Open 652- Making Friends and Enemies: Over

[Zyf]

policy lynch not_mafia

can we pls wagon scum
kthnx

[Harkonnen97]

do you think he's town?

[Io]

do you think he's town?

That's a loaded question as there is nothing to go off of for an inactive.
PL lynches are extremely stupid. OK, if he keeps doing it down the line maybe lynch him but PL lynching is the worst thing that you can possibly do. It's a complete blind lynch just because you hate a player.
Reasonably lynching scummy people like you is a lot better than whatever PL lynch you can come up with.

[Harkonnen97]

i dont hate him lol

[Io]

That part wasn't necessarily directed at you more at PL's in general, but PL's are killing players just because you don't like them.

[Harkonnen97]

no

you policy lynch players due to anti-town behaviour

[Io]

no

you policy lynch players due to anti-town behaviour

No that's being scummy not Policy Lynching.
That implies because they have a certain play style or record they must be scum which is such stupidity.

[Harkonnen97]

Spoiler:

[Dunnstral]

Can we please not let karnos slide when he plays like this?

Zyf might be scum with him too, stay tuned

[Zyf]

Can we please not let karnos slide when he plays like this?

Zyf might be scum with him too, stay tuned

?
have I interacted with karnos yet?

Also what are you referring to when you say "playing like this"?

[Io]

Guess I forgot about Dunn. Dunn could be scum too.
But last time Dunn was scummy he was a VT so he might just naturally be scummy.

[Zyf]

Guess I forgot about Dunn. Dunn could be scum too.
But last time Dunn was scummy he was a VT so he might just naturally be scummy.

not a very good reason
"poor play" meta is not consistent at all

[Loopdan]

@Hark-- I'd like your explanation of 63 (ref. 413).

[Loopdan]

Can we please not let karnos slide when he plays like this?

Zyf might be scum with him too, stay tuned

I've never played with Karnos. What specifically about his play here is suspicious?

[Thor665]

Think thor is acting off, too, like why'd he ignore the naru wagon?

Probably because it was boring and went nowhere - why, what interesting observations do you think came out of the Naru wagon that I should have made?
You weren't exactly extolling info about it either as I recall - no one was.

If people think Not_Mafia and Tex are both town - they should wagon up Karnos.
Otherwise people should get on NM or Tex.

I, personally, still rather like the Tex wagon, and would note to people voting NM that, unlike Not_Mafia, Tex has been posting quite a bit.
Yet, you could actually talk just as much about NM's opinions as you could about Tex's.
So...just saying.

[Io]

No Thor. I do not agree with you.

Not_Mafia literally has done nothing.
Not doing anything scummy does not equal being scummy.

I would like Hark or Tex dead. Both of them are scummy, Hark more so.
Karnos just isn't scummy atm, and like I said NM hasn't done anything scummy to warrant a scum read.

[Zyf]

No Thor. I do not agree with you.

Not_Mafia literally has done nothing.
Not doing anything scummy does not equal being scummy.

I would like Hark or Tex dead. Both of them are scummy, Hark more so.
Karnos just isn't scummy atm, and like I said NM hasn't done anything scummy to warrant a scum read.

all this except tex can live
b/c there's nothing left for us to do with them, no claim to be had

can we please consolidate on not!tex, get a claim, and go from there?

[Io]

No Thor. I do not agree with you.

Not_Mafia literally has done nothing.
Not doing anything scummy does not equal being scummy.

I would like Hark or Tex dead. Both of them are scummy, Hark more so.
Karnos just isn't scummy atm, and like I said NM hasn't done anything scummy to warrant a scum read.

all this except tex can live
b/c there's nothing left for us to do with them, no claim to be had

can we please consolidate on not!tex, get a claim, and go from there?

There is literally only 1 role to claim.
No Mason would be stupid enough to claim day 1. They are only useful day 2 or 3. Day 2 is a stretch.

[Thor665]

@Io - since my entire comment was an explanation of why people should vote for Tex over N_M I'll just encourage you to read my comments again.

[Io]

You made it sound like those were the only 2 options. I know you did say Tex over NM and that's pretty much all I agree with you about.

[Harkonnen97]

@Hark-- I'd like your explanation of 63 (ref. 413).

Naru's 49 and my 63 are 14 posts apart. Do you really think that people reading through the thread would read 49 and then read 63 and forget that Naru voted?
How is it not obvious that I was focusing on the words Naru used to accompany his vote, rather than the whole thing itself?

[Save The Dragons]

The

hey now hey now it's a vote count

vote count

4 Not_Mafia (Loopdan, texcat, Harkonnen97, karnos)

3 Harkonnen97 (Io, BlueBloodedToffee, Zyf)
2 texcat (Thor665, Narurider)
2 karnos (Dunnstral, Penguin Power)
1 Zyf (NJAC)
1 BlueBloodedToffee (Not_Mafia)


Not Voting: Nobody.

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

Day ends:
(expired on 2016-09-21 04:08:06)

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Thor, is there a reason you ignored my response to you?

[Loopdan]

Hey

VOTE: BBT

Well I didn't know game had started so it will take me a bit of time to catch up

I didn't get a daystart pm until page 11

This is now NM's entire iso.

If we aren't lynching NM, someone please go delete the "policy lynch" page off the wiki, as it is no longer site meta.

[Zyf]

@Hark-- I'd like your explanation of 63 (ref. 413).

Naru's 49 and my 63 are 14 posts apart. Do you really think that people reading through the thread would read 49 and then read 63 and forget that Naru voted?
How is it not obvious that I was focusing on the words Naru used to accompany his vote, rather than the whole thing itself?

this
is terrible reasoning
and a terrible defense