Mini 1840: Watch Dogs Blitz [Game Over]

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #350 (ISO) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 4:56 pm

His random accusation of whiteknighting. It looks like scum trying to pin something that isn't there. I am also not fond of all the naked votes. There was a chain of three I saw.

Dunnstral · Post Post #351 (ISO) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 4:56 pm

Post 345 was bad

House wrote:
In post 346, Dunnstral wrote:When you defend everything he does while he's sitting at 1 vote I'd call that white knighting
idk whether you are confbiased or just bad scum but I quite plainly called him out for being defensive.

Now it looks like you're flailing. You "called him out" then in your next post said you doubted he was scum about something else

Dunnstral · Post Post #352 (ISO) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 4:57 pm

In post 347, House wrote:
In post 288, Gamma Emerald wrote:Naked vote on someone who sits with them in the scumpool.
VOTE: Dunnstral
Do you have something besides this to call him scum?

In post 350, Gamma Emerald wrote:His random accusation of whiteknighting. It looks like scum trying to pin something that isn't there. I am also not fond of all the naked votes. There was a chain of three I saw.

? that literally just happened

House · Post Post #353 (ISO) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 4:57 pm

OH NOEZ I'M FLAILING OVER ONE VOTE Y'ALL!

Lol.

Dunnstral · Post Post #354 (ISO) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 4:58 pm

In post 350, Gamma Emerald wrote:I am also not fond of all the naked votes. There was a chain of three I saw.

Turns out I am fond of naked votes

Dunnstral · Post Post #355 (ISO) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 4:58 pm

VOTE: House

House · Post Post #356 (ISO) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 4:59 pm

In post 351, Dunnstral wrote:Post 345 was bad

House wrote:
In post 346, Dunnstral wrote:When you defend everything he does while he's sitting at 1 vote I'd call that white knighting
idk whether you are confbiased or just bad scum but I quite plainly called him out for being defensive.
Now it looks like you're flailing. You "called him out" then in your next post said you doubted he was scum about something else

Yeah, one defensive post does not a scumread make, moron.

Town gets defensive too.

Doesn't change my point that I'm not defending him at every turn.

House · Post Post #357 (ISO) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 4:59 pm

In post 355, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: House

Dunnstral · Post Post #358 (ISO) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 5:00 pm

In post 356, House wrote:Doesn't change my point that I'm not defending him at every turn.

I'd argue that you have been doing that

House · Post Post #359 (ISO) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 5:01 pm

Gamma, I suspect Dunn is a VI.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #360 (ISO) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 5:01 pm

In post 351, Dunnstral wrote:Post 345 was bad

House wrote:
In post 346, Dunnstral wrote:When you defend everything he does while he's sitting at 1 vote I'd call that white knighting
idk whether you are confbiased or just bad scum but I quite plainly called him out for being defensive.
Now it looks like you're flailing. You "called him out" then in your next post said you doubted he was scum about something else

No I suspect Dunn is scum.

Dunnstral · Post Post #361 (ISO) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 5:03 pm

In post 192, House wrote:
In post 191, Infinity 324 wrote:VOTE: lane
Wrong.

In post 194, House wrote:
In post 191, Infinity 324 wrote:VOTE: lane
lane looks sincerely concerned about scum trying to disguise communications.

He doesn't seem to know scum have day chat.

Dude's town.

In post 195, House wrote:
In post 193, Infinity 324 wrote:He's trying to make something out of nothing, pretending to be doing something when really he's pushing on something NAI
Why would he be accusing Sly of hidden messages when scum have day chat if he's scum?

In post 233, House wrote:
In post 199, lane0168 wrote:
In post 193, Infinity 324 wrote:He's trying to make something out of nothing, pretending to be doing something when really he's pushing on something NAI
You asked what the point was. I didn't make anything out of it. I explained why I was asking. Again... Wtf are you expecting so early here? Christ. The irony here is youre the one making something out of nothing, pretending you're doing something when really you're pushing on something nai
It actually wasn't NAI at all.

In post 241, House wrote:L-2 on Infinity.

No derphammers please.

In post 249, House wrote:
In post 246, Stargazers wrote:Maybe Nat or one of you can explain the Infinity SR I don't really see it well I don't townread him but I don't see anything from his play that warrants this many votes

Creature on the other hand is a much dif story
VOTE: Creature
L-2 vote on Creature too.

Not seeing why he's scum and not lynch bait.

