Mini 1836: Space Mafia (Game Over)

ISO · Post Post #450 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:32 am

VC 1.11

Naomi-Tan (4)- massive, Xkfyu, A Simple Plan, grapes
massive (3)- Nosferatu, Zachstralkita, gerryoat
Dunnstral (1)- TwoFace
Zachstralkita (1)- Dunnstral
MariaR (1)- itlepip

Not voting (3)- MariaR, Naomi-Tan, Toto

With 13 alive it takes 7 to lynch.

(expired on 2016-10-13 11:00:00)

Mod notes:

gerryoat · Post Post #451 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:32 am

In post 437, TwoFace wrote:
In post 433, massive wrote:
In post 431, gerryoat wrote:How am I not gonna be any help for town? So you'd rather lynch someone that will get no clues as to who is town or maf rather than lynching a potentially scummy person? That doesn't seem like a town mindset.
Yes. If you are town, you will be a liability for the rest of the town if we let you live to endgame. "Town mindset" isn't JUST about finding scum, it's also about making sure you can convince others to lynch them once you find them, and so far you're not doing any of either.
I'll actually agree with this. From what I can tell Gerry is more often a liability to town instead of helpful. The vote on you this game is actually a good example. There was no good reason for it at all.

Also, the vote on him was an obvious joke. But, he started outing bad reasons so now it's a real vote

Naomi-Tan · Post Post #452 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:32 am

@Grapes I missed your question until now, however to fully answer It you will need to wait a bit longer I'll make that up as soon as I look at everyone so far and get a grasp on how I feel about them.

PEDIT; Classic why me scum post, that is then answered by her own follow up post?

gerryoat · Post Post #453 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:33 am

In post 436, massive wrote:So you're saying this is your playstyle?

What would you consider my playstyle? Because I don't have a strong fos, I'm a liability to town? that's utter bullshit

TwoFace · Post Post #454 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:39 am

In post 448, grapes wrote:Classic "why me" scumpost.

i really hope you aren't serious

massive · Post Post #455 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:39 am

No, you're doing jack and shit, which is why you're a liability to town. If you're doing it PURPOSEFULLY then I can't imagine why you're surprised.

grapes · Post Post #456 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:40 am

In post 454, TwoFace wrote:
In post 448, grapes wrote:Classic "why me" scumpost.
i really hope you aren't serious

I am.

He asked me why I'm reading him differently to someone with 2 posts. Straight up scumplaining.

TwoFace · Post Post #457 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:40 am

In post 451, gerryoat wrote:Also, the vote on him was an obvious joke. But, he started outing bad reasons so now it's a real vote

Obvious? Not quite. It didn't even look like a subtle joke.

Dunnstral · Post Post #458 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:42 am

In post 456, grapes wrote:
In post 454, TwoFace wrote:
In post 448, grapes wrote:Classic "why me" scumpost.
i really hope you aren't serious
I am.

He asked me why I'm reading him differently to someone with 2 posts. Straight up scumplaining.

Wait, you were talking to me there?

TwoFace · Post Post #459 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:42 am

In post 456, grapes wrote:
In post 454, TwoFace wrote:
In post 448, grapes wrote:Classic "why me" scumpost.
i really hope you aren't serious
I am.

He asked me why I'm reading him differently to someone with 2 posts. Straight up scumplaining.

It's a valid question. One town would also ask if in the situation. This classic why me was disproven on epic mafia like 6 years ago. It's certainly been disproven on this site as well.

gerryoat · Post Post #460 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:43 am

In post 457, TwoFace wrote:
In post 451, gerryoat wrote:Also, the vote on him was an obvious joke. But, he started outing bad reasons so now it's a real vote
Obvious? Not quite. It didn't even look like a subtle joke.

hey buddy, you said from what you've seen im a liability to town. explain that read and where it came from. we have never played together.

MariaR · Post Post #461 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:44 am

Pretty sure I can safely say Gerry flipped town
But knowing me I'm gonna take back that statement 2 days later right Gerry!

grapes · Post Post #462 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:46 am

Okay why are you arguing with about one detail that you don't agree with about why dunn's scum when
1) Your vote's there
2) I've got scattered additional reasons why he's a scumlord this game on the very last page and even more in my iso

@twoface

Naomi-Tan · Post Post #463 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:46 am

In post 456, grapes wrote:
In post 454, TwoFace wrote:
In post 448, grapes wrote:Classic "why me" scumpost.
i really hope you aren't serious
I am.

He asked me why I'm reading him differently to someone with 2 posts. Straight up scumplaining.

Wait you wasn't talking about me there?

Dunnstral · Post Post #464 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:47 am

In post 462, grapes wrote:on the very last page

And every one of those thoughts also has a counter to it

It's OK to admit you're wrong, you know?

grapes · Post Post #465 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:47 am

In post 463, Naomi-Tan wrote:Wait you wasn't talking about me there?

Correct.

Naomi-Tan · Post Post #466 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:48 am

In post 465, grapes wrote:
In post 463, Naomi-Tan wrote:Wait you wasn't talking about me there?
Correct.

My mind is blown..

grapes · Post Post #467 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:50 am

In post 464, Dunnstral wrote:And every one of those thoughts also has a counter to it

It's OK to admit you're wrong, you know?

That's also part of the problem.

You're trying to disprove every negative

opinion

I have of you while parked on zach and doing nothing to push him.

You aren't approaching this game from a town mindset.

Dunnstral · Post Post #468 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:51 am

In post 467, grapes wrote:doing nothing to push him

Simply untrue

gerryoat · Post Post #469 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:51 am

In post 461, MariaR wrote:Pretty sure I can safely say Gerry flipped town
But knowing me I'm gonna take back that statement 2 days later right Gerry!

don't try and pocket me.

grapes · Post Post #470 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:52 am

Why's he scum? Should seem to think I'm one of the more important people to sell. And you havent' tried.

grapes · Post Post #471 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:53 am

In post 469, gerryoat wrote:
In post 461, MariaR wrote:Pretty sure I can safely say Gerry flipped town
But knowing me I'm gonna take back that statement 2 days later right Gerry!
don't try and pocket me.

Also holy hell this is an awkward interaction.

Dunnstral · Post Post #472 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:54 am

grapes wrote:Why's he scum? Should seem to think I'm one of the more important people to sell. And you havent' tried.

In post 467, grapes wrote:You're trying to disprove every negative opinion I have of you

Uh. I am trying to sell to you that I'm not scum. Then you'll naturally feel inclined to follow

Dunnstral · Post Post #473 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:54 am

In post 471, grapes wrote:
In post 469, gerryoat wrote:
In post 461, MariaR wrote:Pretty sure I can safely say Gerry flipped town
But knowing me I'm gonna take back that statement 2 days later right Gerry!
don't try and pocket me.
Also holy hell this is an awkward interaction.

Looks fine to me.

grapes · Post Post #474 (ISO) » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:55 am

You're not gonna sell me on you not being scum by trying to sell me on you not being scum.