Mini 495 - Mafia on a Plane! GAME OVER! =)


User avatar
Korlash
Korlash
Krap Logick
User avatar
User avatar
Korlash
Krap Logick
Krap Logick
Posts: 6579
Joined: August 23, 2007
Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous

Post Post #1275 (ISO) » Mon Oct 29, 2007 1:11 pm

Post by Korlash »

wow a couple things to talk on.. Cool...

Firstly... My ever favorite Vollkan comments... woopy!
Vollkan wrote:Does this mean that you oppose lynching SK-Orig? By the sounds of it, your sole concern is the prospect of me being scum with Orig.
Yes I am against lynching orig. I would like to hear back from Dybeck first, but right now he is my top pick for a lynch.
Vollkan wrote:Use of the word "crazy" is interesting, because it is not "crazy". In fact, I think it is a legitimate suggestion.


Oh I think it is a legitimate suggestion. It's just that I clearly remember one of the first posts I read of Gem's when I got back was "Don't take what I have been saying personally" or something like that and it made me laugh this morning. That crazy thing is more of a joke really.

@ shaft.ed: sweet... That saves me a lot of reread ^^
Elias wrote:you realize this is a scum list right? not a list of people who you want to pressure?
Do you honestly feel that me and lucienne are the most likely scum based on the fact that we've posted the least?
If so, thats ridiculous.

Further, I havent even been that inactive lately. I've been keeping up and posting my opinion where needed. It's starting to get kind of irritating how the latest cool thing to do is go "hmm, i cant think of anything to say, hey lucienne and elias! post something!"

Anyways, Shafted makes some good points on the Dybeck claim, many that I missed, mainly because I was in my official out of game stage. Now that the these things are pointed out to me, they definately add up. So Dybeck just moved up several spots on my LoS.
Well with posts like these I cant imagine how I could think your not contributing useful stuff... [/sarcasm]

I mean seriously with all the talk on Dybeck and orig you cannot say more then "Hmm, interesting post Shaft.ed! Dybeck has just moved up a bit!" I am glad you went into more detail in yoru next post and for all intensive purposes I did list Lucienne first for a reason.

Secondly, I do find any sort of lurking right before a deadline very scummy. In my mind I see you two as trying to stay out of the radar for the rest of the day while giving us very little to go on tomorrow. So yes, I consider you two the most needed responses/posts out of and if I have to call you scum to get it so be it.

Now I am not saying I would lynch either of you two right now or anything... But a little more detailed stuff then you have been giving would be very nice man.

Ok thats about all the stuff facing me at this moment I think...
It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.

Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!
User avatar
Streeflo
Streeflo
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Streeflo
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1156
Joined: March 30, 2007

Post Post #1276 (ISO) » Mon Oct 29, 2007 2:15 pm

Post by Streeflo »

Day 2, Votecount #34!

Dum de dum, this votecount
should
be right =)

dybeck (1) - AlyG
Lucienne (1) - originality
originality (1) - dybeck

Not voting: Lucienne, shaft.ed, Elias_the_Thief, Gemelli, Korlash, vollkan

With
9
alive it takes
5
to lynch!


Day 2 Deadline: November 8
User avatar
Elias_the_thief
Elias_the_thief
He/Him
Not Statistically Significant
User avatar
User avatar
Elias_the_thief
He/Him
Not Statistically Significant
Not Statistically Significant
Posts: 3194
Joined: August 15, 2006
Pronoun: He/Him
Location: Maryland.

Post Post #1277 (ISO) » Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:43 pm

Post by Elias_the_thief »

Korlash wrote:
Elias wrote:you realize this is a scum list right? not a list of people who you want to pressure?
Do you honestly feel that me and lucienne are the most likely scum based on the fact that we've posted the least?
If so, thats ridiculous.

Further, I havent even been that inactive lately. I've been keeping up and posting my opinion where needed. It's starting to get kind of irritating how the latest cool thing to do is go "hmm, i cant think of anything to say, hey lucienne and elias! post something!"

Anyways, Shafted makes some good points on the Dybeck claim, many that I missed, mainly because I was in my official out of game stage. Now that the these things are pointed out to me, they definately add up. So Dybeck just moved up several spots on my LoS.
Well with posts like these I cant imagine how I could think your not contributing useful stuff... [/sarcasm]

I mean seriously with all the talk on Dybeck and orig you cannot say more then "Hmm, interesting post Shaft.ed! Dybeck has just moved up a bit!" I am glad you went into more detail in yoru next post and for all intensive purposes I did list Lucienne first for a reason.
I'm not sure what you expect out of me Korlash. I have clearly shown more then once that I believe that Orig is SK, and I have clearly shown that I dont intend to lynch him today. What else do you want me to say on the subject of Orig? Just because I haven't posted novels like you doesnt mean that you have expressed your opinion any more then I have.
And about Dybeck? I was undecided/ leaning more towards believing the claim, because I had no reason to disbelieve it. Shafted posted, and it revealed several reasons to disbelieve it. So I commented that I agreed with it, and swayed me towards disbelieving his claim. I also said that I was my preferred lynch today. What more do you want out of me on this subject? Do you expect me to pull more evidence against Dybeck out of my ass in addition to the case that Shafted has already meticulously constructed?
At this point, I see your insistence that I dont post enough content as a personal attack. I responded both to your posts, naming two lurkers the two top scum, as well as responded to Shafteds case, the two most important posts. Furhter, its ridiculous of you to attack my response to shafteds post. Shall we compare it to yours?
Korlash wrote:@ shaft.ed: sweet... That saves me a lot of reread ^^
Yeah, my post was definately the one that added nothing to the discussion.

Korlash wrote:Secondly, I do find any sort of lurking right before a deadline very scummy. In my mind I see you two as trying to stay out of the radar for the rest of the day while giving us very little to go on tomorrow. So yes, I consider you two the most needed responses/posts out of and if I have to call you scum to get it so be it.
You dont understand my point. Although I believe that lurking is a completely and utterly STUPID scum tell, (as I do it all the time as town and scum, depending on time constraints, how into the game I am, and other factors) my point is not that you have no basis for suspecting me. The point is that you made a list of scum, not a list of people that needed to be more active. If in fact, you just put us up there to get us to talk,
Korlash wrote:So yes, I consider you two the most needed responses/posts out of and if I have to call you scum to get it so be it.
who ARE your top suspects?

And to actually address the supposed problem of me not providing you enough info for tomorrow, I have already shown who I want lynched, my opinion on Dy and Orig, and my top suspects. Now, how have I not provided enough info for tomorrow?

Now lets look at you:
Opinion on Dybeck claim? undecided.
Top suspects? Two lurkers (one of which is posting content, though you refuse to accept it)
Opinion on Orig? undecided on whether he is vig or SK.

Yes, I'm certainly the one limiting our info for tomorrow.

Korlash wrote: Now I am not saying I would lynch either of you two right now or anything... But a little more detailed stuff then you have been giving would be very nice man.
What exactly do you mean by detailed? I've given you my opinions, and why. As far as I can tell, most of your content comes from being attacked by Vollkan, and some OMGUS on shafted. So I'd advise you to get off my fucking case on "not enough content".
Korlash wrote: Ok thats about all the stuff facing me at this moment I think...
This post you just made was so full of content. A baseless attack on my contribution. Nice one.
I play the games rul gud.
User avatar
vollkan
vollkan
The Interrogator
User avatar
User avatar
vollkan
The Interrogator
The Interrogator
Posts: 5373
Joined: March 29, 2007
Location: Australia

Post Post #1278 (ISO) » Mon Oct 29, 2007 4:02 pm

Post by vollkan »

shaft.ed, I agree completely with your first post querying dybeck's claim.
shaft.ed wrote: We know that dybeck and originality's claims are mutually exclusive, thus at least one of them has to be scum, and there is a possibility that they both are. Thus lynching one of them has greater than 50% odds of hitting scum. Anyone else in the town is much lower than this and thus should not be considered.
Also even if we hit SK putting us in LyLo this is better than hitting town and being in 3:2:1 if we have a nonOrig SK.
On the numbers, 3:2:1 is not significantly worse than 4:3; it is still LYLO. The only difference is that it is possible for a mafia lynch to result in a 1:1:1 wcs.
shaft.ed wrote: I also posit that lynching dybeck has the possibility of providing more information of originality's alignment than lynching origanilty has on dybeck's alignment. If we lynch dybeck he comes up SK, we know orig is mafia and can then autolynch tommorow. If he comes up mafia then we know orig is either vig or SK. If he comes up town (which I doubt given his horrible cop claim) then we know orig is scum of some sort. If orig comes up mafia or SK we still don't know if dybeck is a cop becuase he could easily be faking the investigation given the info AlyG provided. If orig comes up vig we know that dybeck is either mafia or SK faking cop.
This earns a big QFT.
Elias wrote: Well, your post has certainly changed my mind on the Dybeck claim. Theres a lot of inconsistency there, and the motivation for scum to fake claim cop there is certainly plentiful. So, I'd put my opinion on the Dybeck claim as a tentative no, as opposed to the tentative yes that was there before. As to the Orig claim, Ive already told the town what I think of his claim, in fact, that was my first post upon reentering the game, debunking his claim. I'm fairly certain that Orig is our SK.

As for favored lynch? Orig seems like a bad choice, as Vollkan has pointed out multiple times. I dont believe Shafted or Vollkan are scum. Lucienne doesnt post enough to tell. Korlash and Gemelli I'm undecided on, though I dont like Korlashs play thus far. So I think that leaves me with Dybeck, who I've thought was slightly scummy throughout the game. Combined with the likelihood of his claim being false, he is my preferred lynch at this point.
You say you don't like Korlash, what are your thoughts on Gemelli?

Vote: dybeck
User avatar
Korlash
Korlash
Krap Logick
User avatar
User avatar
Korlash
Krap Logick
Krap Logick
Posts: 6579
Joined: August 23, 2007
Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous

Post Post #1279 (ISO) » Mon Oct 29, 2007 4:44 pm

Post by Korlash »

Wow... I never thought that would go like it did... Gotta be careful not to let personal feelings get into this post...

As much as I hate to kick a dead horse here it goes...
Elias wrote:At this point, I see your insistence that I dont post enough content as a personal attack. I responded both to your posts, naming two lurkers the two top scum, as well as responded to Shafteds case, the two most important posts. Furhter, its ridiculous of you to attack my response to shafteds post. Shall we compare it to yours?
And I see your reaction to me naming you in my top two scum pick as a little bit over the top.

Elias wrote:Yeah, my post was definately the one that added nothing to the discussion.
Yes it was... Glad you can admit that. Mine on the other hand addressed three real points while yours barely addressed one. I think the scale is in my favor there.
Elias wrote:You dont understand my point. Although I believe that lurking is a completely and utterly STUPID scum tell, (as I do it all the time as town and scum, depending on time constraints, how into the game I am, and other factors) my point is not that you have no basis for suspecting me. The point is that you made a list of scum, not a list of people that needed to be more active. If in fact, you just put us up there to get us to talk,
No shit sherlock... Did the fact I said I put you guys up there to get you to talk have anything to do with this breakthrough here? Also I find the fact that your talking now to be... I don't know... my point! I too agree lurking is not a scum tell, I hardly think ANYTHING can be defined as a "scum tell" that word is so god damn overused in this game... HOWEVER! When a deadline is posed and a player repeatedly uses an excuse not to post, or repeatedly posts very little it makes me think he or she is trying to skirt under the radar. I don;t see why you are reacting so badly to me asking you to post a bit more then you are. I don't see Lucienne acting so rash... That was a joke in case your as slow as you seem...
Elias wrote:who ARE your top suspects?
An hour ago, Dybeck, right now, you and Dybeck...
Elias wrote:I have already shown who I want lynched, my opinion on Dy and Orig, and my top suspects. Now, how have I not provided enough info for tomorrow?
How do you feel on Gem? Whats your biggest issues with me? How about Lucienne? Vollkan? Shaft.ed? There is going to be a fucking mafia NK here... and I would either like to know what your issues are with the person going to die, or if you die what your issues are with your supposed killers. Also if I am the one to die perhaps it may lead to my killer being found. I don't really know, but we have like a week + until deadline... use it stupid...
Elias wrote:Opinion on Orig? undecided on whether he is vig or SK.
I believe I was undecided on whether he was Sk or Mafia... I could be wrong... I do have a bad memory XD
Elias wrote:What exactly do you mean by detailed? I've given you my opinions, and why. As far as I can tell, most of your content comes from being attacked by Vollkan, and some OMGUS on shafted. So I'd advise you to get off my fucking case on "not enough content".
that seems a little over the top... I mean... If you are posting content, detailed and useful, don't you think that it would backfire on me? And that the other players would see that? Why are you so afraid to be in the spotlight right now? A simple "I think I am posting enough" would be enough on your part and would probably end up making me look like the bad guy. Yet you choose to react pretty defensive... I don't get it... It doesn't make sense...

Elias wrote:This post you just made was so full of content. A baseless attack on my contribution. Nice one.
My post also contained two answers to things Vollkan said. A thank you to Shaft.ed for doing something nice( I have mentioned before how helpful you guys can be to me in this regards.), and 2, count them two issues against you. Thats a total of 5 points in my post. Stop trying to make me seem just as useless as you are...
Vollakn wrote:You say you don't like Korlash, what are your thoughts on Gemelli?
What he asked...

I still hold to waiting until Dybeck answers some things. After that I will place my vote... Until then I will keep poking Elias as it seems to be having some effect... *poke poke poke*

(Guess I didn't do a good job of keeping personal feelings out of the post eh? ;) )
It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.

Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!
User avatar
Gemelli
Gemelli
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Gemelli
Goon
Goon
Posts: 295
Joined: September 10, 2007
Location: WiscAAHHnsin

Post Post #1280 (ISO) » Mon Oct 29, 2007 5:44 pm

Post by Gemelli »

OK, folks. I promised PBPA, and a PBPA you shall have. Starting with Vollkan. Yes, I decided to get the major pain out of the way first. Thank gawd for Advil!

Please keep in mind that this summary is NOT intended to be a complete record of all of Vollkan's posts. I've tried to summarize major themes, and to record his stance throughout the game on some major issues. But there was a ton of content to sort through, and I did the best I could with the time that was available to me.

Anyway, I'll post the complete PBPA after I summarize some of the key themes I noticed. Apologies once again for what will be a post that tests the character limits of phpBB. (And I've seen at least 6 posts made since I started writing this up; I have not read those and will comment on them tomorrow.)

Key themes from Vollkan review:

#1: Vollkan has been going after Dybeck like he was made of ham through all of D2.
This is not in itself surprising given Dybeck's attitude. What is notable after a complete reread is that the grounds for his suspicion have shifted dramatically, not just from the start of D2 to now, but in some cases from post to post. Examples: in posts 439 and 497, he suspects Dybeck of being mafia. In 544, he starts suspecting that Dybeck is the SK. In 598, he describes Dybeck as "quite pro-town." But just a few posts later, in 608, he's back to arguing that Dybeck is probably mafia, a line he continues until 1193, when he's back to accusing Dybeck of being the SK. In 1208, he states that he believes Dybeck's cop claim, that his claim doesn't make sense as a mafioso, but that SK is likely. In 1226 he's back to accusing Dybeck of being mafia.

Rarely do we see an acknowledgement that the line of attack is changing from Vollkan. He seems to have made up his mind very early in the game that Dybeck is scum, and has simply been trying to figure out a way to craft a resonating argument to support that premise.

Review post 974, in which Vollkan claims that Dybeck is scummy for dropping his case against Originality, despite being "100% convinced" of orig's scumminess. Then look at posts 1008 -- where Vollkan posts that Dybeck had "no need" to abandon the lynch-originality theme, and that he finds that change in heart suspicious -- and 1214, in which Vollkan says that Dybeck would have been LESS suspicious if he had abandoned the case against originality earlier. Vollkan has created a damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't situation; no matter what course of action Dybeck chooses here, Vollkan will attack him for it. You could draw a conclusion from this that Vollkan has made up his mind that Dybeck should be lynched, and is opportunistically using whatever facts happen to be at hand to advance that agenda.

#2: Vollkan sticks to his guns, but only until shaft.ed disagrees.
Vollkan is a tenacious debator, and almost never abandons an argument. Except, of course, when shaft.ed posts ANYTHING in disagreement, after which Vollkan is highly likely to change his mind.

Post 462, Vollkan suggests that AlyG should track originality. 491, shaft.ed says that he doesn't want the town to guide AlyG in any way. 492, vollkan reverses his earlier suggestion and agrees with shaft.ed.

Post 512, Vollkan tells Originality that he should kill, but be careful. 515, shaft.ed posts that he'd prefer a no kill. 517, Vollkan says "You're right. Don't kill tonight Orig."

Post 598, Vollkan says that "CarrotCake was clearly using very good logic and posting to a great extent. Thus, she was a threat to the scum. By NKing her, there is the added advantage of throwing suspicion onto AlyG. It is VERY plausible that scum would NK carrot." Post 617, shaft.ed posts a summary of CC's posts, showing that she was hardly a hugely obvious townie. Post 638, Vollkan says that he thought that CC wasn't really townie all along, but didn't want to say anything in order to get more info on the players supporting originality's lynch.

Post 680, Vollkan says that "we haven't instructed Orig not to kill. Orig is to do as Orig sees fit, but with the utmost caution." And to AlyG: "Doc should probably protect either you or Orig, let me think on that one." 682-683, shaft.ed states his preference for giving orig a consensus list to work with rather than a blank slate, and FoS's vollkan for suggesting doc protection for orig. 705, Vollkan responds to that with "I said I was not convinced and I needed to think. I didn't mean that I considered Orig an equal option to AlyG at all. I just meant that I was going to look at both options, rather than immediately ruling it out without doing a proper analysis. I can't think of any reason to protect Orig, after all I've been pushing hard on not lynching Orig for the crossfire thing as well."

751-755: Vollkan states that "I would not support a blanket limiting of Orig to the consensus." 778, shaft.ed states his preference from having orig work off a list, and indicates that he could see dybeck's posts reflecting the perspective of an angry townie. 779, Vollkan agrees to this, agrees that shaft.ed's dybeck-townie suspicions are valid, and states that "Oman looks worse" at this point.

You get the idea. See the detailed PBPA for a few other instances of this behavior.

#3: Vollkan claiming to have "proved" something is sometimes (but not always) smoke and mirrors.
In post 675, Vollkan claims to have "refuted" Dybeck's suspicion that Originality lied in his initial role claim. As we now know, Vollkan is now leading the "orig is 100% scum and is most likely the SK" train, despite apparently having proved that this wasn't possible many pages ago.

Vollkan first advocates the "anyone who wants to lynch originality today is probably scum" theory in post 487. This despite the fact that he had voted for an orig lynch just 20 posts or so ago in post 462. This is a dramatic reversal of opinion. At first, Vollkan has argued that an Orig lynch is obviously bad because there is such a strong chance that orig is a vig. In post 457, he argues that originality is almost definitely NOT the SK, and it's in the town's best interest to lynch the SK today. Now, of course, he is arguing that originality is almost definitely CONFIRMED as the SK today, and that the best play for the town is to lynch someone who is NOT the SK.

In post 779, vollkan claims to have "proved" that dybeck's argument that originality is scum is wrong.

Are you seeing the trend here? I am not by any means saying that when vollkan posts a fact, the reverse must be true. But when Vollkan tells me that he has proved something, you'll have to excuse me wanting to test the waters for myself before diving in. And I really, really don't like his use of the "if you don't agree with what I have claimed to prove, you are by definition scummy" tactic through much of D2.

#4: Vollkan has maintained a constant support for originality until very recently, but has offered shifting explanations of orig's role and shifting reasons for not lynching him.
Like his attacks on dybeck, Vollkan's support of originality has been founded on a wildly shifting set of assumptions. He paints originality as most likely mafia through post 455. 457, he states that CarrotCake makes no sense for an SK kill. By post 487, Vollkan has come all the way around to believing originality's claim to be genuine. In 501, Vollkan is so certain that orig can't be the SK, he votes Oman for even suggesting it. He stays on the vigOrig theme through post 841, with occasional posts here and there continuing his rationale for why Orig can't be the SK; in one analysis of town scenarios in post 573, he doesn't even include the analysis of that situation.

In post 862, Vollkan posts that "Something dybeck has been saying throughout this game is that I am acting too convinced of Orig being pro-town. I want to be clear that Orig is acting scummy and I do think there is quite a good chance of him being scum. The problem is that he has claimed vig." He goes on to state that if orig is scum, he is most likely mafia, and that dybeck is the SK.

In post 999, Vollkan indicates that his post 993 offers "unrebutted evidence" demonstrating why Originality can't be scum. He then goes on to state that he is 65% likely that originality is scum. Heh.

In post 1011, Vollkan responds to more recent originality posts by raising his suspicion of originality to 75% scum, and then 100% scum. Even at this point, he maintains that dybeck is most likely also scum (if not aligned with orig). By 1268, Vollkan has turned the corner and claims that he has already established that he agrees that orig is the SK.

============================

My analysis of this reading:

* Much of Vollkan's arguments against Dybeck, when held up to close analysis, do not hold water. In post 1025, Vollkan himself claims that of the evidence vs Dybeck to date, "There are a number of minor tells in there, but collectively and when analysed by someone other than myself (multiple scrutiny = very important) it is not decisive." Since then, he has found new reasons to suspect Dybeck. Some of those reasons may be perfectly valid, but I find the degree of antagonism being levelled through the whole game, coming from such a wide variety of directions, to be suspect. Do minis ever have lyncher/lynchee roles?

* Vollkan has from time to time relied on fallacies and incomplete reasoning to present strongly-worded arguments. Meta analysis suggests that Vollkan does not exhibit those behaviors when playing as town. This is a significant scum tell to me, though not definitive.

* Based on the relationships I've been able to track here, if Vollkan *does* come up scum, I would consider his most likely scumbuddies to be Lucienne and Korlash.

