Wake's Massive Role Madness - Game Over

Elitism · Post Post #900 (ISO) » Sat Aug 06, 2016 1:01 am

Yume, vote HC with me please

Skybird · Post Post #901 (ISO) » Sat Aug 06, 2016 1:02 am

OK, I iso'd HC because people are throwing his name around for a lynch. There's a lot of AtE in there (Be gentle, don't hurt me, etc.) but no real scum hunting.

VOTE: Hot Chocolate

I'm not interested in Lynching Cookie Bakers, Varsoon, Boem today. It will take me a couple of days to figure out Titus/Shiro but if they are town they are definitely worth keeping around. Varsoon and Boem feel town to me.

I need to read the rest of the game now.

Lapsa · Post Post #902 (ISO) » Sat Aug 06, 2016 1:03 am

Shaziro · Post Post #903 (ISO) » Sat Aug 06, 2016 1:04 am

In post 899, Accountant wrote:

I have recently played with CCC I can pull the game if someone wants he was town in that game but way too focused on throwing algebra in a logic NOT MATH game.
Aw cmon rach thats ongoing, I thought you knew better

Well shit. It is.

Elitism · Post Post #904 (ISO) » Sat Aug 06, 2016 1:04 am

Dang Skybird flipped scum but is on a separate faction from HC most likely.

amalgam · Post Post #905 (ISO) » Sat Aug 06, 2016 1:05 am

In post 900, Elitism wrote:Yume, vote HC with me please

Sure. For the sake of automatic counter.

VOTE: Hot Chocolate

Blanche · Post Post #906 (ISO) » Sat Aug 06, 2016 1:07 am

In post 904, Elitism wrote:Dang Skybird flipped scum but is on a separate faction from HC most likely.

HC is prob town but i agree skybird is scummy
-kraska

RachMarie · Post Post #907 (ISO) » Sat Aug 06, 2016 1:07 am

VOTE: Hot Chocolate

Everyone get your votes on me I town slipped because I am in both a neighborhood

and

a mason jeez

analgram sorry dudes I was hoping to wait til later to claim but this is bloody ridic

Kling is also in our mason crew

amalgam · Post Post #908 (ISO) » Sat Aug 06, 2016 1:08 am

Well, I got a green light from her, so.....Pay attention cos this will only be said once.

We're Masons. With RachMarie.

Narna · Post Post #909 (ISO) » Sat Aug 06, 2016 1:09 am

Narna · Post Post #910 (ISO) » Sat Aug 06, 2016 1:10 am

Not really, but seriously? There was no threat.

amalgam · Post Post #911 (ISO) » Sat Aug 06, 2016 1:10 am

That's why I was suspicious of Egg, because he insisted she cannot be Mason.

- Y

amalgam · Post Post #912 (ISO) » Sat Aug 06, 2016 1:11 am

In post 910, Narna wrote:Not really, but seriously? There was no threat.

More people could have voted because they 'trust Egg' or something similar....

BlackStar · Post Post #913 (ISO) » Sat Aug 06, 2016 1:11 am

UNVOTE:

Well that's interesting. I guess I'll look some stuff over again

VA-11 Hall-A · Post Post #914 (ISO) » Sat Aug 06, 2016 1:14 am

So I'm not surprised that the dumb shit Dunn said got a few votes our way. Though for Dunn, this isn't really that bad. It's pretty negligible. I also notice he made some votes. It will stay that way.

@That one Drixx comment where he said he'd get us policy lynched: That's fucking adorable. I hope you feel special.

FTR: I still like Cookie Bakers.

OH, goodie! Mason claims Day 1!!

- Zach

Narna · Post Post #915 (ISO) » Sat Aug 06, 2016 1:15 am

In post 912, amalgam wrote:
In post 910, Narna wrote:Not really, but seriously? There was no threat.
More people could have voted because they 'trust Egg' or something similar....

We could see who in that case and then catch them.

VOTE: Egg
Just to make the slightest use of the mason claim I guess.

Elitism · Post Post #916 (ISO) » Sat Aug 06, 2016 1:16 am

In post 908, amalgam wrote:Well, I got a green light from her, so.....Pay attention cos this will only be said once.

We're Masons. With RachMarie.

