With 7 votes, it will take 4 to reach majority.
The deadline is Thursday, July 28, 2016, at 1:00 PM EDT (UTC-4), which is in (expired on 2016-07-28 13:00:00).[/area]
That's my current lynch pool as well. Unless Mars is lurking her way to victory, I'm fairly confident we win if we lynch {FA, NM, Rach}In post 423, RedCoyote wrote: I'm considering it. I'm also concerned about Rach. NM hasn't brought as much to the table as I'd have hoped either. 421 and 419 read a bit concocted.
Where do you get the idea I'm town reading NM? I'm null reading him at best. I'm just pointing out that your argument is practically invalid. If you're town, you're tunneling and confbiasing.which aren't helping anything.In post 424, RachMarie wrote:What is your concern Red I feel like we need more time to discuss things before hammering my other scum read.
I doubt anyone is convinced about NM being maf, especially since shad is pushing a town read on him.
And other than the whole vote thing most of what I have on NM is gut i don't have a nice neat logical case on him like I want.
Sorry - actually meant to, but wanted to wait until I wasn't phone posting.In post 428, Fire Assassin wrote:Shaddowez you want to comment on my previous post pls?
I'd be interested in knowing more of what you're talking about here, but that can wait until post-game if need be.In post 415, Fire Assassin wrote:I would rather not go into why i was "defensive" there, since i have heard a lot of bullock claims of game throwing in my days of playing and its kind of a offense I don't like anyone mindlessly throwing out without consideration. But disregarding that.
The line I was using youWhy do you think i was saying "I do this as scum so I am not scum here"? That wasn't the point at all, my point was it can come from either alignment, not that I just do it as scum and me pointing it out makes me town, or some variation. I am saying what isn't indicative of anything so shouldn't be considered. How you got that interpretation is odd.
In post 394, Fire Assassin wrote:I would say this as either alignment. NAI, because I have gone out of my way to do kills as scum just to make sure the game wasn't a dead lurker fest in order to not have a hollow win.
You're continuing to say things without actually doing anything useful. You leave xy out of any sort of read, but since he's practically confirmed IC, whatever. However, you also leave RC out, who's been active. You've had one vote the entire game, which was on a town wagon, and touted as a convenience vote. You're also town reading NM, because you can't read him...please explain to me how that works.In post 428, Fire Assassin wrote:If I had to decide right now it would be Shaddowez and Marangral.
I see Rach as possible VI, pushing bad reads.
Not Mafia is actually taking stances and seems to have some kind of thought process? I really can't read that guy, ill say its townie cause its not outright anti town.
And if FA is scum? While this isn't a great setup to bus in, are you saying that it's completely out of the question, and it's only somebody not on the wagon as their partner? Also, what does the response have to do with the rest of your statement?xyzzy wrote:I think based on the relatively small response to Fire Assassin being at L-1, if Fire Assassin is town, at least one of shaddowez or Not_Mafia is scum.
If this were my alt, I probably would claim I am scum, its just pure WIFOM. So if anything I said is taking with "I am town" contingency, your point about me talking about my general post about not being in the game and I would feel that way as either alignment as my entirety of actions. I have not said that none of my posts have something alignment indicative, I said a specific post wasn't alignment indicative, because it was my general mood, and I would have that attitude regardless of alignment. Your rest of your points don't make sense to me.In post 430, shaddowez wrote:The line I was using you specifically say you do something as scum. You're not going to post anything saying "I'm scum, lynch me" (unless you'd like to, I won't complain). Considering that, anything you (or anybody) say is to be taken with the "I'm town" contingency, truth or not. What you said was your actions here are NAI because you would do something specific as scum. Why point out something that hasn't really happened this game (possibly because there's only been 1 NK so far so there hasn't been time to act this way), that you would do as scum, with the underlying implication of "I'm town"?