* If Dybeck turns up town -- and it seems fairly likely that we will know his alignment as of tomorrow morning -- Vollkan will move to the #1 spot on my suspect list. One scenario that I have been considering with varying degrees of confidence is that mafVollkan picked up on Dybeck's cop tells early on D2, and that this is the real reason for him promoting a Dybeck lynch so heavily.

* If Dybeck turns up scum, I will almost certainly be the next town lynch. Again, I recognize this fact, but feel that if I don't speak honestly out of fear for myself, I will be doing the town a disservice.

* It seems obvious that Dybeck and Vollkan are not aligned with each other as scum. You could make an argument that Vollkan and Originality could be aligned with each other as scum, due to Vollkan's consistent drumming that lynching orig is bad for town, but this seems unlikely unless orig has made some truly boneheaded moves as mafia.

* I am still mostly certain that shaft.ed is town. But Vollkan's repeated about-faces in response to shaft.ed posts have forced me to think hard about that perspective. If Vollkan comes up scum, there is a clear tie to shaft.ed that much be explored.

* Overall, this re-read has brought up quite a bit of behavior that I find suspicious, and this has me thinking VERY hard at this point about Vollkan as possible mafia. In fact, the more I think about it, the more likely I think this scenario is.

So:
HoS: Vollkan
I am curious to hear your (and others') response to this summary, as well as the more detailed PBPA itself. At this point, you have firmly entered my top-3 suspect list.
"Specialization is for insects." --Heinlein

[i]Limited Access most weekends[/i]
User avatar
Gemelli
Gemelli
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Gemelli
Goon
Goon
Posts: 295
Joined: September 10, 2007
Location: WiscAAHHnsin

Post Post #1281 (ISO) » Mon Oct 29, 2007 5:47 pm

Post by Gemelli »

Detailed PBPA of Vollkan, stream of consciousness style (for reference):

349: Casts a huge net of suspicion across the town. Notes that Oman giving AlyG townie brownies is "kind of like giving Hitler the Nobel Peace Prize." Sums up that after his D1 read:
vollkan wrote:Elias_the_thief: Has done nothing to arouse my suspicion, but I may do a reread on him just to be sure.
Oman: Started off well but became increasingly contrived and is now defending AlyG. From the above, I gave HoS: Oman
AlyG: Scum. Plain and simple. I have already voted but I will put it down here again for mod?s convenience and because I want to vote him again. Vote: AlyG
Dr. Blackstrike: Newbish. I don't think is scum.
Lucienne: Not particularly notable but a potential scumbuddy with AlyG based on earlier stuff.
originality: On one hand, AlyG has been rabidly against Orig. On the other, Orig's latest play is defending himself and AlyG. FoS: originality
shaft.ed: Town.
dybeck: Similar to Elias.
353: Continues to press AlyG. Defends AlyG charge that Lucienne was lurking ("she wasn't, FTR"). Notable quote:
vollkan wrote:Prodding for opinions is something I consider a scumtell. By all means, say "X is not contributing" but specifically asking "What do you think of A, B and C?" looks like you are trying to get a particular response.
363-4: Questions dybeck about why he accused shaft.ed of being the SK.

374: Responds to shaft.ed's post suggesting that vollkan's accusation of AlyG is over the top. Explains why he thinks Dr. BS is newbish, not scummy.

382: Asks Oman why he thinks AlyG is more suspicious than Dybeck.

392: Explains that he thinks that Dybeck's "we should not kill the SK" strategy is only valid if we know the SK's identity.

394:
vollkan wrote:Thus, since I am sure a vig would not kill Carrot and find no reason for a vig to kill Spurg I can draw but one conclusion:
People we have a SK.
398-399: Numbers analyses. Spends equal time assessing whether we are at 6:2:1 or 5:3:1. Draws this conclusion:
vollkan wrote:Taking the 5:3:1 scenario,
If we lynch the SK today, then D3 opens at 4:3. LYLO.
If we lynch the scum today, then D3 opens at 3:2:1 in wcs. This is outcome (A) in my previous post. It can go any number of ways.
If we mislynch today, then D3 opens at 2:3:1 in wcs. Outcome (B) from above.
Uses this post to argue that it doesn't really matter whether we go after the SK or mafia today.

403: Responds to AlyG claim by unvoting.

408: Notes that tracker is actually a fairly safe claim for scum. Indicates that he suspects orig, but suspects AlyG more at this point.

413: Indicates that though he suspects AlyG, feels he should not vote for him as he is a claimed power role.

415: Indicates that if AlyG dies, orig should roleclaim before anything happens. FoS's dybeck for his willingness to vote originality so quickly.

439: Reacts to originality's vig claim. Lists four scenarios; states that both scenarios where orig=vig are unlikely. States that "Dybeck's willingness to follow AlyG is very smelly (along with the SK-shaft.ed stuff from just before)." Lists his two main options as either lynching AlyG, or looking elsewhere, and places a Dybeck vote.

446: Defends vigOrig as "plausible" if not likely. Indicates that if scum, Orig is likely to be killed by the rival scum faction tonight. Assesses contradictions in dybeck posts 286-404, in which dybeck switches from "my gut says [originality is] not scum" to "It's not like we didn't think he was scum yesterday" with no intervening posts mentioning orig.

448-449: Suggests bizarre (and ultimately proved ineffective) plan to confirm AlyG's alignment. "My feeling at the moment is that Dybeck is our SK and that AlyG is scum with Orig."

453: Continued numerical analysis with Oman. Again gives equal weight to the possibility of 5:3:1 or 6:2. Notable quote:
vollkan wrote:As we can see, our situation is VERY grim if there is a mafia trio. It means inescapable LYLO for us. Things are much better if it is a duo.
455: Responds to Oman's suggestion that 5:3:1 is more likely by saying "In Mini 467 ( a game I was in), there were 2 mafia, SK and no vig. I don't know whether 3 mafia and 1 SK is more likely, but 2 is a possiblity nonetheless." Also says "There is no logical reason for the SK to kill Carrot. As such, I think it more likely that Orig is mafia than SK."

457: Continued disc with Oman. "In short, our best bet is to lynch the SK. I feel confident AlyG is not the SK, her actions are either mafia or tracker." Rebuffs Oman suggestion that CarrotCake makes sense as an SK kill.

460:
vollkan wrote:If we lynch vig-Orig, D3 opens at wcs 4:3 LYLO.
If we lynch SK-Orig D3 opens at wcs 4:3 LYLO.
If we lynch maf-Orig D3 opens at wcs 3:2:1. (yuck)

If mislynch someone who is not Orig and Orig is SK, D3 wcs is 2:3:1 (yuck)
If mislynch someone who is not Orig and Orig is maf, D3 wcs is 2:3:1 (basically scum win)
If mislynch someone who is not Orig and Orig is vig, D3 wcs is 3:3 LOSS (if Orig screws up again). If Orig doesn't shoot: 4:3 LYLO. If Orig succeeds: 4:2 LYLO.

If we lynch non-Orig mafia and Orig is SK, D3 wcs is 3:2:1 (yuck)
If we lynch non-Orig mafia and Orig is vig, D3 wcs is 3:2 LYLO (with mis-vig). If no-vig shot then 4:2 LYLO. If successful vig-shot then 3:1 LYLO.
If we lynch non-Orig SK, meaning Orig is maf D3 wcs is: 4:3 LYLO

Good grief...It looks like there are no advantages ANYWHERE without relying on help from maf or SK.
462: Suggests that AlyG should track originality. Votes originality.

463-464, 466, 468, 470, 472: Minor clarifications on analysis post.

474: Unvotes: "If Orig is a vig, the set-up is 6:3. In other words, a scum lynch today and a vig kill tonight can put as at 6:1. This game is well within our grasp. The constant focus on wcs has distorted things."

487: Agrees with shaft.ed that people should be careful with their votes at this point. Responds to Oman's post that "letting a killing role live the night will only lead to pain" by stating that:
vollkan wrote:It's a gambit, no doubt about that. Let's not forget, though, that Orig could easily have claimed weak doctor or something if he was the SK/mafia and did not want to expose himself to NK risk. The fact that has has claimed vig, a role likely to get NKed, points to him being genuine.

As such, I think our situation is 6:3 more likely than one of 6:2:1 or 5:3:1. I really don't think we should be killing Orig today.
Unvotes (despite not having a vote logged). Also states that "Oman and Dybeck have both really been taking similar lines in regards to Orig, however Oman did vote Dybeck in #440. I am now sure that this stance is anti-town, but I myself held it just yesterday until I realised how stupid it is. I have my eye on them, particularly Dybeck given all the previous stuff."

Note: This is the first place where vollkan posts his "anyone who wants to lynch originality is anti-town" premise, despite he himself holding that opinion just a few posts ago.

492: Echoes shaft.ed that we should not guide AlyG's actions tonight. Replies to Lucienne's notice that she will be LA due to family emergency by saying "And I don't want Lucienne replaced."

494: Defends Originality's rationale for NK'ing carrotcake to Dybeck, stating that "it basically looks like an OMGUS kill."

496-497: Replies to Oman's post (claiming that he is convinced that orig is an SK) by stating that while there are good arguments for orig being the SK, "if he is the vig, we are really hurting ourselves by lynching him." Adds this post:
vollkan wrote:However, there is one fact which kind of defeats the whole SK theory: Orig claimed VIG.

If Orig is SK, why the hell would he claim the one pro-town role which we can be almost certain that the mafia will prioritise over all others.

I know that if I were a SK in Orig's position, I would have claimed weak doc or RB or something, NOT Vig.

Hence, my instinct is telling me that the people pushing Orig's lynch are mafia trying to score a vig or SK lynch.
501: Votes Oman, and FoS's dybeck, for arguing that Originality is the SK. "The fact that he is now trying to prove that Orig is the SK, in light of everything I have been saying suggests very strongly that he has a motivation to get rid of Orig."

504: Replies to Oman's comment that "Wait, Vollkan was voting for originality, and even posted points on why he was an SK and not a vig and now you want to let him live?" by saying "now you are telling lies about what I said." Goes on to demonstrate that Oman's comment was not a lie at all, oddly.

506-508: Replies to Dybeck's FoS of vollkan by stating that "I think my case for Orig being vig is a hell of a lot more convincing than your blind support for a lynch or Oman's feeble arguments." and "I have just come to the conclusion that Orig is very likely not a SK. I guess this leaves us with Orig being vig or being mafia." Uses shaft.ed's analysis to support his case that originality is a vig. Further suggests that it is unlikely that originality would be mafia given the Vig claim. Votes for Dybeck again.

512: Tells originality that "you should kill...just be careful"

517: Replies to a shaft.ed FoS (stating that Vollkan's rapid voting, despite having agreed that quick votes are a bad idea, is suspicious) by stating that he will unvote if the wagon goes higher. Also turns a 180 at shaft.ed's prompting: "You're right. Don't kill tonight Orig."

523, 526: Replies to shaft.ed's comment that having dybeck at L-2 is not a good idea. Gives Oman some leeway for changing his mind. Posts suspicion of AlyG based on his prodding people to talk while not contributing content himself, and discusses the possibility of an AlyG/orig pairing. Discusses the possibility of lynching AlyG in order to confirm Originality's role, but still favors a Dybeck lynch.

534: Replies to orginality's responses.

536, 538: Notes that AlyG and Originality seem keen on getting role info from Dr BS.

544: Unvotes, but states that his vote is still on dybeck (??). Is again influenced by a shaft.ed post. Indicates that his "lynch AlyG" suggestion was a trap. States that "The fact that Orig is supporting Dybeck's lynch is a little perturbing to me. If Dybeck is SK, then his death is going to mean the end of Orig."

549: Lauds shaft.ed for a "brilliant post." Reiterates that "Orig is most likely not a SK" and that "I think it is overall more likely that the claim is genuine than that Orig is mafia."

554, 557, 559: "2 mafia is a real possibility if we have a SK. Otherwise, it is most likely 3." Indicates that he thinks Originality's placement of Oman on the "almost definitely town" list is odd. States that even with a mafia lynch tonight, a misvig puts us into LYLO: "in short, your vigging is dangerous to us."

561: Suggests that Oman is wasting his "lurker" vote on Elias, who has posted a lack of availability.

565: Continues to explain to Originality why a vig on N2 would be a bad idea.

573: "Yes; there seems to be some agreement that he is very much more likely vig than SK and probably more likely vig than mafia (though he may well be mafia)." Gives credence to Lucienne's suggestion that there may be a Dybeck/Elias scum partnership. Posts numeric analyses that omit any possibility of Originality being the SK.

575: Replies to AlyG post. "I don't think we should lynch Orig today. If he is scum, then there is a SK (since I don't think Orig is SK) who would be crazy not to get rid of him. As such, lynching Orig today will only help that scum group. Dybeck is far more sensible a choice."

598: Big post here:

Dybeck:"if you're not going to lynch him, we may as well at least make sure that his kills are working for the good of the town." Vollkan: "It's pretty damn ironic that you are suspicious of him and think he is scum because he killed a very pro-town player, but now you WANT him to kill."

Indicates that Dybeck has actually made a good point: "The only problem here, though, is that all you have proved is that vig is a safe claim for scum. This doesn't prove that he is scum. Actually, given this logic, it kind of debunks the whole argument that Orig is not a SK." Also indicates that an Orig post has helped him realize that vig would be a safe claim for an SK.

"CarrotCake was clearly using very good logic and posting to a great extent. Thus, she was a threat to the scum. By NKing her, there is the added advantage of throwing suspicion onto AlyG.
It is VERY plausible that scum would NK carrot."
vollkan wrote:I was wrong...Dybeck's latest stuff makes a lot of sense and I now see he has never been stubbornly pushing for Orig's lynch; in fact, Dybeck now appears quite pro-town to me.

Orig looks a lot worse to me right now but, for reasons I gave previously, I don't want him lynched today.

Gemelli looks very pro-town to me, as does shaft.ed.

I am a little concerned with the lurky players: Lucienne and Elias.
As such, I guess my suspicion falls back to the second person who has raised my eyebrows today: Oman.
607: Continues to suspect that orig is not an SK, but in fact a vig or mafia. "This makes me think he is unlikely to be mafia and, so, I am left thinking he is pro-town vig."

608: Switches tacks on Dybeck again: "he may very well be mafia trying to get rid of Orig; same goes for anyone on Orig's wagon." Going back to the "anyone who wants to get rid of Orig is anti-town" premise. Also switches tacks on Orig action: "Secondly, I don't know whether we should be demanding that Orig does not NK. By telling him not to kill, we nullify the threat he presents to the mafia. I think it might be better if we allow Orig to kill, but request that he take much more thought. Thirdly, the matter of lynching Orig. If Orig is lynched, we can be certain that AlyG will be NKed. AlyG's power is very useful."

638: Again agrees with a shaft.ed post. Claims to have noted that CarrotCake wasn't really all that pro-town but that "I wanted to see how things played out given that the anti-Orig lobby was relying on it so crucially."
vollkan wrote:My view is as follows.
Town
shaft.ed -- 80% sure
AlyG -- claimed
Orig -- claimed
Vollkan

Unreadable
Elias_the_thief
Lucienne
Gemelli (As you say, though, slightly scummy. I think about 55% scummy)

Scummy
Oman -- 60%
dybeck --65%
Votes for Dybeck. Again. Continues to support the premise that Orig is a pro-town vig.

639: Attacks dybeck again for posting that "If we mislynch today, we're down to 8. If mafia and SK both hit town tonight, it's 3 mafia, 2 town and 1 SK and we lose. If mafia hits SK and SK hits town, it's 3 mafia and 3 town and we lose." Vollkan: "The fact you are raising this falsity now as some fearsome spectre just reinforces my suspicion in you. You are doing all you can to push Orig's lynch in spite of the evidence against you."

642: Numbers. Again reiterates that he thinks orig is pro-town.

644:
vollkan wrote:The threat Orig presents to the mafia is incredible.

To make this as wcs as possible, I shall assume that Orig is SK and that we mislynch and that there are 3 mafia. Town lynch makes it 4:3:1.
Scum NK of town makes it 3:3:1.
Now, Orig could target maf or town. If town = 2:3:1 (mafia wins). If mafia = 3:2:1.
In the 3:2:1 situation, if we lynched mafia it becomes 3:1:1. As such, if Orig NKs the last mafia, they lose. As such, Orig presents the prospect of a loss to the mafia even if we mislynch.
646, 648: States that a 2-person mafia (rather than 3) is plausible, though unbalanced against the mafia, and that a 3-person mafia is more likely.

651: Replies to Oman's comment that "dybeck is starting to look town" by saying that "Dybeck's actions are also entirely consistent with him being a mafia hunting SK-Orig."

653: Prods Oman with a question about whether we should lynch originality.

656, 658: Argues against the "no kill" limitation on originality.

662: Lends credence to originality's explanation for why he killed CarrotCake. Supports idea of letting Originality NK. Rebuffs idea that Originality is an SK.

663: Continues to advocate giving originality NK decision. Indicates that most of his grounds for suspecting me at 55% was based on "Mostly your predecessor. And some of this stuff regarding Orig." Frames dybeck's actions as consistent with mafia.

665: More back-and-forth with me.

666: Suggests mini-scumdar list to guide Originality.

668: Argues that it's less likely that Originality is mafia, but not a given.

670: Suspects Gemelli/Dybeck partnership based on my rating Dybeck at 50% scum/town.

672: Argues that a 9:2:1 setup is difficult, but not broken. Suggests that Dybeck has just implied that Streeflo is incompetent.

675: Attacks (guess who?) Dybeck again, because "You were very actively hunting Orig as a SK. I don't believe Orig is SK. This was you hunting someone who could be a SK but is very likely vig and you are ignoring the actual hunting of mafia, other than your latest insinuations about shaft.ed and myself." Points out that a mislynch is not an auto-loss if Orig is mafia. Continues to support the vigOrig premise. And this exchange -- Dybeck: "I don't want any of this to dilute the core message, which is that originality is lying and he does have to die." Vollkan: "Your argument that he is lying has been refuted. I don't like your phrase 'have to die'."

678: "I think it is possible that Dybeck is mafia with two of Elias/Lucienne/Gemelli and not Oman."

680: Reiterates that "we haven't instructed Orig not to kill. Orig is to do as Orig sees fit, but with the utmost caution." And to AlyG: "Doc should probably protect either you or Orig, let me think on that one."

705: Responds to shaft.ed's alarm that vollkan has suggested doc protection for Orig: "I said I was not convinced and I needed to think. I didn't mean that I considered Orig an equal option to AlyG at all. I just meant that I was going to look at both options, rather than immediately ruling it out without doing a proper analysis. I can't think of any reason to protect Orig, after all I've been pushing hard on not lynching Orig for the crossfire thing as well." Posts his "Orig list":
vollkan wrote:1. No Kill
2. Dybeck
3. Oman
4. Elias (though well below the others).
Increases HoS on Oman for putting AlyG on his Orig list. Continues to go after Dybeck: "Everything you are saying there has been refuted at some point, and you must know that."

Responds to my comment that Vollkan seems to have waffled in his opinion on CarrotCake and myself. "As for the difference regarding my opinion of you, Gemelli. It stemmed from my changed views regarding Orig and the situation with Dybeck and from me remembering to consider your predecessor's play. When I said I thought you were very pro-town, I was reading you in isolation." (So again: "anyone who wants to lynch orig is anti-town.")

Indicates that Oman's and Dybeck's lists are both scummy. "At deadline, I would change to Oman if it came down to it, but I would prefer a dybeck lynch today."

712, 714, 718, 721, 723, 725, 727: Accuses Oman of backpedalling for replacing AlyG with Lucienne. Suggests a possible dybeck/oman partnership based on an Oman typo. Points out issues with Oman posts, specifically that Oman seems to be assuming AlyG tracker role despite him having put him on the Orig list. Votes Oman, and continues back-and-forth with him.

728, 730, 732, 734, 736: Unvotes, votes dybeck without explaining. Then claims that he had not thought things through sufficiently, thereby putting Oman lower than Dybeck on the scum list. More back-and-forth with Oman.

747: Responds to my question about why Lucienne is suspicious, saying that her behavior is "not vote-worthy," but a valid tell. Reiterates that he wants Orig's N2 action to be a "complete unknown:"
vollkan wrote:Hence, Orig should not approach this on a set mathematical basis, as in, selecting the most popular option. Orig should take our opinions as a basis but should exercise his own judgment. If Orig does NK, he will have a lot to answer for, but at the same time I want him to have complete freedom in this matter, to maintain the vital spectre of uncertainty.
Furthermore: "I think it might be an idea not to demand that Orig limit himself to them. Orig has complete control here and our list is only a guide. I suggest he follow the guide, but he is not bound by it if he thinks it is the best course of action otherwise."

751: Tells orig not to kill at random, but to use his judgement.

754-755: Reiterates that he does not want to confine orig to killing only a target on the town's top 4 list. "I would not support a blanket limiting of Orig to the consensus." Suggests that dybeck's use of the word "lose" implies that he is somehow assuming that originality is town (??). Tells orig that there are "many justifiable methodologies" to use in deciding his night action.

760, 763, 766, 768: Continues to beat on dybeck for using the word "lose" instead of "die." Acknowledges that "this is not a killer point, despite how much I am having to write on it. It is a complicated semantic one."

770: Finally accepts dybeck's explanation for using that word: "You have now clarified this matter in full." Claims that despite orig's posting that he views dybeck as probable scum, he does not believe that it is a given that orig will kill dybeck. States that "I don't think Orig is mafia."

774: Explains originality's potential use of the town lynch list. "I don't mean this as a set of rules or anything."

779: Switches direction in response to (you guessed it) a shaft.ed post, and backs off on the need to give Orig "guidance" rather than firm direction. Replies to shaft.ed's comment stating that he could see dybeck's posts as possibly consistent with a frustrated townie: "I understand this point and I admit it is giving me a bit of frustration. I mean, I can see a townie adopting dybeck's stance, the problem is that it has been proven to be so wrong that I can't understand why he persists in pushing it. ... I guess the question is basically: Dybeck who is adamant and scummy, or Oman who is opportunistic and scummy? When I frame it that way, Oman does look worse."