In post 257, House wrote:
In post 255, Infinity 324 wrote:
In post 254, Stargazers wrote:
In post 249, House wrote:
In post 246, Stargazers wrote:Maybe Nat or one of you can explain the Infinity SR I don't really see it well I don't townread him but I don't see anything from his play that warrants this many votes

Creature on the other hand is a much dif story
VOTE: Creature
L-2 vote on Creature too.

Not seeing why he's scum and not lynch bait.
Can I give you a counter question and ask the same about Infinity?
~Maria
I like you defending me, but that feeling makes me suspicious that you're WKing.
Right, I'm WK'ing you.

Where is my vote, bro?

In post 313, House wrote:Oh noez, I has a vote.

In post 338, House wrote:Damn lane, that defensiveness was unexpected.

In post 341, House wrote:
In post 340, SlySly wrote:
In post 337, lane0168 wrote: Define big deal! And show me where I made it a big deal. Again it is you and infinity who are making it a big deal and somehow trying to make it seem like I'm making it a bit deal. Do you think a "big deal" generally comes with a vote. I mean if I made such a big deal about it that it gets your vote, but not a big enough deal that you get mine? You make no sense. You better read through it a third time. Carefully.
I'm not gonna spam the thread with more about this, everyone has already witnessed it once and everyone knows who initiated the blowup about me sending texts. Technically, it didn't get my vote. Reading through again and spotting the pattern after seeing you do it to infinity as well got my vote.
I doubt he's scum, man.

In post 353, House wrote:OH NOEZ I'M FLAILING OVER ONE VOTE Y'ALL!

Lol.

In post 357, House wrote:
In post 355, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: House

House · Post Post #362 (ISO) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 5:05 pm

In post 360, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 351, Dunnstral wrote:Post 345 was bad

House wrote:
In post 346, Dunnstral wrote:When you defend everything he does while he's sitting at 1 vote I'd call that white knighting
idk whether you are confbiased or just bad scum but I quite plainly called him out for being defensive.
Now it looks like you're flailing. You "called him out" then in your next post said you doubted he was scum about something else
No I suspect Dunn is scum.

Do you think he's a good enough player to withstand the scrutiny implied by attacking a player as vocal as I?

Once I decide somebody is scum, it's a nightmare getting me to change my mind.

Do you really think Dunn targeted me? For what, exactly?

Dunnstral · Post Post #363 (ISO) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 5:05 pm

In post 362, House wrote:Do you think he's a good enough player to withstand the scrutiny implied by attacking a player as vocal as I?

lol

House · Post Post #364 (ISO) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 5:08 pm

In post 363, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 362, House wrote:Do you think he's a good enough player to withstand the scrutiny implied by attacking a player as vocal as I?
lol

See man? Scum would know the dangers of being kept in center stage after attacking a noisy player.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #365 (ISO) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 5:09 pm

House, have you played with Dunnstral before?

House · Post Post #366 (ISO) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 5:09 pm

In post 365, Gamma Emerald wrote:House, have you played with Dunnstral before?

If I had, I wouldn't be asking your opinion.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #367 (ISO) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 5:10 pm

So you don't know how he plays as scum.

House · Post Post #368 (ISO) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 5:10 pm

Well, if I REMEMBERED playing with him, at any rate.

Dunnstral · Post Post #369 (ISO) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 5:11 pm

I was in that newbie game with boring

Firebringer · Post Post #370 (ISO) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 5:11 pm

Day 1 Vote Count 1.08

Creature (L-4): lane0168, Infinity324, StarGazers,
Lane0168 (L-5): Tatsuya Kagame, SlySly,
Tatsuya Kagame (L-6): GuiltyLion,
Dunnstral (L-6): Gamma Emerald,
StarGazers (L-5): Creature,
Infinity 324 (L-5): Grapevine, Expedience,
Gamma Emerald (L-6): Mathblade,
House (L-6): Dunnstral,

Not Voting (1): House,

With 13 Alive it Takes 7 To Lynch

Day Ends (expired on 2016-10-17 08:00:00)

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #371 (ISO) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 5:11 pm

I was in a newbie with boring too.
What of it?

Dunnstral · Post Post #372 (ISO) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 5:12 pm

In post 371, Gamma Emerald wrote:I was in a newbie with boring too.
What of it?

That's the game I was in with House

House · Post Post #373 (ISO) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 5:13 pm

In post 369, Dunnstral wrote:I was in that newbie game with boring

Then wtf man, you should know better lol.

Dunnstral · Post Post #374 (ISO) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 5:15 pm

In post 373, House wrote:
In post 369, Dunnstral wrote:I was in that newbie game with boring
Then wtf man, you should know better lol.

There was a distinct lack of white nighting and fake reactions going on in that game, though?