All your doing is asking questions and acting like what is being asked has been responded to.
Did I say all you've done was defend dark? No.
I'm asking why the town read.
All your doing is asking questions and acting like what is being asked has been responded to.
...no there isn't. and if there is, it exists only as a difference in wording. townreading means you think someone is town. and just because you come to a conclusion doesn't mean you can't change it later.In post 572, lane0168 wrote:There's a difference between townread and coming to a conclusion someone is town. If I came up a conclusion I wouldn't bother with a possibility of dark scum.
i don't think anyone is saying that Davsto wasn't kill for a reason. i wasn't questioning you on what i think happened, i was questioning on presenting the possibilities as if there were only two of them. and the other one is probably similar.In post 573, lane0168 wrote:Throwing shade? I'm questioning bnl's townread on you solidifying? Wtf? Why is it weird and you don't understand all of a sudden? When I did the same to dark?In post 569, Not Chara wrote:what crucial points did i agree with you on?In post 568, lane0168 wrote:I see you also like to live dangerously. Getting a more solid town read from someone who says they'll elaborate, then refuses to elaborate, and scum reads a person they agree with on crucial pointsbesidesmy alignment.
also why are you weirdly throwing shade on someone you're supposedly townreading?
Crucial points, Davsto was killed for a reason. Something else you said you agreed with but questioned me. Can't remember what it was
i'm talking about now. i'm talking about the way you answered my questions.In post 577, lane0168 wrote:I'm pointing to things that happened previously. You're using those points to show that I'm aware of how I'm being viewed now. But those all happened previously. You don't get that?
In post 543, farside22 wrote:In post 273, lane0168 wrote:@davsto, I think they were pretty biased. I actually liked his reads with reasons. There were parts I agreed with, and parts that I didn't really care about, but nothing that looked scummy to me. I'll tell you what I think about your reads. I'm never on computer but I'll try my best to make it coherentThis maybe out of order.In post 539, lane0168 wrote:Farside, I'm probably not going to do this with you again. Davsto made a bunch of crap arguments, and I refuted them because davsto asked. And I didn't agree with them.
I'm not going down this road again. Not with you
Lane I don't get the attitude right now.
I looked back and I saw one post and the second post here:
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 7#p8316077
None of this explains the town read on dark.
All you have done is defend the spot and I'm wondering what you see that is town?
also. this.In post 575, farside22 wrote:All your doing is asking questions and acting like what is being asked has been responded to.
Did I say all you've done was defend dark? No.
I'm asking why the town read.
Oh.In post 579, Not Chara wrote:i'm talking about now. i'm talking about the way you answered my questions.In post 577, lane0168 wrote:I'm pointing to things that happened previously. You're using those points to show that I'm aware of how I'm being viewed now. But those all happened previously. You don't get that?
the 'you're wrong, i did towny things like this, this, and this'.
No. Not this. I already answeredIn post 581, Not Chara wrote:also. this.In post 575, farside22 wrote:All your doing is asking questions and acting like what is being asked has been responded to.
Did I say all you've done was defend dark? No.
I'm asking why the town read.
you've been defending him since 53. it stood out as strange to me. i never said it's all you were doing. and 187, again.In post 583, lane0168 wrote:I bring those things up because you act like I've been constantly defending dark and I have this conclusion dark was town. Like some infallible read. That's not true and its a misrepresentation.
Oh fuck that. That's my a defense. That's an attack on Charloux JesusIn post 53, lane0168 wrote:Filler question alert! BEEOOOBEEOOOBEEOOO! Quite obvious what he is implyingIn post 52, Charloux wrote:What are you implying with this? Do you think he is scum for that?In post 51, DarkLightA wrote:There was a lot to comment on by that point. RVS was not necessary or helpful.
your reaction to dark's big post that you liked, not Davsto.In post 588, lane0168 wrote:Not chara? What was so "incredible" about my reaction? Serious question. Answer it.
What was so incredible about davsto pointing out a bunch of scum points, which you don't see, and then asking if he was crazy, and me saying yeah, you're crazy I don't see those scum points at all.
Are you fucking serious? I explained what the fuck was going on?In post 187, lane0168 wrote:He was obviously trying to bait you. Trying to see if you agreed with both davstos points in that post, cause you said you agreed with his points. But only the one point was about him.In post 184, farside22 wrote:Kick starting something by asking the same question that how been awnser already??In post 181, lane0168 wrote:Ok... So this is underwhelming. What a great weekend. Apparently everyone else had the same weekend.
DarkLightA has easily the best post on the game. I'm not sure why Farside is asking if he's just trying to look busy when to me, even if that were true, he's kick starting the game. I'm a fan.
You can't be serious
Its clear he was trying to see if you knew what you were talking about or bull shitting your way through. You obviously weren't bs
That's not a defense of dark? That was me spewing my thoughts in the threadIn post 195, lane0168 wrote:Vedith, why is Farside town?
Fire, why is Farside scum?
Vedith, why is Dav scum?
Fire, why is Dav town?
Vedith, why is bnl scum?
Fire, why is bnl town?
What is with the giant disconnect? You guys using your pt? What does your other partner think?
The only thing I saw I didn't like was fire being defensive to bnl. I probably wouldn't even respond. But having said that, I didn't think fire was being especially irrelevant at that point, to refute Bnl's point, who clarified it as being more scum.
The other thing would be the disconnect going on, but that mostly just bugs me. The only reason it would be scummy, would be to be able to vote pretty much anyone they want without getting shit. Sow confusion maybe? Idk.
I'm trying to ignore Farside. She's doing the same crap she did to me our last game. Long story short I got force replaced. I don't have a strong read on her but she was town in that game so I guess I'd town lean?In post 590, Not Chara wrote:your reaction to dark's big post that you liked, not Davsto.In post 588, lane0168 wrote:Not chara? What was so "incredible" about my reaction? Serious question. Answer it.
What was so incredible about davsto pointing out a bunch of scum points, which you don't see, and then asking if he was crazy, and me saying yeah, you're crazy I don't see those scum points at all.
i might be beginning to reconsider. did you answer about your read on farside and i missed it?
Dark wanted to know if Farside agreed with both of davstos points. He had them numbered 1 and 2.In post 593, Not Chara wrote:calm down. and as for 187.
i read 176. it looked like a request for clarification, as darklight later said.
i have no idea where you got that it was bait?
pedit: i wasn't trying to say it was. 195 was about the Firebringer hydra. i should have clarified.