785: Attacks Oman for stating that "the town is strong."

800: CarrotCake was "not clearly pro-town." "I cannot support any motion to outright ban Orig from killing."

802: Corrects typo.

811: Quotes shaft.ed's CarrotCake summary post as a response to dybeck's "has someone managed to find a single scummy thing carrotcake said yet?" Despite the fact that NOTHING in that post points to scumminess, only a limited contribution to the town.

813, 815: Follows up one of my questions by pressing Oman on why he has suspected Lucienne without providing clear explanation of why.

819: FoS's Lucienne based on providing miniscule content.

822: Thanks Lucienne for reminding him that I had rated Dybeck as 50% scummy earlier.

825: Suspects that dybeck's ignoring my posts are a scumbuddy tell.

827: I had posted that if I am confirmed town, I did not want people to automatically assume that dybeck is also town. "This really smacks of you just trying to assert that you are pro-town. Maybe you are pre-empting a mafDybeck lynch and are trying to distance yourself. The point is, I don't like it." (Vollkan examples of posting that he is town: 638, 705, 754) Suspects dybeck for not having a strong read on me yet. Replies to my concern that giving Orig permission to kill outside the consensus list is a mistake: "We need Orig to present the threat that he could kill any mafia tonight, that a mafia could be lynched tomorrow and that orig could NK a mafia on N3 in order to hold this against the mafia. Imagine if, for instance, the mafia are Lucienne, Gemelli and shaft.ed. In that case, there is no threat posed by Orig even if he is limited to No Kill, Dybeck, Oman and Elias."

838:
vollkan wrote:SK Orig has effectively already lost. He is guaranteed to be NKed over the next 2 nights unless the three mafia are eliminated today, tonight and tomorrow. In which case he loses anyway because we have majority. If he fails to have mafia killed at any of these, he will die and lose.

This is important because it basically means that SKOrig has no incentive to stick to consensus at all. If we mislynch today, he can just kill at random to mess things up since he can be sure of his death. If we lynch mafia today, he will need to kill mafia to have a hope. In other words, we really bear no control over SkOrig
841: Reiterates that vigOrig is the most likely scenario. Clarifies that he does not want orig to kill, but also does not want a blanket ban.

862: "Something dybeck has been saying throughout this game is that I am acting too convinced of Orig being pro-town. I want to be clear that Orig is acting scummy and I do think there is quite a good chance of him being scum. The problem is that he has claimed vig. I don't necessarily like keeping Orig alive today, but he has claimed and, if we lynched him and he came up vig, we would be truly kicking ourselves."

"I don't think Orig is a SK; a vig claim is just too suicidal."

Advances the possibility of mafia-Orig and SK-dybeck.

865:
vollkan wrote:His behaviour is undoubtedly anti-town; ignoring everything and blindly pursuing the lynch of a claimed vig. Additionally, we have his misrepresentations and hints of buddyness with Gem.

On the other hand, however, I have this niggling concern that dybeck's actions seem almost too blatantly stubborn to be mafia and that his actions make more sense as a SK.

I'm going to throw my concern out here and see what people think: Dybeck is clearly anti-town, but I wonder if a mafioso would be this desperate. I mean, fine, a mafia dybeck would want you dead, but would a mafia really be willing to take the stance that dybeck is, which seems like it will result in his own lynching? Things would probably make more sense if dybeck is SK and Orig is mafia. This would fit with the fact that dybeck seems convinced Orig is mafia. Dybeck SK NEEDS us to lynch mafia today in order to have a hope of winning.
871: Attacks dybeck for creating strawmen, when in fact dybeck's comment was accurate. Further goes to explain that if orig is Mafia, the SK will certainly kill him tonight. Claims that dybeck's leaving his vote on orig since post 404 means that he is "Desperately seeking the lynch of Orig who he thinks is mafia.... "

881: Replies to shaft.ed:
vollkan wrote:It's frustrating. Dybeck is clearly anti-town in his behaviour; I don't think we need debate that. And, yet, he is playing in such a blatantly anti-town manner that it just makes no sense to me at all. I mean, it could be a strategy in itself, but this gets tangled up in layers of messy WIFOM and I'd rather not go there.

Oman is playing like classic opportunistic scum. We've established that well and truly.

I guess the reason I am favouring dybeck is that his actions make no sense to me from a pro-town whereas I can imagine a townie acting like Oman, though his disapperance is a cause for concern. T

hat said, if Oman really was frustrated and wavering in his views, one would think he would be posting a lot more in an effort to sort things out. The fact that he has now vanished suggests more strongly that he may be scum.
887: Attacks dybeck's list.

893: Reiterates that "If Orig = SK, he effectively loses unless mafia is lynched today, in which case he still needs to NK a mafioso to have a hope of winning. If we mislynch today, Orig has effectively lost so he will likely just kill at random."

899: Describes originality's "why I can't be mafia" post as WIFOMish.

902: Reiterates that orig should not be autolynched if he kills someone outside the consensus list.

907-908: Analyzes the scenario of Orig being an SK. "It is true, therefore, that if Orig does not NK, he is almost certainly town. The thing I don't get though, dybeck, is that for all your insistence on lynching Orig, your main concern seems to be preventing him from NKing. You seem to be pushing for us to mandate no NK from dybeck when you should know full well that dybeck will only oblige with that if he is town "

921: Switches gears (prompted by shaft.ed post, cue expressions of shock): "I read your analysis and I think that you are correct here and that we have finally determined the best approach to make. We should be demanding that Orig does not commit a NK."

927: Despite what was posted in 921, does not think there is a really strong argument for a ban on orig NKing vs. him using a consensus approach.

937: Goes back to advocating no-NK.

953: Suspects originality posts, specifically the fact that he keeps reiterating that he is pro-town. Suspects that orig may be bussing Oman. "At the moment, I am happy with either dybeck or Oman. I will wait until Oman checks in before I consider changing my vote."

957: Goes back after dybeck:
vollkan wrote:
dybeck wrote:Way to look like you're bussing your scumbuddy whilst still continuing your campaign for an alternate lynch.

I'm happy that both orig and Oman are mafia, and I'd be happy with either.

I might actually be happier with Oman, because in the event that we're wrong in any combination, we've pretty much managed to neuter originality for tonight because he now knows how likely his lynch is for tomorrow if he strays from the "no-kill" line.

Anybody need to say anything before I drop the hammer?
I just reread this and it chronically set off all sorts of bells for me.

1) Dybeck, I thought you were arguing that Oman was the SK? Does a possible bus (only possible, it may not be at all) really have the potential to shift this? If it has shifted you, then I demand that you identity a SK.

2) More importantly, you seem damn keen on Oman's lynch. You haven't even asked for a claim and you were evidently prepared to hammer.

3) You are pre-empting that this hammering could be wrong, despite the fact that you appear to be champing at the bit to hammer.

4) You are wrong that we have neutered Orig even if we are wrong about Oman (interesting that you saying this serves to encourage Oman's lynch). If Oman is town and Orig is mafia, he is still going to NK regardless, since his death is assured by the SK. If Orig is SK, he will pretty much have to NK to have a shot. In other words, your argument is complete rot. If Orig is scum, he will very near certainly night kill.

5) Using Gemelli's wonderful little tool, dybeck has not FoSed Oman this day. He FoSed Oman on D1 for "misrepresentation". Willing to hammer under no pressure of deadline without a FoS?
Ironically, this attack is a response to a dybeck post that essentially mirrors Vollkan's suspicion in 953.

960, 961, 963: Comments on Gemelli's super-fabulous parsing tool.

972: Replies to my question on whether dybeck's post is really "chomping at the bit." Claims that he views any variation of "should I do the honors?" to be a scumtell. Defends Oman as lurking in a number of games, not just ours. Demands that dybeck point out another SK candidate if he views originality as mafia.

974: Attacks dybeck for claiming 100% certainty on orig guilt, and for not pursuing his lynch in spite of this feeling. This is "damned if you do, damned if you don't" logic. Dybeck has been scummy for pressing for originality's lynch, and now he is scummy for pressing for someone else's lynch.

976: Welcomes Elias back.

982: Continues to press dybeck.

993: Claims that he is not asking dybeck to name an SK because he necessarily thinks we have one. Only wants to gauge dybeck's response to the question. Responds to my FoS by saying "I never said that I was going to vote Oman if he did not post to my satisfaction; I simply said I was not going to change until he checked in." Literally true, but smacks of hair-splitting and deceptiveness. Also: "I know CC was not scummy and I think her suspicion in AlyG was very well-placed." Argues with Elias and dybeck on why originality's vig claim is plausible, rather than being the best claim option for a SK.

995: Backs off a bit, admits that Vig is a likely claim for an SK. Lists 10 points in favor of dybeck being scum.

999: Replies to dybeck's response to those 10 points. Claims that post 993 presents unrebutted evidence as to why orig can't be scum. Also claims that he is not defending orig, that he thinks orig is 65% likely to be scum.

1001: "Why Dybeck is Wrong Regarding Originality Being Obvious Scum" ... immediately followed by a disclaimer that orig is 65% scum :) Concludes that based on Elias analysis, we should take a closer look at orig.

1008: Claims that much of suspicion vs dybeck is due to use of terms like "100%" and "positive." Goes on to say that "it is very rare that I will be definite on things, because I see certainty as something which no townie should have." This is demonstratably false. In this game, Vollkan has regularly posted opinions as though they were confirmed facts.

Responds to suspicions I'd raised. Responds to suspicions that shaft.ed raised. Strongly believes that one of the three players, Dybeck, Orig, and Oman, is scum.

1011: Replies to orig's post by increasing his scum assessment of orig to 75%.

1014: Admits that an earlier post of mine that vollkan had viewed as scummy "looks more valid" now.

1016, 1018, 1020: Renewed focus on originality

1025: Responds to Elias's analysis of his case against Dybeck: "And you know what... Unvote. There are a number of minor tells in there, but collectively and when analysed by someone other than myself (multiple scrutiny = very important) it is not decisive. I hadn't gotten the whole thing out and analysed before this, so it was a good exercise."

1033: Oman is now his top lynch candidate. Orig "could be newb scum or new vig and I cannot think of any way to differentiate. His responses to my interrogation were what I would have expected. The fact is, that he really seems to think it makes sense for him to distance himself. It could be pure BS coming from him, but his explanation is complete at the moment."

"If Oman is mafia I do not think that shaft.ed and gemelli are." Suggests possible relationship between Elias and Lucienne.

1040: Disappointed at the prospect of replacing Oman, due to difficulty of getting a replacement.

1048: Replies to shaft.ed and dybeck posts.

1053: Detailed numerical analysis arguing that lynching originality would be bad for the town.

1067, 1070: Claims to have "crippled dybeck's case against originality" and wants him to reply.

1084: SK orig will probably not NK. "I just proved numerically that lynching Orig is a terrible idea."

1088: Replies to Korlash's initial suspicions of him. "If you read my posts #566 and #574, I argued that a vigging was very dangerous. In #560, I said I was definitely not up for the risk. In #558 I said his vigging was dangerous. And in #518 I agreed with shaft.ed's numerical argument against Orig vigging. That was just 6 posts after the first one you cite." <-- THIS IS FALSE. VOLLKAN HAS MADE MORE POSTS ADVOCATING US LETTING ORIG PICK HIS OWN NK TARGET THAN POSTS SUPPORTING NO-KILL. MANY OF THOSE POSTS WERE MADE AFTER THE POSTS HE LISTS ABOVE.

1090: Replies to dybeck's vote on Korlash by returning his vote to dybeck.

1098: Claims that posts along the lines of "Orig is to do as orig sees fit, but with the utmost caution" was a cryptic way of telling him not to NK, but keeping the uncertainty active. Accuses dybeck of parroting.

1107: Explains what "ad hominem" means. Attacks Korlash for "role claiming" (his words).

1109: Attacks Korlash's use of ellipses. Continues to state that Korlash has claimed.

1111, 1113, 1114: Continues to explain why he thinks Korlash's post constituted a roleclaim. "If you weren't, that's fine."

1117: Continues to attack Korlash over his "claiming vanilla was the best thing I could do" stance. "It seems Oman has been replaced by a village idiot."

1123: More fun back and forths with Korlash.

1124: Responds to my questioning why he continues to use the term "role claim" by saying that his post amounted to an obvious claim in his opinion. Claims that calling someone a village idiot is not ad hominem.

1126: Why claiming vanilla is damaging.

1128: Explains acronyms.

1139, 1147: Keeps pushing Korlash. Votes Korlash twice.

1149, 1151: Rebuffs Korlash's list of false claims that have been made against him.

1158: Responds to my opinion that only one of the posts Korlash made is in fact a "false claim." Acknowledges "overarguing" on points.

1166: Replaces his Korlash vote with an FoS. "Typically, there are only 3-member mafias in minis." Runs through analysis of three scenarios, but only touches on those where Orig is a vig or Orig is an SK.

1168: "Orig has been ordered not to NK, punishable by his own lynching. He won't NK."

1171, 1177, 1180: More dialogue with Korlash. Vote correction to mod.

1183, 1184, 1188: Reiterates that Korlash is scummy. Suspects that Korlash not wanting to put someone at L-1 suggests that he is worried about possible ramifications. Points out that if orig misvigs tonight, we lose. Votes dybeck, putting him at L-1.

1190-1191: Unvotes quickly. Claims that this was a trap to see how strongly Korlash felt about not wanting to leave someone at L-1. HoS on Korlash.

1193: Replies to dybeck's role claim. "All in all, I think it more likely that Orig is SK than mafia." Also suggests that Dybeck may be the SK.

1195: Replies to Korlash's questioning about the trap.

1208: Responds to shaft.ed post by changing gears. Shaft.ed doesn't buy the cop claim, and now Vollkan doesn't, either. Posts more questions for dybeck. Tells orig that he doesn't think dybeck is lying, asks orig to "truthfully claim now."

1211: Posts that he never said he was certain that dybeck is not lying. "Orig and Dybeck's claims are mutually exclusive, since insanity and vigmiller are both exceedingly unlikely. In other words, one of them is scum." "Tbh, I find it very hard to imagine a mafioso doing a dybeck and pushing so adamantly for the lynch of someone, to the point of drawing themself under such heat. It just is not sensible scumplay. At most, all dybeck needed to do would be to play normally and get a 4:3:1 mislynch, then NK Orig. At worst, the mafia get a 4:2. The risk assessment just doesn't weigh up." Thinks that Dybeck could, however, be an SK.

1214: "In fact, dybeck would have looked much less suspicious if he had abandoned his case."

1218: Question for Korlash and Elias

1226: "time for me to open the floodgates and go on the rabid offensive" Describes my posted opinion that either orig or dybeck is the right play today as "a major slip," and FoS's me. Once again: if you want to lynch orig, you must be scummy.

FoS's Korlash for basically the same thing.

FoS's Lucienne for chronically lurking and "her only content is plainly anti-town."

Replies to a shaft.ed post by switching gears (sigh). Now Dybeck is either mafia or cop, not an SK.

Suggests that Dybeck will be NK'd by the SK. (This seems to imply that the SK will see Dybeck as mafia, when in fact Vollkan has just painted a picture that he could be a cop. If the SK kills town, the SK loses, right?)

Votes Lucienne.

1228: Backs down on Elias ranking: "If I saw more of you, I would probably think you were pro-town." (???)
vollkan wrote:If you want percentages (0% = obv town, 100% = obv scum)
AlyG = 0%
shaft.ed = 20%
Elias = 55%
Gemelli = 60%}
Korlash = 65%} Not tied, but the above was more based on specific reactions to lynching Orig. On overall perception, Korlash is scummier.
Lucienne = 70%
dybeck = 75%
Orig = 100%
1230: "Gemelli is suspicious for his supporting Orig's lynch when we know that it is not the best option for the town."

1232: Jousting with Korlash

1236: "Gemelli, your number analysis is correct, but faulty because it fails to look at the motivation of the SK being his own survival and win:" Predicts that the SK will not night kill if the town mislynches. More numerical analysis of why lynching the SK is bad.

1240, 1242: Replies to Korlash's questioning why he voted for Lucienne. After a PBPA, decides that there is nothing inherently damning and unvotes.

1251: Responds to my suspicions of him that he has been changing direction increasingly and making posts that he then retracts. Claims that there was obvious anti-town content in her most recent post, and that voting someone and then unvoting on second thought is not harmful. Agrees with shaft.ed post. Once again, casts suspicion on dybeck. "I think the mafia in that situation are most likely- dybeck/Gemelli/Elias or dybeck/Gemelli/Korlash"

1254: Replies to post by Korlash. Starts tracking people's perspective on dybeck's claim. Criticizes dybeck for claiming cop.

1259: PBPA on Elias. Suspects that I am Elias's most likely scum partner, followed by dybeck.

1260: Replies to my responses.

1266: HoS's dybeck for posting something his answers to my question on whether everyone else agrees with Vollkan's arguments.

1268: "I am the one agreeing that Orig is most likely the SK; I don't dispute that. All the "evidence" is saying is that Orig is probably the SK. My numbers build upon that to point out that lynching him is not in our best interests."

==========================================

THEMES OF NOTE


What is originality's most likely role?


* 408: Orig is suspicious, but AlyG is more suspicious
* 439: Scenarios where orig=vig are both unlikely
* 446: vigOrig is "plausible," if not likely.
* 448-449: Orig is most likely mafia with AlyG
* 455: Orig is more likely mafia than SK
* 457: CarrotCake doesn't make sense as an SK kill
* 487: Orig vig claim seems genuine
* 496-497: Orig is most likely not the SK
* 501: Suspecting that orig is the SK is suspicious
* 506-508: Orig is most likely vig
* 549: Orig is most likely not an SK. Claim is most likely genuine
* 573: Analysis of possible scenarios omit any possibility of orig being an SK
* 575: "I don't think Orig is SK"
* 598: "CarrotCake was clearly using very good logic and posting to a great extent. Thus, she was a threat to the scum. By NKing her, there is the added advantage of throwing suspicion onto AlyG. It is VERY plausible that scum would NK carrot."
* 607: "This makes me think he is unlikely to be mafia and, so, I am left thinking he is pro-town vig."
* 638: Orig is most likely town
* 642: Orig is most likely town
* 651: Orig may be SK
* 662: Orig is probably not SK
* 668: Orig mafia is possible, but less likely
* 675: To dybeck: "You were very actively hunting Orig as a SK. I don't believe Orig is SK. This was you hunting someone who could be a SK but is very likely vig and you are ignoring the actual hunting of mafia"
* 800: CarrotCake was "not clearly pro-town."
* 838: If Orig is SK, he has effectively already lost
* 841: vigOrig is most likely situation
* 862: "Something dybeck has been saying throughout this game is that I am acting too convinced of Orig being pro-town. I want to be clear that Orig is acting scummy and I do think there is quite a good chance of him being scum. The problem is that he has claimed vig." Raises possibility of mafia-orig and SK-dybeck
* 893: "If Orig = SK, he effectively loses unless mafia is lynched today"
* 907-908: "if Orig does not NK, he is almost certainly town."
* 993: "I know CC was not scummy and I think her suspicion in AlyG was very well-placed."
* 999: Claims that post 993 offers unrebutted evidence of why originality can't be scum. That being said, believes that originality is 65% likely to be scum
* 1001: "Why Dybeck is Wrong Regarding Originality Being Obvious Scum" ... immediately followed by a disclaimer that orig is 65% scum :)
* 1011: Orig is now 75% scum
* 1208: Orig should "truthfully claim now"
* 1228: Orig is now 100% scum
* 1268: "I am the one agreeing that Orig is most likely the SK; I don't dispute that. All the 'evidence' is saying is that Orig is probably the SK."

What is the town's best course of action today?


