[Mini 1835] - Everything Is A Lie Mafia 4 (Abandoned)

ISO · Post Post #1125 (ISO) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 6:39 am

Why not?

ISO · Post Post #1126 (ISO) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 6:40 am

In post 1077, The Counsel wrote:The information is : An investigation targeting xyzzy yielded "no result".

We won't talk about the information source -even that we know it or not- unless a majority asks us to.

in another note L&L must be a part of counsel if nothing interfered with the chairman actions. L&L confirm or deny this please.

VOTE: Nay to Revealing source knowledge

ISO · Post Post #1127 (ISO) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 6:41 am

In post 1125, Ircher wrote:Why not?

@Xyzzy

xyzzy · Post Post #1128 (ISO) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 6:46 am

I think there's an alternate explanation for why the results of the investigation would not have gone through. I don't think it's in the town's best interest for me to immediately say why, but I have a pretty strong hunch.

Leather and Lace · Post Post #1129 (ISO) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 7:30 am

In post 1077, The Counsel wrote:in another note L&L must be a part of counsel if nothing interfered with the chairman actions. L&L confirm or deny this please.

I have access to The Counsel and their revealed investigative target and results which I confirm, but not their role pm.

I have asked the mod to resend the role pm to The Counsel.

The Counsel · Post Post #1130 (ISO) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 7:37 am

We answered you in the place you can see but others can't.

Flames682 · Post Post #1131 (ISO) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 9:31 am

In post 1119, malpascp wrote:A bomb was planted on me today.
Not funny

Wanna expand on that?

Flames682 · Post Post #1132 (ISO) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 9:34 am

In post 1129, Leather and Lace wrote:
In post 1077, The Counsel wrote:in another note L&L must be a part of counsel if nothing interfered with the chairman actions. L&L confirm or deny this please.
I have access to The Counsel and their revealed investigative target and results which I confirm, but not their role pm.

I have asked the mod to resend the role pm to The Counsel.

Did something happen overnight so you have access?

Leather and Lace · Post Post #1133 (ISO) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 9:35 am

In post 1130, The Counsel wrote:We answered you in the place you can see but others can't.

It doesn't help that you also deleted any sign of the information that you provided town yesterDay.

Leather and Lace · Post Post #1134 (ISO) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 9:35 am

In post 1132, Flames682 wrote:
In post 1129, Leather and Lace wrote:
In post 1077, The Counsel wrote:in another note L&L must be a part of counsel if nothing interfered with the chairman actions. L&L confirm or deny this please.
I have access to The Counsel and their revealed investigative target and results which I confirm, but not their role pm.

I have asked the mod to resend the role pm to The Counsel.
Did something happen overnight so you have access?

Obviously, Sherlock.

The Counsel · Post Post #1135 (ISO) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 9:37 am

In post 1133, Leather and Lace wrote:It doesn't help that you also deleted any sign of the information that you provided town yesterDay.

That information is what the main chairman account received. Nothing was deleted from the proxy account.

Flames682 · Post Post #1136 (ISO) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 9:37 am

I'm asking what happened Sherlock

The Counsel · Post Post #1137 (ISO) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 9:38 am

In post 1136, Flames682 wrote:I'm asking what happened Sherlock

The chairman invited them.

The Counsel · Post Post #1138 (ISO) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 9:41 am

In post 1136, Flames682 wrote:I'm asking what happened Sherlock

*waves*

~Leather and Lace (House)

The Counsel · Post Post #1139 (ISO) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 9:42 am

By the way the fake counsel vote is again changed by shos.

Leather and Lace · Post Post #1140 (ISO) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 9:45 am

You guys realize that wgeurts told us Kuroi was in a mason topic?

Who is the other mason? Please claim.

(Also please note this is not rolefishing, as being a mason is completely NAI in wgeurts' games.)

ISO · Post Post #1141 (ISO) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 9:46 am

“It seems I'm able to relay information through this now, what good this does idk.”

― Anonymous

VOTECOUNT 2.2

Ircher (5) [

L-3!

]:

Flames682, Rylai & Lina, SirCakez, Vedith, The MM

The MM (2):

BulletNLynchproof, Ircher

BulletNLynchproof (1):

The Counsel

Nay to Revealing source knowledge (1):

Ircher

Not Voting (6):

shos, Davsto, Leather and Lace, malpascp, xyzzy, The Counsel

With 14 Votes, it takes 8 to Lynch.
Deadline

: (expired on 2016-10-22 09:52:49)

Leather and Lace · Post Post #1142 (ISO) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 9:47 am

In post 1078, Ircher wrote:Yeah, scum have a Roleblocker.

L&L can die, tyvm.
VOTE: L&L

In post 1090, Ircher wrote:
In post 906, Leather and Lace wrote:
In post 903, Rylai and Lina wrote:
In post 902, Ircher wrote:Exactly. Concurring on a lynch should be our focus right now.

Double vote ; Triple Vote ; Fucking lynch IRcher

If you can't see scum in this you suck house
I see something else in his posts somewhere else that has me believing otherwise.
This is why L&L is scum.

Pedit: VOTE: MM

So.. we are scum (because house thinks you are town), but you think there is a stronger case on scum!MM?

Why would you vote no to revealing more information?

Flames682 · Post Post #1143 (ISO) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 9:52 am

Ircher has explained none of his reads

Flames682 · Post Post #1144 (ISO) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 10:03 am

In post 1082, Vedith wrote:VOTE: Ircher

In post 1091, Vedith wrote:Can we just lynch Ircher btw?

In post 1101, Vedith wrote:Can we get more votes onto Ircher?

In post 1122, Vedith wrote:
In post 1119, malpascp wrote:A bomb was planted on me today.
Not funny
How about you get a temporary vote on Ircher?

You've never expressed any interest at all in Ircher before...

Rylai and Lina · Post Post #1145 (ISO) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 10:25 am

In post 1143, Flames682 wrote:Ircher has explained none of his reads

he wants to start day parking his vote on blind-tunneled town though ^

~Lina

Davsto · Post Post #1146 (ISO) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 10:27 am

In post 1141, wgeurts wrote:
“It seems I'm able to relay information through this now, what good this does idk.”

― Anonymous

I- uh-

what??

ISO · Post Post #1147 (ISO) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 10:27 am

In post 1143, Flames682 wrote:Ircher has explained none of his reads

I've explained as much as I can explain truthfully.

ISO · Post Post #1148 (ISO) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 10:28 am

In post 1146, Davsto wrote:
In post 1141, wgeurts wrote:
“It seems I'm able to relay information through this now, what good this does idk.”

― Anonymous
I- uh-
what??

nice catch.

Vedith · Post Post #1149 (ISO) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 10:38 am

In post 1144, Flames682 wrote:You've never expressed any interest at all in Ircher before...

I'm aiming for information.