Street Fighter Mafia [GAME OVER]

zakk · Post Post #5325 (ISO) » Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:28 am

In post 5323, Dwlee99 wrote:that face is because you're telling me to completely ignore the person who has been bringing up really good points about why you're scum lol

ranger is clearly wrong about me, whether she's town or scum

telling people to ignore wrong people is part of what makes towns strong

i'm doing something to strengthen town

let me guess, you're starting to think i'm scum now that i've reversed my townread on you.

is that it dwlee?

zakk · Post Post #5326 (ISO) » Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:29 am

In post 4786, Nosferatu wrote:it's either zakk and suzune or ranger and dwlee tbh

nos talk to me more about this post

what makes you think that?

Dwlee99 · Post Post #5327 (ISO) » Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:29 am

In post 5319, zakk wrote:
Spoiler: dwlee found titus buddying him
In post 1368, Dwlee99 wrote:also ftr titus isnt really a master at reading me and the way she declared this is 100% town me felt like some buddying because she wanted me dead in mildly dangerous mafia and was incorrectly reading me from the moment she replaced in iirc.

In post 1624, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 1621, Dunnstral wrote:YOU DIDN'T DO MUCH OF ANYTHING AT ALL
wait what
Dunnstral wrote:
In post 1366, Dwlee99 wrote:Backstory for college mafia: Titus was convinced guiltylion was 100% town and massive was their second choice for the remaining town but those two ended up being the remaining scum.
Sorry if this game off jerk-y titus >.<
pedit The quote wall is read progression on beeboy que no me gusta (that I dont like)
Explaining why I didnt like sircakez sheeping titus on me, explaining quote wall of read progression I didnt like from cakez.

In post 1367, Dwlee99 wrote:came off*

In post 1368, Dwlee99 wrote:also ftr titus isnt really a master at reading me and the way she declared this is 100% town me felt like some buddying because she wanted me dead in mildly dangerous mafia and was incorrectly reading me from the moment she replaced in iirc.
Expounding on that thinking titus might be buddying me

In post 1371, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 1370, Nero Cain wrote:DW what is your read on me?
Youre
probably
town

In post 1373, Dwlee99 wrote:what do you mean? Ive beem town reading you for almost if not all of today and the end of yesterday

In post 1395, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 1388, Varsoon wrote:Dwlee99
top of the list
lezgo

In post 1462, Dwlee99 wrote:VOTE: a50
o shit waddup
here come beefboi
sheeping a50 case as I didnt like his slot anyway before hand

In post 1465, Dwlee99 wrote:
V/LA July 10th - July 17th due to a family vacation

In post 1554, Dwlee99 wrote:UNVOTE: A50
The way I interpreted his role is that if he targets town the vig doesnt kill him, if he targets scum the vig does kill him.

In post 1563, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 1559, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: Dwlee
your
read
progression
makes
zero
sense
Calling you out on your shit

In post 1599, Dwlee99 wrote:where do you get the third on a wagon is scum thing, almost?
Trying to understand almost

In post 1969, Dwlee99 wrote:Cause they tried to buddy me.
But ranger is today Titus tomorrow

In post 2235, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 2227, beeboy wrote:
In post 2226, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 2225, beeboy wrote:
In post 2223, Dwlee99 wrote:What do I do
I feel like waiting for Anti and sheeping him tbh.

Are you feeling Luna town or Luna scum?
I think Luna is town but my judgment might be clouded :I
Nah Luna's town you got this.
Let's wait for Anti unless you got reads or something you want to share.
I wanna lynch titus still. Felt like she was buddying me and her logic normally makes more sense than this.

