http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Mhsmith0
Conq: you, sir, are great at being town.
BATMAN: Only jugg was the only one we didn’t scum read at least not me
Quick: There is little to no chance this slot is Power-Wolfing.
SR: I want to give him a day
Life is simply unfair, don't you think?
Just skimming, karnos's lazy meaningless vanity vote on shadow (which is quickly abandoned) seems to mimic his lazy meaningless vanity vote on wolf bro transcend in open 646. so from that alone I could see a connection.
At the least, karnos isn't making his interactions with his buddies numerous and looking good (though not as blatant as in 646 w trans). Could easily be the last wolf.
http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Mhsmith0
Conq: you, sir, are great at being town.
BATMAN: Only jugg was the only one we didn’t scum read at least not me
Quick: There is little to no chance this slot is Power-Wolfing.
SR: I want to give him a day
Life is simply unfair, don't you think?
btw IF karnos was actually ascetic goon I'd call the setup scum-sided by MS standards.
Two mafia PR's, including one investigative (that can be verified as an actual role by the tracker) and a second that is immune to BOTH town investigative roles... that's a lot of scum power against town power that basically sucks (ZERO ability to stop night kills [BG only switches the victim unlike doc/JK], and the potential to vig PR's, and the potential for the BG to accidentally save scum). If the vig doesn't kill scum, and does kill at least one villager that scum aren't simultaneously shooting (and that happens reasonably often), then scum only need three mislynches to win. A game that can potentially be won D3 is a pretty nice edge, plus gunsmith gets a false guilty and one block.
http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Mhsmith0
Conq: you, sir, are great at being town.
BATMAN: Only jugg was the only one we didn’t scum read at least not me
Quick: There is little to no chance this slot is Power-Wolfing.
SR: I want to give him a day
Life is simply unfair, don't you think?
http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Mhsmith0
Conq: you, sir, are great at being town.
BATMAN: Only jugg was the only one we didn’t scum read at least not me
Quick: There is little to no chance this slot is Power-Wolfing.
SR: I want to give him a day
Life is simply unfair, don't you think?
I'd still hold up IV's fake scum claim at http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 2#p7983722
as a fantastic example of effort. Amusingly, BTD's reaction was garbage but somehow got town read, but kappy (the other wolf) reacted really well, and was a big part of why they won. So fake scum claims don't always work that well, but it can still be fun to mess with the board (if you guys lynched me final 5 in 646 I was definitely going to do an actual effort at a fake scum claim FWIW).
http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Mhsmith0
Conq: you, sir, are great at being town.
BATMAN: Only jugg was the only one we didn’t scum read at least not me
Quick: There is little to no chance this slot is Power-Wolfing.
SR: I want to give him a day
Life is simply unfair, don't you think?
If scum doesn't kill at all, then there is no more a danger to town.
In that sense, town generally wins. The lynching is taking place because of the killing. If the no-kill and no-lynch keeps happening then either it is considered a draw, or a town win.
Not sure what the normal guidelines on this are. But scum would be kind of playing against their wincon by no-killing for several days.
In post 144, chilledtea wrote:Not sure what the normal guidelines on this are. But scum would be kind of playing against their wincon by no-killing for several days.
Not really(?)
They are no killing so they have an easier day phase.
It's the same way scum bussing isn't playing against their win con.
No killing on a single night is acceptable but if it turns out to be no killing on consecutive nights then it means that as long as town doesn't lynch scum won't, which means town wouldn't have a reason to lynch in the first place.