Mafia 73: NEGWLTWWWTKY - Abandoned!

[Albert B. Rampage]

[...]in order to protect someone you know is -100%- town?

Oh good grief. Doesn't anybody know how to play this game anymore?

unvote

Peers was referring to himself. Why did you unvote him ?

lol good spot.

FoS: TS

Why are you FoSing TS, do you think that was an excuse to take her vote off of Peers ?

[zu_Faul]

I'm glad we don't have a deadline right now. I'd have to vote for Sikario8 out of self-defense, and that's a horrible reason to vote for someone (well, not -horrible-, but there's better).

This post seems like a scum tell. Together with your other posts lately it's more like a scumscream, then a scumtell.

How many to lynch peers?

unvote

.

[Albert B. Rampage]

A lot. We are 19 players.

[Battle Mage]

[...]in order to protect someone you know is -100%- town?

Oh good grief. Doesn't anybody know how to play this game anymore?

unvote

Peers was referring to himself. Why did you unvote him ?

lol good spot.

FoS: TS

Why are you FoSing TS, do you think that was an excuse to take her vote off of Peers ?

She seems jumpy, and seems not to be reading the game. Very quick to hop away from the wagon when she thought that she might have outted the cop, but as soon as she is corrected, she hops back on.

In fact,

Unvote, Vote: TS

.

Albert, with me.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Let me remind you that BM had his vote on Peers for quite a while. When I dropped my case on Peers he was starting to feel the heat, BM suddenly makes this post:

I would still appreciate a list of all games you are playing in now, and all games you replaced out of within the last week. Just for my notes.

oh and

Unvote, Vote: ABR

Bandwagonning and setting up future-lynches?

DIE SCUM DIE.

Effectively finding an excuse to unvote Peers, as his case makes no sense whatsoever, as everyone can attest. And then he attacks TS for unvoting Peers, the exact same action he did just a few posts back. Yet again, BM shows himself desperate to derail the Peers bandwagon by dropping his case on me when he finds no support, and attempts to buddy up with me in bandwagonning another *easier*-according to him- target!

This is ridiculous.

Major FoS: BM

[...]in order to protect someone you know is -100%- town?

Oh good grief. Doesn't anybody know how to play this game anymore?

unvote

Peers was referring to himself. Why did you unvote him ?

lol good spot.

FoS: TS

Why are you FoSing TS, do you think that was an excuse to take her vote off of Peers ?

She seems jumpy, and seems not to be reading the game. Very quick to hop away from the wagon when she thought that she might have outted the cop, but as soon as she is corrected, she hops back on.

In fact,

Unvote, Vote: TS

.

Albert, with me.

This attitude change is unbelievably scummy. I think both Peers and BM are scum.

[Albert B. Rampage]

EBWOP

BM shows himself desperate to derail the Peers bandwagon by

dropping

abandoning his case on me when he finds no support.


CONCLUSION:

BM and TS' votes are on Peers.
BM unvotes with a bad excuse to vote me.
TS unvotes because of a misinterpretation.
BM unvotes me when he sees no one is taking the bait.
BM attacks TS for doing the exact same thing he did, and tries to buddy up with someone he finds scummy.

[Peers]

Oh, for crying out loud... Am I at L-1 yet? L-2? Anything like that?

[Battle Mage]

I would still appreciate a list of all games you are playing in now, and all games you replaced out of within the last week. Just for my notes.

oh and

Unvote, Vote: ABR

Bandwagonning and setting up future-lynches?

DIE SCUM DIE.

Effectively finding an excuse to unvote Peers, as his case makes no sense whatsoever,

as everyone can attest

. And then he attacks TS for unvoting Peers, the exact same action he did just a few posts back. Yet again, BM shows himself

desperate

to derail the Peers bandwagon by dropping his case on me when he finds no support, and attempts to buddy up with me in bandwagonning another *easier*-according to him- target!

Erm, Albert, why do you suppose i would be incredibly desperate to take my vote off Peers, when i had had my vote on him for a while? I mean, if i was 'desperate to derail a lynch on Peers', why do you suppose i started a BW on him in the first place?
Secondly, your Appeal to Emotion is noted. (underlined for clarity).
It is quite clear that my vote on you was not rubbish, but in case you have neglected to watch ANY of my play this game, i'm trying to stay on the ball. My voting may look jumpy, but when i reread later in the game, i will have a decent list of scummy players, and scummy actions, accompanied by votes.
Thirdly, i didnt attack TS for unvoting Peers, i attacked TS for his misinterpretation of Peers statement, and haste to unvote, under false pretences.
Fourthly, saying 'with me' is an MS term used by the cool kids. Its a running joke if you will. Not an example of buddying up. rofl.

[...]in order to protect someone you know is -100%- town?

