I refer you to our signature.In post 1922, camn wrote:Omg you are juststipulatingdissonance? You can't even act it out for our amusement?
bulbs is scum.
-Bulba
I refer you to our signature.In post 1922, camn wrote:Omg you are juststipulatingdissonance? You can't even act it out for our amusement?
bulbs is scum.
So, the people involved in the fiasco is CKD, and two other people, both could be scum or 1/1, scum town. Also, if one of the two people that visited Ted was a PR, then, after scum is lynched, then CKD and Town PR can protect each other. That or create a WIFOM bubble around the two and it'd be a fool's errand to go kill them.In post 1927, Pine wrote:
It needlessly outs two Town PRs to get one scum. A better move was just lynching the one and not revealing anyone. I mean, Christ. Last Wills are actually part of this game. This sort of anti-Town-wincon nonsense is specifically why those exist.
I'm sorry, but we now have two Town PRs played badly and exposed, with a third now threatened with exposure. We're a few hours into D2. It's hard to be happy with this.In post 1931, camn wrote:Sssshhhhh, pine. Shhhh. No tears.
The problem with having 2 confirmed townies not dying is?In post 1932, Pine wrote:Watcher (or whatever, it's implicitly the power CKD is claiming) is a weak Town PR, and that would mean that Watcher and Doc are doing nothing but protecting one another, which means they're not stopping or spotting scum. CKD has effectively neutralized two of Town's only PR assets
The problem is that they won't be protecting anyone else, and scum knows what they'll be doing.In post 1934, Blawb wrote:The problem with having 2 confirmed townies not dying is?In post 1932, Pine wrote:Watcher (or whatever, it's implicitly the power CKD is claiming) is a weak Town PR, and that would mean that Watcher and Doc are doing nothing but protecting one another, which means they're not stopping or spotting scum. CKD has effectively neutralized two of Town's only PR assets
As a doctor, you're supposed to protect a townie, so would you rather protect a CONFIRMED townie, or someone that MIGHT be townie?
As a watcher, you're supposed to watch over a townie to make sure whoever does the killing, gets caught. If the doc was killed after the watcher was on him, that is our 2ND scum of the game and that much closer to winning.
I fail to see the problem with a townie having the opportunity to protect another townie as a bad thing
/Gin
This is 100% wrong and probably scum minded.In post 1937, Pine wrote:A PR that does nothing but survive isn't useful.
It's not wrong. If you have a Watcher and Doctor (Oh fine, "a protective role") doing nothing but watching and protecting one another, they're essentially turning themselves into VTs. They are far more useful being less predictable. A Watcher that catches scum is useful. A Watcher doing nothing isn't. Same goes for a protective role - if it doesn't block kills, it's basically a VT.In post 1939, 1 Shot Vanilla Town wrote:This is 100% wrong and probably scum minded.In post 1937, Pine wrote:A PR that does nothing but survive isn't useful.
The issue is, as Camn said we don't know if it's a doctor. Where did we even get that idea from?
I'm done arguing as I see no point, CKD's plan is already in motion and I'm not the one trying to stop it.In post 1945, camn wrote:Plus more midget votes while you are arguing please.