I've made like half a dozen groupings of "this group" versus "that group", of one scum in each.
If I effectively crossreferenced those different groups, then all of the different "this group versus that group" pairings should, in theory, when overlapped...give us only one pair, one team, where there's a member of both groups. To my head, that'd be something like kraska-Creature, but I haven't done my work yet.
In the Shadow/Shiro/Creature group, I see it as Creature > Shadow > Shiro right now.
In the Fuzzy/farside/kraska/RR group, I see it as kraska > farside > Fuzzy > RR right now.
In the kraska/RR/farside(/Almost) group, I see it as kraska > farside > RR right now.
In the Shadow/Shiro/Creature/Fuzzy group, I see it as Creature > Fuzzy > Shadow > Shiro right now.
I do not believe SirCakez was an all-town wagon.
So Shiro/kraska/RR should have one scum in it. (
The SirCakez wagon almost by necessity (barring kraska/Shiro) has one scum minimum off of it: Fuzzy/Creature/Shadow/farside.
There, I get Creature > Fuzzy > farside > Shadow.
I do not believe DGB was an all-town wagon. So, Creature/Fuzzy/Shiro/farside has 1-2 scum in it;
kraska/RR/Shadow has 0-1 scum in it.
Creature > Fuzzy > farside > Shiro.
kraska > Shadow > RR.
Fuzzy/Shiro/Creature should have exactly one scum in it.
Creature > Fuzzy > Shiro.
No matter how I look at it, my lynch order isn't changing.
Creature/kraska > Fuzzy > farside > Shadow > RR/Shiro.
And this makes sense from pair perspective, too.
Creature-kraska
kraska-fuzzy
Creature-farside
Creature-Fuzzy
Creature-Shadow
kraska-Shiro
Creature-Shiro
Most likely to least likely pairings assuming one of them minimum being scum. (Though, I'll need to double-check with the possibility of Skybird having a double-vote during Beachapalooza and the implications thereof. Because if she did, that would potentially open up things like, say, farside-kraska, depending on the team math.)