Open 652- Making Friends and Enemies: Over

[Harkonnen97]

thor where have i "town-slipped?

the wagon on me is scum-motivated

[Harkonnen97]

VOTE: texcat

my wagon is a derail from that wagon^^^

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Hark, what happened to your Penguin and Io scum reads?

[Thor665]

First, you say "How do you know I have not reevaluated?" (implying that you had)
BBT assumes the implication is true, but I ask explicitly to find out that you had not, in fact, reevaluated.

I had and continue to reevaluate.
There is, as I said, a massive difference between reevaluating a read and changing a read.

Also, this is literally the only time you can even suggest I'm obfuscating - and it requires you to want me to interpret a word incorrectly, and also to provide an answer to a question that wasn't asked.

None of that bothers you when suggesting I'm obfuscating? You're just like, 'yup, that's obfuscating'?

[Harkonnen97]

I wasn't really scumreading them it was just pressure to fish for reactions

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Ah. That old chestnut.

What did you learn from said reactions?

[Thor665]

I ask again - do you think he's a skilled enough player to intentionally fake slip?
Judging by your scum case on him I feel the answer is 'no' so...?

@BBT

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Thor, can we please just drop it.

Neither of us are getting anywhere and it's making you look like you're busy doing things instead of sitting on a stale read and I'm not interested in doing that.

[Thor665]

My "stale" read is the largest wagon, and also who I want to have flipped.
Don't mistake longevity with staleness. It's a silly issue.

I would rather like you to at least on open record state your value call on the slip.
Clearly you've decided it's not a slip - but I just want to have you claim he did it intentionally.
And, if you'd rather not claim that, describe that you think he slipped as scum.

[Zyf]

jesus thor this is some next-level tunneling that you're not even doing anything about

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Harl intentionally cut that quote down to remove the vote.

I have already stated as much, if not so blatantly.

[karnos]

Zyf, quit making excuses to vote random players who aren't a viable lynch today. What is your stance on texcat? Last time I asked you, you thought she was scum. She hasn't posted in the meantime. Has her lack of posting changed your opinion? Do you find lurking to be town-indicative?

Is it because I called you out on it being an obvious bus?

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Karnos, what is your read on Hark?

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Zyf, quit making excuses to vote random players who aren't a viable lynch today.

Hark is a viable lynch today.

[Harkonnen97]

Ah. That old chestnut.

What did you learn from said reactions?

nothing from penguin

but from my vote on Io i've learned that you two are buddying. i doubt that both of you are scum, but i also don't see two towns buddying so hard just because they share a common scumread on me

[Harkonnen97]

bbt is scum or just plain b a d

[Harkonnen97]

also nobody responded to my statement that my wagon is a distraction from texcat's wagon, which makes me believe that it's true

[karnos]

I meant Thor, that Thor vote from zyf was just silly.

Hark could be scum, but I think he still fits into my null reads. I think texcat & zyf could really be aligned, while I think hark is of opposite alignment compared to zyf.

I'd prefer to lynch texcat or zyf, but I could make a compromise if we were running out of time.

[Harkonnen97]

the thor vote isn't the only silly thing that zyf has done this game

[Thor665]

Harl intentionally cut that quote down to remove the vote.

I have already stated as much, if not so blatantly.

I understand your claim about the supposed misrep.
I'm asking you about the slip and your thoughts on it.

[NJAC]

Sorry for the absence. Some IRL issues. Catching up in a while.

[Thor665]

I ask again - do you think he's a skilled enough player to intentionally fake slip?
Judging by your scum case on him I feel the answer is 'no' so...?

@BBT

This is the question.
The slip is here;
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 7#p8312767

[PenguinPower]

VOTE: Hark

Karnos can wait until tomorrow.

[Zyf]

Hark @ L-2 btw

[Narurider]

VOTE: Io

lynch this scumlady

This was just plain scummy and I'm not buying the "it was a reaction test" thing

VOTE: texcat

my wagon is a derail from that wagon^^^

Or maybe people just think you're scummier than texcat, which you are

also nobody responded to my statement that my wagon is a distraction from texcat's wagon, which makes me believe that it's true

Well that's just a ridiculous statement. Nobody responded to it, so it must be true? Shaky logic right there.

Hark has just gotten progressively scummier as the day has gone on so I'mma vote him now.

L-1

VOTE: Hark