagree I think scum is more likely to suggest a mass claim d1
^ scum

Basically admits it if you think about it.

Think for a moment Robb.

You don't think molla was being sarcastic in 65?

Wake1 · Post Post #489 (ISO) » Mon Jul 04, 2016 4:22 am

In post 487, House wrote:
In post 486, Wake1 wrote:
In post 482, House wrote:
In post 479, Wake1 wrote:
In post 472, House wrote: Molla isn't being lynched today
You don't know that
the Day's still young
.

Are you saying, right now, that you will not consider voting for or lynching Molla today?
Not with Rob's bullshit going on. I don't care if Molla straight up named the entire scum team. I'm not rewarding terrorist behavior.
Take Robb out of the equation. That doesn't matter.

What matters to me is whether or not you—on your own—are willing to consider voting for or lynching BBmolla Day 1.
Once Rob is taken out of the equation, I'll take him out of the equation.

Can you answer me House?

Are you or are you not willing to consider voting for or lynching BBmolla Day 1?

Robbnva · Post Post #490 (ISO) » Mon Jul 04, 2016 4:25 am

Since sarcasm isn't clear on the Internet I can't possibly know. Usually sarcasm included an emoji or something

House · Post Post #491 (ISO) » Mon Jul 04, 2016 4:26 am

In post 489, Wake1 wrote:
In post 487, House wrote:
In post 486, Wake1 wrote:
In post 482, House wrote:
In post 479, Wake1 wrote:
In post 472, House wrote: Molla isn't being lynched today
You don't know that
the Day's still young
.

Are you saying, right now, that you will not consider voting for or lynching Molla today?
Not with Rob's bullshit going on. I don't care if Molla straight up named the entire scum team. I'm not rewarding terrorist behavior.
Take Robb out of the equation. That doesn't matter.

What matters to me is whether or not you—on your own—are willing to consider voting for or lynching BBmolla Day 1.
Once Rob is taken out of the equation, I'll take him out of the equation.
Can you answer me House?

Are you or are you not willing to consider voting for or lynching BBmolla Day 1?

I've already answered you. You know damned well you've already received my answer and you're still posturing like you expect something more.

I absolutely refuse to entertain the notion at any level under terrorist threats. Period.

Robbnva · Post Post #492 (ISO) » Mon Jul 04, 2016 4:27 am

In post 485, Grendel wrote:I don't get why you're so sure you need to do this. You just saying how you hate people adding anti-town quarks to their meta, and this is pretty anti-town. Is this normal for you, or are you feeling idk more indignity then usual?

When in Rome?

Wake1 · Post Post #493 (ISO) » Mon Jul 04, 2016 4:27 am

In post 490, Robbnva wrote:Since sarcasm isn't clear on the Internet I can't possibly know. Usually sarcasm included an emoji or something

Not always, and for someone who has been here since 2010 you should know better than to frequently take declarations before page 4 seriously.

Wake1 · Post Post #494 (ISO) » Mon Jul 04, 2016 4:28 am

In post 491, House wrote:
In post 489, Wake1 wrote:
In post 487, House wrote:
In post 486, Wake1 wrote:
In post 482, House wrote:
In post 479, Wake1 wrote:
In post 472, House wrote: Molla isn't being lynched today
You don't know that
the Day's still young
.

Are you saying, right now, that you will not consider voting for or lynching Molla today?
Not with Rob's bullshit going on. I don't care if Molla straight up named the entire scum team. I'm not rewarding terrorist behavior.
Take Robb out of the equation. That doesn't matter.

What matters to me is whether or not you—on your own—are willing to consider voting for or lynching BBmolla Day 1.
Once Rob is taken out of the equation, I'll take him out of the equation.
Can you answer me House?

Are you or are you not willing to consider voting for or lynching BBmolla Day 1?
I've already answered you. You know damned well you've already received my answer and you're still posturing like you expect something more.

I absolutely refuse to entertain the notion at any level under terrorist threats. Period.

Are you or are you not willing to consider voting for or lynching BBmolla Day 1?

Yes

or

No

?

House · Post Post #495 (ISO) » Mon Jul 04, 2016 4:28 am

In post 490, Robbnva wrote:Since sarcasm isn't clear on the Internet I can't possibly know. Usually sarcasm included an emoji or something

Right. Because Mason claims that start out in, oh, I don't know, THE FIRST POST IN THE GAME, are always serious, amirite?

House · Post Post #496 (ISO) » Mon Jul 04, 2016 4:30 am

In post 494, Wake1 wrote:
In post 491, House wrote:
In post 489, Wake1 wrote:
In post 487, House wrote:
In post 486, Wake1 wrote:
In post 482, House wrote:
In post 479, Wake1 wrote:
In post 472, House wrote: Molla isn't being lynched today
You don't know that
the Day's still young
.

Are you saying, right now, that you will not consider voting for or lynching Molla today?
Not with Rob's bullshit going on. I don't care if Molla straight up named the entire scum team. I'm not rewarding terrorist behavior.
Take Robb out of the equation. That doesn't matter.

What matters to me is whether or not you—on your own—are willing to consider voting for or lynching BBmolla Day 1.
Once Rob is taken out of the equation, I'll take him out of the equation.
Can you answer me House?

Are you or are you not willing to consider voting for or lynching BBmolla Day 1?
I've already answered you. You know damned well you've already received my answer and you're still posturing like you expect something more.

I absolutely refuse to entertain the notion at any level under terrorist threats. Period.
Are you or are you not willing to consider voting for or lynching BBmolla Day 1?

Yes
or
No
?

At this point I'll lynch you over nearly anyone else because you know damned well I'm not budging one inch after being threatened until that that has been removed.

Wake1 · Post Post #497 (ISO) » Mon Jul 04, 2016 4:32 am

In post 496, House wrote:
In post 494, Wake1 wrote:
In post 491, House wrote:
In post 489, Wake1 wrote:
In post 487, House wrote:
In post 486, Wake1 wrote:
In post 482, House wrote:
In post 479, Wake1 wrote:
In post 472, House wrote: Molla isn't being lynched today
You don't know that
the Day's still young
.

Are you saying, right now, that you will not consider voting for or lynching Molla today?
Not with Rob's bullshit going on. I don't care if Molla straight up named the entire scum team. I'm not rewarding terrorist behavior.
Take Robb out of the equation. That doesn't matter.

What matters to me is whether or not you—on your own—are willing to consider voting for or lynching BBmolla Day 1.
Once Rob is taken out of the equation, I'll take him out of the equation.
Can you answer me House?

Are you or are you not willing to consider voting for or lynching BBmolla Day 1?
I've already answered you. You know damned well you've already received my answer and you're still posturing like you expect something more.

I absolutely refuse to entertain the notion at any level under terrorist threats. Period.
Are you or are you not willing to consider voting for or lynching BBmolla Day 1?

Yes
or
No
?
At this point I'll lynch you over nearly anyone else because you know damned well I'm not budging one inch after being threatened until that that has been removed.

I don't think I threatened you House.

Yes

or N

o

.

I have a very good reason for asking this type of question but I can't explain it atm b/c of valid reasons.

House · Post Post #498 (ISO) » Mon Jul 04, 2016 4:35 am

In post 497, Wake1 wrote:
In post 496, House wrote:
In post 494, Wake1 wrote:
In post 491, House wrote:
In post 489, Wake1 wrote:
In post 487, House wrote:
In post 486, Wake1 wrote:
In post 482, House wrote:
In post 479, Wake1 wrote:
In post 472, House wrote: Molla isn't being lynched today
You don't know that
the Day's still young
.

Are you saying, right now, that you will not consider voting for or lynching Molla today?
Not with Rob's bullshit going on. I don't care if Molla straight up named the entire scum team. I'm not rewarding terrorist behavior.
Take Robb out of the equation. That doesn't matter.

What matters to me is whether or not you—on your own—are willing to consider voting for or lynching BBmolla Day 1.
Once Rob is taken out of the equation, I'll take him out of the equation.
Can you answer me House?

Are you or are you not willing to consider voting for or lynching BBmolla Day 1?
I've already answered you. You know damned well you've already received my answer and you're still posturing like you expect something more.

I absolutely refuse to entertain the notion at any level under terrorist threats. Period.
Are you or are you not willing to consider voting for or lynching BBmolla Day 1?

Yes
or
No
?
At this point I'll lynch you over nearly anyone else because you know damned well I'm not budging one inch after being threatened until that that has been removed.
I don't think I threatened you House.

Yes
or N
o
.

I have a very good reason for asking this type of question but I can't explain it atm b/c of valid reasons.

I didn't say you did.

I refuse to give Robb one inch of satisfaction after he turn ed into a cyber terrorist, holding the entire game at random for over his demands.

He can take a flying formication and I refuse to entertain the notion of anything related to what he wants on any level. Period. End of story.

All when he is no longer in this game, and you will get an answer. But not bloody well until.

House · Post Post #499 (ISO) » Mon Jul 04, 2016 4:37 am

In post 498, House wrote:
In post 497, Wake1 wrote:
In post 496, House wrote:
In post 494, Wake1 wrote:
In post 491, House wrote:
In post 489, Wake1 wrote:
In post 487, House wrote:
In post 486, Wake1 wrote:
In post 482, House wrote:
In post 479, Wake1 wrote: You don't know that
the Day's still young
.

Are you saying, right now, that you will not consider voting for or lynching Molla today?
Not with Rob's bullshit going on. I don't care if Molla straight up named the entire scum team. I'm not rewarding terrorist behavior.
Take Robb out of the equation. That doesn't matter.

What matters to me is whether or not you—on your own—are willing to consider voting for or lynching BBmolla Day 1.
Once Rob is taken out of the equation, I'll take him out of the equation.
Can you answer me House?

Are you or are you not willing to consider voting for or lynching BBmolla Day 1?
I've already answered you. You know damned well you've already received my answer and you're still posturing like you expect something more.

I absolutely refuse to entertain the notion at any level under terrorist threats. Period.
Are you or are you not willing to consider voting for or lynching BBmolla Day 1?

Yes
or
No
?
At this point I'll lynch you over nearly anyone else because you know damned well I'm not budging one inch after being threatened until that that has been removed.
I don't think I threatened you House.

Yes
or N
o
.

I have a very good reason for asking this type of question but I can't explain it atm b/c of valid reasons.
I didn't say you did.

I refuse to give Robb one inch of satisfaction after he turned into a cyber terrorist, holding the entire game at ransom for over his demands.

He can take a flying formication and I refuse to entertain the notion of anything related to what he wants on any level. Period. End of story.

All when he is no longer in this game, and you will get an answer. But not bloody well until.

EBWOP