1.)
Okay. I am frustrated with all of these replacements. The moderator
specifically
asked players to treat this game like a commitment in sign-ups. I (at least) have a hard time reading and reconciling replacements, so this is only getting more difficult.
I
do not
understand the apparent lack of interest in this game, either. We lynched scum Day One -- and quickly, as opposed to a long, drawn-out lynch that breeds disinterest. Day Two started off with a guilty result, a stolen vote, and a lively discussion leading to a shift in the Leader. We aren't even sure what the Leader does yet. The Mod is posting fairly regular vote counts and timely prods. By all accounts there is enough going on in this game to keep players engaged.
I am going to (re)-propose that players actually
vote
. If you think this game needs life,
give it some life
. You can't just wait around for other people to do everything.
2.)
DrippingGoofball, your player list in
Post #688 is missing myself and Cogito Ergo Sum. Where would you put us on your list?
3.)
DrippingGoofball, why are pitoli (kraska77) and lalaladucks scummy?
4.)
In post 679, hiplop wrote:Honestly if you think im avoiding the game and am not just busy, that is pre low? Im essentually a camp counselor this week
Yes, I
do
think you are avoiding this game. You
have
been posting on the site, as I have already illustrated. And your posts here a week ago were:
In post 588, hiplop wrote:promise i will get active tomororw and save this games activity
watch out scum butts
In post 631, hiplop wrote:Okay. I am committing 100% to blowing off plans tonight to fuck up scum tonight.
You probably are busy outside of this game; I don't doubt it. So is everybody else, I expect. But you have specifically promised to post in this game -- to the point of "committing 100% to blowing off other plans" -- and you have failed to do so.
Here's where you can start. Address my
Post #475. Then tell us who
you
think is scum. Is there some player you think is being overly ignored? Do you think somebody is playing weird? Any revelations about the 'squirrel crew'? Just do
something
.
Please.
It's not a game if you don't bother to play, and I am not keen on continually trying to figure you out based on one-liners and promises to post.
5.)
SnarkySnowman, can you elaborate on implosion? You have recently played together and it does not seem like there is much love lost between the two of you. You also (incorrectly) thought he was scum last game, and you seem to think he is potentially scum this game. Do you think there is something about his playstyle that makes you think he is scum, or is there something
more
this game that makes you have that read?
6.)
DeathRowKitty, I have asked you point-blank who is scum twice (because your posts really give no clue who you think is scum as of Day Two), and you have not even acknowledged me.
Please
take the time to read the game and post.
7.)
UpTooLate, based on your V/LA you should be returning soon. What do you think about SnarkySnowman now? What do you think of the replacements we've had while you were away?
8.)
Cogito Ergo Sum, please detail why you think Katsuki's guilty result is a fake claim. I have read over the events
multiple
times now and I still do not believe it is a fake claim.
Katsuki-scum does not make sense. I do not think Katsuki would kill camn Night One. Scum are far less likely to try a guilty-claim gambit on Day Two if a partner was just lynched on Day One. And even if scum were going to try a fake-guilty in that situation, claiming it on a player who was already bandwagoned and a suspect from Day One makes even less sense.
So the realistic question is whether Katsuki is Town fake-claiming a guilty. I understand that Katsuki apparently has a habit of 'fake-claiming' guilty results as Town. Fine. But this looks legitimate:
->
a.)
First, Katsuki made (what I think to be) an obviously fake claim at the end of Day One. If I had to guess, it was done along the lines of "I have a power role, so I might as well claim a power so ridiculous that scum will write me off not being a threat on Night One."
->
b.)
Second, Katsuki distanced himself from his
vote on Killthestory, which would give scum less of an incentive to gun for Katsuki on Night One (as opposed to if Katsuki was leading the charge). I see this another attempt to subtly sway scum into thinking Katsuki was not a threat on Night One.
->
c.)
Third, I would completely think that if Katsuki had an investigative role that he would have investigated either Bulbazak or kraska77 on Night One.
->
d.)
Fourh, even after being elected Leader (i.e., in a position where we cannot lynch Katsuki), Katsuki has not backed down as having a guilty result on Bulbazak. And all of Katsuki's Day Two posts are consistent with a guilty reult on Bulbazak.
Even the boy who cried wolf eventually sees the wolf. And this is looking like the situation where Katsuki legitimately has a guilty result. I do not find the "lying about receiving the vote stealing PM" persuasive in the least. Yes it was
dumb
, but it doesn't make the guilty result less valid. The post that gives me the most doubt is indeed the obviously tongue-in-cheek:
In post 388, Katsuki wrote:I would never fake a guilty result hiplop. Pls don't fake guilty kids
But it reads as just that. Tongue-in-cheek. The fact is, Katsuki has had ample opportunity to back away from the claim if it is fake given that he has been elected Leader, and he has not done so. As you argued yourself, if he is faking he has probably already gotten what he wanted (i.e., to be Leader). So why keep up the charade?
