Mini 1840: Watch Dogs Blitz [Game Over]

[Infinity 324]

What do you think about grapevines

He's the closest to a 2nd scumread I have at least I feel like if there is scum on your wagon it's him
Knowing this site I'ma have to make a giant quote wall on why I think this and to that I say No.

Why do we agree on everything

Hopefully you're town and we can have a happy mind meld game

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Stargazers, you should try summarize your wall to a few words, or even an ambiguous metaphor.

Me think grape can be scum!
~Maria

Have you caught up? If so, what are your thoughts?

[Gamma Emerald]

You're giving it too much credit. Go read page 15 his posts are designed to do nothing but cause flail and/or keep the pointless WK argument going.

Doesn't look town.

I had a scumread on Dunnstral, so of course I pushed the argument.

[Grapevine]

Me think grape can be scum!

Please elaborate.

pedit: that's a lame response

explain what your motivation for making those shit posts actually were? get a read on them? no. convince people to lynch him? meh?

[Gamma Emerald]

Me think grape can be scum!

Please elaborate.

pedit: that's a lame response

explain what your motivation for making those shit posts actually were? get a read on them? no. convince people to lynch him? meh?

Convince people to lynch Dunnstral, yes.

[Firebringer]

Stargazers has sent a message to Dunnstral.

[Infinity 324]

Me think grape can be scum!

Please elaborate.

pedit: that's a lame response

explain what your motivation for making those shit posts actually were? get a read on them? no. convince people to lynch him? meh?

Can you quote the particular quotes you're talking about?

If he wasn't trying to convince people to vote dunn, how would he set up the 1v1?

[Grapevine]

I mean my argument is very contextual with this particular string of events but hold on I'll quote some of the specific posts in question. (it's why i told people to read that page in full)

Spoiler:

Post 345 was bad

When you defend everything he does while he's sitting at 1 vote I'd call that white knighting

idk whether you are confbiased or just bad scum but I quite plainly called him out for being defensive.

Now it looks like you're flailing. You "called him out" then in your next post said you doubted he was scum about something else

No I suspect Dunn is scum.

Who's this selling?

House, have you played with Dunnstral before?

This looks like cogdis actually now that I'm hyperanalyzing like, you know house is pushing on dunn, you're pushign on dunn, what's the point of this question with regards to you wanting to get dunn lynched?

So you don't know how he plays as scum.

And you didn't explain why him not knowing how he plays as scum should be affecting his read.

I was in a newbie with boring too.
What of it?

This isn't a good question. (this is the trying to create flail part among others)

His random accusation of whiteknighting. It looks like scum trying to pin something that isn't there. I am also not fond of all the naked votes. There was a chain of three I saw.

Generic reasoning for his accusations (running theme in the iso)

Define big deal! And show me where I made it a big deal. Again it is you and infinity who are making it a big deal and somehow trying to make it seem like I'm making it a bit deal. Do you think a "big deal" generally comes with a vote. I mean if I made such a big deal about it that it gets your vote, but not a big enough deal that you get mine? You make no sense. You better read through it a third time. Carefully.

I'm not gonna spam the thread with more about this, everyone has already witnessed it once and everyone knows who initiated the blowup about me sending texts. Technically, it didn't get my vote. Reading through again and spotting the pattern after seeing you do it to infinity as well got my vote.

I doubt he's scum, man.

I love white knighting

I love voting scum.

And again, I'm totally sold, man.

-G

[Stargazers]

Banking off what Math said in post 678 (i'm re reading) Infinity is a good player I've played with him before I don't feel like scum would auto bus him and all the talk seems to be about infinity scum wise with light talk on lane there's no huge "counter wagon" so that either means:
A) Town is a genius and everyone is bwing scum 2 days...or is it 3 days in
B) Town found scum and scum are lightly bussing or don't think he's getting lynched
C) Town found Town and scum is just letting it happen and go into a ml

Now what one sounds more likely
Quick jab at creature while I'm at it. For one of the main people who seemed to tr Infinity he sure doesn't mind that he's the main bw
~Maria

[Stargazers]

Town
{lane0168, SlySly}
{PantherPunt, House, Grapevine}
{GuiltyLion, StarGazers}
{Infinity324, Mathblade}
{Creature, Expedience, Dunnstral}
Scum

Mfw SlySly has the worst post in the game and is in your top townreads slot *deep breath*
~Maria

[Infinity 324]

I mean my argument is very contextual with this particular string of events but hold on I'll quote some of the specific posts in question. (it's why i told people to read that page in full)

Spoiler:

Post 345 was bad

When you defend everything he does while he's sitting at 1 vote I'd call that white knighting

idk whether you are confbiased or just bad scum but I quite plainly called him out for being defensive.

Now it looks like you're flailing. You "called him out" then in your next post said you doubted he was scum about something else

No I suspect Dunn is scum.

Who's this selling?

House, have you played with Dunnstral before?

This looks like cogdis actually now that I'm hyperanalyzing like, you know house is pushing on dunn, you're pushign on dunn, what's the point of this question with regards to you wanting to get dunn lynched?

So you don't know how he plays as scum.

And you didn't explain why him not knowing how he plays as scum should be affecting his read.

I was in a newbie with boring too.
What of it?

This isn't a good question. (this is the trying to create flail part among others)

His random accusation of whiteknighting. It looks like scum trying to pin something that isn't there. I am also not fond of all the naked votes. There was a chain of three I saw.

