Mini Normal 1832 [game over]

[Psyche]

hello i have returned to this thread in order to establish or indicate who is scum

[Psyche]

after considered analysis i have determined that there is no content on the first page of this thread that is in any way alignment indicative

[xyzzy]

Gear has been prodded.

[Gamma Emerald]

Noticed my vote was still on Jake.
VOTE: Psyche
For his tone of posting.

[light_ganski]

after considered analysis i have determined that there is no content on the first page of this thread that is in any way alignment indicative

No shit sherlock

[Psyche]

would you prefer a high alto

[Gamma Emerald]

I'd prefer you a) post more substantial posts and b) actually take things seriously.

[Psyche]

after considered analysis i have determined that there is no content on the first page of this thread that is in any way alignment indicative

No shit sherlock :roll:

for your pleasure i will now dutifully develop my analysis to include the second page of this thread concerning content that may in any way be alignment indicative

[light_ganski]

VOTE: Psyche

[light_ganski]

ugh actually UNVOTE: this is probably shitposting town

[light_ganski]

VOTE: gerryoat

[ecane]

VOTE: Gamma Emerald

@Gamma, did that ping you?

I don't understand this question at all. Please be a little more specific.

You seemed to be pinged by quite a few things earlier yet didn't really do much about them. Why's that?

[Gamma Emerald]

Could you quote some examples?

[ecane]

Actually, Jake is

really

pinging me.
VOTE: Jake from State Farm

Okay what teh fuq everyone's being really pingy.

The way he said that really pinged me.

[Gamma Emerald]

Okay, I don't think it's vote worthy at all.

[ecane]

Well, it sure is now. Why can't you answer? Why didn't you follow up those pingy feelings you were having?

[Gamma Emerald]

Because other things pinged me more. Right now Psyche's inability to actually contribute is what I'm dealing with.

[gerryoat]

Gerry you're awfully worried about one vote. Why?

You're awfully quick to try and get pressure on the person who started a bw on you

[gerryoat]

I mean Psyche isn't a bad vote, now that I think about it. But, I'd much rather vote Jake here.

[Jake from State Farm]

I asked you a question. I'm not trying to get pressure on you and I certainly am not worried about the votes on me.

[Raskolnikov]

can you go into ecane?
you said you didnt understand the votes for maria so im wondering how you townread her for it

The vote looks like misguided town, 140 through 144 look super TvT to me and are a reason I am town reading Maria as well. Not sure that scum would be ballsy enough to vote 3 different people in their first 6 posts either. Do you think there's scum motivation there Rask?

not really, though i dont share your super TvT judgement there either
but it was interesting that you townread him when you didnt follow his maria vote and he disagreed with you on the rvs wagon stuff

[Raskolnikov]

a fan of the townhunting approach though

My town hunting approach really isn't perfect, case in point last time I played with you you were my strongest townread and now I'm getting myself tied up in knots because you look pretty townie, but I though the same of you last time we played together and I was so wrong then, I feel like my gut is wrong now too ugh

in general its really good if youre strict and careful not to give people undeserved town
ive lost games when i clear people through things like bad setup speculation or because their inherent style appeals to me instead of their actual thoughts
how you address me here is a little AtE-ish but i dont think you'd do that intentionally
cough maria cough

[Raskolnikov]

VOTE: gerryoat
ignores my question
is friends with maria and doesnt bother sorting her through their engage, doesnt even seem interested
no evidence of reads developing

[Raskolnikov]

actually i think i should have naked voted
every time i give good reasoning people just sheep and dont add anything

[Raskolnikov]

@mod vc please

im giving you this pagetop