Ehhh I will agree I haven't been that useful my mood in general hasn't improved enough for me to be actively scumhunting and the player base is very inactive.In post 430, shaddowez wrote:You're continuing to say things without actually doing anything useful. You leave xy out of any sort of read, but since he's practically confirmed IC, whatever. However, you also leave RC out, who's been active. You've had one vote the entire game, which was on a town wagon, and touted as a convenience vote. You're also town reading NM, because you can't read him...please explain to me how that works.
You realize this doesn't help either, right?In post 429, xyzzy wrote:I think based on the relatively small response to Fire Assassin being at L-1, if Fire Assassin is town, at least one of shaddowez or Not_Mafia is scum.
In post 431, shaddowez wrote:@Mod- Can Mara please be prodded? It's been over 2 days since her last post, and that wasn't even productive. Thanks!
I'm saying that I think it's likely at least one of the scum would be moving in the direction of thinking Fire Assassin is scum if he's town and there's no scum on the wagon, but I don't think it's likely that they'd want to both be on it, so if one of them is already on it, I don't think it's as likely that the other one would jump on. basically, the response I'm referring to is the lack of further movement in that wagon.In post 430, shaddowez wrote:And if FA is scum? While this isn't a great setup to bus in, are you saying that it's completely out of the question, and it's only somebody not on the wagon as their partner? Also, what does the response have to do with the rest of your statement?xyzzy wrote:I think based on the relatively small response to Fire Assassin being at L-1, if Fire Assassin is town, at least one of shaddowez or Not_Mafia is scum.
Unless of course both Shaddow and Not Mafia are scum, then me not being lynched yet makes perfect sense.In post 425, Equinox wrote:shaddowez, xyzzy, Not_Mafia
UNVOTE:In post 438, Fire Assassin wrote:Unless of course both Shaddow and Not Mafia are scum, then me not being lynched yet makes perfect sense.In post 425, Equinox wrote:shaddowez, xyzzy, Not_Mafia
Optimal play in this scenario for scum is to immediately hammer me at L-1, because it puts the game in rarefaction.
Aka, I'm probably only ever gonna be around tuesday-thursdayIn post 116, Ms Marangal wrote:GET OUT OF HEREIn post 112, thenewearth wrote:LAMIST = "HEY GUYS LOOK WHAT I'M DOING I'M BEING TOWN PLZ NO LYNCH"
first off, I didn't really see that in his play, and second off, that kinda play seems more town than scum
And, no rach, I just don't wanna be unnecessarily poked :<
I'm putting my vote somewhere.
Weekends and Monday are hardest for me just FYI!
Xy is scum, and tried to bait out the real ic in lieu of getting lynched but the only way we will really know is if we go into rarefaction!In post 409, RedCoyote wrote:Re-reading over some of the end of yesterday trying to wrap my head around why Shadow was killed instead of xyzzy, and this is the best motive I can come up with so far. Anyone else have a theory?In post 338, Shadow_step wrote:Town shouldn't be scared of putting a scum read on L-1.In post 337, Fire Assassin wrote:That sounds pretty reasonable, I could vote TNE from what I have read, though I want to discuss and interact with everyone more and don't want to put her at L-1 right now.
VOTE: FA
You are scum or didn't read what I said about quick hammers.In post 444, RachMarie wrote:Since you unvoted him
VOTE: FA
L1 do not hammer without giving intent and give him a chance to claim.
You haven't really seemed like you did that much in day one besides push someone else for not contributing.In post 442, Ms Marangal wrote:All this talk of not having contributed anything and being an empty slot just because I was busy since daybreak is pretty insulting. I'm damn sure there hasn't been anyone else whose tried reaching out to as many people as I have d1 nor has tried to communicate with others regardless of how I was reading them
I pointed this out and rach doesn't bother commenting on it and puts me back a L-1In post 438, Fire Assassin wrote:Optimal play in this scenario for scum is to immediately hammer me at L-1, because it puts the game in rarefaction.