In post 2813, Dwlee99 wrote:I CAUGHT SOMEONE BUDDYING ME I AM SO PROUD
I figured it out cause titus said something to town read me that when I thought about it it didnt make sense

and look, he's supposedly super proud of himself

but then

Spoiler: he has NO CLUE i'm supposedly buddying him?
In post 5157, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 5156, Ranger wrote:
zakk wrote:so antihero and nosferatu have to come in and make waves and show themselves to be town, because currently i could definitely see the scenario that they're both just skating and hoping town tears itself apart
^Case'n'point about zakk driving a wedge in the town.
He is, quite literally, casting suspicion everywhere except for at the player he is blatantly sucking up to, and needs in order to get the mislynches he wants.
Yesterday, that player was Luna Fox.
Today, it's Dwlee.
Am i getting buddied

why is that??

i'll tell you why. it's because it's not me buddying him

it's
him
buddying
me

Are u saying me not knowing if I'm being buddied by you constantly saying "Dwlee is so town look dwlee town never gonna lynch dwlee" which seems kinda like trying to pocket me like people always do and I fall for it way too much is scummy because I had suspicions that titus was buddying me earlier in the game and was right?
Cause that makes 0 sense
pedit that isn't it at all. It's that ranger has made a good case, and instead of responding to it you've gone "ignore it ignore it lol" which is

super fucking scummy

Nosferatu · Post Post #5328 (ISO) » Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:30 am

ranger has a bigger ISO that me wtf

zakk · Post Post #5329 (ISO) » Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:30 am

dwlee do you think suzune is scum?

zakk · Post Post #5330 (ISO) » Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:30 am

In post 5328, Nosferatu wrote:ranger has a bigger ISO that me wtf

that is definitely a thing

Nosferatu · Post Post #5331 (ISO) » Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:31 am

In post 5326, zakk wrote:
In post 4786, Nosferatu wrote:it's either zakk and suzune or ranger and dwlee tbh
nos talk to me more about this post

what makes you think that?

was coming around on dunn and process of elimination? Not much thought to explain in there.

Nosferatu · Post Post #5332 (ISO) » Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:31 am

In post 5330, zakk wrote:
In post 5328, Nosferatu wrote:ranger has a bigger ISO that me wtf
that is definitely a thing

gonna go ahead and spam thread for a bit

Dwlee99 · Post Post #5333 (ISO) » Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:32 am

In post 5318, zakk wrote:and today he is willing to vote dunnstral.

zakk: *claims a guilty*
dwlee: *uhm are u sure it's a guilty and you're not being dumb*
zakk: *ya it's a guilty*
dwlee: *uh ok votes dunnstral*
...
zakk: *DWLEE IS WILLING TO HOP ON DUNNSTRAL'S WAGON HE IS SCUM*

zakk · Post Post #5334 (ISO) » Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:32 am

@everyone:

who do you think are the two scum pairs that makes the most sense, within:

antihero
nosferatu
dwlee
dunnstral
ranger

and why?

zakk · Post Post #5335 (ISO) » Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:32 am

In post 5331, Nosferatu wrote:
In post 5326, zakk wrote:
In post 4786, Nosferatu wrote:it's either zakk and suzune or ranger and dwlee tbh
nos talk to me more about this post

what makes you think that?
was coming around on dunn and process of elimination? Not much thought to explain in there.

so do you still think it's ranger and dwlee?

Dwlee99 · Post Post #5336 (ISO) » Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:33 am

zakk it's like you're expecting me to have concrete opinions that never change or something

zakk · Post Post #5337 (ISO) » Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:36 am

In post 5336, Dwlee99 wrote:zakk it's like you're expecting me to have concrete opinions that never change or something

cool whatever answer 5334

Nosferatu · Post Post #5338 (ISO) » Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:36 am

This would've been a lot better if we didn't lynch all of my town reads.

@zakk: why should we not lynch a mason if you've already detailed why it leads to the best case scenario?

zakk wrote:
In post 5331, Nosferatu wrote:
In post 5326, zakk wrote:
In post 4786, Nosferatu wrote:it's either zakk and suzune or ranger and dwlee tbh
nos talk to me more about this post

what makes you think that?
was coming around on dunn and process of elimination? Not much thought to explain in there.
so do you still think it's ranger and dwlee?

no, I've been switching around between coming around on dunn and not.

