Decided to give it a second look for ya.In post 824, Zachstralkita wrote:I mean I still want to lynch Mimikyu but everyone thinks I'm fucking deluded apparently
His 247 was pretty bad, but I'm not seeing nearly as much lurking as The-Jester
Decided to give it a second look for ya.In post 824, Zachstralkita wrote:I mean I still want to lynch Mimikyu but everyone thinks I'm fucking deluded apparently
In post 819, Zachstralkita wrote:In post 816, Ümläüt wrote:I don't see how this is odd at all. There's nothing inconsistent or even troublesome about scumreading Gamma while townreading someone for doing otherwise, especially not when Gamma is by far the leading wagon right now.In post 814, Zachstralkita wrote:Odd, considering your vote is on Gamma.Aubrey wrote:I like the fact that the both of you are double guessing your reads on Gamma. It seems townie. I doubt scum would buss/push Gamma this close to getting lynched then suddenly back off. Not only is it super risky to bus this early as scum, but I feel like scum would commit to the bussing instead of backing off as well. Further more, if you two were scum looking to hunt other scum, I feel as if you would commit to the Gamma lynching even if you begin to have doubts regarding how scummy they may actually be. Any kill is beneficial to you as long as it isn't one of your own. In short, lynch the possible scum/town player, then night kill your other/stronger scum reads that developed later in the day phase.
You both have good town leans for me.
Obviously not at face value but I found something off about the way he worded it.
I bet you would love to see me gone. Interesting I go from a town read for you to suddenly worse than BTD...Seems like a revenge vote. I hope everyone also notes that once again, Dunn doesn't give reasons for his thinking.In post 815, Dunnstral wrote:Let's get himIn post 814, Zachstralkita wrote:Odd, considering your vote is on Gamma.
VOTE: Aubrey
afraid so. However, we have a few days. Who knows.In post 821, Aristophanes wrote:I don't see any of these counterwagon happening
Thank you!In post 816, Ümläüt wrote:I don't see how this is odd at all. There's nothing inconsistent or even troublesome about scumreading Gamma while townreading someone for doing otherwise, especially not when Gamma is by far the leading wagon right now.In post 814, Zachstralkita wrote:Odd, considering your vote is on Gamma.Aubrey wrote:I like the fact that the both of you are double guessing your reads on Gamma. It seems townie. I doubt scum would buss/push Gamma this close to getting lynched then suddenly back off. Not only is it super risky to bus this early as scum, but I feel like scum would commit to the bussing instead of backing off as well. Further more, if you two were scum looking to hunt other scum, I feel as if you would commit to the Gamma lynching even if you begin to have doubts regarding how scummy they may actually be. Any kill is beneficial to you as long as it isn't one of your own. In short, lynch the possible scum/town player, then night kill your other/stronger scum reads that developed later in the day phase.
You both have good town leans for me.
And you! Thank you!
This ones better:In post 818, Gamma Emerald wrote:Opportunistic vote.In post 815, Dunnstral wrote:Let's get himIn post 814, Zachstralkita wrote:Odd, considering your vote is on Gamma.
VOTE: Aubrey
Do I even have to say what's wrong with this vote?In post 827, Dunnstral wrote:When did I say you were worse than btd?
Why not talk about Gamma, by the way?
Yes, I would like to see you gone, since recently (as I've pointed out) you went from voting me to gamma but went off on a mini rant to go back to it later. At this point I know you'll vote whoever has the most votes
I'm also ok with jester being lynched for being parked on me forever
This ones better:In post 818, Gamma Emerald wrote:Opportunistic vote.In post 815, Dunnstral wrote:Let's get himIn post 814, Zachstralkita wrote:Odd, considering your vote is on Gamma.
VOTE: Aubrey
VOTE: Gamma
Hello contradiction. I also assume my Jester, Dunn, and earlier votes were also of popular opinion?In post 827, Dunnstral wrote:At this point I know you'll vote whoever has the most votes
VOTE: Gamma
I have.In post 827, Dunnstral wrote: Why not talk about Gamma, by the way?
Unless you think BTD or myself is town all of a sudden, then I doubt you are much different than me. I campaigned against someone who I think maybe scum, people didn't rally behind it, so I moved onto another person who I had issues with that a bigger number of people thought was possible scum. I consider this also a contradiction on your part.In post 827, Dunnstral wrote:
Yes, I would like to see you gone, since recently (as I've pointed out) you went from voting me to gamma but went off on a mini rant to go back to it later.
Why?
Overall this is nullish to me.In post 820, Vaxkiller wrote:I'm goign to write out some thoughts as I read.
I'm n page 9 right now, holy cow you guys talk alot.... that's... GREAT!
Blackstar seems kinda aggressive but I have more of a null read on him so far.
Jester seems pretty scummy to me at the moment. Hes just sitting in the back acting like a commentator.
Page 10
Not really agreeing with meow's (i know its my slot!) thoughts on Gamma. Jester actually joins the game with post 246
Page 13
I'm seeing some similar commentator actions from Dunn, they have some thoughts on people but don't explain why.
Page 18 (yeah im stating to skim through some pages. I've been reading for more than 2 hours now!)
Holy shit! Some guy name BTD6_maker is in this game? Lurking hard!
Clearly you missed my explanation of my Real Life being busy.
Oh god I just powered through he last of it.
I need more time to read through iso's but here are some current thoughts of where we are at. I'm not down for a gamma vote. Dunn vote im ok with , but would really prefer a jester vote first.
