Mafia 73: NEGWLTWWWTKY - Abandoned!

[Neo-Viper9]

Your expecting me to react to a vote in the random voting stage?

[Mastermind of Sin]

Original Roll String: 1d19

1 19-Sided Dice: (17) = 17

[Mastermind of Sin]

Vote: Zu_Faul

[Mastermind of Sin]

Your expecting me to react to a vote in the random voting stage?

You just did.

[Shanba]

Vote Count:
3: Battle Mage

(Panzerjager, Neo-Viper9, ABR)

2: ABR

(Erg0, JordanA24)

1: Paradox244

(Elmo)

1: Erg0

(BM)

1: MoS

(hasdgfas)

1: hasdgfas

(Peers)

1: Kscope

(schismatized)

1: Neo-Viper9

(Toaster Strudel)

1: Zu_Faul

(MoS)

Not voting:

Zu_Faul, Sir Tornado, Sikario8, Paradox244, Yosarian2, Mert, Kscope

Happy Birthday schismatized

Note, this VC is accurate up to the place where it was posted.

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

Vote: Battle Mage

[schismatized]

Thanks shan!

[Mastermind of Sin]

Congrats schizy =P

[zu_Faul]

Congratz, shismatized.

[Battle Mage]

Let's not start the whole "getting defensive" bull again. It's the first freakin' page.

It's never too early to hunt scum.

Unvote, Vote: Peers

[Battle Mage]

Vote: Battle Mage

Hello Mr. Jumpy

of all the people on my BW, you are the one person i dont understand-mainly because all the others hate me for out of game reasons. Do you even know me?

Unvote, Vote: Viper

*watch me go for the most votes cast in a game, record.

[hasdgfas]

So how did we get a BM BW already?

Oh, I forgot to mention:

EXPLAIN YOUR REASONING.

Very nice, I like

[Peers]

Mod:

I voted for hasdgfaablagadad, not myself.

[Shanba]

That is indeed correct - it is now fixed in he vote count. Apologies.

[Peers]

No problem. Just didn't want self-vote-bandwagoners to start piling on me or something.

anyway, now that it's fixed...

Unvote

vote: BM:

And if I need a reason, it's... um... due to frequent and recurring votehopping. Or something else that sounds similarly random yet not-random. Or whatever.

[Yosarian2]

Unvote, Vote:BM

Prosecuted on page 1 is bad BM.

Care to clarify that, Panzer?

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

Why are you not voting BM?

[Yosarian2]

[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]Why are you not voting BM?[/quote]

...because the bandwagon against him is dumb, and Panzer's vote against BM is the scummiest thing I've seen so far this game?

[hasdgfas]

I would like to hear the case against BM as well. As he well knows, I like reasons behind votes. From what I understand, Panzer had one, but I didn't understand panzer's comment at all. Clarification would be nice there.

[schismatized]

[quote="Yosarian2"][quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]Why are you not voting BM?[/quote]

...because the bandwagon against him is dumb, and Panzer's vote against BM is the scummiest thing I've seen so far this game?[/quote]

agreed.

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

[quote="Yosarian2"][quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]Why are you not voting BM?[/quote]

...because the bandwagon against him is dumb, and Panzer's vote against BM is the scummiest thing I've seen so far this game?[/quote]1. It's BM
2. It's Panzer
3. It's Day 1, Page 2
4. It's a Bandwagon
5. It's a Bandwagon on BM

[PJ.]

I think I meant "prosecuting". And it's cause I felt he was voting for serious on the vote he put down so i voted him saying serious vote on page 1 is bad and scummy.

[Yosarian2]

I think I meant "prosecuting". And it's cause I felt he was voting for serious on the vote he put down so i voted him saying serious vote on page 1 is bad and scummy.

Yeah, that's what I thought you meant, and, huh? Why would a serious vote on page 1 be bad? That's silly. A random vote on page 1 isn't terrible, but a vote that has a reason behind it is obveously better, right?

[Peers]

How many times do you get an actual, bona-fide legit serious reason to vote for someone on page 1 of a day-start game?

[Yosarian2]

How many times do you get an actual, bona-fide legit serious reason to vote for someone on page 1 of a day-start game?

I'd say, more then half the time. Not usually a very strong reason, granted, but voting with any kind of semi-legitimate reason is better then a random vote.