In post 1738, Nero Cain wrote:In your last town game you were reading players as scummy for lurking, including BBT, who was scum. Can you explain to me how my belief that Mal was lurker scum is not a town mindset when you've gone after lurkers yourself as town?
This is an OUTRIGHT LIE. Here is the closest I came to even considering lurking as scummy:
From
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 9#p6792639
"OK so, scum killed at least one player from the lurky category. As I said before, this suggests to me that there was little/no benefit in killing players from the "actually playing the game" category, which implies that the scum were not in any particular danger after Day 1. The scum kill of either Slandaar or evilpacman18 suggests to me that scum liked the Day 1 fighting between BBT/RC/me/Scripten. Of all the players in that group, there are two who have mostly escaped scum reads during Day 1: BBT and me. I'm not scum, so the only interesting person in the category of "players who played hard day 1 but didn't get many scum reads" is BBT.
Therefore, I categorize my likely scum as BBT, and one or more of the lurkers."
I was scum reading the lurkers for REASONS,
NOT BECAUSE THEY WERE LURKERS
.
AND, BBT WAS NOT EVEN IN THAT CATEGORY!
Furthermore, your vote on Mal had the unique characteristic of choosing the player with the least interaction with anyone, making it the optimal scum mislynch. You are conveniently ignoring that part of the argument, every time your defense of the wagon you started on Mal is brought up.
Furthermore to my furthermore, you didn't argue against Mal because he was lurking, it was because his V/LA status happened to coincide with day end.
You lie too much to be town.
VOTE: Nero Cain