Mini 1836: Space Mafia (Game Over)

ISO · Post Post #800 (ISO) » Thu Oct 06, 2016 6:50 am

VC 1.16

Zachstralkita (3)- Dunnstral, itlepip, MariaR
Naomi-Tan (3)- A Simple Plan, grapes, massive
TwoFace (1)- gerryoat
massive (1)- Nosferatu
Dunnstral (1)- Zachstralkita
gerryoat (1)- Xkfyu
Xkfyu (1)- Naomi-Tan

Not voting (2)- Toto, TwoFace

With 13 alive it takes 7 to lynch.

(expired on 2016-10-13 11:00:00)

Mod notes: Nosferatu is V/LA until Monday.

Xkfyu · Post Post #801 (ISO) » Thu Oct 06, 2016 6:50 am

In post 798, TwoFace wrote:
In post 795, Xkfyu wrote:His confirmation bias is.......other-worldly, and his refusal to listen to reason screams arrogant town to me, and not scum tunneling.
I am pretty sure you have me confused with somebody else.

I'm actually fairly certain that I don't.

Naomi-Tan · Post Post #802 (ISO) » Thu Oct 06, 2016 6:52 am

In post 780, Xkfyu wrote:Sorry to disappoint, but I'm sure it won't be the last time.

No not cool. maybe okay upto a certain stage in the game we are past that. You can't just go around voting people with no reason and not give a reason when asked. There is no way to get a read out of it properly! I do not approve of this vote and approve less of your unwillingness to share why your voting.

itlepip · Post Post #803 (ISO) » Thu Oct 06, 2016 6:58 am

Weak town circle of about 5 (ASP, Twoface, Nos, Dunn, Naomi) Strong are Dunn and Naomi, weakest is ASP

Null or mixed on Toto, xkfyu

slight to mid scum on Massive, Gerry, Maria, Zach

uh VOTE: Massive right now until Gerry responds.

TwoFace · Post Post #804 (ISO) » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:00 am

In post 801, Xkfyu wrote:
In post 798, TwoFace wrote:
In post 795, Xkfyu wrote:His confirmation bias is.......other-worldly, and his refusal to listen to reason screams arrogant town to me, and not scum tunneling.
I am pretty sure you have me confused with somebody else.
I'm actually fairly certain that I don't.

I haven't used any conf bias though and I don't recall anyone trying to reason with me. I'm a very reasonable person.

I don't appreciate you downplaying my scum hunting as conf bias.

Xkfyu · Post Post #805 (ISO) » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:00 am

In post 802, Naomi-Tan wrote:
In post 780, Xkfyu wrote:Sorry to disappoint, but I'm sure it won't be the last time.
No not cool. maybe okay upto a certain stage in the game we are past that. You can't just go around voting people with no reason and not give a reason when asked. There is no way to get a read out of it properly! I do not approve of this vote and approve less of your unwillingness to share why your voting.

Ah, there's your mistake. You assume that I am actually concerned about people reading me from it, instead of the other way around.

Let me ask you a question.

Do you pass judgement on people's posts in isolation, or do you see a player, on a whole, as scummy or townie?

MariaR · Post Post #806 (ISO) » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:02 am

Can pip eat rope tomorrow please anyone who says he's towny is just wrong.

Xkfyu · Post Post #807 (ISO) » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:04 am

In post 804, TwoFace wrote:
In post 801, Xkfyu wrote:
In post 798, TwoFace wrote:
In post 795, Xkfyu wrote:His confirmation bias is.......other-worldly, and his refusal to listen to reason screams arrogant town to me, and not scum tunneling.
I am pretty sure you have me confused with somebody else.
I'm actually fairly certain that I don't.
I haven't used any conf bias though and I don't recall anyone trying to reason with me. I'm a very reasonable person.

I don't appreciate you downplaying my scum hunting as conf bias.

Well yeah, that's pretty much the whole thing about confirmation bias. Those who are guilty of it aren't aware of it. Otherwise, if you were aware of it, you wouldn't suffer from it.

Dunnstral · Post Post #808 (ISO) » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:06 am

In post 806, MariaR wrote:Can pip eat rope tomorrow please anyone who says he's towny is just wrong.

stick to epicmafia

MariaR · Post Post #809 (ISO) » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:07 am

In post 808, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 806, MariaR wrote:Can pip eat rope tomorrow please anyone who says he's towny is just wrong.

stick to epicmafia

Once you beat me you can say that

Xkfyu · Post Post #810 (ISO) » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:09 am

In post 803, itlepip wrote:Weak town circle of about 5 (ASP, Twoface, Nos, Dunn, Naomi) Strong are Dunn and Naomi, weakest is ASP

I'm actually mostly in agreement with you here. I completely agree with you on TwoFace and Dunn, mostly on Nos, and I might even be starting to come around on Naomi.

However, ASP is a different story. I realize you say it's a weak read, but I haven't even been able to get even that on him yet. What makes you lean town on him?

