That wasn't me.
I have to post mine in thread.
Currently I'm a few pages behind. I'll get to this game tonight.
That wasn't me.
Wait, is Xyzzy a doublevoter? (aaka, the vote weight is 3...)In post 410, wgeurts wrote:“Lies are the ultimate weapon. They can be used to bludgeon like a mace or cut like a scalpel.”
― House, again
VOTECOUNT 1.2
Leather and Lace (3):Ircher, xyzzy
xyzzy (2):Flames682, Leather and Lace
SirCakez (2):BulletNLynchproof, farside22
wgeurts (1):Rylai & Lina
BulletNLynchproof (1):Davsto
farside22 (1)Vedith
The Counsel (1):The Counsel, shos
Not Voting (4):Yume, KuroiXHF, SirCakez, The Counsel
With 14 Votes, it takes 8 to Lynch.: (expired on 2016-10-08 01:28:46)
Deadline
Was away most of this weekend, sorry for the lack of votecounts.
oh
I have no jnowledge of possessing a double vote. Perhaps one of us should unvote?
Take your vote off and see what the next VC looks like.In post 476, Ircher wrote:Wait, is Xyzzy a doublevoter? (aaka, the vote weight is 3...)
They claimed they know nothing about it as wellIn post 476, Ircher wrote:Wait, is Xyzzy a doublevoter? (aaka, the vote weight is 3...)
>.>
STOP THE DAGGUM WAGON!!!In post 447, Rylai and Lina wrote:VOTE: Shos
confirm or deny , "how you concluded this?" is neither >.>
this might actually be 1v1 as we suspected. this makes sense as it has one extra vote for town and one for mafia - to balance stuff. Its only bug is why should mod put a way for the real counsel to know the identity of the hidden voter cause that makes no sense - unless scum was supposed to keep it for later use or has an ability or enough starting numbers to compete with this.
My read is null; I believe the mod framed them.In post 482, Rylai and Lina wrote:why though?In post 481, Ircher wrote:STOP THE DAGGUM WAGON!!!
What is your read on shos?
~Lina
like, I don't have a single idea of what you're talking about. You did not even scumread me. how is your supposed scumhunting bad to me? You literally spat bullshit for a dozen pages. You call that scumhunting? care to elaborate on the results? or are these too nonexistent that you vote me after it all?In post 438, Leather and Lace wrote:Just because you don't like my scumhunting doesn't mean I haven't been doing it.In post 419, shos wrote:In post 372, Leather and Lace wrote:That's because I'm DOING SHIT!In post 367, shos wrote:They have 128 posts dude. 128.I don't know what you're talking about.In post 374, Leather and Lace wrote:That's what I've been doing, but you want to receive the benefits of my efforts while also casting shade for the work it took to get here?In post 361, shos wrote:counsel should tell us who they are and who has the other vote
Screw that dude.
You have spammed the thread like shit. you are doiong shit, yes, but SHIT does not need to be done, ANY SORT OF SCUMHUNTING does.
there is literally no content. at all. in the last 11 pages or so.
In fact, you don't like it because it outed you.
VOTE: shos
Take your hidden double voting ass to Hell.
DING DING DING DING!!!! XDIn post 478, Ircher wrote: Also, the title's a lie --> There is no "Everything is a Lie 3".
I don't recall anything against me? a 5-wagon (call it 6 with the counsel if you want) grew basically on "the counsel" saying I control them, lol.In post 483, Ircher wrote:UNVOTE:
I have a theory that the extra vote has a weight of zero.
Shos needs to defend themsekves & attempt to move the vote elsewhere (to a wagon that isnt likely to be easily hammered)
No shit, Sherlock. Why do you think I stopped bitching about them?In post 488, shos wrote:seeing 437, I'm thinking the counsel is probably managed by townies after all.
VOTE: L&L
This is actually where I started townreading TC.In post 444, The Counsel wrote:UNVOTE: UNVOTE:
We can't use the a majority for the vote of this account as if the majority is already willed to vote someone, They are already lynched.
For that we won't vote in this day phase at all, Till this account get a publicized voice. Is that acceptable for you?
If this account was voting it would vote Shos.This is how I will address our will for vote during this day phase.
In post 496, House wrote:This is actually where I started townreading TC.In post 444, The Counsel wrote:UNVOTE: UNVOTE:
We can't use the a majority for the vote of this account as if the majority is already willed to vote someone, They are already lynched.
For that we won't vote in this day phase at all, Till this account get a publicized voice. Is that acceptable for you?
If this account was voting it would vote Shos.This is how I will address our will for vote during this day phase.
Did you send the mod any kind of message?In post 494, shos wrote:ok so...I've fully read up.
it appears I...need to "explain myself".
well.
considering there is nothing to explain (I deny controlling the counsel, so...is there anything?), and the deadline is short, I guess I'll go ahead and claim.
I'm a tracker. I have another passive ability and another 1-shot ability which I don't want to disclose, as it wouldn't help town in shit.
There is also 1-word flavor and a quote from some french guy.