* 392: The "we should not kill the SK" strategy is only valid if we know the SK's identity.
* 398-399: It doesn't really matter whether we go after the SK or mafia today.
* 439: Votes dybeck
* 457: "In short, our best bet is to lynch the SK. I feel confident AlyG is not the SK, her actions are either mafia or tracker."
* 462: AlyG should track originality. Votes originality
* 487: "Oman and Dybeck have both really been taking similar lines in regards to Orig, however Oman did vote Dybeck in #440. I am now sure that this stance is anti-town,
but I myself held it just yesterday until I realised how stupid it is.
I have my eye on them, particularly Dybeck given all the previous stuff."
* 496-497: "My instinct is telling me that the people pushing Orig's lynch are mafia trying to score a vig or SK lynch"
* 492: We should not guide AlyG's actions tonight
* 501: Votes Oman
* 508: Votes Dybeck
* 512: Tells originality that "you should kill...just be careful"
* 517: "Don't kill tonight Orig."
* 526: Still favors a Dybeck lynch
* 544: Unvotes, still favors a dybeck lynch.
* 554, 557, 559: To orig: "in short, your vigging is dangerous to us."
* 565: A vig on N2 would be a bad idea
* 575: "I don't think we should lynch Orig today. If he is scum, then there is a SK (since I don't think Orig is SK) who would be crazy not to get rid of him. As such, lynching Orig today will only help that scum group. Dybeck is far more sensible a choice."
* 608: Anyone who wants to get rid of orig looks anti-town. "I think it might be better if we allow Orig to kill, but request that he take much more thought."
* 656, 658: Argues against the "no kill" limitation on originality.
* 662: We should let originality NK.
* 663, 666: Originality should be guided, but not restricted, by town consensus
* 680: "We haven't instructed Orig not to kill. Orig is to do as Orig sees fit, but with the utmost caution." And to AlyG: "Doc should probably protect either you or Orig, let me think on that one."
* 705: "I can't think of any reason to protect Orig" ... "At deadline, I would change to Oman if it came down to it, but I would prefer a dybeck lynch today."
* 725: Votes Oman
* 728: Votes Dybeck
* 747: "Orig should take our opinions as a basis but should exercise his own judgment. If Orig does NK, he will have a lot to answer for, but at the same time I want him to have complete freedom in this matter, to maintain the vital spectre of uncertainty."
* 751: Same argument: Orig should not be bound by consensus
* 754-755: "I would not support a blanket limiting of Orig to the consensus." Orig has "many justifiable methodologies" for selecting an action.
* 779: Firm direction for Orig would be better than vague guidance.
* 800: "I cannot support any motion to outright ban Orig from killing."
* 841: Does not want orig to kill, but does not want to ban him from killing.
* 865: "Dybeck SK NEEDS us to lynch mafia today in order to have a hope of winning."
* 902: Reiterates that orig should not be autolynched if he kills someone outside the consensus list.
* 921: "I read your analysis and I think that you are correct here and that we have finally determined the best approach to make. We should be demanding that Orig does not commit a NK."
* 927: Does not think there is a really strong argument for a ban on orig NKing vs. him using a consensus approach.
* 937: Once again, no-NK is the way to go
* 1053: Lynching originality would be bad for the town
* 1084: Ditto
* 1088: "If you read my posts #566 and #574, I argued that a vigging was very dangerous. In #560, I said I was definitely not up for the risk. In #558 I said his vigging was dangerous. And in #518 I agreed with shaft.ed's numerical argument against Orig vigging. That was just 6 posts after the first one you cite." <-- THIS IS FALSE. IN BETWEEN THOSE POSTS, VOLLKAN CONTINUED TO ADVOCATE FOR AN ORIG NK, AS DEMONSTRATED ABOVE
* 1098: Claims that his posts that included comments along the lines of "Orig is to do as orig sees fit, but with the utmost caution" were just a cryptic way of telling him not to NK, but keeping the uncertainty active.
* 1168: "Orig has been ordered not to NK, punishable by his own lynching. He won't NK."
* 1188: Votes dybeck to L-1
* 1190: Unvotes
* 1226: Anyone who wants to lynch originality is scummy by definition
* 1230: "Gemelli is suspicious for his supporting Orig's lynch when we know that it is not the best option for the town."

What is dybeck's most likely role, based on the evidence?


* 439: "Dybeck's willingness to follow AlyG is very smelly"
* 487: "Oman and Dybeck have both really been taking similar lines in regards to Orig, however Oman did vote Dybeck in #440."
* 497: "my instinct is telling me that the people pushing Orig's lynch are mafia trying to score a vig or SK lynch.
* 501: "The fact that [dybeck] is now trying to prove that Orig is the SK, in light of everything I have been saying suggests very strongly that he has a motivation to get rid of Orig."
* 544: "The fact that Orig is supporting Dybeck's lynch is a little perturbing to me. If Dybeck is SK, then his death is going to mean the end of Orig."
* 598: "I was wrong...Dybeck's latest stuff makes a lot of sense and I now see he has never been stubbornly pushing for Orig's lynch; in fact, Dybeck now appears quite pro-town to me."
* 608: "he may very well be mafia trying to get rid of Orig; same goes for anyone on Orig's wagon."
* 651: "Dybeck's actions are also entirely consistent with him being a mafia hunting SK-Orig."
* 663: Dybeck's actions are consistent with mafia.
* 675: "Your argument that [originality] is lying has been refuted."
* 678: "I think it is possible that Dybeck is mafia with two of Elias/Lucienne/Gemelli and not Oman."
* 779: "I guess the question is basically: Dybeck who is adamant and scummy, or Oman who is opportunistic and scummy? When I frame it that way, Oman does look worse."
* 825: Dybeck may be mafia with Gemelli
* 862: Raises possibility of mafia-Orig and SK-dybeck
* 865: Dybeck is most likely mafia
* 1008: "The mind changing is something that bugs me for the simple reason that there was no need for him to change. He could have kept pushing Orig if he was so sure (as well as actually dealing with my arguments and rebuttal); there was no deadline. Instead, once Orig's NK is gone, he jumps over to Oman who he thought was the SK until fairly recently (remember, dybeck was adamant about not lynching the SK). "
* 1193: Dybeck may be the SK
* 1208: Doesn't think Dybeck is lying about his cop claim
* 1211: Dybeck's play doesn't make sense as mafia, but he could be an SK
* 1214: "In fact, dybeck would have looked much less suspicious if he had abandoned his case." (Compare and contrast with 1008)
* 1226: Dybeck may be cop, or may be mafia. Will likely be killed by the SK.
* 1251: Suspects Dybeck is mafia, lists possible buddies

What is the alignment of Dr. BS/Gemelli?


* 349: "Dr. Blackstrike: Newbish. I don't think is scum."
* 598: "Gemelli looks very pro-town to me"
* 638: Gemelli is 55% scummy
* 670: Gemelli may be mafia with Dybeck
* 678: "I think it is possible that Dybeck is mafia with two of Elias/Lucienne/Gemelli and not Oman."
* 705: "As for the difference regarding my opinion of you, Gemelli. It stemmed from my changed views regarding Orig and the situation with Dybeck and from me remembering to consider your predecessor's play. When I said I thought you were very pro-town, I was reading you in isolation."
* 865: There are hints of buddyness between Gemelli and Dybeck, even though Dybeck seems to be more likely a SK (???)
* 1033: "If Oman is mafia I do not think that shaft.ed and gemelli are."
* 1228: Gemelli is 60% scummy
* 1230: "Gemelli is suspicious for his supporting Orig's lynch when we know that it is not the best option for the town."
* 1251: "I think the mafia in that situation are most likely- dybeck/Gemelli/Elias or dybeck/Gemelli/Korlash"
* 1259: PBPA on Elias. Suspects that I am Elias's most likely scum partner, followed by dybeck.
"Specialization is for insects." --Heinlein

[i]Limited Access most weekends[/i]
User avatar
Korlash
Korlash
Krap Logick
User avatar
User avatar
Korlash
Krap Logick
Krap Logick
Posts: 6579
Joined: August 23, 2007
Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous

Post Post #1282 (ISO) » Mon Oct 29, 2007 6:23 pm

Post by Korlash »

... :shock:

*twitch*

The only thing I can think to say to that is wow... Then make a joke... so here it goes...

Wow...

Also:
Gem wrote:Based on the relationships I've been able to track here, if Vollkan *does* come up scum, I would consider his most likely scumbuddies to be Lucienne and Korlash.
Well as much as I would love to get closer to Lucienne... *Rowl* I find it hard to imagine me and Vollkan as buddies... Just because of how hard we fought in the beginning... I mean distancing can only go so far right? Did you actually point out these "relationships" in the huge thing or do i have to ask for them? I will look later when I have time but I feel asking might get it fast..

*Scoots closer to Lucienne*

So... I hear we make good buddies...
It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.

Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!
User avatar
vollkan
vollkan
The Interrogator
User avatar
User avatar
vollkan
The Interrogator
The Interrogator
Posts: 5373
Joined: March 29, 2007
Location: Australia

Post Post #1283 (ISO) » Mon Oct 29, 2007 6:50 pm

Post by vollkan »

Gemelli wrote: So: HoS: Vollkan I am curious to hear your (and others') response to this summary, as well as the more detailed PBPA itself. At this point, you have firmly entered my top-3 suspect list.
Okay, I shall address this extensive post by you now:
Gemelli wrote: #1: Vollkan has been going after Dybeck like he was made of ham through all of D2. This is not in itself surprising given Dybeck's attitude. What is notable after a complete reread is that the grounds for his suspicion have shifted dramatically, not just from the start of D2 to now, but in some cases from post to post. Examples: in posts 439 and 497, he suspects Dybeck of being mafia. In 544, he starts suspecting that Dybeck is the SK. In 598, he describes Dybeck as "quite pro-town." But just a few posts later, in 608, he's back to arguing that Dybeck is probably mafia, a line he continues until 1193, when he's back to accusing Dybeck of being the SK. In 1208, he states that he believes Dybeck's cop claim, that his claim doesn't make sense as a mafioso, but that SK is likely. In 1226 he's back to accusing Dybeck of being mafia.
So the notable thing is that my opinion changed?

Let's see.
439 wrote: If Orig is scum, then we can reasonably infer we have no vig (no counters). Therefore, Orig will very likely be NKed by the other scum faction. (** see "A" below)

**A - For this reason, I think it very likely that scum may be pushing Orig's lynch (ie. Dybeck). They know he is either vig or their enemy faction.
My reasoning there was on the assumption that Orig was either SK or Vig, so for dybeck to be mafia is logical.
497 wrote: However, there is one fact which kind of defeats the whole SK theory: Orig claimed VIG.

If Orig is SK, why the hell would he claim the one pro-town role which we can be almost certain that the mafia will prioritise over all others.

I know that if I were a SK in Orig's position, I would have claimed weak doc or RB or something, NOT Vig.

Hence, my instinct is telling me that the people pushing Orig's lynch are mafia trying to score a vig or SK lynch.
Again, I am reasoning that the people pushing Orig are mafia.
544 wrote: The fact that Orig is supporting Dybeck's lynch is a little perturbing to me. If Dybeck is SK, then his death is going to mean the end of Orig.
It is misrepresentation of Gemelli to say that here I am arguing dybeck is SK. I was merely pointing out that if dybeck shows up SK, Orig will be confirmed scum.

The description of dybeck as "quite pro-town" was in response to that spate of good reasoning he had, until I realised the whole thing was flawed.
698 wrote: I just don't think we should be pegging Dybeck as a townie purely because he is hunting a SK.
I don't see why this is a problem. I thought about things more and reasoned that dybeck was not necessarily pro-town for going after SK (something that has become even more apparent given the numbers)
1193 wrote: Something else to consider:
The possibility that dybeck is the SK. SKdybeck knows that Orig is mafia and wants him gone. SKdybeck thought he was at L-1, panicked and claimed cop, using Orig's guilty lynch as hopeful proof of him being cop.
I was NOT saying dybeck is the SK; I raised it as a possibility to remember, as any decent player would.

In 1208 I said dybeck's behaviour was consistent with cop, but I gave him questions for the obvious problems with it. Hence, I did not revert to a stance that dybeck was mafia.
Rarely do we see an acknowledgement that the line of attack is changing from Vollkan. He seems to have made up his mind very early in the game that Dybeck is scum, and has simply been trying to figure out a way to craft a resonating argument to support that premise.
In most of the examples you gave, I was merely looking at possibilities. In the sole example where my view actually shifted (dybeck being pro-town) I admitted that "I was wrong".

In other words, this point is complete rot.
Gemelli wrote: Review post 974, in which Vollkan claims that Dybeck is scummy for dropping his case against Originality, despite being "100% convinced" of orig's scumminess. Then look at posts 1008 -- where Vollkan posts that Dybeck had "no need" to abandon the lynch-originality theme, and that he finds that change in heart suspicious -- and 1214, in which Vollkan says that Dybeck would have been LESS suspicious if he had abandoned the case against originality earlier. Vollkan has created a damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't situation; no matter what course of action Dybeck chooses here, Vollkan will attack him for it. You could draw a conclusion from this that Vollkan has made up his mind that Dybeck should be lynched, and is opportunistically using whatever facts happen to be at hand to advance that agenda.
Now you are just misconstruing what I have been saying.

If dybeck was 100% convinced of Orig being "scum", he should NOT have dropped his pursuit so arbitrarily. What he should have done is admit he was wrong in full and with reasoning.

There is a difference between simply saying "Righto. Let's lynch Oman instead" to "I have reviewed your arguments and you make a good case against lynching Orig"

It is not a Catch 22. I would have been perfectly happy if dybeck had abandoned his case, rather than arbitrarily flipping.

My verdict on #1
- Complete rot and misrepresentation.
Gemelli wrote: Post 462, Vollkan suggests that AlyG should track originality. 491, shaft.ed says that he doesn't want the town to guide AlyG in any way. 492, vollkan reverses his earlier suggestion and agrees with shaft.ed.
Actually, in 462 I agreed with Oman's suggestion that dybeck be tracked, not Orig. In 492, I accepted shaft.ed was right, because I realised that ordering the tracking would be pointless. So yes, I did change my mind. My initial suggestion was stupid and I don't defend it.
Gemelli wrote: Post 512, Vollkan tells Originality that he should kill, but be careful. 515, shaft.ed posts that he'd prefer a no kill. 517, Vollkan says "You're right. Don't kill tonight Orig."
We've been over my "support" for Orig killing already. I never wanted him to kill, but I wanted him to be a threat. The point was that, after the numbers materialised, it became patently obvious that the risk outweighed any potential benefit of uncertainty
Post 598, Vollkan says that "CarrotCake was clearly using very good logic and posting to a great extent. Thus, she was a threat to the scum. By NKing her, there is the added advantage of throwing suspicion onto AlyG. It is VERY plausible that scum would NK carrot." Post 617, shaft.ed posts a summary of CC's posts, showing that she was hardly a hugely obvious townie. Post 638, Vollkan
says that he thought that CC wasn't really townie all along,
but didn't want to say anything in order to get more info on the players supporting originality's lynch.
That's a lie. My exact words were:
shaft.ed, reading over these past few pages, I really agree with you. The CarrotCake post, in particular, makes a very good point and one which I noticed some time ago. I wanted to see how things played out given that the anti-Orig lobby was relying on it so crucially. My reasons for doing so will become clear below.
I was pretty clear that I had "noticed" it. It was not always my view. Given CC's very big attacking post, I was initially convinced she was uber-town, but it became clearer to me after I read that she was not. Nonetheless, I said nothing to see how much longer the anti-Origs, mainly dybeck, would keep it up.
Gemelli wrote: Post 680, Vollkan says that "we haven't instructed Orig not to kill. Orig is to do as Orig sees fit, but with the utmost caution." And to AlyG: "Doc should probably protect either you or Orig, let me think on that one." 682-683, shaft.ed states his preference for giving orig a consensus list to work with rather than a blank slate, and FoS's vollkan for suggesting doc protection for orig. 705, Vollkan responds to that with "I said I was not convinced and I needed to think. I didn't mean that I considered Orig an equal option to AlyG at all. I just meant that I was going to look at both options, rather than immediately ruling it out without doing a proper analysis. I can't think of any reason to protect Orig, after all I've been pushing hard on not lynching Orig for the crossfire thing as well."
Yes? I was unsure and wanted to make certain that protecting AlyG was the best move.
751-755: Vollkan states that "I would not support a blanket limiting of Orig to the consensus." 778, shaft.ed states his preference from having orig work off a list, and indicates that he could see dybeck's posts reflecting the perspective of an angry townie. 779, Vollkan agrees to this, agrees that shaft.ed's dybeck-townie suspicions are valid, and states that "Oman looks worse" at this point.
Where is the "agreement" you refer to? I said shaft.ed's suspicions were valid and that Oman looked worse. Oman did look worse. As for the "blanket limiting", I have already said that I was trying to codedly tell Orig not to NK in such a way as to ensure full uncertainty.

Verdict on #2
- I and been influenced by shaft.ed's arguments at a number of points and I make no apology for that. What Gemelli is claiming, though, is complete exaggeration, as I have shown.
In post 675, Vollkan claims to have "refuted" Dybeck's suspicion that Originality lied in his initial role claim. As we now know, Vollkan is now leading the "orig is 100% scum and is most likely the SK" train, despite apparently having proved that this wasn't possible many pages ago.
Sorry? Where did I say Orig was 100% confirmed scum. In my most recent post I said:
We need to assume that we have two scumgroups: 3-person mafia and SK (Orig) so that we are accommodating for the worst possible scenario.
The point is, dybeck's arguments were poor. Based on Orig's actions over the course of today, most recently his jumping on Lucienne after my PBPA, he is looking like a very likely SK and we need to assume so accordingly.
Vollkan first advocates the "anyone who wants to lynch originality today is probably scum" theory in post 487. This despite the fact that he had voted for an orig lynch just 20 posts or so ago in post 462. This is a dramatic reversal of opinion. At first, Vollkan has argued that an Orig lynch is obviously bad because there is such a strong chance that orig is a vig. In post 457, he argues that originality is almost definitely NOT the SK, and it's in the town's best interest to lynch the SK today. Now, of course, he is arguing that originality is almost definitely CONFIRMED as the SK today, and that the best play for the town is to lynch someone who is NOT the SK.
The difference was due to my numerical analysis of things. It was not a magical conversion.

You are ignoring my post 474:
Unvote [Orig] What the hell am I thinking?

If Orig is a vig, the set-up is 6:3. In other words, a scum lynch today and a vig kill tonight can put as at 6:1. This game is well within our grasp. The constant focus on wcs has distorted things.
In post 779, vollkan claims to have "proved" that dybeck's argument that originality is scum is wrong.
Key words "dybeck's argument"
Are you seeing the trend here? I am not by any means saying that when vollkan posts a fact, the reverse must be true. But when Vollkan tells me that he has proved something, you'll have to excuse me wanting to test the waters for myself before diving in. And I really, really don't like his use of the "if you don't agree with what I have claimed to prove, you are by definition scummy" tactic through much of D2.
"Tactic"? My numbers prove things. People do the opposite, despite me having shown them to be anti-town and not being rebutted. It is perfectly sensible for me to suspect those people.

Verdict on #3
- Again, nothing.
#4: Vollkan has maintained a constant support for originality until very recently, but has offered shifting explanations of orig's role and shifting reasons for not lynching him. Like his attacks on dybeck, Vollkan's support of originality has been founded on a wildly shifting set of assumptions. He paints originality as most likely mafia through post 455. 457, he states that CarrotCake makes no sense for an SK kill. By post 487, Vollkan has come all the way around to believing originality's claim to be genuine. In 501, Vollkan is so certain that orig can't be the SK, he votes Oman for even suggesting it. He stays on the vigOrig theme through post 841, with occasional posts here and there continuing his rationale for why Orig can't be the SK; in one analysis of town scenarios in post 573, he doesn't even include the analysis of that situation.

In post 862, Vollkan posts that "Something dybeck has been saying throughout this game is that I am acting too convinced of Orig being pro-town. I want to be clear that Orig is acting scummy and I do think there is quite a good chance of him being scum. The problem is that he has claimed vig." He goes on to state that if orig is scum, he is most likely mafia, and that dybeck is the SK.

In post 999, Vollkan indicates that his post 993 offers "unrebutted evidence" demonstrating why Originality can't be scum. He then goes on to state that he is 65% likely that originality is scum. Heh.

In post 1011, Vollkan responds to more recent originality posts by raising his suspicion of originality to 75% scum, and then 100% scum. Even at this point, he maintains that dybeck is most likely also scum (if not aligned with orig). By 1268, Vollkan has turned the corner and claims that he has already established that he agrees that orig is the SK.
455 wrote: All in all, since Orig is unlikely the SK, we know the paths that can arise if he is mafia.
I am talking in terms of probability and of reasoning pathways.
457 wrote: If we lynch Orig (or anyone) and he is SK, then our wcs D3 is:
4:3 LYLO. Of course, if someone else is the SK, then we know Orig is scum, which takes us to 4:2 LYLO. If we get it right again, we move to 4:1 NOT LYLO.

If we lynch Orig (or anyone) and he is mafia then our wcs D3 is:
3:2:1 See my previous post for the yucky consequences of this. Basically a scum win most likely.
I look at both options here, so you can hardly say I am arguing he is one or the other.
487 wrote: Basically, all in all, I don't think we should lynch Orig today. If this is a SK-game, then there is a good chance of cross-fire. If it is not a SK-game, lynching Orig would be stupid and unproductive.
Convinced Orig is vig? It sure as hell doesn't look like it.
501 wrote: Now, next on the agenda. Unvote, Vote: Oman. FoS: Dybeck

Reason: Oman is now arguing firmly, and very poorly, that Orig is the SK. The fact that he is now trying to prove that Orig is the SK, in light of everything I have been saying suggests very strongly that he has a motivation to get rid of Orig.
Here, Oman is poorly arguing Orig is likely SK as support for lynching. I disagree with his arguments and see it as mafia trying to off the vig/SK. Gemelli is, again, misrepresenting me.
841 wrote: I am not "convinced" Orig is pro-town, though I consider it the most likely scenario. It is perfectly possible he is a SK (who has now well and truly lost the game), or he could be a mafia who claimed vig in the hopes of outing a real vig. Certainly, Carrot would not be my first choice for a vigging, but it is not ridiculously outlandish that a pro-town vig might target Carrot.
Again, I am pretty clear that I am NOT convinced. I argue he is probably pro-town, but I have clear reservations.

As for 862, Gemelli is again being completely fallacious:
862 wrote: This reminds me: Something dybeck has been saying throughout this game is that I am acting too convinced of Orig being pro-town. I want to be clear that Orig is acting scummy and I do think there is quite a good chance of him being scum. The problem is that he has claimed vig. I don't necessarily like keeping Orig alive today, but he has claimed and, if we lynched him and he came up vig, we would be truly kicking ourselves.

If Orig is mafia, then he is dead tonight anyway (by the SK) and thus will almost certainly carry out the mafia NK. Whilst a vig claim is unlikely, it might be used by a mafia to determine whether they have a vig or a SK against them.

If Orig is SK, then he has already lost and, thus, is a complete wildcard. This worries me, but I don't think Orig is a SK; a vig claim is just too suicidal.

If Orig is vig, then he will probably act properly tonight and follow consensus.

...
If Dybeck is SK, then he knows for certain that Orig is mafia. Thus, dybeck simply HAS to get rid of Orig today in order to have a hope.
Again, I am NOT convinced on Orig and it is pretty clear that my "IF dybeck is SK" thing is a hypothetical. It should be obvious that if dybeck is SK, Orig is mafia.

As for 999 and 993, I don't see the problem. My arguments were not rebutted. That doesn't mean I should be 100% convinced. 65% was what I thought and I don't see why it is unreasonable.