Do you have any reasoning for your Townread on Gamma and scumread on Jester and Dunn?
I'm not sure about a something smart vote yet. I still have a null read with a slight town edge.
I'm just going to post what I have and start participating wher we are at in the game.
VOTE: The-Jester
lmao, sorry! if it's this one:
the answer is that, at that time, my reasoning on Gamma was conflicted; he had done some newb-towny things and some newb-scummy things; and furthermore, he strikes me as an easy push for scum to make. whereas I don't think I've actually liked anything Dunnstral has done.In post 755, Aubrey wrote:I'm still waiting to know why you would prefer to lynch a gut read over a read in which you seem to have some logical reasoning behind SS.
Because things are shaking up and I want to make sure I actually see scum here. I'll Iso them and Dumm and see what I can do from there.In post 836, Aubrey wrote:Why?
I'm wrong here, where I stroke though . Wasn't keeping up with the votes correctly. Before Dunn Voted Gamma, I believe the votes were tied. Dunn's vote however tipped Gamma's vote count over by 1 in comparison to Dunn's.In post 836, Aubrey wrote:In post 827, Dunnstral wrote:At this point I know you'll vote whoever has the most votes
VOTE: GammaHello contradiction. I also assume my Jester, Dunn, and earlier votes were also of popular opinion?
Yeah Umlaut, we should just have the same opinions and feel the same way at the same time all the time so everything can be fine? Of what I post, what is the deductive method that allows you to determine what is genuine or not?Ümläüt wrote:I'm not eyeing you for being opportunistic, I'm eyeing you because I have trouble crediting your misgivings about Aubrey's post as genuine.
What you're not familiar with is that the norm for myself and Funnstral is to argue for a fuckton of pages and have people bitch at us. I tried to detract from that this game but eventually gave in to the relentless stream of shit. It's my fragile human soul. I can only take so much.The_Jester wrote: I'm actually starting to dislike Zach in #590. He's blamed Dunn for tunnelling him but all he does at this point is talk about Dunn and use it as an excuse not to talk about other stuff. But then he follows with a pretty good point on BTD in #593 so I don't know.
What does this mean for your read on me?In post 847, Zachstralkita wrote:hold the fuck up
Since I'm more free and more inclined to post here now I'll get into that
For the record I don't like this wagon right now and if anything want Dunnstral to post his reads. It's not that he's a scum impossibility to me, but that the lynch Gamma crowd has suddenly had a convenient revelation that would prompt the wagon switch at the same time and no one is addressing that. Oh, oh, because there's no opposition to the lynch it's so opportunistic and suddenly all of you want to switch?w o w, how convenient!
Does no one care? Or are you not caring on purpose? Quite fucking obviously there are strings being pulled.
That is the main factor. The other one is I don't actually have a game with Scum Dunnstral, well technically, but I'm very certain he plays very similar as both alignments. This is key. And there's lynches I'd much rather prefer.
Gammahimselfhopped on his fucking counterwagon with no shame.
I don't know why people are giving me shit about still wanting to lynch my probably top scumread. Like he should have stopped being scum to me or something. Get the fuck out of here. Sorry guys, I don't fucking make up SRs when convenient to me. I felt strongly about Mimikyu when I voted him. I still feel strongly about it now. If you don't care then say so.
Yeah Umlaut, we should just have the same opinions and feel the same way at the same time all the time so everything can be fine? Of what I post, what is the deductive method that allows you to determine what is genuine or not?Ümläüt wrote:I'm not eyeing you for being opportunistic, I'm eyeing you because I have trouble crediting your misgivings about Aubrey's post as genuine.
What you're not familiar with is that the norm for myself and Funnstral is to argue for a fuckton of pages and have people bitch at us. I tried to detract from that this game but eventually gave in to the relentless stream of shit. It's my fragile human soul. I can only take so much.The_Jester wrote: I'm actually starting to dislike Zach in #590. He's blamed Dunn for tunnelling him but all he does at this point is talk about Dunn and use it as an excuse not to talk about other stuff. But then he follows with a pretty good point on BTD in #593 so I don't know.
Of the people on Gamma's wagon, if I had to name someone suspicious, it's Jester based on that catch-up, but I'll wait for him to finish it to say what I have to say. The whole Aubrey situation is fucking bizarre because when I state an opinion based on my perception and not even attack or push, I'm in the wrong.
It might be that Fix-it Felix avatar that has my emotions going haywire, but I don't see the fuss about S_S. It looks like he's been shooting straight to me from here.
Yakko's been getting a free pass for not doing shit simply because "I'm scum", which is just dandy, isn't it?. I'm not too fond of when people say I'm scum and don't present their bullshit argument so I can go into precisely how bullshit it is. Please provide me with that common courtesy. Are you gonna say it's a gut read, bud? It doesn't make it any less obvious to anyone if you don't.
If you guys are fine with that I'm not gonna say shit because it's a testament to the amount of fuckery people condone this game. I'd definitely lynch there, though as opposed to these fucking options. BTD does not, to me, give the appearance of that scum who's under pressure. I think in his situation, scum that was trying to slide by would opt to acquiesce and attempt to post heavy content rather than still not doing that and still saying they'll be inactive. That's not someone who's deceiving us IMO.
Vax himself I need to get accustomed to his posts. However MeowMix was a very strong TR of mine and I liked his posts a lot.