MariaR · Post Post #811 (ISO) » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:10 am

It's game in a nutshell: bad pushes filler questions that have little to no meaning (that he finds scummy)

sorry dunn that was mean of me I take it back

MariaR · Post Post #812 (ISO) » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:13 am

(Naomi Twoface)
(Gerry Xk)
(Dunn grapes Nos Toto)
(Massive)
(Pip Zach)

TwoFace · Post Post #813 (ISO) » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:15 am

In post 807, Xkfyu wrote:
In post 804, TwoFace wrote:
In post 801, Xkfyu wrote:
In post 798, TwoFace wrote:
In post 795, Xkfyu wrote:His confirmation bias is.......other-worldly, and his refusal to listen to reason screams arrogant town to me, and not scum tunneling.
I am pretty sure you have me confused with somebody else.
I'm actually fairly certain that I don't.
I haven't used any conf bias though and I don't recall anyone trying to reason with me. I'm a very reasonable person.

I don't appreciate you downplaying my scum hunting as conf bias.

Either you don't know what conf. bias actually means or you don't know what scum hunting looks like.

Xkfyu · Post Post #814 (ISO) » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:19 am

In post 813, TwoFace wrote:
In post 807, Xkfyu wrote:
In post 804, TwoFace wrote:
In post 801, Xkfyu wrote:
In post 798, TwoFace wrote:
In post 795, Xkfyu wrote:His confirmation bias is.......other-worldly, and his refusal to listen to reason screams arrogant town to me, and not scum tunneling.
I am pretty sure you have me confused with somebody else.
I'm actually fairly certain that I don't.
I haven't used any conf bias though and I don't recall anyone trying to reason with me. I'm a very reasonable person.

I don't appreciate you downplaying my scum hunting as conf bias.
Either you don't know what conf. bias actually means or you don't know what scum hunting looks like.

Ok

itlepip · Post Post #815 (ISO) » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:26 am

In post 731, itlepip wrote:Maria is there anything recent that makes you think I'm scum?

Maria since you are here mind answering this?

MariaR · Post Post #816 (ISO) » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:29 am

In post 815, itlepip wrote:
In post 731, itlepip wrote:Maria is there anything recent that makes you think I'm scum?
Maria since you are here mind answering this?

just did for you.

itlepip · Post Post #817 (ISO) » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:31 am

In post 811, MariaR wrote:It's game in a nutshell: bad pushes filler questions that have little to no meaning (that he finds scummy)

sorry dunn that was mean of me I take it back

Also this isn't true, I'm not saying that what I am doing is outside of my scum range, but I got readlists out of a few people, and most of the questions I ask I am looking for a very specific thing. If you don't see it fine but there is absolutely no way to call what I am asking filler.

For reference (to try to improve your own play), the question to xkyfu I was looking for 'it was just a joke' of some sort which I think would be a townier reaction. His reaction was fine since he had a different interpretation of my question but not exactly what I was looking for either which is why ASP is still townier than xkyfu. Depending on the question and my memory I can do that with nearly every question I have asked in the game which is decidedly not filler.

itlepip · Post Post #818 (ISO) » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:31 am

That is the reason you are scumreading me?

Alrighty then.

MariaR · Post Post #819 (ISO) » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:33 am

Alright can I ask what makes me scummy to you then?
Your answer makes some sense but is still strange with the outcome of your answers

TwoFace · Post Post #820 (ISO) » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:38 am

In post 817, itlepip wrote:Also this isn't true, I'm not saying that what I am doing is outside of my scum range, but I got readlists out of a few people, and most of the questions I ask I am looking for a very specific thing. If you don't see it fine but there is absolutely no way to call what I am asking filler.

to be honest though these things can easily be done by scum. Nothing you have done screams obv town, doesn't scream obv scum either with the exception of the whole wanting to get rid of me for the gimmick thing.

itlepip · Post Post #821 (ISO) » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:45 am

The thing with Naomi I think is reasonably scummy either trying to pocket a newbtown or protect a partner.

The whole 'imma vote twoface cause he is a liability and also hard to lynch over someone I think is scummy but wait twoface is kinda scummy but I will never say why oh wait twoface is a liability again shit people are complaining let's go to Zach' progression was quite quite awful.

I will say my last reason in a second but can you give some reasons for all of your townreads?

MariaR · Post Post #822 (ISO) » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:47 am

In post 821, itlepip wrote:The thing with Naomi I think is reasonably scummy either trying to pocket a newbtown or protect a partner.

The whole 'imma vote twoface cause he is a liability and also hard to lynch over someone I think is scummy but wait twoface is kinda scummy but I will never say why oh wait twoface is a liability again shit people are complaining let's go to Zach' progression was quite quite awful.

I will say my last reason in a second but can you give some reasons for all of your townreads?

So you think me defending someone I townread is scummy? Or why is it just with Naomi I don't really see how I can answer that for you cause that just happens in games

The twoface thing I understand cause I was a bit of a mess.

TwoFace · Post Post #823 (ISO) » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:47 am

hey itle, i don't think you ever answered me. why were you asking why people were talking about lylo strategies like you had a problem with that, when 1. nobody was talking about lylo strategies and 2. you were one of the first to ever talk about lylo strategies.

seems odd to question something that you did yourself.

TwoFace · Post Post #824 (ISO) » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:48 am

In post 821, itlepip wrote:The whole 'imma vote twoface cause he is a liability and also hard to lynch over someone I think is scummy but wait twoface is kinda scummy but I will never say why oh wait twoface is a liability again shit people are complaining let's go to Zach' progression was quite quite awful.

but you basically said you want me gone before lylo which basically makes you guilty of essentially the same thing. Why is it horrible for one person but not horrible when you did it?