As for my rising suspicion, Orig has been looking more and more SKish to the point where I am now assuming he is scum (ie. 100%) Don't get me wrong, he could be vig, but his recent behaviour stands firmly against it. If you want an actual percentage, then I remain at 75%. I am just assuming henceforth that he will act as a SK to ensure that we plan for the worst.

Verdict on #4
- Misrepresentation of my stance on Orig.
* Much of Vollkan's arguments against Dybeck, when held up to close analysis, do not hold water. In post 1025, Vollkan himself claims that of the evidence vs Dybeck to date, "There are a number of minor tells in there, but collectively and when analysed by someone other than myself (multiple scrutiny = very important) it is not decisive." Since then, he has found new reasons to suspect Dybeck. Some of those reasons may be perfectly valid, but I find the degree of antagonism being levelled through the whole game, coming from such a wide variety of directions, to be suspect. Do minis ever have lyncher/lynchee roles?
And I think the antagonism is justified. By 1025, the point was that there was room for reasonable doubt (not 'decisive'). Since then, he has been getting even scummier (as I have been arguing)
* Vollkan has from time to time relied on fallacies and incomplete reasoning to present strongly-worded arguments. Meta analysis suggests that Vollkan does not exhibit those behaviors when playing as town. This is a significant scum tell to me, though not definitive.
Find me the fallacies and incomplete reasoning. As for the strongly-worded arguments, that is one thing I am prone to, and not just in games either.
* Based on the relationships I've been able to track here, if Vollkan *does* come up scum, I would consider his most likely scumbuddies to be Lucienne and Korlash.
I'm curious as to why.
* If Dybeck turns up town -- and it seems fairly likely that we will know his alignment as of tomorrow morning -- Vollkan will move to the #1 spot on my suspect list. One scenario that I have been considering with varying degrees of confidence is that mafVollkan picked up on Dybeck's cop tells early on D2, and that this is the real reason for him promoting a Dybeck lynch so heavily.
I know how bad I will look if dybeck is town.

As for the theory you give at the end, it's baseless conjecture.
* If Dybeck turns up scum, I will almost certainly be the next town lynch. Again, I recognize this fact, but feel that if I don't speak honestly out of fear for myself, I will be doing the town a disservice.
And I feel the same way about dybeck being scum.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
All in all, nothing substantial, largely misrepresentation and/or exaggeration.
User avatar
vollkan
vollkan
The Interrogator
User avatar
User avatar
vollkan
The Interrogator
The Interrogator
Posts: 5373
Joined: March 29, 2007
Location: Australia

Post Post #1284 (ISO) » Mon Oct 29, 2007 6:51 pm

Post by vollkan »

I posted...then I saw the second wave.

Give me some time...and caffeine
User avatar
vollkan
vollkan
The Interrogator
User avatar
User avatar
vollkan
The Interrogator
The Interrogator
Posts: 5373
Joined: March 29, 2007
Location: Australia

Post Post #1285 (ISO) » Mon Oct 29, 2007 7:08 pm

Post by vollkan »

Okay. I won't comment on every PA, since most won't need any comment. If there is anything specific you want me to address, tell me. I will mainly look at the themes of note.

353: I know I have been doing that sort of thing. The difference is that Lucienne was adding nothing of her own and that there is a good reason for people posting their suspicions at this stage of the game.
487: The change was due to the reality of the numbers
1001: Why the smile? There is no inconsistency
1088: I said vigging was very dangerous in the posts referred to, yes. Then I continued my line of wanting uncertainty. There is no contradiction. Vigging was dangerous, but uncertainty was good. It was only when I realised how dangerous exactly, that I decided to change my line.

Themes of note:
What is originality's most likely role?

* 408: Orig is suspicious, but AlyG is more suspicious
* 439: Scenarios where orig=vig are both unlikely
* 446: vigOrig is "plausible," if not likely.
* 448-449: Orig is most likely mafia with AlyG
* 455: Orig is more likely mafia than SK
* 457: CarrotCake doesn't make sense as an SK kill
* 487: Orig vig claim seems genuine
* 496-497: Orig is most likely not the SK
* 501: Suspecting that orig is the SK is suspicious
* 506-508: Orig is most likely vig
* 549: Orig is most likely not an SK. Claim is most likely genuine
* 573: Analysis of possible scenarios omit any possibility of orig being an SK
* 575: "I don't think Orig is SK"
* 598: "CarrotCake was clearly using very good logic and posting to a great extent. Thus, she was a threat to the scum. By NKing her, there is the added advantage of throwing suspicion onto AlyG. It is VERY plausible that scum would NK carrot."
* 607: "This makes me think he is unlikely to be mafia and, so, I am left thinking he is pro-town vig."
* 638: Orig is most likely town
* 642: Orig is most likely town
* 651: Orig may be SK
* 662: Orig is probably not SK
* 668: Orig mafia is possible, but less likely
* 675: To dybeck: "You were very actively hunting Orig as a SK. I don't believe Orig is SK. This was you hunting someone who could be a SK but is very likely vig and you are ignoring the actual hunting of mafia"
* 800: CarrotCake was "not clearly pro-town."
* 838: If Orig is SK, he has effectively already lost
* 841: vigOrig is most likely situation
* 862: "Something dybeck has been saying throughout this game is that I am acting too convinced of Orig being pro-town. I want to be clear that Orig is acting scummy and I do think there is quite a good chance of him being scum. The problem is that he has claimed vig." Raises possibility of mafia-orig and SK-dybeck
* 893: "If Orig = SK, he effectively loses unless mafia is lynched today"
* 907-908: "if Orig does not NK, he is almost certainly town."
* 993: "I know CC was not scummy and I think her suspicion in AlyG was very well-placed."
* 999: Claims that post 993 offers unrebutted evidence of why originality can't be scum. That being said, believes that originality is 65% likely to be scum
* 1001: "Why Dybeck is Wrong Regarding Originality Being Obvious Scum" ... immediately followed by a disclaimer that orig is 65% scum Smile
* 1011: Orig is now 75% scum
* 1208: Orig should "truthfully claim now"
* 1228: Orig is now 100% scum
* 1268: "I am the one agreeing that Orig is most likely the SK; I don't dispute that. All the 'evidence' is saying is that Orig is probably the SK."
I addressed these sorts of concerns in my previous post. I have never argued Orig is definitely one thing or another. My view has changed over time due to certain arguments one way or the other. I don't pretend that I was initially correct, because more arguments came to light over time. The 100% is an assumption to ensure we acting on wcs scenarios.
Gemelli wrote: What is the town's best course of action today?

* 392: The "we should not kill the SK" strategy is only valid if we know the SK's identity.
* 398-399: It doesn't really matter whether we go after the SK or mafia today.
* 439: Votes dybeck
* 457: "In short, our best bet is to lynch the SK. I feel confident AlyG is not the SK, her actions are either mafia or tracker."
* 462: AlyG should track originality. Votes originality
* 487: "Oman and Dybeck have both really been taking similar lines in regards to Orig, however Oman did vote Dybeck in #440. I am now sure that this stance is anti-town, but I myself held it just yesterday until I realised how stupid it is. I have my eye on them, particularly Dybeck given all the previous stuff."
* 496-497: "My instinct is telling me that the people pushing Orig's lynch are mafia trying to score a vig or SK lynch"
* 492: We should not guide AlyG's actions tonight
* 501: Votes Oman
* 508: Votes Dybeck
* 512: Tells originality that "you should kill...just be careful"
* 517: "Don't kill tonight Orig."
* 526: Still favors a Dybeck lynch
* 544: Unvotes, still favors a dybeck lynch.
* 554, 557, 559: To orig: "in short, your vigging is dangerous to us."
* 565: A vig on N2 would be a bad idea
* 575: "I don't think we should lynch Orig today. If he is scum, then there is a SK (since I don't think Orig is SK) who would be crazy not to get rid of him. As such, lynching Orig today will only help that scum group. Dybeck is far more sensible a choice."
* 608: Anyone who wants to get rid of orig looks anti-town. "I think it might be better if we allow Orig to kill, but request that he take much more thought."
* 656, 658: Argues against the "no kill" limitation on originality.
* 662: We should let originality NK.
* 663, 666: Originality should be guided, but not restricted, by town consensus
* 680: "We haven't instructed Orig not to kill. Orig is to do as Orig sees fit, but with the utmost caution." And to AlyG: "Doc should probably protect either you or Orig, let me think on that one."
* 705: "I can't think of any reason to protect Orig" ... "At deadline, I would change to Oman if it came down to it, but I would prefer a dybeck lynch today."
* 725: Votes Oman
* 728: Votes Dybeck
* 747: "Orig should take our opinions as a basis but should exercise his own judgment. If Orig does NK, he will have a lot to answer for, but at the same time I want him to have complete freedom in this matter, to maintain the vital spectre of uncertainty."
* 751: Same argument: Orig should not be bound by consensus
* 754-755: "I would not support a blanket limiting of Orig to the consensus." Orig has "many justifiable methodologies" for selecting an action.
* 779: Firm direction for Orig would be better than vague guidance.
* 800: "I cannot support any motion to outright ban Orig from killing."
* 841: Does not want orig to kill, but does not want to ban him from killing.
* 865: "Dybeck SK NEEDS us to lynch mafia today in order to have a hope of winning."
* 902: Reiterates that orig should not be autolynched if he kills someone outside the consensus list.
* 921: "I read your analysis and I think that you are correct here and that we have finally determined the best approach to make. We should be demanding that Orig does not commit a NK."
* 927: Does not think there is a really strong argument for a ban on orig NKing vs. him using a consensus approach.
* 937: Once again, no-NK is the way to go
* 1053: Lynching originality would be bad for the town
* 1084: Ditto
* 1088: "If you read my posts #566 and #574, I argued that a vigging was very dangerous. In #560, I said I was definitely not up for the risk. In #558 I said his vigging was dangerous. And in #518 I agreed with shaft.ed's numerical argument against Orig vigging. That was just 6 posts after the first one you cite." <-- THIS IS FALSE. IN BETWEEN THOSE POSTS, VOLLKAN CONTINUED TO ADVOCATE FOR AN ORIG NK, AS DEMONSTRATED ABOVE
* 1098: Claims that his posts that included comments along the lines of "Orig is to do as orig sees fit, but with the utmost caution" were just a cryptic way of telling him not to NK, but keeping the uncertainty active.
* 1168: "Orig has been ordered not to NK, punishable by his own lynching. He won't NK."
* 1188: Votes dybeck to L-1
* 1190: Unvotes
* 1226: Anyone who wants to lynch originality is scummy by definition
* 1230: "Gemelli is suspicious for his supporting Orig's lynch when we know that it is not the best option for the town."
On Orig NKing:
My position was that a NK was bad, but uncertainty was good.

On whether or not to NK SK:
Changed as the numbers progressed.
Gemelli wrote: What is dybeck's most likely role, based on the evidence?

* 439: "Dybeck's willingness to follow AlyG is very smelly"
* 487: "Oman and Dybeck have both really been taking similar lines in regards to Orig, however Oman did vote Dybeck in #440."
* 497: "my instinct is telling me that the people pushing Orig's lynch are mafia trying to score a vig or SK lynch.
* 501: "The fact that [dybeck] is now trying to prove that Orig is the SK, in light of everything I have been saying suggests very strongly that he has a motivation to get rid of Orig."
* 544: "The fact that Orig is supporting Dybeck's lynch is a little perturbing to me. If Dybeck is SK, then his death is going to mean the end of Orig."
* 598: "I was wrong...Dybeck's latest stuff makes a lot of sense and I now see he has never been stubbornly pushing for Orig's lynch; in fact, Dybeck now appears quite pro-town to me."
* 608: "he may very well be mafia trying to get rid of Orig; same goes for anyone on Orig's wagon."
* 651: "Dybeck's actions are also entirely consistent with him being a mafia hunting SK-Orig."
* 663: Dybeck's actions are consistent with mafia.
* 675: "Your argument that [originality] is lying has been refuted."
* 678: "I think it is possible that Dybeck is mafia with two of Elias/Lucienne/Gemelli and not Oman."
* 779: "I guess the question is basically: Dybeck who is adamant and scummy, or Oman who is opportunistic and scummy? When I frame it that way, Oman does look worse."
* 825: Dybeck may be mafia with Gemelli
* 862: Raises possibility of mafia-Orig and SK-dybeck
* 865: Dybeck is most likely mafia
* 1008: "The mind changing is something that bugs me for the simple reason that there was no need for him to change. He could have kept pushing Orig if he was so sure (as well as actually dealing with my arguments and rebuttal); there was no deadline. Instead, once Orig's NK is gone, he jumps over to Oman who he thought was the SK until fairly recently (remember, dybeck was adamant about not lynching the SK). "
* 1193: Dybeck may be the SK
* 1208: Doesn't think Dybeck is lying about his cop claim
* 1211: Dybeck's play doesn't make sense as mafia, but he could be an SK
* 1214: "In fact, dybeck would have looked much less suspicious if he had abandoned his case." (Compare and contrast with 1008)
* 1226: Dybeck may be cop, or may be mafia. Will likely be killed by the SK.
* 1251: Suspects Dybeck is mafia, lists possible buddies
Yes, by and large I have been arguing dybeck is mafia, but I have acknowledged he could be SK.
Gemelli wrote: What is the alignment of Dr. BS/Gemelli?

* 349: "Dr. Blackstrike: Newbish. I don't think is scum."
* 598: "Gemelli looks very pro-town to me"
* 638: Gemelli is 55% scummy
* 670: Gemelli may be mafia with Dybeck
* 678: "I think it is possible that Dybeck is mafia with two of Elias/Lucienne/Gemelli and not Oman."
* 705: "As for the difference regarding my opinion of you, Gemelli. It stemmed from my changed views regarding Orig and the situation with Dybeck and from me remembering to consider your predecessor's play. When I said I thought you were very pro-town, I was reading you in isolation."
* 865: There are hints of buddyness between Gemelli and Dybeck, even though Dybeck seems to be more likely a SK (???)
* 1033: "If Oman is mafia I do not think that shaft.ed and gemelli are."
* 1228: Gemelli is 60% scummy
* 1230: "Gemelli is suspicious for his supporting Orig's lynch when we know that it is not the best option for the town."
* 1251: "I think the mafia in that situation are most likely- dybeck/Gemelli/Elias or dybeck/Gemelli/Korlash"
* 1259: PBPA on Elias. Suspects that I am Elias's most likely scum partner, followed by dybeck.
By and large, I think you are scummy. You make good contributions, which I did see as pro-town at a point, but by and large you are suspicious to me.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I feel like I am short-changing you by not responding with something equally as massive, but most of what I would have said, I said above anyway.

If there is anything in particular I have missed, let me know.
User avatar
Gemelli
Gemelli
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Gemelli
Goon
Goon
Posts: 295
Joined: September 10, 2007
Location: WiscAAHHnsin

Post Post #1286 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2007 4:22 am

Post by Gemelli »

vollkan wrote:
Gemelli wrote: #1: Vollkan has been going after Dybeck like he was made of ham through all of D2. This is not in itself surprising given Dybeck's attitude. What is notable after a complete reread is that the grounds for his suspicion have shifted dramatically, not just from the start of D2 to now, but in some cases from post to post. Examples: in posts 439 and 497, he suspects Dybeck of being mafia. In 544, he starts suspecting that Dybeck is the SK. In 598, he describes Dybeck as "quite pro-town." But just a few posts later, in 608, he's back to arguing that Dybeck is probably mafia, a line he continues until 1193, when he's back to accusing Dybeck of being the SK. In 1208, he states that he believes Dybeck's cop claim, that his claim doesn't make sense as a mafioso, but that SK is likely. In 1226 he's back to accusing Dybeck of being mafia.
So the notable thing is that my opinion changed?
No. The notable thing is that you have argued both sides of the fence against Dybeck. First, he seems mafia to you. Then his behavior doesn't seem consistent with mafia, so he must be the SK. It just feels to me like you've assumed the verdict and are just looking for the argument to support it.

I am looking at your posts in aggregate here. Individually, I do not have a problem with each post in and of itself. It's the attack-dybeck-from-any-angle-I-can-think-of approach that I find suspicious.
vollkan wrote:In most of the examples you gave, I was merely looking at possibilities. In the sole example where my view actually shifted (dybeck being pro-town) I admitted that "I was wrong".

In other words, this point is complete rot.
I would have been perfectly happy if you'd actually come out from time to time and admitted that you had made mistakes. But look at the facts: after the "quite pro-town" post you refer to (598), the VERY NEXT TIME you mentioned Dybeck (608), you had him back as likely anti-town, and then by 638 he was back at the top of your scum list and you voted him.

It's apparent to me that you have assumed a guilty Dybeck since very early in the game. Again, he might in fact be scum, in which case I will owe you an apology. But you have already acknowledged that most of your D2 arguments against Dybeck do not merit a vote, yet you continue to argue that your aggressive stance against him is justified. Something smells rotten in Denmark.
vollkan wrote:
Gemelli wrote: Review post 974, in which Vollkan claims that Dybeck is scummy for dropping his case against Originality, despite being "100% convinced" of orig's scumminess. Then look at posts 1008 -- where Vollkan posts that Dybeck had "no need" to abandon the lynch-originality theme, and that he finds that change in heart suspicious -- and 1214, in which Vollkan says that Dybeck would have been LESS suspicious if he had abandoned the case against originality earlier. Vollkan has created a damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't situation; no matter what course of action Dybeck chooses here, Vollkan will attack him for it. You could draw a conclusion from this that Vollkan has made up his mind that Dybeck should be lynched, and is opportunistically using whatever facts happen to be at hand to advance that agenda.
Now you are just misconstruing what I have been saying.

If dybeck was 100% convinced of Orig being "scum", he should NOT have dropped his pursuit so arbitrarily. What he should have done is admit he was wrong in full and with reasoning.

There is a difference between simply saying "Righto. Let's lynch Oman instead" to "I have reviewed your arguments and you make a good case against lynching Orig"

It is not a Catch 22. I would have been perfectly happy if dybeck had abandoned his case, rather than arbitrarily flipping.
You are dodging my point. Much of your case vs dybeck is based on his single-minded pusuit of the scumOrig argument. And yet in 1214, you said "In fact, dybeck would have looked much less suspicious if he had abandoned his case" vs orig. This is a point that shaft.ed has also raised, and so far I have been unconvinced by your responses.
Vollkan wrote:We've been over my "support" for Orig killing already. I never wanted him to kill, but I wanted him to be a threat. The point was that, after the numbers materialised, it became patently obvious that the risk outweighed any potential benefit of uncertainty
I'm not buying this. Your defense has been that you were trying to deliver cryptic messages to orig that implied that he shouldn't kill, despite (1) your repeated verbal support for allowing him to lynch outside consensus, using his judgement, and (2) your insistence that you would not support any blanket ban on him killing. I find that argument specious, especially with post 680 buried in there where you consider the merits of giving orig doc protection tonight.
Vollkan wrote:I was pretty clear that I had "noticed" it. It was not always my view. Given CC's very big attacking post, I was initially convinced she was uber-town, but it became clearer to me after I read that she was not. Nonetheless, I said nothing to see how much longer the anti-Origs, mainly dybeck, would keep it up.
I overstated the case by saying you'd known it all along; that was a poor attempt at irony and I apologize. My point, though, was that you made a complete reversal of your stated opinion of CC between posts 598 and 800 with no incremental change of opinion stated in between. Shaft.ed's analysis pointed out that there was nothing innately uber-town about CarrotCake, given. But you quoted his analysis in a response to dybeck asking what evidence had been given that CarrotCake seemed scummy. Given your attack on dybeck for reversing his position on the orig-lynch topic, why is it questionable that I am suspecting you for a 180-degree reversal of opinion with no intermediate comment?
vollkan wrote:
751-755: Vollkan states that "I would not support a blanket limiting of Orig to the consensus." 778, shaft.ed states his preference from having orig work off a list, and indicates that he could see dybeck's posts reflecting the perspective of an angry townie. 779, Vollkan agrees to this, agrees that shaft.ed's dybeck-townie suspicions are valid, and states that "Oman looks worse" at this point.
Where is the "agreement" you refer to? I said shaft.ed's suspicions were valid and that Oman looked worse. Oman did look worse. As for the "blanket limiting", I have already said that I was trying to codedly tell Orig not to NK in such a way as to ensure full uncertainty.
On review, this point was not strong and should not have been part of the summary. I was reacting to your "That's fine" in response to shaft.ed's statement that he will be autovoting if orig lynches outside consensus, but you then go on to explain that "there is even an advantage in us adopting slightly different attitudes to this," so chalk this one up to me being overly paranoid in the face of a monstrous headache. But as I said above, I find your argument that you were trying to deliver a message to originality not to kill -- and that somehow, he would pick up on this, but the scum wouldn't -- hard to swallow.
vollkan wrote:Sorry? Where did I say Orig was 100% confirmed scum.
Vollkan, in post 1228 wrote:If you want percentages (0% = obv town, 100% = obv scum)
AlyG = 0%
shaft.ed = 20%
Elias = 55%
Gemelli = 60%}
Korlash = 65%} Not tied, but the above was more based on specific reactions to lynching Orig. On overall perception, Korlash is scummier.
Lucienne = 70%
dybeck = 75%
Orig = 100%
Please explain how it is possible to read that post otherwise. This should be good.
Vollkan wrote:You are ignoring my post 474:
Unvote [Orig] What the hell am I thinking?