Fail.

Anyways I'm happy with the Hot Chocolate BW that's forming and will probably dip for the night. You'll most likely hear from my other two heads that haven't played the site as long and as much as me, but trust me. They're a lot nicer than me, and they are very solid players.

~T

BlackStar · Post Post #917 (ISO) » Sat Aug 06, 2016 1:17 am

In post 915, Narna wrote:
In post 912, amalgam wrote:
In post 910, Narna wrote:Not really, but seriously? There was no threat.
More people could have voted because they 'trust Egg' or something similar....
We could see who in that case and then catch them.

VOTE: Egg
Just to make the slightest use of the mason claim I guess.

The fuck is this post?

amalgam · Post Post #918 (ISO) » Sat Aug 06, 2016 1:17 am

In post 876, Blanche wrote:
In post 868, Blanche wrote:serrapaladin(whtever the spelling)
obviously i'm still scumreading this slot and the offer's still here but

VOTE: RachMarie

I trust Egg. Who else is in the six person neighborhood?

~Giga

In post 882, Elitism wrote:VOTE: RachMarie

sounds pretty convincing

the offer to lynch HC is still on the table though.

PEDIT: Lurking is NAI. The sun is rising for most people, plus there's already over
30
pages of this bullshit already.

In post 894, BlackStar wrote:
In post 892, Boem_u_dusi wrote:
In post 890, BlackStar wrote:Boem, why'd you start doing this steak thing? I'm not just asking that because it's making me hungry
770 774
Okay, thanks

P-edit: VOTE: RachMarie

Blanche · Post Post #919 (ISO) » Sat Aug 06, 2016 1:18 am

In post 912, amalgam wrote:
In post 910, Narna wrote:Not really, but seriously? There was no threat.
More people could have voted because they 'trust Egg' or something similar....

on the one hand, if she posted there by mistake, then she definitely didnt single egg out in her post or say something that indicates egg is the buddy right? so egg stretched this
on the other hand, there's 4 other people in that neighborhood according to egg. so misrepping rach and outing a potential mason is pretty ballsy
meh he's prob town
-kraska

Blanche · Post Post #920 (ISO) » Sat Aug 06, 2016 1:20 am

In post 915, Narna wrote:
In post 912, amalgam wrote:
In post 910, Narna wrote:Not really, but seriously? There was no threat.
More people could have voted because they 'trust Egg' or something similar....
We could see who in that case and then catch them.

VOTE: Egg
Just to make the slightest use of the mason claim I guess.

this is a really bad vote
read post 919

Narna · Post Post #921 (ISO) » Sat Aug 06, 2016 1:20 am

BlackStar wrote:
In post 915, Narna wrote:
In post 912, amalgam wrote:More people could have voted because they 'trust Egg' or something similar....
We could see who in that case and then catch them.

VOTE: Egg
Just to make the slightest use of the mason claim I guess.
The fuck is this post?

The fuck is yours? You don't think the masons claimed prematurely?

amalgam · Post Post #922 (ISO) » Sat Aug 06, 2016 1:21 am

In post 921, Narna wrote:
BlackStar wrote:
In post 915, Narna wrote:
In post 912, amalgam wrote:More people could have voted because they 'trust Egg' or something similar....
We could see who in that case and then catch them.

VOTE: Egg
Just to make the slightest use of the mason claim I guess.
The fuck is this post?
The fuck is yours? You don't think the masons claimed prematurely?

Would you rather one of us get lynched? Cos the way it was going, I wouldn't be suprised if it happened.

Blanche · Post Post #923 (ISO) » Sat Aug 06, 2016 1:22 am

narna is scummy

Narna · Post Post #924 (ISO) » Sat Aug 06, 2016 1:24 am

In post 920, Blanche wrote:
In post 915, Narna wrote:
In post 912, amalgam wrote:
In post 910, Narna wrote:Not really, but seriously? There was no threat.
More people could have voted because they 'trust Egg' or something similar....
We could see who in that case and then catch them.

VOTE: Egg
Just to make the slightest use of the mason claim I guess.
this is a really bad vote
read post 919

I agree with this. I didn't really think it through. I was just sheeping the masons while I am catching up.
UNVOTE: