1.)
No. lalaladucks is actually pretty much completely null for me. He does not seem Townish or scummish. He just has posts.
2.)
In post 810, DrippingGoofball wrote: In post 778, petroleumjelly wrote:Unvote: hiplop
Vote: DrippingGoofball
Largely changing votes so that hiplop is not left at L-1, but (besides Bulbazak) this looks like the best place for my vote in the meantime. I would still prefer a hiplop lynch currently.
Your fake case is pretty rich considering the above ^^^^^
You are doing exactly what you are complaining I am doing LOL
I voted you because I did not want hiplop to remain close to being lynched but I wanted my vote to be on somebody. I decided you were a good place to pressure in the meantime given that I already had some questions for you. Additionally, you replaced SleepyKrew whose play I did not like (especially given that he caused kraska77, one of my Townreads, to replace out) and Nahdia, who did pretty much nothing besides cast suspicion on two of my Townreads (UpTooLate and kraska77/pitoli) without ever answering why.
You, however, voted one of your Townreads for the sake of "movement." I would say these are quite different.
3.)
In post 832, Bulbazak wrote: In post 778, petroleumjelly wrote:
2.)
DrippingGoofball, we just had about three replacements in a row who are all reading the game and providing fresh viewpoints. Why would you then feel the need to vote one of your Townreads for the sake of "movement" when you have three scumreads to choose from? For somebody who has apparently not even read Day Two yet, voting for the sake of "movement" seems even more manufactured.
I would ask if you've played with DGB before, but further down, it's quite evident that you have. DGB wanting to get the game moving is not out of the ordinary. Why then do you try to paint it like it is?
DrippingGoofball and I have played together for many years.
What kind of "painting" did I do? I am trying to figure out why she would vote one of her Townreads and whether she is making up reasons to do it. It does not make sense to me that a replacement who is still reading the game would feel compelled to vote one of their Townreads.
In post 832, Bulbazak wrote: In post 778, petroleumjelly wrote:
4.)
Serious questions: DrippingGoofball, do you feel like you are still having memory issues? Do you feel like that is affecting your play in this game to any extent? Are you okay to be playing mafia right now?
My apologies if these questions are a bit too personal or are not worded sensitively. And I am not trying to imply that I personally want you to replace out. But I do honestly worry whether this is a game you should be playing.
This is dirty pool.
No, it's not.
For starters, I just finished a game (
Mini #1805) with DrippingGoofball where this was an issue. She was a Vigilante who honestly believed she had nightkilled a player she did not kill because she forgot. She claimed the wrong kill on Day Three which led her to being lynched. After the lynch -- because a Vigilante has no reason to lie about who they kill -- her claim caused the Town to think there was a Serial Killer in the game which helped lead to the final mislynch.
In the Dead Thread and Post-Game she discussed her memory and health and how embarrassed she was for making these types of mistakes across multiple games. Everybody wished her well. Because in the end, Mafia is ultimately just a game played by people. Given her play in that game and the discussion of her memory and health, I legitimately worry whether she should be playing mafia games right now.
That said, I
am
also trying to judge if her play in this game may to some extent be affected by her memory. This could change my view on how I read some of her posting. I
already
have a hard time judging her play normally. I realize this is a sensitive topic, which is why I tried to broach it politely and respectfully.
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