If Orig is a vig, the set-up is 6:3. In other words, a scum lynch today and a vig kill tonight can put as at 6:1. This game is well within our grasp. The constant focus on wcs has distorted things.
How the hell does that support your "anyone who wants to lynch originality is scum" premise? All you are saying is that if orig is vig, things aren't as dire as you and Oman had been assuming.
vollkan wrote:
In post 779, vollkan claims to have "proved" that dybeck's argument that originality is scum is wrong.
Key words "dybeck's argument"
No, key word "proved." Dybeck's argument had been that originality was obviously scum, based on the fact that he had been tracked as targetting a pro-town player. Your "proof" boiled down to two key points: (1) CC made sense as a vig target, and (2) the most likely scenario is that Originality's claim is valid. Did you ever go back and admit that you were wrong about having "proved" that dybeck was incorrect? No. You shifted your stance to SK-orig with no comment.
Vollkan wrote:"Tactic"? My numbers prove things. People do the opposite, despite me having shown them to be anti-town and not being rebutted. It is perfectly sensible for me to suspect those people.
As a newer player, it is harder for me to assess whether your numerical analyses are valid or not. They LOOK valid to me, absolutely. But my observation is that in this game, you have used the word "proof" when the facts do not really support it. And claiming that you proved an ARGUMENT was false, even when the conclusion ended up being true, does not inspire me to let your "proofs" direct my actions in this game.
vollkan wrote:
455 wrote: All in all, since Orig is unlikely the SK, we know the paths that can arise if he is mafia.
I am talking in terms of probability and of reasoning pathways.
457 wrote: If we lynch Orig (or anyone) and he is SK, then our wcs D3 is:
4:3 LYLO. Of course, if someone else is the SK, then we know Orig is scum, which takes us to 4:2 LYLO. If we get it right again, we move to 4:1 NOT LYLO.

If we lynch Orig (or anyone) and he is mafia then our wcs D3 is:
3:2:1 See my previous post for the yucky consequences of this. Basically a scum win most likely.
I look at both options here, so you can hardly say I am arguing he is one or the other.
487 wrote: Basically, all in all, I don't think we should lynch Orig today. If this is a SK-game, then there is a good chance of cross-fire. If it is not a SK-game, lynching Orig would be stupid and unproductive.
Convinced Orig is vig? It sure as hell doesn't look like it.
Now you're just cherry-picking quote fragments. My point is that in 455, you said that Orig is likely not the SK, because "There is no logical reason for the SK to kill Carrot." In 457, you reiterated this point, questioning Oman for doubting you. And in 487, you said "The fact that has has claimed vig, a role likely to get NKed,
points to him being genuine.
" You may not have been "convinced," but you were sure arguing strongly through this entire part of the game that his vig claim seemed legitimate.
vollkan wrote:
501 wrote: Now, next on the agenda. Unvote, Vote: Oman. FoS: Dybeck

Reason: Oman is now arguing firmly, and very poorly, that Orig is the SK. The fact
that he is now trying to prove that Orig is the SK, in light of everything I have been saying
suggests very strongly that he has a motivation to get rid of Orig.
Here, Oman is poorly arguing Orig is likely SK as support for lynching. I disagree with his arguments and see it as mafia trying to off the vig/SK. Gemelli is, again, misrepresenting me.
Misrepresenting? My whole point here is that you find Oman suspicious because "everything you have been saying" demonstrates that Orig cannot be the SK. Read the posts around this one; you have been arguing that the most likely scenario at this point is that orig is a vig.
Vollkan wrote:Again, I am pretty clear that I am NOT convinced. I argue he is probably pro-town, but I have clear reservations.
My point here was to show the start of your change in direction. Up until that post, nearly ALL of what you'd posted about originality supported the premise that his claim was genuine. This was the first time that you expressed a lack of conviction, and your posts prior to this did not make it "pretty clear" that you were unconvinced.
vollkan wrote:As for 862, Gemelli is again being completely fallacious:
Can you please name the fallacy I am committing here? What I am trying to demonstrate in these posts is that while your opinions of orig's role have shifted over the course of the game, the course of action you've advocated to the town -- lynching orig would be a bad idea -- has not. 862 is the first instance after weeks of pro-orig posts where you pull back on that, and I found that notable. Where's the fallacy?
Vollkan wrote:As for 999 and 993, I don't see the problem. My arguments were not rebutted. That doesn't mean I should be 100% convinced. 65% was what I thought and I don't see why it is unreasonable.
The problem is that you claimed that post 993 offered evidence for why Originality
can't
be scum. If you had claimed that the post offered evidence for why Originality is not
definitely
scum, I'd have no issues. But that's not what you did. Again, you are overstating the argument and I find it scummy.
Vollkan wrote:As for my rising suspicion, Orig has been looking more and more SKish to the point where I am now assuming he is scum (ie. 100%) Don't get me wrong, he could be vig, but his recent behaviour stands firmly against it. If you want an actual percentage, then I remain at 75%. I am just assuming henceforth that he will act as a SK to ensure that we plan for the worst.
I don't even know where to begin with this comment. Is he 100%, or 75%? Do you think he's the SK, or are you just making that assumption as a WCS?

The whole purpose of this section was to demonstrate that you have been making analyses of Orig's role throughout the game with confidence, and from time to time using your analysis as the basis for suspecting others who question your "don't lynch orig" advocacy. I find that suspicious.
Vollkan wrote:I think the antagonism is justified. By 1025, the point was that there was room for reasonable doubt (not 'decisive'). Since then, he has been getting even scummier (as I have been arguing)
Again, look at 598 and 638. You switched from "seems quite pro-town" to "scummiest player in the game" without any intervening commentary on Dybeck.

It's the same behavior I noticed in your attitudes toward me: I went from "very pro-town" to "55% scummy" with minimal interim commentary on why. You've claimed that this was because you had forgotten to read me in context with Dr BS, but your assessment of him before I joined was that he was newbish, but probably not scummy. When one sees radical shifts in direction without supporting commentary to back it up, pointing that behavior out is important. You've jumped on those sorts of things yourself this game, so please don't act appalled when someone else applies the same standards to you.
Vollkan wrote:Find me the fallacies and incomplete reasoning.
Ad hominem against Korlash (the "Village Idiot"). Begging the question ("I argue that X is true, player Y argues that this is not true, therefore Y is suspicious since X is true"). Poisoning the Well (Oman giving AlyG townie brownies is "kind of like giving Hitler the Nobel Peace Prize"). And all of the stuff I've harped on about how some of your "proofs" about Originality and Dybeck are actually just strongly held opinions. I do not have the stomach to pick out every single instance of fallacious reasoning in your posts, but will locate more examples if you insist.
Vollkan wrote:
* Based on the relationships I've been able to track here, if Vollkan *does* come up scum, I would consider his most likely scumbuddies to be Lucienne and Korlash.
I'm curious as to why.
For Lucienne, there were a few things. When she needed to go on V/LA, you used strong wording to indicate that you didn't want her replaced. You showered praise on her for identifying a tenuous Dybeck/Elias relationship. And your short-term vote on her smells of bussing to me.

For Korlash, I am basing most of this on your relationship with Oman before he was replaced. You and he seemed to bolster each others' numerical analyses, and you were resistant to move your vote to him several times even while stating that you thought he seemed scummier than even Dybeck. Admittedly, your back-and-forth with him today makes this link seem weaker, but given the other possibilities, Korlash makes the most sense.
vollkan wrote:As for the theory you give at the end, it's baseless conjecture.
It is conjecture, yes. But it is a potential scenario that occurred to me during the analysis, and it is absolutely consistent with your rabid pursuit of Dybeck through D2. Hardly baseless.
vollkan wrote:And I feel the same way about dybeck being scum.
Fair enough. If Dybeck does turn up scum, I preemptively apologize for dragging the town down this rabbit hole. But until we get his alignment confirmed, I do think there is cause to suspect you as a possible mafioso, and honestly I don't think you've done anything to allay my suspicions.
"Specialization is for insects." --Heinlein

[i]Limited Access most weekends[/i]
User avatar
Gemelli
Gemelli
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Gemelli
Goon
Goon
Posts: 295
Joined: September 10, 2007
Location: WiscAAHHnsin

Post Post #1287 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2007 4:35 am

Post by Gemelli »

vollkan wrote:1001: Why the smile? There is no inconsistency
I simply found it funny that you had been beating on Dybeck for so long for insisting that Orig was scum, and in this post your argument was essentially "he is NOT obvious scum! He is only 65% likely to be scum!" My sense of humor is unusual, and was probably influenced by CRT overexposure at that point.
vollkan wrote:1088: I said vigging was very dangerous in the posts referred to, yes. Then I continued my line of wanting uncertainty. There is no contradiction. Vigging was dangerous, but uncertainty was good. It was only when I realised how dangerous exactly, that I decided to change my line.
I appreciate your at least acknowledging that you changed your mind here. What bothered me was that during this part of the game, you weren't just arguing for keeping orig a little uncertain; you wanted to give him the option of choosing any action, regardless of town consensus. That line of discussion bothered me at the time, and I wanted to capture it here.
vollkan wrote:I have never argued Orig is definitely one thing or another. My view has changed over time due to certain arguments one way or the other. I don't pretend that I was initially correct, because more arguments came to light over time. The 100% is an assumption to ensure we acting on wcs scenarios.
But we have to look at the whole game here. You jumped on dybeck for many posts just because he used the terms "certain" and "100%" in making his arguments ... "a townie should never be 100% certain of anything," remember? And yet here you are in post 1228 using "100%" on originality. You didn't qualify that post as a wcs analysis. You were posting your scumdar ratings on all of the players. Do as I say, not as I do ...?
vollkan wrote:I feel like I am short-changing you by not responding with something equally as massive, but most of what I would have said, I said above anyway.

If there is anything in particular I have missed, let me know.
Please don't apologize for not replying at great length. I assume that at some point, you will get around to doing a PBPA of me, and you can return the favor then :) I don't necessary think we need to keep going back and forth on these points either ... I think that our players will be able to review what we've posted already, and come to their own conclusions.

I am not (despite how it may seem) trying to build momentum for a Vollkan lynch here. I am simply trying to point out that there is some cause to suspect you, just as you've pointed out that there is cause to suspect me. And given that you have been advocating a strategy for the town, I think it makes sense for each of us to ask questions on your possible motivations.

That being said, my fingers are sore and my eyeballs are fried. I'll check in sometime this afternoon.
"Specialization is for insects." --Heinlein

[i]Limited Access most weekends[/i]
User avatar
vollkan
vollkan
The Interrogator
User avatar
User avatar
vollkan
The Interrogator
The Interrogator
Posts: 5373
Joined: March 29, 2007
Location: Australia

Post Post #1288 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2007 5:30 am

Post by vollkan »

Gemelli wrote: No. The notable thing is that you have argued both sides of the fence against Dybeck. First, he seems mafia to you. Then his behavior doesn't seem consistent with mafia, so he must be the SK. It just feels to me like you've assumed the verdict and are just looking for the argument to support it.

I am looking at your posts in aggregate here. Individually, I do not have a problem with each post in and of itself. It's the attack-dybeck-from-any-angle-I-can-think-of approach that I find suspicious.
Actually, the only posts you refer to where I refer to dybeck possibly being SK were 544 and 1193.

As I have already said:
Vollkan wrote:
544 wrote: The fact that Orig is supporting Dybeck's lynch is a little perturbing to me. If Dybeck is SK, then his death is going to mean the end of Orig.
It is misrepresentation of Gemelli to say that here I am arguing dybeck is SK. I was merely pointing out that if dybeck shows up SK, Orig will be confirmed scum.
...
1193 wrote:
Something else to consider:
The possibility that dybeck is the SK. SKdybeck knows that Orig is mafia and wants him gone. SKdybeck thought he was at L-1, panicked and claimed cop, using Orig's guilty lynch as hopeful proof of him being cop.
I was NOT saying dybeck is the SK; I raised it as a possibility to remember, as any decent player would.
I'll say it again, apart from two lapses my view has consistently been that dybeck was mafia.
Lapse #1: Where dybeck appeared to post very good reasoning, actually turned out wrong on closer scrutiny.

Lapse #2: Where I felt his behaviour was consistent with cop, but then doubted it after questioning things more.
Gemelli wrote: I would have been perfectly happy if you'd actually come out from time to time and admitted that you had made mistakes. But look at the facts: after the "quite pro-town" post you refer to (598), the VERY NEXT TIME you mentioned Dybeck (608), you had him back as likely anti-town, and then by 638 he was back at the top of your scum list and you voted him.

It's apparent to me that you have assumed a guilty Dybeck since very early in the game. Again, he might in fact be scum, in which case I will owe you an apology. But you have already acknowledged that most of your D2 arguments against Dybeck do not merit a vote, yet you continue to argue that your aggressive stance against him is justified. Something smells rotten in Denmark.
598 wrote: I was wrong...Dybeck's latest stuff makes a lot of sense and I now see he has never been stubbornly pushing for Orig's lynch; in fact, Dybeck now appears quite pro-town to me.
That was after his apparently well-reasoned post.
608 wrote: If Orig is the SK, then Dybeck's latest actions in no way make him pro-town, for the simple reason that he may very well be mafia trying to get rid of Orig; same goes for anyone on Orig's wagon. This goes for anyone, but I just don't think we should be pegging Dybeck as a townie purely because he is hunting a SK.
Here I am theorising about dybeck being mafia trying to off Orig. I even say that it goes for everyone, not dybeck in particular.
638 wrote: Scummy
Oman -- 60%
dybeck --65%

I think that our situation is 6:3 and that the mafia are probably Gemelli, Oman and Dybeck. Meta, Oman is quite easy to be swayed by strong opinions. For that reason, I would personally favour a lynch of Dybeck.

Unvote, Vote: Dybeck
The thoughts of mine in 608 influenced me to reconsider dybeck as scummy at 65%.

Have I assumed dybeck is guilty? No. That much is evident by the fact that I shift and think of him as pro-town at that point, and the fact that I lost faith in the decisiveness of the case at one point.
Gem wrote: You are dodging my point. Much of your case vs dybeck is based on his single-minded pusuit of the scumOrig argument. And yet in 1214, you said "In fact, dybeck would have looked much less suspicious if he had abandoned his case" vs orig. This is a point that shaft.ed has also raised, and so far I have been unconvinced by your responses.
I am not dodging. I answered it.

If you want it more clearly. This is what I would have liked from dybeck:
dybeck should have written along the lines of wrote: Vollkan, after reading your arguments I realise that my case against Orig is not so solid as I thought. Moreover, regardless of whether he is SK or mafia, it is clearly not in our interests to lynch him.
You get the idea.
I overstated the case by saying you'd known it all along; that was a poor attempt at irony and I apologize. My point, though, was that you made a complete reversal of your stated opinion of CC between posts 598 and 800 with no incremental change of opinion stated in between. Shaft.ed's analysis pointed out that there was nothing innately uber-town about CarrotCake, given. But you quoted his analysis in a response to dybeck asking what evidence had been given that CarrotCake seemed scummy. Given your attack on dybeck for reversing his position on the orig-lynch topic, why is it questionable that I am suspecting you for a 180-degree reversal of opinion with no intermediate comment?
Irony? It was misrepresentation. Understand that I am holding that against you. I have no clue why you would apologise for doing so.

And you are being fallacious again here.
705 wrote: CC's later posts were good efforts at scum-hunting, even if the claims suggest otherwise. My remarks were confined exclusively to her later posts however, because I knew that she was pretty much a lurker besides. In fact, in 439 I actually said
vollkan wrote:
Carrot was about more helpful than everybody else. Fine, he lurked early, but his later stuff was pure brilliance. I don't buy this at all.
I admit that Carrot's later posts probably contorted my opinion of her so that I thought more of her than I otherwise should have. That became clearer to me as things progressed.
No intermittent explanation? Hardly. I am surprised that you omit this.
Gem wrote: I'm not buying this. Your defense has been that you were trying to deliver cryptic messages to orig that implied that he shouldn't kill, despite (1) your repeated verbal support for allowing him to lynch outside consensus, using his judgement, and (2) your insistence that you would not support any blanket ban on him killing. I find that argument specious, especially with post 680 buried in there where you consider the merits of giving orig doc protection tonight.
I will repeat what I have been saying again and again: I did not want Orig to NK; that should have been clear. I wanted it to be possible that he could kill. So, yes, I did support him being able to kill out of consensus and I did insist against a blanket ban until the numbers emerged.

In 680, again, my words were
Doc should probably protect either you or Orig, let me think on that one. Immediately, I see it being sensible for doc to protect you. If only because then if you track someone and they go for Orig, you could out the doc inadvertently, but let me think on this because I am not decided.
I was not taking a position until I thought about it. I do not see why you have such a problem with this.
Gem wrote: As a newer player, it is harder for me to assess whether your numerical analyses are valid or not. They LOOK valid to me, absolutely. But my observation is that in this game, you have used the word "proof" when the facts do not really support it. And claiming that you proved an ARGUMENT was false, even when the conclusion ended up being true, does not inspire me to let your "proofs" direct my actions in this game.
I understand that you might find the arguments difficult to accept, but I know them to be valid and I have seen no argument against the conclusions I have formed based on them. If someone can argue against me, I will willingly change my position, but I believe I am correct based on the fact that there appears to be nothing at fault in my numbers.
Gem wrote: Now you're just cherry-picking quote fragments. My point is that in 455, you said that Orig is likely not the SK, because "There is no logical reason for the SK to kill Carrot." In 457, you reiterated this point, questioning Oman for doubting you. And in 487, you said "The fact that has has claimed vig, a role likely to get NKed, points to him being genuine." You may not have been "convinced," but you were sure arguing strongly through this entire part of the game that his vig claim seemed legitimate.
In 455 I was actually arguing that a SKOrig would not have killed Carrot, since Carrot presented no real threat to him and I saw that as evidence for Orig being
mafia/

This I continued in 457, but it was not saying Orig was vig. It was taking one line of reasoning which led to Orig possibly being mafia.

And yes, I did see Orig's vig claim as pointing to him being genuine in 857.

What are you trying to show with this?
My point here was to show the start of your change in direction. Up until that post, nearly ALL of what you'd posted about originality supported the premise that his claim was genuine. This was the first time that you expressed a lack of conviction, and your posts prior to this did not make it "pretty clear" that you were unconvinced.
No. This is simply not the case. I assume you mean up to 862.

Let me take some quotes of mine.
497 wrote: If Orig is SK, why the hell would he claim the one pro-town role which we can be almost certain that the mafia will prioritise over all others.

I know that if I were a SK in Orig's position, I would have claimed weak doc or RB or something, NOT Vig.

Hence, my instinct is telling me that the people pushing Orig's lynch are mafia trying to score a vig or SK lynch.
506 wrote: 1) How does this prove Orig is scum? This proves Orig is vig just as much as it proves he is SK/Mafia.
2) It is plausible. In fact, the very fact he has claimed it in light of its inevitable consequences makes me think it to be very plausible.
3) Not enough to prove he is scum, particularly in light of his claim.
506 wrote: Clutching at straws? I think my case for Orig being vig is a hell of a lot more convincing than your blind support for a lynch or Oman's feeble arguments.

What are you FoSing people for? I took notice of AlyG's claim; I have analysed it to no end. I have just come to the conclusion that Orig is very likely not a SK.

I guess this leaves us with Orig being vig or being mafia.
507 wrote: If Orig is mafia, then he knows there is a SK. Therefore, why would he claim vig when he could claim a safer pro-town role.

For argument's sake, let's use RB.
If Orig claims RB, we don't lynch him and he is not an immediate threat to the SK. Therefore, much safer.
Weak doc would be even safer still, along with many others.

It just doesn't make sense for scum-Orig to claim vig when that claim is the one which has the greatest chance of getting him killed.
523 wrote: Orig refers to him and AlyG as an "us" and then expresses real regret about how the " strategy " (VERY interesting word choice) exposes either of them to a lynching. If Orig is vig, then he has good reason to consider AlyG protown, but I don't get why he immediately fears the possibility of them BOTH being lynched.
531 wrote: Orig explicitly refers to "claiming us two". The emphasis is on the two of them. I mean, if I was in Orig's position I would say something more like "Why claim and reveal people so soon?", but Orig focuses on the two of them.

I really don't know what we should do here. AlyG and Orig were scummy yesterday, they are partner-ish today AND they are claimed power roles. It is the most frustrating situation I think I have ever encountered here.
538 wrote: Also, Orig, you do realise what happens if Dybeck or ANYBODY comes up SK?
544 wrote: The fact that Orig is supporting Dybeck's lynch is a little perturbing to me. If Dybeck is SK, then his death is going to mean the end of Orig.
573 wrote: Basically, in terms of town:mafia:SK, the likely situations we are currently in are:
A 6:3:0 --> This is where Orig is vig
B 6:2:1 --> Orig is mafia and someone (my bet is on Dybeck) is SK
C 5:3:1 --> Orig is mafia and someone (my bet is on Dybeck) is SK

Obviously, if Orig is telling the truth, only option A is possible.

Assuming Orig is the vig and that Orig is NKed tonight:
If we lynch town today, it goes to 5:3.
The scum NK makes that 4:3 (LYLO). Hence, we don't want Orig to NK because that will put us at a risk of 3:3 (LOSS).

If we lynch scum today, it goes to 5:2.
The scum NK makes that 5:2. If Orig mis-vigs, he will put it to 4:2 (LYLO). Hence, it is most likely a good idea not to vig.
598 wrote: Orig looks a lot worse to me right now but, for reasons I gave previously, I don't want him lynched today.
608 wrote:
If Orig is the SK, then Dybeck's latest actions in no way make him pro-town, for the simple reason that he may very well be mafia trying to get rid of Orig; same goes for anyone on Orig's wagon. This goes for anyone, but I just don't think we should be pegging Dybeck as a townie purely because he is hunting a SK.
638 wrote: If we mislynch, we are either 5:3, 5:2:1 or 4:3:1.
The mafia will NK Orig. Making it either 4:3 (LYLO), 5:2 or 4:3 (LYLO).
Why will the mafia NK Orig (providing we do not blanketly ban him from NKing)? If Orig is scum, the major threat to him is the mafia. His goal, therefore, is to eliminate the mafia. Whilst we should most definitely not rely on him as a source of help, he does present an immediate problem to the mafia.
Anyway, Orig will either kill town or mafia. Meaning D2 opens at the above possibilities for a no-vig/SKing and the below if Orig kills:
3:3 (Loss), 4:2 (LYLO), 4:2 (LYLO), 5:1, 3:3 (Loss) or 4:2 (LYLO).