Dwlee99 · Post Post #5339 (ISO) » Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:37 am

In post 5318, zakk wrote:and today he is willing to vote dunnstral.

like you take this vote completely out of context
and there's no way you forgot that context

Dwlee99 · Post Post #5340 (ISO) » Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:37 am

In post 5334, zakk wrote:
@everyone:

who do you think are the two scum pairs that makes the most sense, within:

antihero
nosferatu
dwlee
dunnstral
ranger

and why?

is zakk and suzune an option

Dwlee99 · Post Post #5341 (ISO) » Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:41 am

In post 5325, zakk wrote: let me guess, you're starting to think i'm scum now that i've reversed my townread on you.

is that it dwlee?

let me guess, you noticed your buddying of me isn't working so you've reversed your town read on me.

is that it zakk?

Nosferatu · Post Post #5342 (ISO) » Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:43 am

scum is definitely in {dwlee, dunnstral, ranger} if the masons aren't scum. I had a concrete scum read on dunn earlier but that kinda dissipated later on as the game continued. I had null reads on dwlee and ranger for most of the game which is why I was kinda drifting towards her wagon a few days ago to get her out of the way, but we didn't. So I'm switching between pretty frequently.

But even you said the best option for us is to lynch a mason, cause then antihero will get a clear if he lives, or if he dies I'm confirmed. And so is the last mason. The game will be EZ money with 2 confirmed town with no wifom. So why are you still opting for us to lynch someone else?

UNVOTE:

Dwlee99 · Post Post #5343 (ISO) » Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:44 am

In post 5342, Nosferatu wrote:scum is definitely in {dwlee, dunnstral, ranger} if the masons aren't scum.

I'm actually just like
this line
no shit?? fypov

Nosferatu · Post Post #5344 (ISO) » Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:47 am

In post 5343, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 5342, Nosferatu wrote:scum is definitely in {dwlee, dunnstral, ranger} if the masons aren't scum.
I'm actually just like
this line
no shit?? fypov

obviously.

Dwlee99 · Post Post #5345 (ISO) » Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:48 am

In post 5344, Nosferatu wrote:
In post 5343, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 5342, Nosferatu wrote:scum is definitely in {dwlee, dunnstral, ranger} if the masons aren't scum.
I'm actually just like
this line
no shit?? fypov
obviously.

k

zakk · Post Post #5346 (ISO) » Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:52 am

In post 5338, Nosferatu wrote:This would've been a lot better if we didn't lynch all of my town reads.

@zakk: why should we not lynch a mason if you've already detailed why it leads to the best case scenario?

that was when i wasn't considering you or anti might be scum

and i realized not considering that was pretty stupid

zakk · Post Post #5347 (ISO) » Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:53 am

In post 5340, Dwlee99 wrote:is zakk and suzune an option

we're not scum, so no

Dwlee99 · Post Post #5348 (ISO) » Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:54 am

In post 5347, zakk wrote:
In post 5340, Dwlee99 wrote:is zakk and suzune an option
we're not scum, so no

are you gonna respond to my posts or no

zakk · Post Post #5349 (ISO) » Mon Aug 08, 2016 6:55 am

In post 5341, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 5325, zakk wrote: let me guess, you're starting to think i'm scum now that i've reversed my townread on you.

is that it dwlee?
let me guess, you noticed your buddying of me isn't working so you've reversed your town read on me.

is that it zakk?

except it literally WAS working

and if i wanted to lynch dunnstral, WITH YOUR HELP, i wouldn't have unvoted

so yea no i'm mostly just thinking ranger is town and dunn has a loooot of shit that makes him town

and upon review of your slot again, i found a lot of shit i didn't see before, because i wasn't considering you

so if you want to live today, you'd damn well better explain all the shit i posted about you