Beeh?In post 94, rb wrote:@Vecna, you came out swinging and never stopped last game you played as Town, what's changed now?
MEHHEHEHE-BEEEH!
VOTE: Dirty Harry
Beeh?In post 94, rb wrote:@Vecna, you came out swinging and never stopped last game you played as Town, what's changed now?
Why are you calling Nacho, "hella scummy" then?In post 102, Skold wrote:Nobody should go gung-ho over nothing so it makes more sense to have just leans with this little information
There are two cases:In post 102, Skold wrote:LightFOS: E_is_cool. I can't tell between badtown and scum here butthose last posts are awful.
In post 90, e_is_cool wrote:Quote specific posts or it isn't a scumtell.
I see that I said it. Quote past games where a scum said this or it isn't a scumtell.In post 95, Franky wrote:The quote is already in there. I bolded it for you because I'm nice, but I don't believe for a second that you don't remember your own quote, or that you just missed that it was already quoted in a line of discussion that was specifically about it.In post 90, e_is_cool wrote:Quote specific posts or it isn't a scumtell.In post 88, Franky wrote:The part about "that's because of my meta, not because of my alignment" is giving me a scum deja vu.In post 86, Dirty Harry wrote:'Scum being caught for the wrong reason'?In post 71, Errantparabola wrote:ooh. i don't really like this responseIn post 57, e_is_cool wrote:The only argument you have against me is me bringing up RQS, andthat's because of my meta, not because of my alignment. You also say that RQS looks town, but I'm scum because I'm doing it? That's kinda WIFOM-y.
someone take a guess at why
Well, that means he made the conscious choice to avoid defending himself while trying to paint me in bad light at the same time.In post 111, Skold wrote:There is nothing in those posts that could imply he failed to remember the argument he made.
That's not something someone who thinks I'm scum would say, it's something someone who wants everyone else to think I'm scum would say.In post 114, Skold wrote:I don't think town should invest time into defending themselves heavily unless the current wagon is likely to lead to a lynch. And e_is_cool thinking you're scum isn't a scumtell. Stop this Franky it's very stupid.
This makes zero sense as a response to what I've said. I don't think you're scum, I'm not being uncivil and this push is stupid. I'll direct you if I want, you can choose whether to listen.In post 116, Franky wrote:That's not something someone who thinks I'm scum would say, it's something someone who wants everyone else to think I'm scum would say.In post 114, Skold wrote:I don't think town should invest time into defending themselves heavily unless the current wagon is likely to lead to a lynch. And e_is_cool thinking you're scum isn't a scumtell. Stop this Franky it's very stupid.
Also, be civil, I don't appreciate you using that word, or telling me what to stop doing.
That last post is terrible. If I were to be pushing e_is_cool this post would be a rock as well as the three I pointed out. However I'm not pushing e_is_cool and the people who are active need to get on Nacho.In post 117, Franky wrote:Can't say e's last response is any better either. Seems like scum grasping at straws.
The meaning of my "scum-lean" is not neutral.In post 89, e_is_cool wrote:Scum-lean is still neutral. I don't really think it was alignment indicative, even though earth is SE. I personally do not think that overreaction is a scumtell. I'll have to check meta. earth, can you list me the 3 most recent games you've played?
"doesn't babble, gets to the point"In post 107, Skold wrote:And Dirty Harry is town because he doesn't babble, gets to the point and is making sensible conclusions. Look at his ISO, you'll probably agree.