However, I personally believe Orig is pro-town.
675 wrote: If we lynch Orig, we are 5:3 or 5:3 if he is vig or SK, which is more likely than him being mafia. That means the mafia NK puts us in LYLO.
730 wrote: If Orig NKs AlyG, Orig has to be anti-town. Why? If AlyG comes up town, then Orig has, as you say, gone against everyone and killed a power role. That reeks of scumminess for obvious reasons.

If AlyG is mafia, then AlyGcould not have tracked Orig. I said this earlier on, but I was thinking about it in entirely the wrong way. This makes Orig obvMafia.

If AlyG is SK, Orig is obvMafia.
838 wrote: If Orig is mafia, then he faces the imminent prospect of being SKed. Thus, he will likely kill AlyG.

If we mislynch today and Orig is vig, a misvig can lose us the game. Thus, I think the best course of action in that event is a No Vig.
If we lynch mafia today, then Orig has license to act with due regard to our preferences. His lynch will be likely if breaches this, though not guaranteed.
The overwhelming pattern: I think orig is vig but I am not convinced. So yes, I was arguing he was likely vig, but I was fully aware he might not be. I really fail to see what this demonstrates other than that I was not convinced one way or the other.
Gem wrote: Can you please name the fallacy I am committing here? What I am trying to demonstrate in these posts is that while your opinions of orig's role have shifted over the course of the game, the course of action you've advocated to the town -- lynching orig would be a bad idea -- has not. 862 is the first instance after weeks of pro-orig posts where you pull back on that, and I found that notable. Where's the fallacy?
862 wrote:
This reminds me: Something dybeck has been saying throughout this game is that I am acting too convinced of Orig being pro-town. I want to be clear that Orig is acting scummy and I do think there is quite a good chance of him being scum. The problem is that he has claimed vig. I don't necessarily like keeping Orig alive today, but he has claimed and, if we lynched him and he came up vig, we would be truly kicking ourselves.

If Orig is mafia, then he is dead tonight anyway (by the SK) and thus will almost certainly carry out the mafia NK. Whilst a vig claim is unlikely, it might be used by a mafia to determine whether they have a vig or a SK against them.

If Orig is SK, then he has already lost and, thus, is a complete wildcard. This worries me, but I don't think Orig is a SK; a vig claim is just too suicidal.

If Orig is vig, then he will probably act properly tonight and follow consensus.

There is one possibility arising from this which interests me: If Orig is mafia and dybeck is SK. That would certainly explain dybeck's desperation to get rid of Orig. Assuming SK-Dybeck survives until tomorrow,
If we lynch a town today it becomes 4:3:1.
Mafia NK makes it 3:3:1
Dybeck's NK makes it 2:3:1 (basically mafia win) or 3:2:1 (messy)

If Dybeck is SK, then he knows for certain that Orig is mafia. Thus, dybeck simply HAS to get rid of Orig today in order to have a hope.
Where do I "pull back" on my opposition to lynching Orig? This quote is exactly consistent with the position I have been holding.
Gem wrote: The problem is that you claimed that post 993 offered evidence for why Originality can't be scum. If you had claimed that the post offered evidence for why Originality is not definitely scum, I'd have no issues. But that's not what you did. Again, you are overstating the argument and I find it scummy.
Where did I say Orig cannot be scum.

My exact words in 993 were:
993 wrote: Again, dybeck, I find this case seriously wanting. Rather than re-running over the same ground again and again, please address my rebuttal. If you are serious about Orig, then don't get frustrated, explain why I am wrong.
I don't even know where to begin with this comment. Is he 100%, or 75%? Do you think he's the SK, or are you just making that assumption as a WCS?

The whole purpose of this section was to demonstrate that you have been making analyses of Orig's role throughout the game with confidence, and from time to time using your analysis as the basis for suspecting others who question your "don't lynch orig" advocacy. I find that suspicious.
Orig is 75% scum in my opinion. However, I am assuming he will act like a SK for the sake of reasoning. Thus, he is 100% for purposes of determining our strategy.

As for the lynch Orig thing: I believe, firmly, that not lynching Orig is in the town's best interests. I have been arguing this for so long now and have received no numerical rebuttal that I find it highly suspect that people would still go ahead and support Orig's lynch. Why is this scummy of me?
It's the same behavior I noticed in your attitudes toward me: I went from "very pro-town" to "55% scummy" with minimal interim commentary on why. You've claimed that this was because you had forgotten to read me in context with Dr BS, but your assessment of him before I joined was that he was newbish, but probably not scummy. When one sees radical shifts in direction without supporting commentary to back it up, pointing that behavior out is important. You've jumped on those sorts of things yourself this game, so please don't act appalled when someone else applies the same standards to you.
I'm not appalled.

As for my change on you, yes, I thought BS was newbish but probably not scummy. Nonetheless, he had still given scumtells making him a 55%. For me, a neutral player is 50%. I was not going to eradicate my thoughts on BS just because your posting had appeared good. I gave you a 55% and I stand by that.
Ad hominem against Korlash (the "Village Idiot"). Begging the question ("I argue that X is true, player Y argues that this is not true, therefore Y is suspicious since X is true"). Poisoning the Well (Oman giving AlyG townie brownies is "kind of like giving Hitler the Nobel Peace Prize"). And all of the stuff I've harped on about how some of your "proofs" about Originality and Dybeck are actually just strongly held opinions. I do not have the stomach to pick out every single instance of fallacious reasoning in your posts, but will locate more examples if you insist.
I did not ad hom against korlash because I did not use his idiocy to discredit his arguments. Ad hom is:
Person X says Y
Person X is a "z"
Therefore, Y is untrue.

I refuted Korlash's arguments on their logical merits (or lack thereof)

Begging the question. This is untrue. My understanding of what I did:
I demonstrate that X is bad, nobody challenges this. People support X. Therefore, I suspect those people.

Poisoning the well: The Hitler thing was jest. I argued very strongly with argument that AlyG was scummy.

As for Orig and dybeck, I have never been 100% convinced on anything. I have argued my cases and, when I was not refuted, I stuck to my guns. If somebody wants to disagree with me, I expect them to prove me wrong. If they don't, I am going to hound them until they do. My arguments were not solid proof, but if a person disagreed I expected them to debate me.
For Lucienne, there were a few things. When she needed to go on V/LA, you used strong wording to indicate that you didn't want her replaced. You showered praise on her for identifying a tenuous Dybeck/Elias relationship. And your short-term vote on her smells of bussing to me.
I simply said "I don't want Lucienne replaced" (in 492). The reason I said this was because she had said she did not want to be replaced. I know I would be peeved if I got replaced and I did not want to be replaced, so I said I did not want her to.

The dybeck/Elias thing was information which may prove valuable yet.

As for the bussing "smell", this is pure conjecture from you. My reasons for voting Lucienne were suspicion of her, pressure and a desire to see what Orig did.
For Korlash, I am basing most of this on your relationship with Oman before he was replaced. You and he seemed to bolster each others' numerical analyses, and you were resistant to move your vote to him several times even while stating that you thought he seemed scummier than even Dybeck. Admittedly, your back-and-forth with him today makes this link seem weaker, but given the other possibilities, Korlash makes the most sense.
You are balanced here and what you say is sensible so I won't debate you.
Fair enough. If Dybeck does turn up scum, I preemptively apologize for dragging the town down this rabbit hole. But until we get his alignment confirmed, I do think there is cause to suspect you as a possible mafioso, and honestly I don't think you've done anything to allay my suspicions.
After this, what more do I need to address?
User avatar
vollkan
vollkan
The Interrogator
User avatar
User avatar
vollkan
The Interrogator
The Interrogator
Posts: 5373
Joined: March 29, 2007
Location: Australia

Post Post #1289 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2007 5:38 am

Post by vollkan »

Vollkan wrote: I appreciate your at least acknowledging that you changed your mind here. What bothered me was that during this part of the game, you weren't just arguing for keeping orig a little uncertain; you wanted to give him the option of choosing any action, regardless of town consensus. That line of discussion bothered me at the time, and I wanted to capture it here.
That's fine. As I have already explained, I did not want dybeck to kill outside of consensus; I simply wanted the threat to exist.
But we have to look at the whole game here. You jumped on dybeck for many posts just because he used the terms "certain" and "100%" in making his arguments ... "a townie should never be 100% certain of anything," remember? And yet here you are in post 1228 using "100%" on originality. You didn't qualify that post as a wcs analysis. You were posting your scumdar ratings on all of the players. Do as I say, not as I do ...?
I should have stated that my Orig thing was me thinking in wcs terms for reasoning. As I have said, the figure should be 75% not taking wcs.
Please don't apologize for not replying at great length. I assume that at some point, you will get around to doing a PBPA of me, and you can return the favor then Smile I don't necessary think we need to keep going back and forth on these points either ... I think that our players will be able to review what we've posted already, and come to their own conclusions.
Agreed. In my experience (chiefly with Elias), after more than 2 rounds of rebuttal and counter-rebuttal, things degrade to the point of collapse.

I encourage other people to raise specific points, if any remain or emerge.
I am not (despite how it may seem) trying to build momentum for a Vollkan lynch here. I am simply trying to point out that there is some cause to suspect you, just as you've pointed out that there is cause to suspect me. And given that you have been advocating a strategy for the town, I think it makes sense for each of us to ask questions on your possible motivations.
I appreciate you are not building for my lynch, but let me be frank: Given the level of contortion in a number of your arguments, I am beginning to fear that I am falling in for a trap where cop-dybeck gets lynched and I emerge as the most likely suspect. For that reason, I have my eyes on you.

I have a tendency towards paranoia, but this is FTR.
User avatar
shaft.ed
shaft.ed
dem.agogue
User avatar
User avatar
shaft.ed
dem.agogue
dem.agogue
Posts: 4998
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis

Post Post #1290 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2007 6:30 am

Post by shaft.ed »

Gemelli, I agree with a lot of your points, but not to the extent that you are taking many of them. Vollkan has been moving about on his opinions of players, but generally he has been doing so following discussion. His posting frequency seems very high and he does a lot of scenario listing in which he puts down things like If X is SK than Y is town. Of course you're going to find a lot of back and forth on ideas. But I do agree he has been using wording that makes it seem his analysis is gospel.

In regards to him disproving dybeck's argument, I think you two are talking about different things. You refer to dybeck's argument as "Orig is scum because he killed CC." Vollkan refers to dybeck's argument as "Orig needs to be NK'd because he killed CC." there is an important difference. Vollkan and my numbers have shown that an orig lynch is a poor move because he's very very likely NK'd tonight. That means his lynch is a poor choice. This is what disproves dybeck's argument that orig needs to be lynched, not that orig is or isn't scum.

In regards to him being swayed by my opinions, I have also noticed this, and have been worried by it. I can attribute it to vollkan being scum trying to buddy up to me, or the fact that I make really good points 8-) . Since the rest of the town seems to think I'm doing a pretty good job, I think chalking it up to the latter is reasonable, but I do have vollkan as scum on my back burner.

As far as your statement that vollkan noticed dybeck giving off cop tells. I would hope that you can spend some time reading my recent post. If anything I think dybeck was giving off anti-cop tells. Please let me know what you tink of dybeck's claim in light of my evidence.

The weakest part of your argument, Gemelli, was the possible scum groups. I see absolutely no reason to include Lucienne in fact orig and vollkan just recently tried to get her lynched. And Korlash is also a pretty weak association given the dust up surrounding the "vanilla incident."

In conclusion I see the most likely scenario by which vollkan is scum as follows:
dybeck: SK/cop
originality: must then be mafia
vollkan: then obviously linked to orig

I should note that I do not find the above scenario most likely, but it is the most likely scenario should dybeck turn up non-mafia.

And yes I understand completely that I would also be linked to an orig/vollkan scum group.
User avatar
Gemelli
Gemelli
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Gemelli
Goon
Goon
Posts: 295
Joined: September 10, 2007
Location: WiscAAHHnsin

Post Post #1291 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2007 6:39 am

Post by Gemelli »

shaft.ed wrote:
-Why investigate originality?
His investigation of originality is off.
This bugs me too. I can, however, think of one plausible explanation of why he would have used a cop investigation on originality, but before I share it, I would like to hear Dybeck's plain and simple reasoning for his decision. He hasn't posted since your post, which bugs me as well.
shaft.ed wrote:*Side note interesting that he quickly unvoted Dr. BS under the guise of protecting town power roles, another Gemelli link.
I agree that this does strenghen the case for a Dybeck/Gemelli link, although to be fair: (1) five RL days passed between him voting Dr BS and unvoting, so it wasn't really all that quick, (2) he only cast three votes through all of D1, and the other two were for players who are now dead and confirmed town, and (3) he wasn't the only player advocating that we should not vote for claimed power roles.
shaft.ed wrote:This really looks like someone trying to pretend to be a cop that doesn't have the insight. Leaning towards SK here.
If Dybeck is scum, I think that SK is the most likely scenario, since practically everyone else in the game (aside from me) is ready to string him up :) Then again, that would argue against me being aligned with him, so people will have to decide which of those two arguments is most compelling.
shaft.ed wrote:
-Why wait on bringing up your case on originality?
This has already been brought up, but dybeck did not even utter the word originality in the first RL week of this day.
Another excellent question. The fact that he attacked you over what he saw as a minor SK tell, rather than starting by asking orig questions, doesn't make much sense.
shaft.ed wrote:
-Where is your case against originality?
While dybeck claims a guilty investigation on originality he has provided no new evidence against him.
Also true, although I can (maybe naively) reconcile this with a cop viewpoint. In that scenario, he already has all the evidence HE needs to make a decision on orig's alignment. Though as you and vollkan both point out, the better pro-town play would have been to try and gather more evidence by way of asking questions etc.
shaft.ed wrote:If you were in fact the cop and had a guilty claim on someone I would hope that you would be able to come up with some evidence for his guilt that other people had not talked about. Why else would you have investigated him?
Good question, and again, I'd like to hear Dybeck's reply to that question before I give my two cents.
shaft.ed wrote:
-If you have a guilty investigation why offer to hammer someone else?


...

-Why did you claim prematurely?


...

-Why did you forget to vote for a proven killer you had a guilty investigation on?


...

-Why are you not providing more insight into who the scum groups might be?
All valid questions, and I sincerely hope that dybeck weighs in soon to provide specific answers. You've successfully brought my assessment on Dybeck back into the probably-scum category, pending his response.
"Specialization is for insects." --Heinlein

[i]Limited Access most weekends[/i]
User avatar
Gemelli
Gemelli
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Gemelli
Goon
Goon
Posts: 295
Joined: September 10, 2007
Location: WiscAAHHnsin

Post Post #1292 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2007 6:58 am

Post by Gemelli »

vollkan wrote:Irony? It was misrepresentation. Understand that I am holding that against you. I have no clue why you would apologise for doing so.
The part of my comment that I would withdraw now is the words "all along," which I intended to be viewed as a variation of the cliche "oh yeah, I knew it all along" from a stock B-movie character who is trying to hide his ignorance.

It seemed that you only changed your opinion on CC after shaft.ed's post. That was all I was trying to demonstrate there. And you're right, I missed the latter half of 705 (focusing on the comments you made in the initial paragraphs instead).
vollkan wrote:I understand that you might find the arguments difficult to accept, but I know them to be valid and I have seen no argument against the conclusions I have formed based on them.
I can respect that. What I have a hard time with is that anyone who does not fall into lockstep with your arguments to be suspect.
vollkan wrote:Where did I say Orig cannot be scum.
vollkan, post 999 wrote:
dybeck wrote:5) You posted reasons why orig can't be scum? For real?!
YA RLY! And you still haven't rebutted them (hint: read post #993)
That is what I was reacting to.

On the fallacies, I have studied college-level logic and I disagree with you on all three of your rebuttals. But I don't see much merit to the town in having us debate the finer points of fallacy analysis here.
vollkan wrote:I am beginning to fear that I am falling in for a trap where cop-dybeck gets lynched and I emerge as the most likely suspect. For that reason, I have my eyes on you.
I'm honestly glad that you are suspecting me, as it shows that you are active in the game and are willing to assess less-obvious details. I would like to think that you'd grant me the same leeway. But you don't honestly believe in that trap premise, do you? That's more than a stretch.
"Specialization is for insects." --Heinlein

[i]Limited Access most weekends[/i]
User avatar
Gemelli
Gemelli
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Gemelli
Goon
Goon
Posts: 295
Joined: September 10, 2007
Location: WiscAAHHnsin

Post Post #1293 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2007 7:26 am

Post by Gemelli »

shaft.ed wrote:In regards to him disproving dybeck's argument, I think you two are talking about different things. You refer to dybeck's argument as "Orig is scum because he killed CC." Vollkan refers to dybeck's argument as "Orig needs to be NK'd because he killed CC." there is an important difference.
I assume you meant "lynched" instead of "NK'd" there? But I think you've hit the nail on the head. I have believed that orig is scum since I joined the game, and some of my suspicions are based on the perception that Vollkan has been attacking THAT premise.

I missed this post earlier when playing catchup:
shaft.ed wrote:As far as who to lynch today, it has to be dybeck or originality. I don't know why other peole are supporting other somewhat random townies for lynch, especially one who is such a fan of numbers.

We know that dybeck and originality's claims are mutually exclusive, thus at least one of them has to be scum, and there is a possibility that they both are. Thus lynching one of them has greater than 50% odds of hitting scum. Anyone else in the town is much lower than this and thus should not be considered. Also even if we hit SK putting us in LyLo this is better than hitting town and being in 3:2:1 if we have a nonOrig SK.
That is exactly what I was trying to say back in post 1199! Of course, Vollkan FoS'd me for saying it (even bolding the sentence where I say what you've just said), but he was most likely influenced by the myriad scumtells I've given off today :roll: (Yeah, yeah, and you provided a better explanation. I'm just pissy today.)
shaft.ed wrote:I also posit that lynching dybeck has the possibility of providing more information of originality's alignment than lynching origanilty has on dybeck's alignment. If we lynch dybeck he comes up SK, we know orig is mafia and can then autolynch tommorow. If he comes up mafia then we know orig is either vig or SK. If he comes up town (which I doubt given his horrible cop claim) then we know orig is scum of some sort. If orig comes up mafia or SK we still don't know if dybeck is a cop becuase he could easily be faking the investigation given the info AlyG provided. If orig comes up vig we know that dybeck is either mafia or SK faking cop.
This type of analysis makes sense to me. Like you, I think it is entirely possible that both are scum, and hugely unlikely that they are aligned with each other.

I am also coming around to the argument that lynching the SK today would be bad for the town. That being said, if we are going push to lynch dybeck, we are all expressing a degree of confidence that dybeck is not the SK. Fair?

So really, if we are choosing between two targets, we have to ask ourselves: (1) which one will give us more info about the alignments of other players, and (2) which one offers the smallest risk profile for the town in terms of the scum night actions?
"Specialization is for insects." --Heinlein

[i]Limited Access most weekends[/i]
User avatar
shaft.ed
shaft.ed
dem.agogue
User avatar
User avatar
shaft.ed
dem.agogue
dem.agogue
Posts: 4998
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis

Post Post #1294 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2007 8:02 am

Post by shaft.ed »

Gemelli wrote:
shaft.ed wrote:In regards to him disproving dybeck's argument, I think you two are talking about different things. You refer to dybeck's argument as "Orig is scum because he killed CC." Vollkan refers to dybeck's argument as "Orig needs to be NK'd because he killed CC." there is an important difference.
I assume you meant "lynched" instead of "NK'd" there? But I think you've hit the nail on the head. I have believed that orig is scum since I joined the game, and some of my suspicions are based on the perception that Vollkan has been attacking THAT premise.
Yes I meant to say lynched there not NK'd, vollkan and I were actually pushing for an orig NK. I personally haven't seen vollkan actively asserting orig has to be the vig. He has posted many times that orig may be the vig. But your analysis does bring up some instances where vollkan has waffled a little bit, I have taken note. However, the main reason he has been arguing to keep orig alive is that if he's scum he's dead. If he's SK he's still a big mafia threat and a good candidate to be targeted, which is a very nice thing to have with one of your power roles out in the open. The vig aspect has been secondary.
Gemelli wrote:
shaft.ed wrote:As far as who to lynch today, it has to be dybeck or originality. I don't know why other peole are supporting other somewhat random townies for lynch, especially one who is such a fan of numbers.
...(shortened to keep this from being the longest single page in MS.net history)
That is exactly what I was trying to say back in post 1199! Of course, Vollkan FoS'd me for saying it (even bolding the sentence where I say what you've just said), but he was most likely influenced by the myriad scumtells I've given off today :roll: (Yeah, yeah, and you provided a better explanation. I'm just pissy today.)
You have every right to be mad at this. I should have done this at the time but
FoS vollkan and originality
for the Lucienne side track
Gemelli wrote:
shaft.ed wrote:I also posit that lynching dybeck has the possibility of providing more information of originality's alignment than lynching origanilty has on dybeck's alignment. If we lynch dybeck he comes up SK, we know orig is mafia and can then autolynch tommorow. If he comes up mafia then we know orig is either vig or SK. If he comes up town (which I doubt given his horrible cop claim) then we know orig is scum of some sort. If orig comes up mafia or SK we still don't know if dybeck is a cop becuase he could easily be faking the investigation given the info AlyG provided. If orig comes up vig we know that dybeck is either mafia or SK faking cop.
This type of analysis makes sense to me. Like you, I think it is entirely possible that both are scum, and hugely unlikely that they are aligned with each other.

I am also coming around to the argument that lynching the SK today would be bad for the town. That being said, if we are going push to lynch dybeck, we are all expressing a degree of confidence that dybeck is not the SK. Fair?

