In post 1863, Skelda wrote:There was so much time spent yesterday talking about how there weren't usually many VTs in role madness. And you clearly understood it yesterday, you talked about it. You are either lying about who you investigated or you made an awful choice.In post 1853, iraonavp wrote:I disagree. If you were a cop, why would you check someone you think is town-aligned? Neapolitan is basically a weaker cop, but you will not be very sure about a guilty result.In post 1844, Cookie Bakers wrote:You didn't.In post 1843, iraonavp wrote:You are right that I don't have any buddies, but your argument is nonsense. I still stand by that I made the correct choice. I very highly doubt that either of the VT claims are scum-aligned.In post 1835, Skelda wrote:It doesn't matter what you think. You could be wrong and your role is useless apart from that.In post 1812, iraonavp wrote:Okay, well those two players I already thought are town-aligned, so it doesn't in this case even though you are being theoretical about it...In post 1803, Skelda wrote:If you get VT, then Neapolitan is useful because it could be used to confirm DGB and Long_Island_Medium as Town and a No Result would tell you virtually nothing.
Vanilla Cop is more useful because I think its optimal use is to catch Goons. Neapoliton can't catch Goons, so it is best used to confirm Town.
The only thing is, if Ira were a scum Neapoliton why wouldn't his buddies tell him to target either Long Island or DGB? That seems like the optimal choice from their perspective too given that they can't be confident in those claims either. Unless, of course, he's buddies with one of them.
Your role exists to confirm your accuracy, not to hunt down suspicions.
Okay, just stop it doesn't matter...In post 1871, Skelda wrote:Ira, if you are left alive you aren't going to do what you just did again right? Can you check a VT claim?