If anything im being fairly transparent about my reasoning.In post 124, MURDERCAT wrote:but when she is scum she isn't transparent about her reasoning because she has none.
Why do you think im not being transparent?
If anything im being fairly transparent about my reasoning.In post 124, MURDERCAT wrote:but when she is scum she isn't transparent about her reasoning because she has none.
IkrIn post 123, MURDERCAT wrote:This interaction is reminding me a lot of that marathon game where postie was town
Well it's kinda hard to not do anything sort of quickly in marathon games XDIn post 126, Postie wrote:When I played with her and she was town and I was scum she townread me pretty quickly too though so idk.
wouldn't being scum allow you to have transparent reasoning because you know for sure people are town? Also she is being pretty transaparent as isIn post 124, MURDERCAT wrote:Luna tries to find town as scum like she does when she is town but when she is scum she isn't transparent about her reasoning because she has none.
VOTE: Luna
Sorry friend
Curious who were/are these peopleIn post 51, kraska77 wrote:I'm reading some awkwardness from two players so far. More talking from everyone pls
The reasoning isn't transparent as the person might not have done anything particularly towny but are being townread for buddying reasonsIn post 130, AlpacaAlpaca wrote:wouldn't being scum allow you to have transparent reasoning because you know for sure people are town? Also she is being pretty transaparent as isIn post 124, MURDERCAT wrote:Luna tries to find town as scum like she does when she is town but when she is scum she isn't transparent about her reasoning because she has none.
VOTE: Luna
Sorry friend
How?In post 103, Luna Fox wrote:Plus i also liked your vote and question towards Dragon.
It is in a townie mindset to interrogate another player into why you're scumreading them, tho people rarely tend to do this nowadays. Why do you disagree? Do you think a townie verifying someone else's alignment wouldn't ask such a question? Or do you think it's scum not knowing what to ask.In post 133, Aristophanes wrote:How?In post 103, Luna Fox wrote:Plus i also liked your vote and question towards Dragon.
This question was bullocks!
This mostly.In post 134, Luna Fox wrote:Or do you think it's scum not knowing what to ask.
I think I was being dumb. I realized after I said this that you almost always claim miller immediately because of the backwards answers it returns. It would be a REALLY bold move for mafia in an open setup because of the chance of there being a role copIn post 117, Postie wrote:DotW, tell me more about this.In post 71, Dragon of the West wrote:I'm wondering how seriously to take beeboy's miller claim
^this is directed @postieIn post 140, kraska77 wrote:^ so is that why you scumread him postie? Tbh I'm not a fan of asking people why you scumread them and I thought your first two posts were awful if that makes you feel any better =P they read like tryhard contribution.
How do you feel about the fact that I've learned absolutely nothing from DotW's answer?In post 136, Aristophanes wrote:This mostly.In post 134, Luna Fox wrote:Or do you think it's scum not knowing what to ask.
The question is an easy one for scum because the answer is so easy to manilplate into either a townread or a scumread.
Maybe weakly. Mostly I was just interested in how he'd respond.In post 140, kraska77 wrote:^ so is that why you scumread him postie? Tbh I'm not a fan of asking people why you scumread them and I thought your first two posts were awful if that makes you feel any better =P they read like tryhard contribution.
Shouldn't be considering the ammount of mafia encryptors that appear in some of them.In post 148, beeboy wrote:i believe in normal games this is public info but I don't have evidence to back this up.