So really, if we are choosing between two targets, we have to ask ourselves: (1) which one will give us more info about the alignments of other players, and (2) which one offers the smallest risk profile for the town in terms of the scum night actions?
I have a ton of opinions on this topic, but I really don't want to let the cat out of the bag until the lurkers weigh in.
That being said Lucienne, and AlyG I'd
REALLY
like to hear from you soon we're approaching deadline and the town needs to be on the same page.

Also dybeck would you please attempt to defend yourself, it's the cop-like thing to do.
User avatar
Elias_the_thief
Elias_the_thief
He/Him
Not Statistically Significant
User avatar
User avatar
Elias_the_thief
He/Him
Not Statistically Significant
Not Statistically Significant
Posts: 3194
Joined: August 15, 2006
Pronoun: He/Him
Location: Maryland.

Post Post #1295 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2007 10:30 am

Post by Elias_the_thief »

Korlash wrote:
Elias wrote:At this point, I see your insistence that I dont post enough content as a personal attack. I responded both to your posts, naming two lurkers the two top scum, as well as responded to Shafteds case, the two most important posts. Furhter, its ridiculous of you to attack my response to shafteds post. Shall we compare it to yours?
And I see your reaction to me naming you in my top two scum pick as a little bit over the top.
Firstly, see mini 486. Nothing is over the top for me. Secondly, this is a reaction, not to you putting me top two persay (I really could care less how scummy you think I am) but about the fact that you continue to say that I havent posted enough info, when I clearly have. Through clever editting, you left out the part of my post where I compared the info we'd provided.
Korlash wrote:
Elias wrote:Yeah, my post was definately the one that added nothing to the discussion.
Yes it was... Glad you can admit that. Mine on the other hand addressed three real points while yours barely addressed one. I think the scale is in my favor there.
I wondor if you think youre clever when you ignore obvious sarcasm. For the record, youre not. Regardless, you miss my point. You said that my first post was bad, because it wasnt a detailed enough response to Shafteds. But your reference to that post was less then a sentance. And as for the rest? You made the following points:
1) That youre against a Dybeck lynch.
2) That you made a joke
3) That Shafteds post saved you a reread
4) That I wasnt posting enough.
So lets see. 1 is a point that I've already made previously, so claiming that your post is better simply because I neglected to reiterate my point is fairly ridiculous. 2 is pretty irrelevant. You made a joke, good for you. In the grand scheme of things, the supposed single point I made in my post is superior. If youre claiming that the third point makes your post superior, then you must be joking, seeing as I actually made a paragraph long response to his points, while you didnt do anything more then acknowledge that he had made a post. Finally, 4 is dead wrong, seeing as I've posted on all of the major issues.
Korlash wrote:
Elias wrote:You dont understand my point. Although I believe that lurking is a completely and utterly STUPID scum tell, (as I do it all the time as town and scum, depending on time constraints, how into the game I am, and other factors) my point is not that you have no basis for suspecting me. The point is that you made a list of scum, not a list of people that needed to be more active. If in fact, you just put us up there to get us to talk,
No shit sherlock... Did the fact I said I put you guys up there to get you to talk have anything to do with this breakthrough here?
That was a nice attempt to undermine my credibility by exaggerating a point I made to make it sound dumb. The thing is, this wasnt even the point. This was all leading up to the question I was asking. To say "no shit sherlock" about the analysis behind a question is really quite silly.
Korlash wrote: Also I find the fact that your talking now to be... I don't know... my point!
If you hadnt noticed, I've been talking the whole game. The reason I'm writing more now is because you've really pissed me off by yelling "you have no content" when I've said all there is to be said.
Korlash wrote: I too agree lurking is not a scum tell, I hardly think ANYTHING can be defined as a "scum tell" that word is so god damn overused in this game... HOWEVER! When a deadline is posed and a player repeatedly uses an excuse not to post, or repeatedly posts very little it makes me think he or she is trying to skirt under the radar.
What does the amount posted in any given post have to do with skimming under the radar? I've given definitive opinions on what people have asked of me and other issues. Why is the fact that I dont post 300 words have to do with me "skirting under the radar" You're ridiculous.
Korlash wrote: I don;t see why you are reacting so badly to me asking you to post a bit more then you are. I don't see Lucienne acting so rash... That was a joke in case your as slow as you seem...
It's not a joke when we're this close to deadline and you were asked seriously who tops you scumlist, and also never clarified in the post who your actual top person was. At this point in the game, I have no choice but to defend myself even with the possibility that you were joking. And if you havent noticed, Lucienne isnt acting this rash because SHE HASNT POSTED YET, for one, and two, now youve said (3 posts later) that is was a joke and theres no reason for her to. Anyways, seeing as Shafted responded in seriousness, I think its pretty clear that that part of your post was not easily distinguished as a joke.
Korlash wrote:
Elias wrote:who ARE your top suspects?
An hour ago, Dybeck, right now, you and Dybeck...
Thats what I was asking for. And you think youve pressured me into providing info. Anyways, what exactly makes you think I'm scum? That I'm pissed off? Ask yourself: do townies get pissed off when theyre wrongly accused? Hell yes they do. Again, youre just making a bad move, placing me at the top of your scumlist for being pissed off.
Korlash wrote:
Elias wrote:I have already shown who I want lynched, my opinion on Dy and Orig, and my top suspects. Now, how have I not provided enough info for tomorrow?
How do you feel on Gem? Whats your biggest issues with me? How about Lucienne? Vollkan? Shaft.ed? There is going to be a fucking mafia NK here... and I would either like to know what your issues are with the person going to die, or if you die what your issues are with your supposed killers. Also if I am the one to die perhaps it may lead to my killer being found. I don't really know, but we have like a week + until deadline... use it stupid...
Attacking my intelligence will make everything better. First of all, I've already said that I'm undecided on Gemelli. Second of all, what the hell do you mean, "biggest issues"? Lucienne is a lurker, Vollkan and Shafted I have no problems with. My biggest issue with you is your refusal to accept that I have been contributing, and the fact that youre continually using it as a fallback thing when you have nothing better to say. "Hmm, elias should post, lol"
Korlash wrote:
Elias wrote:Opinion on Orig? undecided on whether he is vig or SK.
I believe I was undecided on whether he was Sk or Mafia... I could be wrong... I do have a bad memory XD
Good job ignoring my point. I just showed how I've actually given a much clearer depiction of my opinions then you have of yours, and you ignore it. Nice one.
Korlash wrote:
Elias wrote:What exactly do you mean by detailed? I've given you my opinions, and why. As far as I can tell, most of your content comes from being attacked by Vollkan, and some OMGUS on shafted. So I'd advise you to get off my fucking case on "not enough content".
that seems a little over the top... I mean... If you are posting content, detailed and useful, don't you think that it would backfire on me? And that the other players would see that? Why are you so afraid to be in the spotlight right now? A simple "I think I am posting enough" would be enough on your part and would probably end up making me look like the bad guy. Yet you choose to react pretty defensive... I don't get it... It doesn't make sense...
Oh yes, the fact that I said "fucking" means that I went over the top. Listen, just because I used a swears doesnt mean you can ignore my points. You know why I didnt just say "I think I am posting enough"? I dont believe in making random assertions. I like to back up what I say. Thats what that post did. The fat that I was a little angry when I wrote it is not a reason to ignore its logic.
Korlash wrote:
Elias wrote:This post you just made was so full of content. A baseless attack on my contribution. Nice one.
My post also contained two answers to things Vollkan said. A thank you to Shaft.ed for doing something nice( I have mentioned before how helpful you guys can be to me in this regards.), and 2, count them two issues against you. Thats a total of 5 points in my post. Stop trying to make me seem just as useless as you are...
Um yeah, as I said. The first point I had made previously, and you should have also, since it was brought up ages ago. That point hurts you more then helps you. The second response to Vollkan is hardly relevant. You said you joked. The thank you to Shafted is a terrible point! You didnt even address his post! The two issues with me are ridiculous, because I have been posting enough, and with content.
Korlash wrote:
Vollakn wrote:You say you don't like Korlash, what are your thoughts on Gemelli?
What he asked...

I still hold to waiting until Dybeck answers some things. After that I will place my vote... Until then I will keep poking Elias as it seems to be having some effect... *poke poke poke*
Ive already stated that I am undecided on Gemelli. I have a neutral opinion of him currently. I dont know how else to put that. As for poking me, all youre doing is further angering me. Angering me simply gets me to swear a lot, which wont help the town much. If you think thats the best way that you can help the town now, then I think your no one to be telling me theres something wrong with my late day play.
I play the games rul gud.
User avatar
Korlash
Korlash
Krap Logick
User avatar
User avatar
Korlash
Krap Logick
Krap Logick
Posts: 6579
Joined: August 23, 2007
Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous

Post Post #1296 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2007 1:53 pm

Post by Korlash »

I have more to say but I'm pointing this one out now so i don't forget...
Elias wrote:
Korlash wrote:
I don;t see why you are reacting so badly to me asking you to post a bit more then you are. I don't see Lucienne acting so rash... That was a joke in case your as slow as you seem...
It's not a joke when we're this close to deadline and you were asked seriously who tops you scumlist, and also never clarified in the post who your actual top person was. At this point in the game, I have no choice but to defend myself even with the possibility that you were joking. And if you havent noticed, Lucienne isnt acting this rash because SHE HASNT POSTED YET, for one, and two, now youve said (3 posts later) that is was a joke and theres no reason for her to. Anyways, seeing as Shafted responded in seriousness, I think its pretty clear that that part of your post was not easily distinguished as a joke.
Um... so you are that slow... Ok... Sorry... I was under the impression you actually had a positive IQ here... Sorry... I will clearly spell it out right now... Are you ready... I'll try to do it slowly!

I don't see why you are reacting so badly to me asking you to post a bit more then you are. [/real sentence]
I don't see Lucienne acting so rash...
[/joke]
That was a joke in case your as slow as you seem... [/trying to show joke]

As for my top two... I just told you, you! And Dybeck, with Lucienne as a third. My reasons for putting you and her up there may not be enough for you, but I stand by what I posted.

More to come in a second =D
It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.

Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!
User avatar
Elias_the_thief
Elias_the_thief
He/Him
Not Statistically Significant
User avatar
User avatar
Elias_the_thief
He/Him
Not Statistically Significant
Not Statistically Significant
Posts: 3194
Joined: August 15, 2006
Pronoun: He/Him
Location: Maryland.

Post Post #1297 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2007 2:14 pm

Post by Elias_the_thief »

Korlash wrote:I have more to say but I'm pointing this one out now so i don't forget...
Elias wrote:
Korlash wrote:
I don;t see why you are reacting so badly to me asking you to post a bit more then you are. I don't see Lucienne acting so rash... That was a joke in case your as slow as you seem...
It's not a joke when we're this close to deadline and you were asked seriously who tops you scumlist, and also never clarified in the post who your actual top person was. At this point in the game, I have no choice but to defend myself even with the possibility that you were joking. And if you havent noticed, Lucienne isnt acting this rash because SHE HASNT POSTED YET, for one, and two, now youve said (3 posts later) that is was a joke and theres no reason for her to. Anyways, seeing as Shafted responded in seriousness, I think its pretty clear that that part of your post was not easily distinguished as a joke.
Um... so you are that slow... Ok... Sorry... I was under the impression you actually had a positive IQ here... Sorry... I will clearly spell it out right now... Are you ready... I'll try to do it slowly!

I don't see why you are reacting so badly to me asking you to post a bit more then you are. [/real sentence]
I don't see Lucienne acting so rash...
[/joke]
That was a joke in case your as slow as you seem... [/trying to show joke]

As for my top two... I just told you, you! And Dybeck, with Lucienne as a third. My reasons for putting you and her up there may not be enough for you, but I stand by what I posted.

More to come in a second =D
Thanks for once again insulting my intelligence, but I'm going to continue to respond to your points in all seriousness, as long as they have relevance to the game. Even if theyre meant to be a joke. You can point them out later if you want, but I dont feel like concerning myself with your jokes which, quite frankly, arent funny.
I play the games rul gud.
User avatar
Korlash
Korlash
Krap Logick
User avatar
User avatar
Korlash
Krap Logick
Krap Logick
Posts: 6579
Joined: August 23, 2007
Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous

Post Post #1298 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2007 2:32 pm

Post by Korlash »

Elias wrote:Through clever editting, you left out the part of my post where I compared the info we'd provided.
I never posted my actual statement yes, I find it too difficult to go back in and requote my shit. But I did address your statements before and after. I thought that good enough.
Elias wrote:I wondor if you think youre clever when you ignore obvious sarcasm.
The same can be said about you... *Cough*

Elias wrote:If you hadnt noticed, I've been talking the whole game. The reason I'm writing more now is because you've really pissed me off by yelling "you have no content" when I've said all there is to be said.
...
Thats what I was asking for. And you think youve pressured me into providing info. Anyways, what exactly makes you think I'm scum? That I'm pissed off? Ask yourself: do townies get pissed off when theyre wrongly accused? Hell yes they do. Again, youre just making a bad move, placing me at the top of your scumlist for being pissed off.
To be fair I will try and see it from your side here... *looks*
Nope still don't get it...

Ok heres my thing. First, Let's say you are mafia. As town I see you as still an unkown. I could care less about yoru posts before I replaced. I won;t look at them. I don;t give a rat's ass about them. I do care about any posts you have made sense I have been here. And, personally, I do not remember much of you AlyG, or Lucienne. (On a side note AlyG needs to post like.. today... Kinda hard to rank him to high seeing as how he is claimed power role but...) So I want all the yummy info on you I can get my hands on... mmmm... Infoy goodness!

Now lets pretend I am mafia and you are town. I would love the fact your getting pissed off right now! I would keep pushing it as hard as I could to get you to either slip up or maybe get stuff to use tomorrow. So telling me you are getting pissed won't get me to stop. However, if this was the case, I could see you saying "Screw you Korlash I post enough." And leaving it at that. I could possibly accept that...

Lastly, perhaps we are both town. I see your reactions as a little to defensive. Like I said, if you feel you have honestly posted enough just say "I feel I have posted enough and it will take more then just you to get me to post more." And leave it at that instead of actually proving my point and posting more... Whether you like it or not my simple posts at you have made you repost a lot of (semi-useless yes) content. So in my mind I am happy! Yay! Party time is now!
Elias wrote:What does the amount posted in any given post have to do with skimming under the radar? I've given definitive opinions on what people have asked of me and other issues. Why is the fact that I dont post 300 words have to do with me "skirting under the radar" You're ridiculous.
It's not that you don't post a lot, it's that you don;t seem to post that often. There are a lot of excuses for that, and I can accept most of them. But while this deadline is in effect I personally feel the same person should post every 6-8 posts. So roughly 3 times a day would be nice. Again, Some people only have access certain times, or have so many other games, and that is a good excuse. But I wont stop pressing them to post more because of it.
Elias wrote:Attacking my intelligence will make everything better. First of all, I've already said that I'm undecided on Gemelli. Second of all, what the hell do you mean, "biggest issues"? Lucienne is a lurker, Vollkan and Shafted I have no problems with. My biggest issue with you is your refusal to accept that I have been contributing, and the fact that youre continually using it as a fallback thing when you have nothing better to say. "Hmm, elias should post, lol"
Ok become decided, comment on something new about him, say you will do a reread.. theres a million different ways to contribute even if your "undecided." Tell me why. Illustrate both sides. Say reasons he MIGHT be this or that.

And there has to be something else on me then that. I mean half the people here hate me for reasons not even contributed to this game, surely you can find one other thing to mention.

Lucienne is a lurker... Nice... Do you have any feelings on the few posts she did make? Do you think of here one way or the other? Do you plan on helping get her to talk?

You have NO PROBLEMS with either of them? None at all? Even after Gem's huge Vollkan thing? Come on... Stop trying to convince me you post enough when this is all you can fucking say about people. I mean God, is it really that big of a deal whether I think you have posted enough? No. Should you be making such a big deal over it? no. Should you post more? Hell yes.
Elias wrote:Good job ignoring my point. I just showed how I've actually given a much clearer depiction of my opinions then you have of yours, and you ignore it. Nice one.
Kinda like how you keep ignoring me asking you to post more useful stuff... I see it as a fair trade off. I'll gladly do a recap of every single on of my feelings on every single player after you do that same.
Elias wrote:Oh yes, the fact that I said "fucking" means that I went over the top. Listen, just because I used a swears doesnt mean you can ignore my points. You know why I didnt just say "I think I am posting enough"? I dont believe in making random assertions. I like to back up what I say. Thats what that post did. The fat that I was a little angry when I wrote it is not a reason to ignore its logic.
You can say anything you damn well please as long as it is not some personal attack (i.e. your mom is a F... etc etc etc...) I get mad too.. trust me go check out Treestump mafia... Or whatever it is called...

I just think telling me to "get off your case" is a little over the top... its a game of Mafia man... The whole point is to
BE ON SOMEONES CASE!
Stop saying "get off my case" do something about it. You know a simple summary of all your feelings right after I originally said it might have been enough for me to move on. And I don't, and if you had already done one that still stood at that time a simple quote or link to that would have been enough. But nooo...
Elias wrote:Um yeah, as I said. The first point I had made previously, and you should have also, since it was brought up ages ago. That point hurts you more then helps you. The second response to Vollkan is hardly relevant. You said you joked. The thank you to Shafted is a terrible point! You didnt even address his post! The two issues with me are ridiculous, because I have been posting enough, and with content.
Firstly to explain where I was joking and where I was not can lead to some bad misunderstandings being avoided. Already you have taken a joke I said a little to seriously and thus have proved why me explaining my jokes are not a "bad point"

Secondly while I did not add anything to or about Shaft.ed posts my thank you for him was again, because of a previous misunderstanding that has now been avoided. Unlike you, he seems to want the town all on an equal foot here. And if I show my appreciation for it so be it. (See was it that hard? Did you honestly have to take all my comments as personal attacks when you could have easily cleared them up like I just did?)

As for my points against you, While you may think you post enough I don't. So bringing that up is not "ridiculous" in the least. At least not to me. I could care less if your happy with how often/much you post, if I am not I'm going to fucking tell you about it.

Elias wrote:]Ive already stated that I am undecided on Gemelli. I have a neutral opinion of him currently. I dont know how else to put that. As for poking me, all youre doing is further angering me. Angering me simply gets me to swear a lot, which wont help the town much. If you think thats the best way that you can help the town now, then I think your no one to be telling me theres something wrong with my late day play.
Again, you can illustrate why he is neutral. There has to be something either kinda town or kinda scummy he said. His posts against Vollkan have to have somethings you can comment on, there has to be something you can say. Come on man, Saying "I think he is neutral" in no way tells me anything. How can you blame me for not considering that a helpful or content..y... post?

Also me continuing to poke one of my top three does seem like a good play for town... I will keep it up until there is a majority consensus for me to stop or you drop from my radar... *poke poke poke* or until my fingers get tired... *poke poke poke*

I myself will be posting something on the Vollkan/Gem posts tonight hopefully. I have business to attend to first but I ill try and read through all those jumbles... and.. long... ass posts... son of a... This site needs spoiler tags or something... Also A redo of my scum list, a few more Dybeck insights I think, and a couple prods to Lucienne and AlyG are soon to follow... Until then...

Oh and Elias... Take a Chill pill or something... If this is getting you pissed off there has got to be something wrong with you... Cause this is nothing... If you want me to break into my crap logic and stubbornness chest I will. I might even be able to create an equal Swear to real words ratio from you... But that of course woudl not help so I would rather you just calmed down! ^^

Oh and as for your newest posts I could care less if you think they are funny or not. Blatantly taking something I admitted was a joke and trying to use it against me will not help get me to stop focusing on you. Also, I should try and not insult what little intelligence you have... I'll try from now on...

Also I did not proof read this thing.. have to go... Sorry in advance for any mistakes... And for any personal attacks i would have deleted... >.> <.<
It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.

Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!
User avatar
vollkan
vollkan
The Interrogator
User avatar
User avatar
vollkan
The Interrogator
The Interrogator
Posts: 5373
Joined: March 29, 2007
Location: Australia

Post Post #1299 (ISO) » Tue Oct 30, 2007 2:40 pm

Post by vollkan »

shaft.ed wrote: But I do agree he has been using wording that makes it seem his analysis is gospel.
That's a personality thing. As I have been saying, when I make a case or analysis which seems correct to me, I get annoyed if people go against it without proving me wrong. When I do get proven wrong, or there is some supervening thing discovered, I am happy to alter my position.
shaft.ed wrote: In regards to him being swayed by my opinions, I have also noticed this, and have been worried by it. I can attribute it to vollkan being scum trying to buddy up to me, or the fact that I make really good points
Whenever you have been at odds with me on something, you have argued your case in the proper way: By proving that I am wrong or am overlooking something. It's more a compatible playstyle thing than anything else. Your style of argument is the sort that I respect.
Gem wrote: I can respect that. What I have a hard time with is that anyone who does not fall into lockstep with your arguments to be suspect.
Well, that's how I think. If a person is going to disagree with me and not argue with me, then I will suspect them and hound them for it.
Gemelli wrote: I'm honestly glad that you are suspecting me, as it shows that you are active in the game and are willing to assess less-obvious details. I would like to think that you'd grant me the same leeway. But you don't honestly believe in that trap premise, do you? That's more than a stretch.
Actually, I do. As you say, nobody appears to be opposed to dybeck's lynch. Since I think Orig is the SK, that fact is one which points in dybeck's favour as being cop. When you look at things that way, the trap is actually a very plausible scenario.
You have every right to be mad at this. I should have done this at the time but FoS vollkan and originality for the Lucienne side track
Do you mean my vote for Lucienne here?

If so, you have obviously missed the fact that it achieved all that I really wanted it to. I've hinted at this before, but a primary motivator for me was seeing what Orig's response would be.
Firstly, see mini 486. Nothing is over the top for me.
This is true

AlyG, Lucienne, dybeck - POST!

Return to “Completed Mini Normal Games”