Generic reasoning for his accusations (running theme in the iso)

Define big deal! And show me where I made it a big deal. Again it is you and infinity who are making it a big deal and somehow trying to make it seem like I'm making it a bit deal. Do you think a "big deal" generally comes with a vote. I mean if I made such a big deal about it that it gets your vote, but not a big enough deal that you get mine? You make no sense. You better read through it a third time. Carefully.

I'm not gonna spam the thread with more about this, everyone has already witnessed it once and everyone knows who initiated the blowup about me sending texts. Technically, it didn't get my vote. Reading through again and spotting the pattern after seeing you do it to infinity as well got my vote.

I doubt he's scum, man.

I love white knighting

I love voting scum.

And again, I'm totally sold, man.

-G

I did read the page. Putting aside that you may find the posts strange in their own right, can you describe more specifically how you think he was setting up a 1v1 here?

[Grapevine]

I'm not saying he was setting up a 1v1 -- it was already a thing that was happening. He coattails it in a scummy way designed to keep the engagement hot. Which can be forgivable if you're not bringing things designed to see your target fail.

[Stargazers]

Okay Math, I'm fine with lynching Gamma.

VOTE: Gamma

BAD BAD okay I get where this was going.
I want a paragraph on that sr
~Maria

[Stargazers]

HOLY **** BAD

VOTE: Grape
Time for the tunnel
~Maria

[Firebringer]

Mathblade has sent a message to Stargazers

[Infinity 324]

I mean my argument is very contextual with this particular string of events but hold on I'll quote some of the specific posts in question. (it's why i told people to read that page in full)

Spoiler:

Post 345 was bad

When you defend everything he does while he's sitting at 1 vote I'd call that white knighting

idk whether you are confbiased or just bad scum but I quite plainly called him out for being defensive.

Now it looks like you're flailing. You "called him out" then in your next post said you doubted he was scum about something else

No I suspect Dunn is scum.

Who's this selling?

House, have you played with Dunnstral before?

This looks like cogdis actually now that I'm hyperanalyzing like, you know house is pushing on dunn, you're pushign on dunn, what's the point of this question with regards to you wanting to get dunn lynched?

So you don't know how he plays as scum.

And you didn't explain why him not knowing how he plays as scum should be affecting his read.

I was in a newbie with boring too.
What of it?

This isn't a good question. (this is the trying to create flail part among others)

His random accusation of whiteknighting. It looks like scum trying to pin something that isn't there. I am also not fond of all the naked votes. There was a chain of three I saw.

Generic reasoning for his accusations (running theme in the iso)

Define big deal! And show me where I made it a big deal. Again it is you and infinity who are making it a big deal and somehow trying to make it seem like I'm making it a bit deal. Do you think a "big deal" generally comes with a vote. I mean if I made such a big deal about it that it gets your vote, but not a big enough deal that you get mine? You make no sense. You better read through it a third time. Carefully.

I'm not gonna spam the thread with more about this, everyone has already witnessed it once and everyone knows who initiated the blowup about me sending texts. Technically, it didn't get my vote. Reading through again and spotting the pattern after seeing you do it to infinity as well got my vote.

I doubt he's scum, man.

I love white knighting

I love voting scum.

And again, I'm totally sold, man.

-G

I did read the page. Putting aside that you may find the posts strange in their own right, can you describe more specifically how you think he was setting up a 1v1 here?

I'm not saying he was setting up a 1v1 -- it was already a thing that was happening. He coattails it in a scummy way designed to keep the engagement hot. Which can be forgivable if you're not bringing things designed to see your target fail.

Ok, I'm not really seeing the motivation from either side.

Looks more to me like a weird effort to convince house that dunn is scum and not VI.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: creature

Like this better for now.

PEdit: lol

why is gv scum?

[Stargazers]

Oh I haven't read grapes thing on Gamma I prob should I have Gamma as obv town because this is town Gamma via meta I'm trying to think how I took Gamma when I first placed with him cause he may not be obv town to others because of it so
UNVOTE:
It's unfair for me to vote this
~Maria

[Infinity 324]

Fair enough. Gamma's meta changes but he keeps a similar tone and disregard for appearance, I think.

[Stargazers]

I'm trying to reread because I remembering seeing a group of posts that struck me off and I'm not seeing it on a quick re read so I don't know if I should keep the scumread or not I'll read the case on Gamma and give my thoughts as I think I'm one of the main !town Gamma supporters
~Maria

[Grapevine]

Feel like I'm not being completely understood and that's more than likely my fault.

Gamma isn't town.

I'm meh on creature; he should update his reads.

[Creature]

You need to stop being so boring.

[Creature]

Infinity was the leading wagon for the whole day? What?

[Stargazers]

Grape question before I read this spoiler: Do you think you bias tunnel and what I mean from that is when I have a scumread on someone I tend to take a lot of their posts in a scummy light even if some of the posts aren't scummy at all. Do you think you may have done that with Gamma?
~Maria

[Firebringer]

Stargazers has sent a message to Mathblade.

[Creature]

Like why's Dunnstral not being pushed? What's your read on Expedience? Do you think Stargazers' reads look natural? Do you understand why GuiltyLion is being townread? Is PantherPunt gamesolving?

[Gamma Emerald]

@Creature if you want to push Dunn vote Dunn.