Oh good grief. Doesn't anybody know how to play this game anymore?

unvote

Peers was referring to himself. Why did you unvote him ?

lol good spot.

FoS: TS

Why are you FoSing TS, do you think that was an excuse to take her vote off of Peers ?

She seems jumpy, and seems not to be reading the game. Very quick to hop away from the wagon when she thought that she might have outted the cop, but as soon as she is corrected, she hops back on.

In fact,

Unvote, Vote: TS

.

Albert, with me.

This attitude change is unbelievably scummy. I think both Peers and BM are scum.

Its hardly an attitude change. You made a scummy post, but you made a good spot on another scummy post. It has fuck-all to do with your affiliation. I just think you're nervous because you don't know where you stand with me. :p

vote on TS stands btw. Dont worry though, i havent 'dropped' my case on you Albert. I'm keeping my options open atm.

BM

[Albert B. Rampage]

Erm, Albert, why do you suppose i would be incredibly desperate to take my vote off Peers, when i had had my vote on him for a while? I mean, if i was 'desperate to derail a lynch on Peers', why do you suppose i started a BW on him in the first place? Rolling Eyes

Early distancing explains the early vote, followed by the fear of losing a scumbuddy. That clarifies why you used a terrible excuse to unvote him.

Secondly, your Appeal to Emotion is noted. (underlined for clarity).
It is quite clear that my vote on you was not rubbish, but in case you have neglected to watch ANY of my play this game, i'm trying to stay on the ball. My voting may look jumpy, but when i reread later in the game, i will have a decent list of scummy players, and scummy actions, accompanied by votes.

Right-o.

Thirdly, i didnt attack TS for unvoting Peers, i attacked TS for his misinterpretation of Peers statement, and haste to unvote, under false pretences.

She made a painfully obvious mistake. You're just grasping at straws to stop a Peers bandwagon.

[Battle Mage]

Erm, Albert, why do you suppose i would be incredibly desperate to take my vote off Peers, when i had had my vote on him for a while? I mean, if i was 'desperate to derail a lynch on Peers', why do you suppose i started a BW on him in the first place? Rolling Eyes

Early distancing explains the early vote, followed by the fear of losing a scumbuddy. That clarifies why you used a terrible excuse to unvote him.

Thats very weak. I mean, you think i would waste effort distancing from a scumbuddy, only to hop immediately to their defence if they got near a lynch? kinda defeats the object of distancing in the first place, no?

Secondly, your Appeal to Emotion is noted. (underlined for clarity).
It is quite clear that my vote on you was not rubbish, but in case you have neglected to watch ANY of my play this game, i'm trying to stay on the ball. My voting may look jumpy, but when i reread later in the game, i will have a decent list of scummy players, and scummy actions, accompanied by votes.

Right-o.

Thirdly, i didnt attack TS for unvoting Peers, i attacked TS for his misinterpretation of Peers statement, and haste to unvote, under false pretences.

She made a painfully obvious mistake. You're just grasping at straws to stop a Peers bandwagon.

lol i think i've already explained why this argument makes absolutely no logical sense. If anyone is grasping at straws, it is you. Notice also the same logic you put forward for me being scum with Peers, is also present for you and TS.
TS made a mistake, and i think it was a scum one. m'kay?

[Shanba]

Vote Count:
7: Sikario8

(Neo-Viper9, Yosarian Sir Tornado, Elmo, Zu_Faul, Kscope, ABR)

6: Peers

(JordanA24, hasdgfas, Mert, Erg0, Panzerjager, TS)

1: Zu_Faul

(MoS)

1: Kaleidoscope

(Quagmire)

1: JordanA24

(Peers)

1: Toaster Strudel

(Battle Mage)

Not voting:

Sikario8, schismatized

10 will lynchem

First player to spot an error wins the error spotting game <.<

Edit: Abr wins by virtue of actually being a player and spotting the error

[Albert B. Rampage]

Vote Count:
7: Sikario8

(Neo-Viper9, Yosarian Sir Tornado, Elmo, Zu_Faul, Kscope, ABR)

6: Peers

(JordanA24, hasdgfas, Mert, Erg0, Panzerjager, TS)

1: Zu_Faul

(MoS)

1: Kaleidoscope

(Quagmire)

1: JordanA24

(Peers)

1: Albert B. Rampage

(Battle Mage)

Not voting:

Sikario8, schismatized

10 will lynchem

First player to spot an error wins the error spotting game <.<

Edit: Shanba wins -_-

BM voting TS

[hasdgfas]

Oh, for crying out loud... Am I at L-1 yet? L-2? Anything like that?

Peers, your "content" is not making me want to unvote you. I haven't seen a very good defense, so my vote stays.

[Quagmire]

why is kaleidoscope not being lynched right now

[Peers]

Sikario and I are bigger targets?

