"We were about to go chill in the parking lot and freak out some squares."
-Buck
"Oh, but I— I don't have anything against squares. I like all basic shapes."
-Steven,Joy Ride
Deadline
"We were about to go chill in the parking lot and freak out some squares."
-Buck
"Oh, but I— I don't have anything against squares. I like all basic shapes."
-Steven,Joy Ride
I did. I answered it in the dialogue that I had with Creature, which is why I said "keep reading".In post 876, Not Chara wrote:OBK: why didn't you answer my question?
between those, i pick Rational. but it's barely been a day and i'd like to read first.
which do you pick? including me.
You didn't say verbatim that you townread Creature. Your behavior indicated you townread him which is plainly evident from the posts that I quoted.In post 878, Not Chara wrote:yes, i know you 'answered' it. the post i quoted was the last thing you said about me to Creature. now where did i say i was townreading Creature? quote it.
I feel special! Then again, I do tend to be one of those unforgettable characters!In post 868, Not Chara wrote:my memory can be very bad. this excludes Almost50, who i am aware of.
love the timing of this, as i'm in the middle of looking back on why Rational is scum. still, OWK is much worse.In post 883, Obi-Wan Kenobi wrote:Now, I have the reaction I was looking for.
NC had the two players who were possibly scum wagoned together. NC if scum, most likely is scum with RR or Creature due to the rule of 3. (Namely if a scumfuck gives a reads list where there's multiple scum, more likely than not there's a buddy). By having Creature and RR as the options, I could see if NC would bus or not. By approaching this from that angle, NC clearly didn't believe in their scumread allegedly on Creature or RR.
NC has had irregular interactions with RR that have been documented by other people. Yet, she suddenly it's not wanting to rope them.
NC's reactions have been like this all game.
VOTE: NC
This is caught for wrong reasons. Your case is fine but you didn't quote the best evidence, so I'm going to rebel over here.In post 880, Not Chara wrote:so, you made an assumption that my acting civil and friendly to a player has anything to do with my read on them, then proceeded to call that a 180 on my read?
and you didn't even quote the only ammunition you might have had on this point, which is the post where i say i agree somewhat with Creature's view that hunting is harder without votes to look at. still has nothing to do with my read, but i might have actually seen where you're coming from with that.
here, all i see is someone looking for something to attack. even Creature thought you were full of it as you tried to convince him, and he was the one i was scumreading. :>
VOTE: Obi-Wan Kenobi
i... what? are you saying there areIn post 886, Obi-Wan Kenobi wrote:This is caught for wrong reasons. Your case is fine but you didn't quote the best evidence, so I'm going to rebel over here.In post 880, Not Chara wrote:so, you made an assumption that my acting civil and friendly to a player has anything to do with my read on them, then proceeded to call that a 180 on my read?
and you didn't even quote the only ammunition you might have had on this point, which is the post where i say i agree somewhat with Creature's view that hunting is harder without votes to look at. still has nothing to do with my read, but i might have actually seen where you're coming from with that.
here, all i see is someone looking for something to attack. even Creature thought you were full of it as you tried to convince him, and he was the one i was scumreading. :>
VOTE: Obi-Wan Kenobi
No. You're whining that I didn't use the best post (you refer to it as the only ammunition) to make my case that you 180ed your read. You're basically stating that my case is fine but I didn't use the best evidence so you'd OMGUS me instead.In post 895, Not Chara wrote:i... what? are you saying there areIn post 886, Obi-Wan Kenobi wrote:This is caught for wrong reasons. Your case is fine but you didn't quote the best evidence, so I'm going to rebel over here.In post 880, Not Chara wrote:so, you made an assumption that my acting civil and friendly to a player has anything to do with my read on them, then proceeded to call that a 180 on my read?
and you didn't even quote the only ammunition you might have had on this point, which is the post where i say i agree somewhat with Creature's view that hunting is harder without votes to look at. still has nothing to do with my read, but i might have actually seen where you're coming from with that.
here, all i see is someone looking for something to attack. even Creature thought you were full of it as you tried to convince him, and he was the one i was scumreading. :>
VOTE: Obi-Wan Kenobibetterreasons that you're scum?