[Erg0]

Erm, Albert, why do you suppose i would be incredibly desperate to take my vote off Peers, when i had had my vote on him for a while? I mean, if i was 'desperate to derail a lynch on Peers', why do you suppose i started a BW on him in the first place? Rolling Eyes

Early distancing explains the early vote, followed by the fear of losing a scumbuddy. That clarifies why you used a terrible excuse to unvote him.

Thats very weak. I mean, you think i would waste effort distancing from a scumbuddy, only to hop immediately to their defence if they got near a lynch? kinda defeats the object of distancing in the first place, no?

This is a very poor defence, it's entirely possible that you made your initial vote not expecting of the wagon to grow to the size that it did. There's distancing and then there's bussing - I'd say you're a candidate for the first, but didn't want to go through with the second.

TS's unvote/revote looks like a simple reading comprehension error to me. I don't see what your vote is going to achieve there - trying to start the wagon you

really

want?

Also, how on earth, after the last couple of pages, does Sikario still have more votes than Peers?

[Albert B. Rampage]

I'm keeping my vote for the -1 or hammer..I want to see this through til the end.

[Peers]

Also, how on earth, after the last couple of pages, does Sikario still have more votes than Peers?

Because there's still some intelligence left in this town? Just a hunch.

[Erg0]

Excellent rejoinder. I like how you managed to buddy up to every single potential voter in a single post.

[Peers]

Excellent rejoinder. I like how you managed to buddy up to every single potential voter in a single post.

Thanks. It's a talent I have. I figure, if trying to keep my head down got me votes, well, let's see how scummy I can make myself appear.

Without, y'know, unvoting and OMGUSing everyone who's voting for me in a single post. 'cause that's just a jester-tell.

[Battle Mage]

Erm, Albert, why do you suppose i would be incredibly desperate to take my vote off Peers, when i had had my vote on him for a while? I mean, if i was 'desperate to derail a lynch on Peers', why do you suppose i started a BW on him in the first place? Rolling Eyes

Early distancing explains the early vote, followed by the fear of losing a scumbuddy. That clarifies why you used a terrible excuse to unvote him.

Thats very weak. I mean, you think i would waste effort distancing from a scumbuddy, only to hop immediately to their defence if they got near a lynch? kinda defeats the object of distancing in the first place, no?

This is a very poor defence, it's entirely possible that you made your initial vote not expecting of the wagon to grow to the size that it did. There's distancing and then there's bussing - I'd say you're a candidate for the first, but didn't want to go through with the second.

I'd say you should know my play better than this by now. Please refer to 1 game, of the numerous i have shared with you, in which, as scum, i have distanced from my scumbuddy, but then made a point of derailing their wagon when it became inevitable that they would be lynched.

TS's unvote/revote looks like a simple reading comprehension error to me. I don't see what your vote is going to achieve there - trying to start the wagon you

really

want?

I don't see what you're getting at here. Why would a wagon on TS be inherently scummy, whereas bandwagonning newbs-1 of whom is perhaps more worthy of the title 'Jester' than i am, is explicitly protown.?

Peers is currently a better lynch than Sikario i think, although that is subject to change depending on his response to my latest request.
Nonetheless, i'd rather see Albert hang, for his terrible play so far.

BM

[Peers]

Peers is currently a better lynch than Sikario i think, although that is subject to change depending on his response to my latest request.

Sorry, I missed it. What request?

[Battle Mage]

Peers is currently a better lynch than Sikario i think, although that is subject to change depending on his response to my latest request.

Sorry, I missed it. What request?

ah sorry, i may have worded that poorly. The request was to Sikario, not you.

[Erg0]

This is a very poor defence, it's entirely possible that you made your initial vote not expecting of the wagon to grow to the size that it did. There's distancing and then there's bussing - I'd say you're a candidate for the first, but didn't want to go through with the second.

I'd say you should know my play better than this by now. Please refer to 1 game, of the numerous i have shared with you, in which, as scum, i have distanced from my scumbuddy, but then made a point of derailing their wagon when it became inevitable that they would be lynched.

Past behaviour is indicative of future performance, but if you played exactly the same way in every game as scum then you'd be a pretty crappy player. Besides, Peers' lynch is hardly inevitable, he still isn't even the leading vote getter.

TS's unvote/revote looks like a simple reading comprehension error to me. I don't see what your vote is going to achieve there - trying to start the wagon you

really

want?

I don't see what you're getting at here. Why would a wagon on TS be inherently scummy, whereas bandwagonning newbs-1 of whom is perhaps more worthy of the title 'Jester' than i am, is explicitly protown.?

I just don't think the case on TS is any good. Voting on a bad case isn't pro-town regardless of relativism.

[PJ.]

Erg0, please remember we are talking about BM here.